Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Suggest New Bands and Artists
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - QUEEN on progarchives
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedQUEEN on progarchives

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 910111213 17>
Author
Message
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21206
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 01 2005 at 09:08

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Actually Queen II has my favourite Roger Taylor song as well!

I love it - it's very refreshing as a contrast to all the other songs on the album.

Back to Top
richardh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 28064
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 01 2005 at 09:35

Originally posted by manticor manticor wrote:

Come up and see me,make me smile!Where is ABBA,Bay City Rollers,Sweet etc.Don't make me smile.This is serious site,not circus.

Pity you mentioned BAy City Rollers.The other 2 are not so silly.If there was a category for 'pop prog' then Abba (along with 10CC) would have a case.If Seven Seas Of Rhye is a prog track then so is Waterloo.I was also a big Sweet fan as a kid.Fox On The Run and the extended version of Love Is Like Oxygene is more prog than anything Queen ever did..just listen and learn.I also think that other campish glam band of the seventies The Tubes have a case.'White Punks On Dope' is probably my favourite seventies rock track.Again a band with distinct prog stylings in their music over several peices.They even recorded a concept album!

However The Tubes,Abba and The Sweet are not really prog..just like Queen are not really prog.

Back to Top
maani View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Founding Moderator

Joined: January 30 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2632
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 01 2005 at 09:44

Cert:

In responding to my song-by-song analysis, you say: "It's the concept.  You take the album as one whole thing - analysing the individual songs is...fruitless...It's a Night At The Opera - if you've ever been to an evening of operatic highlights that's been skillfully put together, you can enjoy songs from one opera juxtaposed against songs from another and still have a continual feel to the evening."

What are you smoking?  These songs have not one iota of connection beyond the extremely tenuous album title.  "Death on Two Legs?"  "I'm in Love with My Car?"  "You're My Best Friend?"  "Sweet Lady?"  Part of an evening of "operatic highlights?"  I have been to evenings of operatic highlights.  But they don't claim to be an opera - a cohesive event in which the songs are held together by a story or common thread - which is what the title of this album is ultimately claiming.  It isn't called "A Night of Operatic Highlights."

I can't believe you buy into the title that seriously.  There is nothing - nothing whatsoever - that connects these songs into any conceptual framework, no matter how nebulous.  To believe as you do is failing to see that the emperor has no clothes.  This doesn't change the genius of the album, or the vast majority of songs thereon.  NATO is a masterpiece - of rock with occasional prog sensibilities.

By the way, I, too, just re-listened to Queen II.  And I think I see where the confusion lies.  It seems to me that two elements - and only two elements - are swaying people into a belief that the album is prog.  The first element is May's admittedly unique guitarwork - his layering, texturing, etc.  The other is the extensive use of Queen's admittedly unique and layered harmonies, which are often used in a quasi-"symphonic" manner.  However, while the use of these two elements may arguably be said to be proggish, that does not make the music itself prog: i.e., it does not change the influences in the music or, most importantly, the approach to the composition.  That is, if you replaced May's guitars with synths, and removed the heavily layered and textured harmonies, the music itself is only minimally more proggish than lots of straightforward rock, glam rock, etc.  Again, this does not change the "brilliance" of the album (though I think brilliance is a slight overstatement).  But, like Tony, I still fail to see how the music can be classified as "prog."

Interestingly, in listening to it again, some of the influences I heard surprised me.  While I always heard the Beatles, Zep and glam influences, this time, really listening (with a musician's ear...), I heard quite a bit of The Who, especially on Side 1.  However, the only prog influence I heard was Yes in some of the vocals, again primarily on the first side.  But, again, nothing I heard - short of the two elements noted above - changed my mind about the music on the album, or the overall approach to the composition: neither is prog.

As for the harmony issue, Queen may ultimately have "bettered" The Beatles, but they could not have been Queen without The Beatles' influence.  [N.B.  Also keep in mind that, since the technology had changed, Queen were able to do things with their harmonies that were not possible for The Beatles to do even had they thought of if first.]  Re the comparison to Yes, I think both groups were equally brilliant in their harmony structures and uses, for their own individual sounds.  Re 10CC, some of their harmonies are as brilliantly layered, textured and arranged as Queen's.  However, it is likely that their harmonies were at least partially influenced by Queen (and, of course, The Beatles).  One group conspicuously missing from my list was The Beach Boys.  After all, some of their most brilliant harmony arrangements even predate The Beatles, so they would have to be included.  Indeed, Queen's harmonies may have been as influenced by The Beach Boys as by The Beatles.  Listen to Good Vibrations, and especially Little Saint Nick, and I think you'll agree.

Peace.



Edited by maani
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21206
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 01 2005 at 09:53
Originally posted by maani maani wrote:

By the way, I, too, just re-listened to Queen II.  And I think I see where the confusion lies.  It seems to me that two elements - and only two elements - are swaying people into a belief that the album is prog.  The first element is May's admittedly unique guitarwork - his layering, texturing, etc.  The other is the extensive use of Queen's admittedly unique and layered harmonies, which are often used in a quasi-"symphonic" manner.  However, while the use of these two elements may arguably be said to be proggish, that does not make the music itself prog: i.e., it does not change the influences in the music or, most importantly, the approach to the composition.  That is, if you replaced May's guitars with synths, and removed the heavily layered and textured harmonies, the music itself is only minimally more proggish than lots of straightforward rock, glam rock, etc.  Again, this does not change the "brilliance" of the album (though I think brilliance is a slight overstatement).  But, like Tony, I still fail to see how the music can be classified as "prog."

If you do what you describe, what still remains are the song structures - chord progressions, recurring themes etc. These are much more complex than any "straightforward" album. Many of Queen's later hits are really straightforward, like Tie Your Mother Down for example.

But there's another property of that album that needs to be mentioned: The artistic approach that they chose for that album (and non of their other albums). Queen II is anti-pop, except for two songs. Ask any average Queen fan (people who own Greatest Hits 1 & 2 and one or two other Queen albums), and they will not know about the album. It's like the option in my poll "That's the one with Seven Seas on it, isn't it" ... What I'm trying to say is that on this album, they really try to make good music without the tendency to make it all sound smooth and polished even to the "uneducated ear".

 

Back to Top
Fitzcarraldo View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1835
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 01 2005 at 10:01

I thought it might be interesting to dig out an old article from Melody Maker at around the release of QUEEN's first album, so here it is:

Standing Up For Queen

by Michael Benton (Melody Maker, 28 July 1973)

 

Freddie Mercury is liquid heaviness. His friend Brian is an absolute dear. They're a pair of Queens. But let me explain.

 

Freddie and Brian have an amazing band. With two of their friends Roger and Deacon they're busily putting glam-rock on a new level by simply adding guts. To look at, the boys are divine - especially young Freddie who looks every inch a star. But a word of warning, don't try anything on with any of these Queens: They are hard and tough and their music is expressed in a very masculine manner. Their stage act is busy and they flash about in two colours - black and white. Not outstandingly gay, I think you'll agree.

 

"The idea of Queen was conceived by me whilst I was studying in college," says Freddie "Brian who was also at college liked the idea and we joined forces. The very earliest traces of the band go back to a group called Smile who made a single which was released in the States. The group was plagued by bad luck and eventually split up. Queen has been going for about three years now, but until recently we've not had a suitable outlet for our music. Trident took us on and our first album, which has been in the can for almost a year is being released through EMI." recalls Freddie.

 

Adds Queen Brian: "From the beginning the group has kept it's original concept. This album is a way of getting all our frustrations out of our system which we have built up over the years. We were into glam-rock before groups like The Sweet and Bowie and we're worried now, because we might have come too late."

 

Besides vocalist Freddie and guitarist Brian May, Queen's other two members Roger Taylor whose drumming pumps power into the band's songs and Deacon John who blasts away at his growling bass.

 

Brian May's guitar is made from wood plundered from a hundred-year-old fireplace. It sounds remarkable and allows Brian to form an excitingly solid foundation to Freddie's voice. Two perfect partners - but more rapiers than partners. They are Britain's very own New York Dolls - but better.

 

The group's first break came when producers John Anthony and Roy Thomas Baker invited them to make some demos. They hawked their product around innumerable London record companies eventually ending up with EMI.

 

As a live band they work hard to entertain in true showbiz fashion. At the moment they're not particularly well-known but they're already attracting screamers. Until recently the band have had to divide their attentions between studies and Queen but as Freddie explained "We've always wanted to be pop stars and the group used to come first. Now we're all qualified we can concentrate more on the band. We're confident people will take to us, because although the camp image has already been established by people like Bowie and Bolan we are taking it to another level. The concept of Queen is to be regal and majestic. Glamour is part of us and we want to be dandy. We want to shock and be outrageous instantly. We don't want people to have to think of they like us or not, but to formulate an opinion the moment they see us."

 

Brian and Freddie are the main songwriters, but they write individually, Mercury has a tendency to fantasise melodic and is more down to earth. Their first album, "Queen" is a series of amazingly different songs, from faster than fast rockers to soft ballads. Traces of Yes and Black Sabbath can also be found but structurally it seems to sound original.

 

A single 'Keep Yourself Alive' has been released in hopes of giving the band some early chart success. Like the album, it's commercial in a progressive kind of way. Spaced between the chunky verses, the group have incorporated a drum solo (with effects) and a tasty guitar solo which has an interesting synthesizer effect, Brian insists he doesn't use one though.

 

"Singles are important to is and to have a hit now would help the band, We've more to offer than bands like The Sweet, we're not just pop, because our music covers a wide area." Says Freddie.

 

The group are currently preparing to start recording their next album which they say will have a theme if 'good verses evil' They say it'll be much fresher than the first, because early frustrations have been expelled via the first album.

 

"We're worried that the name Queen will give people the wrong impression. We want to be a good British regal rock band and we'll stick to that way of thinking. Our music should override the image, because we'll concentrate on putting out a good product the whole time. Teenyboppers will probably like us and we might get a bit of a 'pop' tag but it won't last. At the moment we're just interested in creating a reaction amongst those who come to see us.

 

Back to Top
Tony R View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: July 16 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 11979
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 01 2005 at 11:30
Originally posted by maani maani wrote:

Peaec.

Shocked

I'd like to speak to the entity that calls itself Maani...........

Back to Top
Lateralus_66 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 03 2005
Location: Fiji
Status: Offline
Points: 118
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 01 2005 at 13:07
What irony..! Some people here are trying to find some prog on Queen II, and on the other hand this site is receiving many five stars reviews about the same album. If this tendency continues will break down albums such as: YES - Close to the Edge, GENESIS - Selling England by the Pound, JETHRO TULL - Thick As A Brick, etc.

Is QUEEN - Queen II a good example of Progressive Rock?


IMO, this web site is suffering the same phenomenon that this genre went through the 80’s… It’s funny… and/or pathetic… and/or another dramatic irony… Please, be aware…



Edited by Lateralus_66
Back to Top
The Wizard View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 18 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7341
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 01 2005 at 14:21
I think the reason a lot of people are against Queen being in the archives is that they don't use synthesizers. Prog is not all about synthesizers. It is about using instrumentation in creative/complex ways. In the case of queen, the instruments are the voice and guitar. So I that justifies Queen as being prog.
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 01 2005 at 14:37

Originally posted by The Wizard The Wizard wrote:

I think the reason a lot of people are against Queen being in the archives is that they don't use synthesizers. Prog is not all about synthesizers. It is about using instrumentation in creative/complex ways. In the case of queen, the instruments are the voice and guitar. So I that justifies Queen as being prog.

This is the stupidest thing that I have read for ages!

Back to Top
CrazyDiamond View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 20 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 466
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 01 2005 at 14:38

No, synthesizers aren't the reason why Queen shouldn't be here. Read the million posts before yours and you'll understand the 10000000 reasons why Queen shouldn't be in PROG ARCHIVES.

___BYE___

Back to Top
CrazyDiamond View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 20 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 466
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 01 2005 at 14:39

Ehi, Snow Dog, you got my agreement.  

Back to Top
maani View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Founding Moderator

Joined: January 30 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2632
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 01 2005 at 15:10

Something else occurs to me.  Many CD stores (though not, perhaps, the major ones) actually have separate "prog" sections.  And there are, of course, many CD stores that specialize in prog.

Have you ever seen Queen in any of these sections or stores?  My guess is that less than 1% of such sections or stores actually carry Queen.

'Nuff said.

Peace.

Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 01 2005 at 15:12
Originally posted by maani maani wrote:

'Nuff said.

HEAR HEAR!!!

Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 01 2005 at 15:13
^ Maani, is this a lost cause or is it that no final decision has been made yet?
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 01 2005 at 15:14
Originally posted by Easy Livin Easy Livin wrote:

Originally posted by maani maani wrote:

'Nuff said.

HEAR HEAR!!!

HE SAID "'NUFF SAID"

Back to Top
CrazyDiamond View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 20 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 466
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 01 2005 at 15:18

Ehi Maani, havn't you heard the last news? Queen is one of the BASICAL BAND of prog rock!

Maybe those stores you've seen were too old to recognise Queen as a prog rock band!

___BYE___

Back to Top
Proglover View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 09 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 416
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 01 2005 at 16:20

I am so very proud right now...Queen being placed on the site is a great move!!!!!!!!....................Ladies and Gentlemen, we must never forget, that we should be in the business of tearing down walls and building communities.....the inclusion of Queen should not in anyway bring forth such vehement opposition. It's quite silly really.....

Let's not become elitist like our classical and jazz brothers and sisters........let us have open minds.....

Back to Top
CrazyDiamond View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 20 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 466
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 01 2005 at 16:26

yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees

let's add all that come in our mind!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

C'mon Backstreet Boys, what are you doing there? Come on Prog Archives and bring also your friends, (Take That, they are quite prog, huh?)!!!!!!!!   

C'mon!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

YEHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

just joking BTW.

___BYE___

Back to Top
tuxon View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 21 2004
Location: plugged-in
Status: Offline
Points: 5502
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 01 2005 at 16:40

Well now Queen is on the archives.

Shouldn't we include Freddie Mercury's solo albums also.

I've listened to roger Taylor and Cross also, but that's not progressive I think, May's solo albums are not progressive also, but the two albums Freddie made, are art Rock I think

Mr Bad Guy, with the title song which can easily be regarded as Art Rock

Barcelona, a combination of Opera and Art Rock, with lyrics by Mercury and Rice, a fabulous rock/Opera hybrid.

I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
Back to Top
CrazyDiamond View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 20 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 466
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 01 2005 at 16:48
Originally posted by <SPAN =bold>tuxon</SPAN> tuxon wrote:

Well now Queen is on the archives.

Shouldn't we include Freddie Mercury's solo albums also.

I've listened to roger Taylor and Cross also, but that's not progressive I think, May's solo albums are not progressive also, but the two albums Freddie made, are art Rock I think

Mr Bad Guy, with the title song which can easily be regarded as Art Rock

Barcelona, a combination of Opera and Art Rock, with lyrics by Mercury and Rice, a fabulous rock/Opera hybrid.

Hope you're joking. Great joke.. the first time I read it i almost believe it. Then i realized it was a joke. Hope so. 

___BYE___

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 910111213 17>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.152 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.