Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Tech Talk
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Digital Audio Myths - Listening on a PC
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedDigital Audio Myths - Listening on a PC

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 19>
Author
Message
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21149
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 02 2005 at 17:27
Originally posted by goose goose wrote:

And when it sounds too good to be true, it is . The X-Fi alters the sound by extreme compression and EQ, to makes things more easy to hear on cheap systems and in noisy environments but actually sounds worse... have a peek at www.hydrogenaudio.org

Can you post a link to a thread where they describe that in detail? I found some threads there, but the posts were not very clever - upsampling is an established technology and known to improve the quality of CD audio, and the members ridiculed it - a bit like myself in the other thread. Actually my statements still stand, but the smoothening of the signal can indeed improve the sound very much.

So what I need now is some article which in detail explains WHAT X-Fi really does to the signal (and not just assumptions, I need FACTS).

Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21149
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 02 2005 at 17:28

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

This is a fascinating thread

I really enjoy not talking about how Gildenlow sucks or Neo-Prog rules for a change ...

Back to Top
goose View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 20 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 4097
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 02 2005 at 18:45
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Originally posted by goose goose wrote:

And when it sounds too good to be true, it is . The X-Fi alters the sound by extreme compression and EQ, to makes things more easy to hear on cheap systems and in noisy environments but actually sounds worse... have a peek at www.hydrogenaudio.org

Can you post a link to a thread where they describe that in detail? I found some threads there, but the posts were not very clever - upsampling is an established technology and known to improve the quality of CD audio, and the members ridiculed it - a bit like myself in the other thread. Actually my statements still stand, but the smoothening of the signal can indeed improve the sound very much.

So what I need now is some article which in detail explains WHAT X-Fi really does to the signal (and not just assumptions, I need FACTS).

I wasn't entirely clear in my post. I think mainly the hydrogenaudio way of thinking is that any modification to the signal is unwanted (and, ideally, we should be able to trust the original recording enough to avoid any post-processing. It's just a sad fact that a lot of masterings are horrible as well ) What I should have said is that Creative cards are said to upsample poorly, which is definitely a real issue. Since it's the only card I have I can't tell how true this is.
 
Fact (well, unless someone faked it I guess )
Waves LinMB is just a multi(5)band compressor/EQ, and the X-Fi Crystallizer seems to have almost the same effects on the sound signal!
Back to Top
cobb View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 10 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 1149
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 02 2005 at 21:10
You don't need specs to tell you the pc can do as good a job as a player, Mike, your ears are already telling you that it can. Ignore oliver- audiophiles are always like this. I don't need fancy graphing images to tell me how good the sound is. My ears do a pretty good job all on their own. 

Edited by cobb
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 03 2005 at 02:53
" I don't need fancing graphing images to tell me how good the sound is. My ears do a pretty good job all on their own. "

Agree!
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21149
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 03 2005 at 04:34

Originally posted by cobb cobb wrote:

You don't need specs to tell you the pc can do as good a job as a player, Mike, your ears are already telling you that it can. Ignore oliver- audiophiles are always like this. I don't need fancy graphing images to tell me how good the sound is. My ears do a pretty good job all on their own. 

Agreed. I like how my system sounds, and no comment here can make me throw it away and buy a new one. But I'm always interested in improving the system.

Although I'm largely opposed to audiophile systems, I really try to understand them. Here's a summary of what I found out so far:

  • Upsampling really improves the sound, if done properly. I now know how it works and what it does, and technically it makes sense (it is not esoteric).
  • The single most important factor for the sound is the amp. Of course for perfect sound every link in the chain has to be good, I know that. But if you have a fairly good - but not HiFi/audiophile - system, upgrading the amp is what will have the most noticeable effect on the sound. Next is the source (good CD player/vinyl), then the speakers, and then the cables.
  • People like Oliver are right in that until just recently, PC sound cards did not do upsampling properly. Cards like the X-Fi are beginning to do so, and their specifications really do compare to good audiophile CD players (jitter, symmetric outputs, etc.), especially if they are connected to the amp digitally.

If I look at my current system (Computer (Audigy 2) - Harman Kardon Amp - Elac speakers), I think that I might buy an X-Fi sound card for €110 and maybe upgrade my amp to a Musical Fidelity Avalon ...

Back to Top
cobb View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 10 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 1149
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 03 2005 at 04:58
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

If I look at my current system (Computer (Audigy 2) - Harman Kardon Amp - Elac speakers), I think that I might buy an X-Fi sound card for €110 and maybe upgrade my amp to a Musical Fidelity Avalon ...



And then you will never have to leave your house
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21149
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 03 2005 at 05:10
Originally posted by cobb cobb wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

If I look at my current system (Computer (Audigy 2) - Harman Kardon Amp - Elac speakers), I think that I might buy an X-Fi sound card for €110 and maybe upgrade my amp to a Musical Fidelity Avalon ...



And then you will never have to leave your house

Hey, I'm already addicted to music. And I will even have to leave my house more often - to work and earn the additional money I need for my expensive hobby.

Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 03 2005 at 16:04

Can I ask something here, I hope its ok.

Is it possible to rip Cds to MP3 using Windows Media Player aand using MP3 Pro?

Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21149
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 03 2005 at 16:20
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Can I ask something here, I hope its ok.

Is it possible to rip Cds to MP3 using Windows Media Player aand using MP3 Pro?

No, I don't think so. Why would you want to use mp3pro?

Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 03 2005 at 16:25
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Can I ask something here, I hope its ok.

Is it possible to rip Cds to MP3 using Windows Media Player aand using MP3 Pro?

No, I don't think so. Why would you want to use mp3pro?

Same sound quality at lower bitrate.

Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21149
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 03 2005 at 16:35
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

No, I don't think so. Why would you want to use mp3pro?

Same sound quality at lower bitrate.

I was using mp3pro a few years ago and in the end I didn't like it. I ripped many CDs in 128kbps mp3pro format, but the problems with mobile players were annoying, and the quality isn't THAT better. mp3pro makes sense if you're using 64kbps - the results pretty much sounds like mp3 128kbps. But 128kbps mp3pro unfortunately doesn't sound like 256kbps mp3.

What do you need the ripped files for?

Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 03 2005 at 16:38
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

No, I don't think so. Why would you want to use mp3pro?

Same sound quality at lower bitrate.

I was using mp3pro a few years ago and in the end I didn't like it. I ripped many CDs in 128kbps mp3pro format, but the problems with mobile players were annoying, and the quality isn't THAT better. mp3pro makes sense if you're using 64kbps - the results pretty much sounds like mp3 128kbps. But 128kbps mp3pro unfortunately doesn't sound like 256kbps mp3.

What do you need the ripped files for?

Just for my hard drive, trying to be as space saving as possible. I was talking about the 64kbs rate as it happens!

Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21149
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 03 2005 at 16:48

I don't know how many CDs you're planing to archive ... I would recommend an external 200GB hard disk. I ripped my 650 CDs in 128-192kbps mp3 (VBR), and now I'm ripping many of them again in lossless format because it just sounds so much better.

How many CDs will it be?

Back to Top
goose View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 20 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 4097
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 03 2005 at 16:54
Originally posted by cobb cobb wrote:

You don't need specs to tell you the pc can do as good a job as a player, Mike, your ears are already telling you that it can. Ignore oliver- audiophiles are always like this. I don't need fancy graphing images to tell me how good the sound is. My ears do a pretty good job all on their own. 
That graph tells me that there's compression, and my ears have already told me that compression sounds band (in this contex only, of course). Good enough for me.
Back to Top
Tony R View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: July 16 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 11979
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 03 2005 at 16:56

Fun with Audiophiles!

Here's some stupid audiophile tricks you can get people to do - kids don't try this at home!
  1. Exclaim that you can easily hear polarity differences, and than get your favorite audiophile to spend the next hour trying to hear a difference on their favorite Chesky recording while you flip the polarity switch back and forth on their Theta Generation V. Be sure to mention that it sure was easier hearing the difference at your friend's house using their Levinson No. 23 with the glass interface, but that their cables are probably clouding the differences.

  2. Point out anything wrong with the stereo you are listening to you can think of (hint: standing waves, put on a rock and album and complain the treble is harsh). See if you can get your audiophile to try and calculate the room nodes based on it's size, and than mention to take into account the ceiling height.

  3. Make up theories about imaging, especially height effects for things like cymbals and center images (such as the bass, snare drum). See if you can actually discover any new laws of physics!

  4. Write letters to the editor of an audio magazine stating that you won't buy their magazine anymore because a) they trashed your speakers which you know are great since your cousin Ralph and his girlfriend said so, b) somebody who writes for their magazine used lewd language, c) the integrity of their reviews has gone down, d) they are racist, or e) the Smice clock they told you to buy didn't really make a diference after all.

  5. (Experienced hackers only): Open up a Krell preamp and put a tube preamp (such as a conrad johnson PV-11) inside. Bring it around with you to people's houses and claim tubes suck and you can prove it. Compare your Krell to their preamp, making special note of it's timbral purity, air and detail, and lack of added euphonics (while at the same time maintaining the essence of music). Another fun trick is to put a Sony discman inside of a three chassis alleged CD player/transport (you usually have to do this at home), and show them what CD is "really capable of". Be sure to play CDs like "Peter, Paul and Mary's Greatest Hits", "Ravi Shankar and Jim Croce - duets" while doing this.

  6. Go to anybody's house with a new stereo and say things like "I think the crossover is hosed", "Too bad you have so many standing waves in here", "the imaging is weird", "the midrange isn't right, I think you need different speakers for this room, or at least try to move the speakers around" (especially if the speakers weigh over 100 lbs, and are spiked into the floor). Chew on pretzels loudly.

Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21149
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 03 2005 at 17:19
Originally posted by goose goose wrote:

Originally posted by cobb cobb wrote:

You don't need specs to tell you the pc can do as good a job as a player, Mike, your ears are already telling you that it can. Ignore oliver- audiophiles are always like this. I don't need fancy graphing images to tell me how good the sound is. My ears do a pretty good job all on their own. 
That graph tells me that there's compression, and my ears have already told me that compression sounds band (in this contex only, of course). Good enough for me.

I did a bit of reading on the X-Fi "Crystalizer", and I don't think that it uses compression in any way. I'm still looking for more meaningful graphs ...

Edit: Have a look at this ... looks like the Crystalizer tries to reverse the compression that was applied when the signal was mastered to the CD:

http://www.de.tomshardware.com/video/20050719/creative-x-fi- 04.html



Edited by MikeEnRegalia
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 03 2005 at 20:11
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

I don't know how many CDs you're planing to archive ... I would recommend an external 200GB hard disk. I ripped my 650 CDs in 128-192kbps mp3 (VBR), and now I'm ripping many of them again in lossless format because it just sounds so much better.

How many CDs will it be?

Don't know. There is no plan. I will not be buying anything extra...

Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21149
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 04 2005 at 04:21
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

I don't know how many CDs you're planing to archive ... I would recommend an external 200GB hard disk. I ripped my 650 CDs in 128-192kbps mp3 (VBR), and now I'm ripping many of them again in lossless format because it just sounds so much better.

How many CDs will it be?

Don't know. There is no plan. I will not be buying anything extra...

Have you tried WMA 64kbps or 96kbps? IMO it sounds much better than mp3 with extremely low bitrates.

You can also consider ripping in two different formats, your favorite albums in 128kbps and the others in 64kbps ... or just rip your favorites.

Back to Top
KoS View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 17 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Points: 16310
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 04 2005 at 04:58
audiophiles are crazy. i just dont get it
anywho i have a 75 watt 5.1 system its really good esp when i blast stuff like magma
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 19>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.176 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.