| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
Drew 
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2005
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 12600
|
 Topic: David Lee Roth vs. Sammy Hagar
Posted: July 21 2005 at 10:37 |
|
Interested in this one............
|
 |
spectral
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 04 2005
Location: Vatican City State
Status: Offline
Points: 1422
|
Posted: July 21 2005 at 10:39 |
Are they prog then? 
|
|
"...misty halos made visible by the spectral illumination of moonshine."
|
|
GoldenSpiral
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3839
|
Posted: July 21 2005 at 10:42 |
|
is 'both suck' a choice?
|
|
|
|
chopper
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20030
|
Posted: July 21 2005 at 11:11 |
Both are good singers but I've seen both live and they're the 2 biggest poseurs I've ever seen. Sammy Hagar spent most of the gig having a "guitar battle" with his other guitarist (which he of course won) and Dave Lee Roth did more posing to the (admittedly stunning) women in the front row than singing. Unfortunately neither are prog.
"Montrose" is a great album tho' (get on your Bad Motor Scooter and ride!).
|
|
Drew
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2005
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 12600
|
Posted: July 21 2005 at 11:49 |
Sorry- dont know of any other site to post this poll-
|
|
Blacksword
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
|
Posted: July 22 2005 at 05:38 |
I would say Hagar is the technically better singer, but Roth is alot more 'talented' I like all the Van Halen albums with Roth singing, but there are only a few VH tracks with Hagar at the helm that I can tolerate.
Roth is more humerous and better showman. Van Halens music was also more original and varied with him. It seemed to fall into American rock cliche when Hagar took over. IMO.
|
|
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
|
Moogtron III
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 26 2005
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Points: 10616
|
Posted: July 22 2005 at 05:49 |
Roth is so funny, and indeed a great show man. He made some great tunes solo. I voted for him.
Still Hagar is a much better lyricist. I guess when he joined Van Halen, the band lost a showman and won a good singer and a lot of depth.
|
|
Hammill
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 09 2005
Location: Greece
Status: Offline
Points: 400
|
Posted: July 22 2005 at 09:10 |
i love van halen  , i am huge glam/aor/poser rock fan....david lee roth is one of the greatest frontmen ever...he gets my vote.
|
|
|
|
King of Loss
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 21 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Status: Offline
Points: 16442
|
Posted: July 22 2005 at 11:34 |
 spectral wrote:
Are they prog then? |
Yea, ugh I know? Wrong section???
|
|
TheProgtologist
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802
|
Posted: July 22 2005 at 14:41 |
|
Roth.I saw them live when they were touring for their first album and Van Halen II.Roth was a good frontman,great showmanship.I was never a huge Hagar fan and saw them live on the 5150 tour and Hagar just bored me.
|
|
|
|
kirklott
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 01 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 623
|
Posted: July 22 2005 at 18:53 |
This really doesn't belong on this site.
Plus the only person I can imagine picking Hagar is a Bud-drunk, Bush-votin' redneck with a serious head injury.
Roth rules.
|
|
"Progressive rock is the key to the continuance of human evolution." - Charles Darwin
|
|
Trotsky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 25 2004
Location: Malaysia
Status: Offline
Points: 2771
|
Posted: July 27 2005 at 05:34 |
|
With VH, Roth of course, but his solo career was really lame, even more lame than Hagar's
|
|
"Death to Utopia! Death to faith! Death to love! Death to hope?" thunders the 20th century. "Surrender, you pathetic dreamer.”
"No" replies the unhumbled optimist "You are only the present."
|
|
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
|
Posted: July 31 2005 at 15:05 |
|
who in their right f**king mind would vote hagar over roth!
|
|
|
|
raindance
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 24 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 443
|
Posted: July 31 2005 at 20:03 |
Roth unfortuneatly has one of those voices that I absolutely detest and 'California Girls'.....? What the f**k was he trying to achieve when he sang that? It's the biggest balls up of a cover song ever!!!!!!!!
Hagar is in a far higher league and Van Halen released their best albums with him in the band!
Edited by raindance
|
|
Humanizzimo
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 19 2005
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 109
|
Posted: August 01 2005 at 13:21 |
|
Well...i really think Hagar sings better than Roth, but Roth is ``the face`` of VH...
|
|
|
|
Sean Trane
Special Collaborator
Prog Folk
Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20240
|
Posted: August 03 2005 at 11:31 |
Diamond is a 100% pure conceited asshole (made from concentrated pure dickhead fruits and with added pulp) but he is the Van Halen frontman.
Hagar pales in comparison. That debut album is flawless. an all-time classic: every track is a gem.
|
|
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
|
|
Vegetable_Man
Forum Groupie
Joined: August 12 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 52
|
Posted: August 12 2005 at 17:42 |
|
I don't really like Van Halen at all, but Roth is a lot cooler than Sammy Hagar. God I hate Sammy Hagar.
|
|
Maike
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 06 2005
Location: Portugal
Status: Offline
Points: 130
|
Posted: August 12 2005 at 19:21 |
Roth is the ultimate rock frontman 
|
|
Anonymous2112
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 24 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 162
|
Posted: August 13 2005 at 01:26 |
|
Both of them eat dieareha as far as i'm concerned. But David Lee Roth's got the edge over Hagar
|
|
And The Meek Shall Inherit The Earth
|
|
porter
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 07 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 362
|
Posted: August 13 2005 at 07:57 |
|
Roth wins....at least for charisma....
|
|
"my kingdom for a horse!" (W. Shakespeare, "Richard III")
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
/PAlogo_v2.gif "Progarchives.com Homepage")
David Lee Roth vs. Sammy Hagar
