Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
maani
Special Collaborator
Founding Moderator
Joined: January 30 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2632
|
Topic: Queen Posted: July 29 2005 at 22:21 |
Self-explanatory. Just curious about this.
|
|
Man With Hat
Collaborator
Jazz-Rock/Fusion/Canterbury Team
Joined: March 12 2005
Location: Neurotica
Status: Offline
Points: 166178
|
Posted: July 29 2005 at 22:36 |
Still No...although i saw them here.....
|
Dig me...But don't...Bury me I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect.
|
|
tuxon
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 21 2004
Location: plugged-in
Status: Offline
Points: 5502
|
Posted: July 29 2005 at 23:15 |
God gave you grace to purge this place And peace all around may be your fortune Oh oh children of the land Love is still the answer take my hand The vision fades a voice I hear Listen to the madman! But still I fear and still I dare not Laugh at the madman!
|
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
|
|
maani
Special Collaborator
Founding Moderator
Joined: January 30 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2632
|
Posted: July 29 2005 at 23:31 |
Yes, tuxon, Prophet Song is probably the most proggish thing they ever did, along with BR. But does that make the band prog? Do you really consider any of their albums wholly and entirely prog? Because that is supposed to be the criterion by which a group is added to the site.
Peace.
|
|
tuxon
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 21 2004
Location: plugged-in
Status: Offline
Points: 5502
|
Posted: July 30 2005 at 00:05 |
Queen II - Pomp prog, prog metal, with pompous ELP excess A Night At The Opera - explained already I think Flash Gordon - space progressive rock, comparable to some Hawkwind, a bit lighter, but definetly prog IMO
Sheer Heart attack is really near full-out prog, if it isn't already Queen I is progressive aswell After ANATO it waters down I agree, but before that it was most certainly progressive, and still the albums after ANATO can be considered Art Rock easily.
You have to want to see it
BTW the most proggiest thing they did was Fairy Feller's Masterstroke
|
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
|
|
Drew
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2005
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 12600
|
Posted: July 30 2005 at 02:05 |
no!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
Easy Livin
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
|
Posted: July 30 2005 at 03:42 |
I would have liked a third option, "Now that they are here, should they be removed". My answer to that would be no.
I have always argued against their inclusion, but I'm not too bothered that they have been added. As I have said in other threads, they will simply find their way to the periphery of the site in due course.
It should be born in mind that Queen were one of the first bands which were not added by the administrators. Under the guidelines for the "add a band facility", the site owners may remove them if they decide they should not be here. I see they have done that for at least one band already).
|
|
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
|
Posted: July 30 2005 at 06:00 |
tuxon wrote:
Queen II - Pomp prog, prog metal, with pompous ELP excess Progish maybe, don't understand the ELP comment! A Night At The Opera - explained already I think Again, some progish elements! Flash Gordon - space progressive rock, comparable to some Hawkwind, a bit lighter, but definetly prog IMO Again, only marginally prog
Sheer Heart attack is really near full-out prog, if it isn't already Not Prog at all IMO Queen I is progressive aswell In what way i don't hear it! After ANATO it waters down I agree, but before that it was most certainly progressive, and still the albums after ANATO can be considered Art Rock easily.
You have to want to see it
BTW the most proggiest thing they did was Fairy Feller's Masterstroke
|
Queen are great non-prog band!
|
|
|
The Hemulen
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: July 31 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 5964
|
Posted: July 30 2005 at 06:25 |
Sheer Heart Attack not prog at all?! It's their proggiest album IMO! (And their best).
|
|
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
|
Posted: July 30 2005 at 06:32 |
Trouserpress wrote:
Sheer Heart Attack not prog at all?! It's their proggiest album IMO! (And their best). |
I love the album (see my review) I've never ever thought of it as prog though! Maybe I'm wrong, whats prog about it?
|
|
|
Tony R
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: July 16 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 11979
|
Posted: July 30 2005 at 12:55 |
This is ridiculous!
Queen are not prog.
They shouldnt be on the Archive in the Prog Section.
Tuxon's gone mad!
|
|
TheProgtologist
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802
|
Posted: July 30 2005 at 13:36 |
No...while some of their earlier stuff is proggish,I don't think on a whole they were progressive enough to be included in the archives.
|
|
|
Frasse
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 22 2004
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 758
|
Posted: July 30 2005 at 17:37 |
Easy Livin wrote:
It should be born in mind that Queen were one of the first bands which were not added by the administrators. Under the guidelines for the "add a band facility", the site owners may remove them if they decide they should not be here. I see they have done that for at least one band already). |
Made me curious of which band(s)?
I must say that this poll is quite bad, Queen are already in the
archives and my opinion is that no bands should be deleted. Even so, I
voted No.
|
|
Bj-1
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: June 04 2005
Location: No(r)Way
Status: Offline
Points: 31292
|
Posted: July 30 2005 at 19:00 |
Nah..!
|
RIO/AVANT/ZEUHL - The best thing you can get with yer pants on!
|
|
Arsillus
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 26 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7374
|
Posted: July 30 2005 at 22:28 |
I like Queen, but they don't belong on PA, though.
|
|
Logos
Prog Reviewer
Joined: March 08 2005
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 2383
|
Posted: July 31 2005 at 05:21 |
3 out of 4 forum members don't want them to be on this site. So there's really no question, they DON'T belong here.
|
|
Easy Livin
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
|
Posted: July 31 2005 at 10:58 |
Frasse wrote:
Easy Livin wrote:
It should be born in mind that Queen were one of the first bands which were not added by the administrators. Under the guidelines for the "add a band facility", the site owners may remove them if they decide they should not be here. I see they have done that for at least one band already).
|
Made me curious of which band(s)?
I must say that this poll is quite bad, Queen are already in the archives and my opinion is that no bands should be deleted. Even so, I voted No.
|
Sorry, I can't remember. I saw one in the list of new bands marked "sorry, removed" or something like that.
|
|
Drachen Theaker
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 376
|
Posted: July 31 2005 at 17:26 |
Queen were never considered prog and were thought of as a glam metal band. When they came along they were a kind of Bowie/Zeppelin hybrid - neither of whom are in the archives.
Yes, they had proggy elements to their sound but practically everyone did in the 70s - the two artists I mentioned above, Lou Reed, Black Sabbath, 10cc, The Who, Wishbone Ash, Deep Purple, even Elton John at times!
A great band but they don't belong on here.
Edited by Drachen Theaker
|
"It's 1973, almost dinnertime and I'm 'aving 'oops!" - Gene Hunt
|
|
Dreamer
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 13 2005
Location: Amsterdam
Status: Offline
Points: 297
|
Posted: August 03 2005 at 07:06 |
The results should speak for themselves. Shame it had to come to this with such a great band like queen
|
|
Fitzcarraldo
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 30 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1835
|
Posted: August 04 2005 at 20:09 |
Their first three albums are fantastic (I'm not so fond of the fourth, but recognise I'm in a very small minority). I don't consider them Progressive Rock, though. Some progressive traits in some songs, but I just don't put them in the same basket as the undisputed Prog Rock groups. That 1973 Melody Maker article sums it up for me as far as the first few albums are concerned: "commercial in a progressive kind of way".
I'm not too fused about QUEEN being in the Archives, but would have preferred the albums to have been listed under another category that reflects the fact that the group were considered a Glam Rock band and that the first albums are not full-blown Prog Rock. And that the music went downhill after that (in my opinion, of course); the infamous Fat Bottomed Girls and Flash's Theme make me cringe (By the way, any of you seen the 1974 cult film Flesh Gordon? It's much more entertaining than the 1980 Flash Gordon).
Mind you, there are other groups in the Archives that I wouldn't have added either, but that's another story.
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.