Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - god
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic Closedgod

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 34567 11>
Author
Message
The-Bullet View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 23 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 401
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 14 2005 at 14:56
Originally posted by Logos Logos wrote:

Originally posted by Tony R Tony R wrote:

Have you read it????


Of course I've read it - it's a basic beginners books for people interested in physics.

True, as is his latest - The Universe in a Nutshell - where he mentions God several times. One statement he has used quite often is "know the mind of God". Although he also calls himself a "positivist".

"Why say it cannot be done.....they'd be better doing pop songs?"
Back to Top
Ricochet View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 27 2005
Location: Nauru
Status: Offline
Points: 46301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 14 2005 at 14:59
Originally posted by Velvetclown Velvetclown wrote:

God is Coming


You keep ignoring my warning that you will burn in hell...
 
Back to Top
Eetu Pellonpaa View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 17 2005
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 4828
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 14 2005 at 15:02

Originally posted by Tony R Tony R wrote:

Stephen Hawking believes in God and is a Christian.

Just thought I would make that point.It shows that clear thinkers can have warped perception.

I don't believe you.

Originally posted by goose goose wrote:

It's impossible to prove anything without making assumptions. Assumptions required to believe in scientific theory are just easier to make in this day and age.

The satellites orbitting earth prove the theory of gravity right. What kind of assumptions I have to do about it?

Back to Top
Tony R View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: July 16 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 11979
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 14 2005 at 15:04
Originally posted by Logos Logos wrote:

Originally posted by Tony R Tony R wrote:

Have you read it????


Of course I've read it - it's a basic beginners books for people interested in physics.

I know what it is.
Hawking mentions several time that he believes in God.
 
Back to Top
Logos View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: March 08 2005
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 2383
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 14 2005 at 15:09
Originally posted by Tony R Tony R wrote:

I know what it is.
Hawking mentions several time that he believes in God.


Very surprising. I've never noticed that. And although he might have hinted that he believes in the existence of god ( which I still seriously doubt ) he certainly doesn't say IN THAT BOOK that he is a Christian. That I know for a fact.

On the contrary , here's a quote from the book:
"He [the pope] told us that it was all right to study the evolution of the universe after the big bang, but we should not inquire into the big bang itself because that was the moment of Creation and therefore the work of God. I was glad then that he did not know the subject of the talk I had just given at the conference - the possibility
that space-time was finite but had no boundary, which means that it had no beginning, no moment of Creation."
Back to Top
Eetu Pellonpaa View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 17 2005
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 4828
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 14 2005 at 15:19

Originally posted by Logos Logos wrote:

"He [the pope] told us that it was all right to study the evolution of the universe after the big bang, but we should not inquire into the big bang itself because that was the moment of Creation and therefore the work of God. I was glad then that he did not know the subject of the talk I had just given at the conference - the possibility
that space-time was finite but had no boundary, which means that it had no beginning, no moment of Creation."

I also got my impression about him from this kind of verses in that book, which I also have read. I'm not sure about his theories, but the main body of the book is a good history of physics, and there's some fundamental, scientifically proved theories explained in it.

I would recommend the books by finnish Kari Enqvist, though I'm not sure if his books are translated to any other landquages?

Back to Top
Tony R View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: July 16 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 11979
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 14 2005 at 15:26
Hawking:

"However, if we do discover a complete theory. . . then we would know the mind of God"(p. 175)

 
"These laws may have originally been decreed by God, but it appears that he has since left the universe to evolve according to them and does not now intervene in it" (p. 122).

"It is difficult to discuss the beginning of the universe without mentioning the concept of God. My work on the origin of the universe is on the borderline between science and religion, but I try to stay on the scientific side of the border. It is quite possible that God acts in ways that cannot be described by scientific laws, but in that case, one would just have to go by personal belief."

When asked whether he believed that science and Christianity were competing world views, Hawking replied, "...then Newton would not have discovered the law of gravity."

A Brief History.. makes wonderfully ambiguous statements such as, "Even if there is only one possible unified theory [here he's talking about the unification of quantum mechanics with an understanding of gravity], it is just a set of rules and equations. What is it that breathes fire into the equations and makes a universe for them to describe?"(p. 174).



Edited by Tony R
Back to Top
Velvetclown View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 8548
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 14 2005 at 15:27
Down You Go CLOWN !!!!!!!!
Bilden “http://home.tephras.com/visual/2000/Daria-hell.jpg” kan inte visas, då den innehåller fel.
Back to Top
Velvetclown View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 8548
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 14 2005 at 15:31
Bilden “http://www.londonstimes.us/toons/cartoons/heaven.gif” kan inte visas, då den innehåller fel.
Back to Top
Tony R View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: July 16 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 11979
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 14 2005 at 15:37
Originally posted by Logos Logos wrote:

Originally posted by Tony R Tony R wrote:

I know what it is.
Hawking mentions several time that he believes in God.


Very surprising. I've never noticed that. And although he might have hinted that he believes in the existence of god ( which I still seriously doubt ) he certainly doesn't say IN THAT BOOK that he is a Christian. That I know for a fact.

On the contrary , here's a quote from the book:
"He [the pope] told us that it was all right to study the evolution of the universe after the big bang, but we should not inquire into the big bang itself because that was the moment of Creation and therefore the work of God. I was glad then that he did not know the subject of the talk I had just given at the conference - the possibility
that space-time was finite but had no boundary, which means that it had no beginning, no moment of Creation."

Sorry Logos a typo:
I meant to write that he does believe in God but isnt a Christian!! ()
My bad,I cant even read my own posts properly....
 
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 14 2005 at 15:52

Originally posted by Tony R Tony R wrote:

Originally posted by Logos Logos wrote:

Originally posted by Tony R Tony R wrote:

I know what it is.
Hawking mentions several time that he believes in God.


Very surprising. I've never noticed that. And although he might have hinted that he believes in the existence of god ( which I still seriously doubt ) he certainly doesn't say IN THAT BOOK that he is a Christian. That I know for a fact.

On the contrary , here's a quote from the book:
"He [the pope] told us that it was all right to study the evolution of the universe after the big bang, but we should not inquire into the big bang itself because that was the moment of Creation and therefore the work of God. I was glad then that he did not know the subject of the talk I had just given at the conference - the possibility
that space-time was finite but had no boundary, which means that it had no beginning, no moment of Creation."

Sorry Logos a typo:
I meant to write that he does believe in God but isnt a Christian!! ()
My bad,I cant even read my own posts properly....
 

that's whay you need to put a disclaimer in your sig like me.

VVVVVVV

Back to Top
frenchie View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: July 30 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 2234
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 14 2005 at 16:11
cartoons are meant to be funny. take note, dilbert.
The Worthless Recluse
Back to Top
JedHead View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: December 15 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 55
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 14 2005 at 17:51

Now it seems to me, there are several people here who just pass off the Bible as 'just a book'.  I have to ask, have you ever actually studied the Bible?  I never met one person who has actually studied it and passed it off as 'just a book'.  While everyones view of the Bible is different, I feel you really have to study it before making judgment.  I mean, how many of you would spazz out if I said 'Prog Rock sucks!' because I heard one song by Rush and Geddy Lee's 'gay hamster voice'? 

 

Moving on, I thought I should share what my dad wrote about the Bible.

The B-I-B-L-E: What it means to me

Leviticus 11:1 – 8

Acts 10: 9 -16

The B-I-B-L-E what does it mean to me?  It is a question I ask myself multiple times each day.  Is it the best selling book of all times?  Is it a history of a people?  Is it a collection of adventure stories with action heroes? Is it a trail guide as Dane pointed out last week in the children’s sermon?  Is it something that most homes in America have at least one of - we have at least 8 – 10?  How many of them are read?  How many sit on the shelf next to Dickens, Conan Doyle and Emerson gathering the same dust, so others think you are well read?  Hopefully they’re not shelved next to Jacqueline Susann and Tom Clancy.

Before I start to relate what the Bible means to me, let’s take a look at what it is and how it has been used.  Some definitions --

From the CHRISTIAN APOLOGETICS & RESEARCH MINISTRY we get this definition – A book or collection of sacred writings. The term "bible" is best known in reference to the Christian Scriptures consisting of the both the Old and New Testaments. The word comes from the Greek, biblios, meaning "book."

Or from Body and Mind -- The sacred book of the Christian religion, that consists of the Old Testament which is also sacred to the Jewish faith and the New Testament.

Or - The holy scriptures of the Christians, comprising 66 books: 39 in the Old and 27 in the New Testament.

From the Netdictionary - bible -- A detailed and sometimes authoritative reference book  covering a particular operating system, platform, or application. Originally, this was used generically to describe fundamental source books; more recently, it has been embraced by computer book publishers as a marketing ploy.  (AND SOMETIMES authoritative reference book )

These are all good definitions but not one of them or even all of them combined truly represents what the Bible means to me.  It is the holy word of God.  It is the authority and voice of God speaking to us. 
The Bible was probably originally conveyed orally. In a time when few people were literate and printing unknown, this was appropriate.  Since wide spread literacy is a fairly recent event, memorization and re-iteration of Bible lessons was and is quite common. The Book of Job is thought by many scholars to be the first of the books written down.  The “Torah" refers to the Five Books of Moses: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy.  It is so sacred to some Jews that they will run into a burning synagogue to save it – in fact some declare that to be doctrine from what I have been told.

Over history, people’s access to the Bible has been repeatedly hindered.  During the Dark Ages it was written in a language that the common people did not understand (Latin) and chained to the altar of the Church.  People could listen to the word but not hear it.  Image if this message was in a language you didn’t understand. 
A  bom  Sum David.
23:0   
23:1    |  joH'a'  ghaH  wIj  DevwI':
23:1      jIH  DIchDaq  Hutlh  pagh.
23:2    |  ghaH  chen  jIH  Qot  bIng  Daq
   SuD  tI yotlh.
23:2      ghaH  Dev  jIH  retlh  vIHHa'  bIQmey.
The famous Gutenberg Bible was the first major work to be printed with movable type thus allowing for greater circulation.  Two of the earliest components of the Reformation were the translation of the Bible into the vernacular and unchaining the Bible from the altar. By the way the King James Version was not the first English translation.  In England it was chained up again to stop it from being stolen.  Today the Bible is available in almost every language, including at least one that really doesn’t exist.  If you haven’t figured out what I just read to you it was Psalm 23: 1 – 2 in Klingon.
People hunger for copies of the Bible.  They go to jail for having a copy.  Yes they even suffer physical torture and even death to read the Bible!  This is not from the past this is going on today especially in some Muslim countries like Saudi Arabia and Sub-Saharan Africa and Communists countries like China.  Why – there must be something in the Bible that makes these dictatorships fear.  Can it be the true Word?  Can you image not being able to read or own a Bible! Like so many things in our lives, we take this privilege for granted.  Would you be willing to risk your liberty or even your life to have access to God’s word? 
This is from an April 2003 news article: “Rules in Muslim host countries such as Kuwait "mostly prohibit the entry of alcoholic beverages, narcotics, munitions, pork and its by-products, pornography and material contrary to the Islamic religion," US Defence Department said.
Capt Tommy Vaughan, an army chaplain said nothing prohibits soldiers from carrying the Bible. "Soldiers are told they are permitted to carry two books; their soldier's handbook and a Bible."
Bible societies say the prohibitions on "material contrary to the Islamic religion" don't include Scripture and US troops and chaplains are requesting thousands of Bibles, the 'Washington Post' reported.
The Campus Crusade for Christ said it has been swamped by an average of 25,000 requests per month. Over 400,000 Bibles have been sent to troops in the past 18 months via military channels. Currently, it has orders for 42,000, many of those orders coming from the war zone, the group said.”

That is my quick history of the Bible’s spread.  Now I will tell you what it means to me.

Understanding the Bible has been a life long journey for me.  The more I study it – not just read it, the more I learn and the more I realize how much more there is to learn.  I have gone through phases in this journey, which in some respects follows the way the Bible has been used and accessed as I just outlined. 

Phase 1. Being told stories
I received my first Bible on June 14, 1958 from my parents.  I didn’t start school until August 1959 so obviously I wasn’t reading it myself.  When I think back – the earliest stories I remember hearing are those from the Bible – Adam and Eve, Noah, Moses, David, Jesus.  The earliest lessons I learned on how to behave came from the Bible – the Golden Rule and the Ten Commandments.  By the way, Barbara and I have done the same with our kids; one of the first books they all received was a King James Version of the Bible.  And they have read them cover-to-cover.   

Phase 2. Reading and memorizing
Reading and memorizing passages and the books of the Bible in Sunday School, whether I was at the Baptist church in Stillwater, OK or the Lakeview Heights Reformed Church in Clifton, NJ or the ecumenical classes at Ft. Know, KY or Canterbury Presbyterian Church in Cornwall, NY.  It seems the stories were the same.  The stories of Moses – the basket in the bulrushes, the burning bush and the parting of the Red Sea.  Or there was David and Goliath – there is a story for an Army brat like me.  Of course who can forget Noah and the Ark or Daniel and the Lions Den. 

Then of course I heard the stories of Jesus.  Of his birth in a stable, how he walked on water and calmed the sea.  I don’t recall the story of the changing of water to wine at the wedding feast - probably to controversial for a Southern Baptist church.  I was told that he died – that he was crucified (what ever that meant) – and that he rose from the dead to save us. 

Phase 3.  Reading for myself
I then started to read these stories for myself along with the good old stand bys of the Lord’s Prayer and Psalm 23 – in English not Klingon.  Reading children’s versions of Bible stories was probably my first effort at this.  I know my kids started out that way.  I would memorize some versus but I do not think that I understood what they really meant. 

These “classics” where the stories I remember and that Barbara and I told to our kids when they were very young.  But do you notice what is missing from these stories.  We hear of the great accomplishments of the Old Testament leaders and of the beginning and end of Jesus’ life on Earth.  What is missing?  That takes me to phase 4 of my sojourn with the Bible. 

Phase 4 – The beginning of questions and answers
I have read the Bible through several times and am doing it again.  I read it nearly every day.  Each time, I find myself asking more and I think better or at least more thought provoking questions.  The first few times it seemed I was raising more questions then getting answers. 

How come does it seem the Bible contradicts itself?  I would ask.  It doesn’t but you have to study it to see the answers.  For example the reading for this morning from Leviticus tells us that we cannot it pigs, yet one of the traditional Easter meals is ham.  Why?  Or why can we eat cheeseburgers when the Jews are forbidden?  Acts 10: 9 – 11 helps answer this.  Now granted this is not necessarily a deep theological question for 21st century Christians, yet dietary laws are extremely important to many Jews today.  And until the Second Vatican Council members of the Roman Church were forbidden to eat meat on Fridays. 

Or – and this is the historian in me coming out – why are there few or no historical records supporting the Bible?  Biblical minimalist in history and Biblical Archeology play down the truth and accuracy of the Bible.  Yet there are more and more discoveries that corroborate the Bible’s accounts – not the other way around.  Here are two examples.  First - Until a few decades ago, the Hittites were only known through the few passages in the Bible that mention them.  Since then, extensive archeolical evidence has been found on Hettite civilization.  Second – King David is held by these naysayers to be a myth.  They pointed to the fact that no records of him exist.  A few years ago a document identifying a king as of the House of David was found. 

Phase 5 – Studying and the birth of understanding
Like many employees of Corning Incorporated I tend to work through most lunch breaks.  However, on Wednesday’s you can usually find me gathered with some co-workers meeting as the Sullivan Park Bible Study. 

Here we study in-depth specific books or topics.  Over the past three years we have studied, Job, Revelation, Ruth and now James.  What I am finding out is that the more I study, the more I understand.  The book of Revelation use to scare the pants off of me!  It was God going to get us.  Then came Erich Von Daniken, - Chariots of the Gods – and others who said that the Revelation of John was space ships and alien creatures.  This along with most of Von Daniken’s theories has been debunked.  Through the Bible study, I came to realize that instead of being the scariest book ever written, it is one of the most uplifting.  If you truly believe in Christ and his divine powers, you have nothing to fear.  Only goodness can come to you from the events in Revelation.

I also learned through studying Revelation and James that to understand the New Testament, you need to understand the Old Testament.  Something many Christian do not do enough of.  A good example of this is my better understanding of this morning’s readings. As I cited above, the two passages look like commentary on dietary laws.  But what Acts really is about is Jesus admonishing Peter for refusing to spread the Gospel to Gentiles.  Peter was a devout Jew who followed the Mosaic Laws.  These laws told Jews that they could have no contact with unclean things including Gentiles.  Jesus tells Peter that he (Peter) cannot make unclean those things that he has made clean (Gentiles) through his sacrifice.  Without understanding the Old Testament context of this story, its deeper meaning is lost on us.

The late Minister of Defense – Reggie White who besides being an incredibly talented football player was also a mister of the Word, realized this fact.  He did not preach the Word the last five years of his life because he came to feel that he did not understand the Old Testament enough.  Instead he studied it in its original language in an effort to better understand it.  Now I think that is admirable but it is not necessary or even feasible for all to do this.  What I feel is right for me is to find the best translation I can.  I believe that God reveals his Word to us in our hearts as well as our minds.

Phase 6  -- What’s next
My Bible journey does not have a 5-year plan. I am not certain what phase 6 will be.  But I am certain there will be a phase 6 and perhaps 7, 8 and beyond.

 

 

 

So there is what my dad has to say about the Bible.  I hope you find it educational, informative, somewhat moving and entertaining as well.  I know I did when he gave the sermon.  As for me, I have only read the Bible once, all the way, but probably 15 years of Bible study.  This Wednesday I head off to college to really begin to study the Bible and will gain more knowledge and understanding of 'that book'.

The good cop and the bad cop left for the day. I'm a different kind of cop.
Back to Top
BaldJean View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: May 28 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10387
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 14 2005 at 19:01
hmm, I can't understand what the bible suddenly does in this thread. one can believe in a deity without the bible; there is more than just one religion


A shot of me as High Priestess of Gaia during our fall festival. Ceterum censeo principiis obsta
Back to Top
maani View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Founding Moderator

Joined: January 30 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2632
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 14 2005 at 19:53

Tony:

May I add one?  This is Hawking on the "anthropic principle" (i.e., that the universe was created for the "purpose" of creating human life; i.e., that everything from the Big Bang forward led directly to "us"):

"It would be very difficult to explain why the universe should have begun in this way, except as the act of a God who intended to create beings like us."  Stephen Hawking.

Peace.

Back to Top
BaldFriede View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 14 2005 at 20:05
the "anthropic principle" is logically flawed though. true, for the human race to emerge all the circumstances mysteriously had to be exactly how they were, but nobody can tell what would have happened if some circumstances would have been different. there might as well have developed a completely different intelligent race to ponder the nature of the universe. you can't conclude backwards in time


BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
Back to Top
JedHead View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: December 15 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 55
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 14 2005 at 20:23

Originally posted by BaldJean BaldJean wrote:

hmm, I can't understand what the bible suddenly does in this thread. one can believe in a deity without the bible; there is more than just one religion

 

I thought I explained why I brought it up.  In fact, it was the first thing I brought up.

Yes, one can Believe in God without the Bible.  But the Bible is a great source of information, right?  And one who is studying the nature of God should use different resources.  Be it the Holy Bible, the Quoran, or Pain of Salvation's BE.

The good cop and the bad cop left for the day. I'm a different kind of cop.
Back to Top
maani View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Founding Moderator

Joined: January 30 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2632
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 14 2005 at 21:40

BaldFriede:

The anthropic principle is not based on a "backward" view of time, but a forward view.  It's premise begins with the Big Bang, it does not end with it.  Hence (and I admit to being very simplistic here, as well as leaving out a few steps...):

1.  As a result of the Big Bang, energy was "released"
2.  Had that energy not been released, it would not have created helium, hydrogen and the other initial elements.
3.  Had those elements not been created, other elements would not have been created.
4.  Had all the elements not been created, there would not have been "matter."
5.  Had matter not been created, there would not have been nebulae, etc.
6.  Had those nebulae not been created - and had gravity not played its part - there would be no stars or galaxies.
7.  If stars and galaxies had not been created, there would be no star systems.
8.  If star systems had not been created, there would be no planetary systems around some of those stars.
9.  If planetary systems had not been created, our sun would not have "captured" the nine (not ten?) known planets in its system.
10.  If the sun had not captured the nine planets in its system - in the exact configuration and distances - there would not have been a planet in that system that had an "atmosphere" in which life could be created.
11.  If that atmosphere around the third planet had not formed exactly as it did, it would not have trapped the necessary elements and molecules required to generate life.
12.  If it had not trapped the necessary elements and molecules required to generate life, then even one-celled life would not have formed.
13.  If one-celled life had not formed, then two-celled life could not have formed.
14.  If two-celled life had not formed, then the evolution of life would not have occurred.
15.  If the evolution of life had not occurred exactly as it did, then some amphibians would not have become reptiles; some reptiles would not have become birds and mammals; some mammals would not have become primates; some primates would not have become Australopithecus; Australopithecus would not have become Homo habilis; Homo habilis would not have become Homo erectus; Homo erectus would not have become Homo sapiens; and Homo sapiens would not have become Homo sapiens sapiens.

Certainly one could look at the timeline "backward."  But that is not how the anthropic principle is arrived at.

Peace.

Back to Top
Logos View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: March 08 2005
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 2383
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 15 2005 at 01:43

Originally posted by Tony R Tony R wrote:

Sorry Logos a typo:
I meant to write that he does believe in God but isnt a Christian!! ()
My bad,I cant even read my own posts properly....

Now that's more like it.

Back to Top
James Lee View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 05 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 3525
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 15 2005 at 03:06
for very many people, 'god' is just 'daddy' without fallibility. I firmly believe that most of our conception of a deity is defined by childhood idealizations of the father figure (though I seem to remember maani asserting that the opposite is true, that fatherhood is a microcosm of godhood). Who better to provide rules that must be obeyed first and understood second (if at all)?

of course, there's also thea concept of a deity based upon an ideal of motherhood, which seems to provide for more acceptance of our physical nature (). Love is less of an abstract concept and more of a biological necessity. Dominion and structure is less emphasized, and understanding is less a matter of reason than emotion (am I not far off, BJ?).

Try separating your image of god from your ideals and memories of your parents (especially your earliest ones, if you can remember them accurately) and see how much is left. Then think about when you first had an idea of what god would be like...I'm not promoting any specific point of view here, I'm just trying to give ya'll something to think about.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 34567 11>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.180 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.