Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Wikipedia . . .
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedWikipedia . . .
 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
goose View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 20 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 4097 		Direct Link To This Post Topic: Wikipedia . . .
    Posted: April 23 2005 at 12:54

Originally posted by utah_man utah_man wrote:


1. do you personally use this resource ?

Yes, and I used to a lot more

Originally posted by utah_man utah_man wrote:

2. how much do you trust the quality of the content ?

Very much so, a magazine monitored it and the average clearup time of vanadlism is five minutes.

Originally posted by utah_man utah_man wrote:


3. have you personally made any contributions to it ?

Yes, on a few things (username: goosegoosegoose)

 

for anybody wondering what the mystical wonder is:

www.wikipedia.org

en.wikipedia.org (english)
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 23 2005 at 10:41
I,ve never even heard of it! Wicked what?
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Forum Guest Group
Forum Guest Group
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 22 2005 at 11:14

I use it...

...and abuse it. I vandalize on occasion. ie. Once I put a pic of a whale in the kirstie alley page.
Back to Top
Peter View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: January 31 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 9669 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 22 2005 at 09:22

1. Yes, a little.

2. Not totally, but it's well "policed," I believe.

3. No.

Smile
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy!
O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!'
He chortled in his joy.
Back to Top
Logos View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: March 08 2005
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 2383 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 22 2005 at 08:40
Originally posted by Man With Hat Man With Hat wrote:

I trust it to an extent. They do allow just anybody to go about and just change things. I wonder how that works.



It doesn't always work. One good example is the battle between evolutionists and creationists there. Whenever someone writes something about evolution or just about anything related to it, there's always some fundamentalist ready to go and mess it up.  (ButI haven't checked that thing out for a while so I don't know how they handle the situation these days..)

But other than that, I've checked many things from Wikipedia and the information there seems valid, so I very much trust in it.


Edited by Logos
Back to Top
Fitzcarraldo View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1835 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 22 2005 at 08:02

1. Yes.

2. The quality of the content of the things I have consulted has been high. I normally consult several references to be sure of my facts and, to date, the information in Wikipedia has tallied well with other sources, and in some cases provided more information than the other sources. Also, the discussion tab often quotes posts pointing out apparent discrepancies, errors or omissions (if any). One's entries are monitored (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Introduction) so abuse will be picked up (not necessarily instantly), but honesty and responsibility are two of the cornerstones of this wonderful project.

3. I have only corrected something (a typographical error that resulted in a link not working).

Why do you ask, utah_man?

 
Back to Top
Beau Heem View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 12 2005
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 227 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 21 2005 at 18:20
1. No, i don't
2. I'm blue-eyed, so I probably would if I ever got to use their services.
3. Me & contributing. Hardly even worth mentioning in the same sentence...

I do have a (rather vague) idea what wikipedia is, though...

Cheers

-Beau
--No enemy but time--
Back to Top
Man With Hat View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Jazz-Rock/Fusion/Canterbury Team

Joined: March 12 2005
Location: Neurotica
Status: Offline
Points: 166178 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 21 2005 at 18:18

1. Yes i have.

2. I trust it to an extent. They do allow just anybody to go about and just change things. I wonder how that works. I mean, anybody can go and change very valueable and correct information and make it into a steaming heap of lies and irrealavance. I don't like that, and i can't honestly say that i think it works like that. Does anybody know how?

3. No i do not.
Dig me...But don't...Bury me
I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive
Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Forum Guest Group
Forum Guest Group
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 21 2005 at 18:05

questions:
1. do you personally use this resource ?
2. how much do you trust the quality of the content ?
3. have you personally made any contributions to it ?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.145 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.