Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Reviews that Stand Out
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedReviews that Stand Out

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 910111213 18>
Author
Message
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 01 2005 at 10:57
PINK FLOYD Dark Side of the Moon, The  progressive rock album and reviews PINK FLOYD - Dark Side of the Moon, The
Review by Plamen Paskalev @ 8:01:44 AM EST, 1/1/2005
5 stars  —   The best progrock album from pink floyd and in all times:) The best progrock album from pink floyd and in all times:)The best progrock album from pink floyd and in all times:)The best progrock album from pink floyd and in all times:)The best progrock album from pink floyd and in all times:)The best progrock album from pink floyd and in all times:)
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------
Finding 50 words to say can be so hard sometimes. What a great solution!LOL
Back to Top
Velvetclown View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 8548
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 01 2005 at 11:02
But do you think he really likes it 
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 01 2005 at 15:00

Doesn't actually say so, does he Velv!

Happy new year to you by the way.Thumbs Up

Back to Top
Fitzcarraldo View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1835
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 08 2005 at 18:49

My congratulations to Julian Smith for a friendly, eloquent and informative review. The fact that our opinions differ markedly on the particular album does not mean that I can't read his review, appreciate it and respect his different opinion.

 

EMERSON LAKE & PALMER (ELP) - Works Vol. 1
Review by Julian Smith @ 5:22:03 PM EST, 2/8/2005

4 stars  —   I absolutely love this album and I'm surprised to read some rather negative opinions. Keith's Piano Concerto seems to come in for some rather unjust criticism I feel. Ok it may not be in the classical tradition but it is unmistakeably Emerson and I find it thrilling at times and full of vitality. Having bought the sheet music I really appreciate the skill of the writing and playing. From a musical point of view it is full of trademark Emerson writing - melodic discord for want of a better expression, but with some true romantic and lyrical passages to boot. Greg Lake's songs are of a consistently high quality - maybe not traditional ELP fare but of their kind I think their top notch and his voice has never sounded better. For me Carl Palmer's side is the weakest and misses the boat simply because he hasn't got a clear musical "voice" or anything particularly notable to communicate. The playing and arrangements are fine though and it is an enjoyable listen. There's not much new that can be said about "Fanfare" - it's a great arrangement and groove and the extended version with the distorted synth hits the button for me. "Pirates" is one of my all-time favourite tracks - great writing, fabulous vocals from Lake - and as others have said, it's definitely the best rock band-orchestra combination piece on record. I'd like to give the album 5 stars but as it isn't flawless, (and OK it is self indulgent but that's fine with me) I should probably stick with four having read the review guidelines.
Back to Top
greenback View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: August 14 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3300
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 09 2005 at 23:51

I did my best: i made paragraphs, but it did not take it!

 

TRANSATLANTIC Bridge Across Forever

Review by greenback @ 10:18:51 PM EST, 2/9/2005

5 stars  —  Well, this supergroup is made of very talented musicians. The first track, "Duel with the Devil", is a tour de force! Wow! Near 27 minutes of uninterrupted progressive rock with vintage keyboards: mini moog, organ, piano, Fender Rhodes and mellotron, accompanied by many miscellaneous bells sounds! This track reminds me some of the best progressive bands of the 70's: Gentle Giant, Camel and slightly Yes. Past the 21st minute, you can appreciate a beautiful young choir. These musicians have a VERY developed sense of catchy & complex melody, which is always present and never the same. Actually, they have something better than the group of the seventies: their sound is much better, more shiny, more atmospheric, and they definitely do not sound outdated. The second track, "Suite Charlotte Pike", is a very rythmic prog lite hard rock song, slightly bluesy, on which the rythmic guitar sounds a bit like Steve Howe's (Yes), and the overall sound and style slightly approaches prog band Kayak, as revealed by the omnipresent rythmic piano and Beatle-esque backing vocals. The third track, "Bridge across the water", contains a relaxing piano and the expressive voice of the lead singer, which clearly reminds me Mrs Amy Grant's soothing voice, especially on "If these walls could speak" of the "Lead me on" album; in the background, there is a mellotron-esque floating keyboard sounding like a gentle string ensemble. The fourth track, "Stranger in your soul", is another outstanding epic masterpiece. Trewavas is VERY elaborated here: quite more than with Marillion. Past the 6th minute, they almost sound grunge for a couples of minutes; nevertheless it is more bearable than any alternative band. At the middle of the track, there is an atmospheric beautiful & relaxing part, with, again the lead vocals reminding the tender voice of Amy Grant! Globally, the tracks are very rythm and mood changing, assorted with some lite string arrangements; the keyboards are rather vintage: the ones used in the early 70's. This record is extremely hard to describe because it involves so many influences! All the musicians play very complete and complex parts, and nodody wants to steal the show: they rather work together to create unforgettable epic songs. The lead & backing vocals are a VERY strong element on each track: all the 4 musicians participate to the vocal arrangements! The tracks are NEVER dark, not psychedelic, always positive, and they do not sound neo prog at all! This record will be a classic progressive album in a couples of decades, like Yes - Close to the edge, Gentle Giant - Octopus and Genesis - Selling England by the pound, because it has only strong points. EXTREMELY RECOMMENDED!


Edited by greenback
[HEADPINS - LINE OF FIRE: THE RECORD HAVING THE MOST POWERFUL GUITAR SOUND IN THE WHOLE HISTORY OF MUSIC!>
Back to Top
Bryan View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 01 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 3013
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 09 2005 at 23:56
Hmm, you didn't show up as a prog reviewer either.  That's odd...
Back to Top
James Lee View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 05 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 3525
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 10 2005 at 01:32
I always double-return for paragraphs. Sometimes even that doesn't do it.  
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21206
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 04 2005 at 15:13
Originally posted by Arbiter Arbiter wrote:

Love this one:

RUSH Rush - In Rio
Review by Ian Gledhill @ 2:15:05 PM EST, 2/14/2004

PROG REVIEWER
1 stars  —  This is one repeatedly overated band who, along with the likes of the rolling stones should have packed it in years ago. The last time I listened to this band was when I was in high school. For eggheads only.

I guess I'm an egghead!

Great thread. BTW: I'm a conehead!

Back to Top
Rhayader View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: April 12 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 79
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 04 2005 at 17:24
Any review that isn't by Hugues. Honestly, I'm all for voicing opinions, but could you please explain why you like or dislike an album instead of plainly stating 'don't buy this because I said so'? Constructive criticism or none at all, please.
"Sadder still to watch you die than never to have known it..."

Rush - Losing It
Back to Top
BaldFriede View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10261
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 04 2005 at 20:33
Sacrilege!! Only 3 stars for Foxtrot and 5 stars for ATTWT! I like both these reviews as Larry explains his views intellegently and I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks that production quality is important (although I gave Foxtrot 5 stars and ATTWT 4 stars when I reviewed them)  
 
 

[/QUOTE]

I'd rather have a poorly produced album with excellent music than an excellently produced one with poor music. Some of my all time favourites are quite poorly produced, like the only record of Arzachel.



BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue.
Back to Top
Gatot View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 28 2004
Location: Indonesia
Status: Offline
Points: 184
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 04 2005 at 23:04
Originally posted by Miaugion Miaugion wrote:

 
GENESIS We Can't Dance  progressive rock album and reviews GENESIS - We Can't Dance
Review by özalan @ 11:23:01 AM EST, 11/24/2004
5 stars  —   well i was telled that genesis is great band from english so i decided to be buy "selling england by the bound". it was horible, too long songs, whine wocalist, whad?!?!: medieval and folk müzik putted there and no god chorus!!! or modulation in end of songs! it was crap! butt then i heard from radio istanbul "jesus he knows me" - of course it was dubbed here in islam to "allah he knows me" butt i was realy astonishments. it was cool! grate 80's sound, catch chorus and great drum machine drummings. and also wery gay vocals by phil collins. i like!!!
 

TongueTongueTongue

 

 

Back to Top
Trotsky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 25 2004
Location: Malaysia
Status: Offline
Points: 2771
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2005 at 01:40

My favourite is still here a few months after I pointed it out ... so I'm guessing this one stays?

 

ZAUBER Aliens
Review (Permanent link) by Kathleen Zien @ 2:42:30 PM EST, 10/28/2004

5 stars  —  This album was totally unrealistic, yet remarkably solid. As a person who has been through an Alien Abduction, I can attest that the Aliens in the songs were right on par. I relived the experience stereophonically. Real aliens make you drink mind bacteria that takes over your brain. This album will take over your brain. I think the singer was appropriate, but the composition of the album was what was amazing.

Kathleen Zien Ohio
"Death to Utopia! Death to faith! Death to love! Death to hope?" thunders the 20th century. "Surrender, you pathetic dreamer.”

"No" replies the unhumbled optimist "You are only the present."
Back to Top
NetsNJFan View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: April 12 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3047
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2005 at 02:12
Originally posted by James Lee James Lee wrote:

PINK FLOYD - Ummagumma
Review by Armchair Jock @ 1:22:41 PM EST, 9/13/2004
0 stars  —   I listened to this album (yes, I said album) many times in the early 1970s. Without the mind-blowing 500 - 700 mics of orange barrel acid, this album would have been as "boring" and "non-sensical" as it really is. This album - like most of Pink Floyd's early stuff - has no place in a sane world...
 
 
On the other hand, fire away at this one.

I happen to agree, but it gets at least 1 star for Grantchester Meadows....

Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2005 at 02:31
MESHUGGAH - Catch 33* (2005)
Review (Permanent link) by Daniel Mahony @ 6:39:34 PM EST, 7/4/2005
4 stars  —   Ok, so Meshuggah aren't prog, that's fair enough by me, but reviewing albums here isn't about rating how prog an album is it? You're supposed to review an album based on how good it is and how much you like it, not how well it fits into a desired genre. Anyway...
 
 
This is only part of the review, but Daniel doesn't understand this site, does he
 
The whole point of the rating system is to evaluate albums in terms of Prog Rock - it is not like Amazon's, where you simply rate it on how good you think it is.
 
How do we get the message to people?? - there are obviously so many like Daniel who don't understand the system.
Back to Top
Matti View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 15 2005
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 2121
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2005 at 04:52

I remember reading this when I had just joined Forum - I am the referred "silly little man"

TALK TALK The Colour of Spring
Review (Permanent link) by martin shaw @ 6:56:59 AM EST, 4/15/2005

4 stars  —  look here you silly little man, just beacause it isn't prog rock doesn't mean we have to put up with your stuffy pompous remarks about 'oh well its not prog' for god sake you lot on here make me want to puke you really do!
 
BUT GOOD RATINGS HE GIVES... Whatever he thinks of Talk Talk instead of me. 
 
Cert, just read your post and I disagree very much. Are you serious or kidding? Rating according only to how 'prog' is it, not how one enjoys it? WOULD NOT MAKE SENSE TO ME. Others?


Edited by Matti
Back to Top
tuxon View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 21 2004
Location: plugged-in
Status: Offline
Points: 5502
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2005 at 05:00
Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

MESHUGGAH - Catch 33* (2005)
Review (Permanent link) by Daniel Mahony @ 6:39:34 PM EST, 7/4/2005
4 stars  —   Ok, so Meshuggah aren't prog, that's fair enough by me, but reviewing albums here isn't about rating how prog an album is it? You're supposed to review an album based on how good it is and how much you like it, not how well it fits into a desired genre. Anyway...
 
 
This is only part of the review, but Daniel doesn't understand this site, does he
 
The whole point of the rating system is to evaluate albums in terms of Prog Rock - it is not like Amazon's, where you simply rate it on how good you think it is.
 
How do we get the message to people?? - there are obviously so many like Daniel who don't understand the system.

Not quite true Oh Certif1ed one.

If a band is on the archives, it is considered prog isn't it.

So any rating is possible, and a band should be rated according it's musical quality. 

Just the fact he says 'OK, so Meshuggah aren't prog' can be considered inapropriate, since it's inclusion on the archives suggests otherwise.

I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
Back to Top
Matti View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 15 2005
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 2121
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 05 2005 at 05:12
Thanx Tux, nevertheless, I would go further: I don't consider many bands or artists here 'prog' (many of them are enjoyed by myself but that's irrelevant), neither I think that "being in Prog Archives = prog" is logical and always true, and it doesn't have to be. There are many good bands more or less related to the prog or art rock and they bring more variety to PA. (Besides, personally I don't like categorizing at all. Sometimes I feel categorizing gets far too much attention here.)
Back to Top
Rhayader View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: April 12 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 79
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 06 2005 at 08:10
RUSH - Hemispheres (1978)
Review (Permanent link) by Rich @ 2:38:41 AM EST, 7/6/2005
1 stars  —   I really love this album,from the ham-fisted guitar to the girlie vocals and from the over- blown concept right up to the masterpiece of mirth that is Cignus X-1 Book11. Long years in the making,due to ego clashes and arguments about makeup,Elton John being part of the recording process then not and finally producer Pete Waterman being replaced by Little Jimmy Osmond,the band finally got this meisterwerk out into the public consciousness.Once out there it was a smash,spending 16 weeks at Number One in Albania and going Quadruple Platinum in Belize. When one listens to Geddy Lee's bass one is immediately reminded of Chas n Dave's egregious masterpieces of the early 80's.I can think of no higher praise than that. I find that "La Villa Strangiato" fills me with nostalgia,or should that be neuralgia? I'm not sure but I know that Mrs Peart should have decided against that shiny red kit for young Neal's 6th Birthday.- what can I say? Cignus X-1 Book11 I nearly choked to death the first time I heard this 18 minute epic.It sounds like the ungodly product of a demonic union between WS Gilbert and The Village People and is breath-taking in its excrutiating awfulness and willfull over-ambition.There is nothing like a great Prog Rock Album and this is nothing like a great Prog Rock Album.


This one cracked me up. Still, not a touch on Ozalan's
"Sadder still to watch you die than never to have known it..."

Rush - Losing It
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2005 at 04:27

This one isn't funny. I post it as I think it's probably the best review I've ever seen on the site. You can actually hear the music as you read it.

MIKE OLDFIELD Hergest Ridge
Review (Permanent link) by Thulëatan @ 4:20:57 AM EST, 7/29/2005

PROG REVIEWER

5 stars  —  With the intensity of the spotlight on him, after the phenomenal 'Tubular Bells' Mike Oldfield retreated into the English countryside; now acknowledged, financially liberated, but far from healed, and with much more music to make. At this time he would create his second masterpiece, 'Hergest Ridge', again born from the depths of both his wonder and fear of life, but this time tempered with moments of pure peace and serenity. This review is based on the original release, thus far only available on vinyl, and not the slightly inferior 'Boxed' remix which is featured on all CD releases.

The album opens abruptly with the sustained chorus of pipes, an eerie, almost magical sound that introduces the listener to the piercing consciousness of Oldfield, built upon by the tinkling of percussion before the main melody of the record emerges. The theme is a strong one, optimistic and self-reinforcing, very much a tale of time, and goes on to be explored through some of Oldfield's most gentle instrumental changes. Through waves of horns, then acoustic guitar, the piece floats along majestically with a solitude and clarity that just seems to drag in the 1976 remix, before reaching a stark moment of upset, and then back to peace in a simply beautiful acoustic guitar/oboe/trumpet section. Here, around the middle of part one, you know you are listening to something truly unique and intriguing when the flow crashes down into a pulsing bass riff and ripples of bright synthesizer which create an atmosphere of mystery, curious searching. Effortlessly, this drives further on into the long climax of the first side, which builds with the festive leisure of sleigh bells and dreamy pipe organs, before the final, exultant, choral reprise. The piece ends fading in the way that it began, the pipes this time having the distinct echo of farewell.

Part two's subtle introduction showcases Oldfield's superb acoustic guitar picking style, in what is quite a delicate, mournful passage. After a short time, however, confidence is found, and the strummed guitars start to take over, as if embarking on a journey, told by a new melody of surpassing, overcoming. This becomes emphasised by the choir, which again was too thick and present in the mix on 'Boxed' but here drifts quietly beneath the other instruments with a natural reverb. In much the same way as part one, uncertainty awaits this journey, as the main theme returns on a lone organ and the piece shifts into darker territory once more, with uneasy staccato organ playing and that searching flute. Unexpectedly, this erupts into the power chord frenzy of what Mike's fans know as the 'thunderstorm' section of 'Hergest Ridge'... this is an extended, relentless struggle of layered distorted and fuzz guitars; frustration and stress but with firm timing, suggesting that there is still a measure of control and defiance within the chaos. At last, as the storm just becomes unbearable, the album returns to one final serene chapter of acoustic guitar, strings and choir... a summary, and perhaps a reference to a future time that looks back on all that has gone before. The last moments of 'Hergest Ridge', however, as the music slowly dies away, are discordant and bleak, before a very deliberate close.

This album still ranks as one of Mike Oldfield's finest achievements - surpassing 'Tubular Bells' - full of rich emotion, unique texture of instrumentation, and extremely gifted performances. This is music of a quality that sadly is not really made anymore, and must be heard to be understood. He was to sing on his next album, "so if you feel a little glum, to Hergest Ridge you should come" - and while it is not all hope and light, it is indeed the clear sound of truth, of home.


 



Edited by Easy Livin
Back to Top
Bryan View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 01 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 3013
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2005 at 14:15
Originally posted by tuxon tuxon wrote:

Originally posted by Certif1ed Certif1ed wrote:

MESHUGGAH - Catch 33* (2005)
Review (Permanent link) by Daniel Mahony @ 6:39:34 PM EST, 7/4/2005
4 stars  —   Ok, so Meshuggah aren't prog, that's fair enough by me, but reviewing albums here isn't about rating how prog an album is it? You're supposed to review an album based on how good it is and how much you like it, not how well it fits into a desired genre. Anyway...
 
 
This is only part of the review, but Daniel doesn't understand this site, does he
 
The whole point of the rating system is to evaluate albums in terms of Prog Rock - it is not like Amazon's, where you simply rate it on how good you think it is.
 
How do we get the message to people?? - there are obviously so many like Daniel who don't understand the system.

Not quite true Oh Certif1ed one.

If a band is on the archives, it is considered prog isn't it.

So any rating is possible, and a band should be rated according it's musical quality. 

Just the fact he says 'OK, so Meshuggah aren't prog' can be considered inapropriate, since it's inclusion on the archives suggests otherwise.



Exactly, I figure that once a band is on here we should just go ahead and rate them however we please.  I don't consider The Bends by Radiohead a prog album, but I still gave it 4 stars.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 910111213 18>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.234 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.