Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Sex before marriage
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedSex before marriage

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 6>
Author
Message
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20338
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 04:28
Originally posted by maani maani wrote:

threefates:

There are over 100 specific and direct proscriptions against "sex for sex' sake" in the Scriptures - and not one supporting it.  I'm not sure you're reading the same Scriptures or practicing the same faith as I am.

Peace.

Let's face it, sex for the sake of it can be fun , medicinal , healthy, and avoids a part of sex crimes (there would be even more rapes if women had not been liberated by the pill) . A good deal of this debate is about women's right to reappropriate their bodies. This goes against religion's will to use the female body other than for reproduction's needs.

This forbidding of sex before marriage is mostly about male misplaced honour and to make sure that the bride is virgin, that their kids are theirs , that their wives is a Lady (and a whore only in their bed), etc..... this debate is the first step leading to the Taliban's Burqas.

Scriptures if you choose to believe in them should be interpreted loosely and certainly not in an integrist way. Christian scriptures were written for the first time  over four centuries after JC's crucification , changed by the Vatican so many times they lost the count themselves and to fit their needs (conquering the world in god's name). I am not sure i would want to follow the philosophy of a guy who let himself crucify and ask for his torturer's forgiveness.

No personal attack , Maani. Just my personal opinion but that I wish would be more widespread, but I am not willing to make a religion of my beliefs.

Just as you always point out so well: PEACE.



Edited by Sean Trane
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
Pathetique View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: April 03 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 54
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 05:56
as long as you ain't talking bout love I'm game, the love of my life (2 years and still going strong!) and I had sex for the first time in the not to distant past granted I've sex before then but I think it really depends on the person.  She at first wanted to wait, but obviously changed her mind. I think sex is a good thing before marrying, sex is a lot of work to make sure everyone involved is pleased and that takes practice. mmmmm practice
The Steve
prog-metal radio on www.wcrx.net,
monday 9-midnight CST
Back to Top
Pixel Pirate View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 11 2004
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 793
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 06:34
Originally posted by Sean Trane Sean Trane wrote:

Originally posted by maani maani wrote:

threefates:

There are over 100 specific and direct proscriptions against "sex for sex' sake" in the Scriptures - and not one supporting it.  I'm not sure you're reading the same Scriptures or practicing the same faith as I am.

Peace.

Let's face it, sex for the sake of it can be fun , medicinal , healthy, and avoids a part of sex crimes (there would be even more rapes if women had not been liberated by the pill) . A good deal of this debate is about women's right to reappropriate their bodies. This goes against religion's will to use the female body other than for reproduction's needs.

This forbidding of sex before marriage is mostly about male misplaced honour and to make sure that the bride is virgin, that their kids are theirs , that their wives is a Lady (and a whore only in their bed), etc..... this debate is the first step leading to the Taliban's Burqas.

Scriptures if you choose to believe in them should be interpreted loosely and certainly not in an integrist way. Christian scriptures were written for the first time  over four centuries after JC's crucification , changed by the Vatican so many times they lost the count themselves and to fit their needs (conquering the world in god's name). I am not sure i would want to follow the philosophy of a guy who let himself crucify and ask for his torturer's forgiveness.

No personal attack , Maani. Just my personal opinion but that I wish would be more widespread, but I am not willing to make a religion of my beliefs.

Just as you always point out so well: PEACE.

Bravo! Intelligence and actual historical knowledge is very rare and it's very gratifying to come across it.Because it is true that marriage was instigated by men as a means of controlling women,to make sure that they didn't "stray" and had sex with other men. It was a way for men to be sure that their children were their own and that they hadn't been cuckolded. In other words: Marriage was invented by men to ensure their genetic investment,pure and simple. Love had nothing to do with it,it was simply a practical and pragmatic measure to control women. It's taken on other aspects along the way,but the origins were pure fallocentric egotism and patriarchal bullying,of which all of this planet's woes can be attributed,incidentally.

And as for the christians among us: Why do you insist on making life so complicated? It's not necessary,you know. You don't need a long list of rules or thick books to tell you what's right and wrong. You only need to keep one thing in mind: Treat the people you meet on your way through life with kindness. Be nice to people. That's it. It really is that simple. If you always keep that in mind,you can't do anything that's truly wrong. Only if having lots of sex with many people hurt the people around you,is it wrong. If it doesn't,it's fine. It certainly is no business of some long dead prophet,whether his name was Jesus,Mohmmad or Buddha. It's only a matter between you and the people in your life. And please keep in mind: Just because it's in a book doesn't mean it's true. Whether the book is The Bible,The Koran or The Shining. Be critical,don't just blindly accept. If any theory or thought doesn't tally with reality,it's obviously incorrect. Saying that sex before marriage is wrong would only be correct if reality,the actual lives that actual men and women live,supported it. Well,it doesn't. It's quite the opposite,in fact. Most men and women enjoy sex. That's it. Before,during,or after marriage,in many ways and with many people. That is a fact. What Paul or any biblical author might have had to say about it,or any other issue for that matter, counts for nothing if it isn't in accordance with the way people actually live their lives. You can't create a set of rules that have nothing,or very little,with the way people actually live their lives.You can't create standards that are impossible to live up to. If people really like something and it doesn't hurt anyone,then it's not wrong. Simple as that. That's precisely what's wrong with religion,trying to impose rules and regulations on a life that naturally resists such restrictions. Let people do what ever they want,as long they don't hurt anybody. What I do with the people in my life is nobody's business as long as I don't mistreat them. Life really is that simple. Why do you treat life as if it's an obstacle course? It doesn't have to be.

Odi profanum vulgus et arceo.
Back to Top
James Lee View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 05 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 3525
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 07:20

^ Pixel is so smart. I hope he gets to have as much sex as he wants.

Anyway...

maani: point taken. I think that two people can discover a unique and lasting joy in knowing that no other has ever been where they go (so to speak), and it is that 'perfect union' that is the ideal of marriage. Your quote from the girl is well worth keeping in mind...but I don't believe that it is always true; even when everything else in a relationship is fine, the sex can very well be bad (or as bad as sex ever is- remember the pizza metaphor ).

And vice versa; good (i.e., meaningful) sex can happen with a stranger, too. Sometimes the connections we make to another person are too powerful to survive imposing a relationship on them. Sometimes you just need a reminder that the beast in us can be as divine as the angel in us. With sex, even casual sex, even nasty dirty depraved sex, one can approach elements of infinity that prayer and reflection fail to illuminate.

I think the various cultural taboos against sex before marriage developed as a warning against the troubles that often come from youthful promiscuity. Most cultural attitudes towards sex are rarely about sex itself, but rather the consequences of sex. And I don't know if there's a trustworthy way to measure the regrets of the chaste against the regrets of the wanton.  

Back to Top
Velvetclown View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 8548
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 07:24
If you´re Religious The Missionary Position must be THE position


Edited by Velvetclown
Back to Top
threefates View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 30 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4215
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 08:34
I agree with Sean, Pixel and James evidently... Sex has been used as a control device over women since the beginning. 

Edited by threefates
THIS IS ELP
Back to Top
James Lee View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 05 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 3525
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 09:00

Originally posted by threefates threefates wrote:

I agree with Sean, Pixel and James evidently... Sex has been used as a control device over women since the beginning. 

How do you mean? I'm not arguing, just asking for elaboration.

Back to Top
Pixel Pirate View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 11 2004
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 793
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 09:01

Since all the major religions were started by men,religion has always had a lot to do with men's control issues,it's laughably obvious if you have some grasp of the male psyche. A lot of it has to do with the love/hate,madonna/whore relationship men have always had with women,most men's feelings towards women are tainted with misygony to some extent and in religion this has played a major part since a lot of the major religious movements,especially Islam but also Christianity,has been about establishing and maintaining patriarchal tyranny. Men,eh? Nature's biggest mistake.

Odi profanum vulgus et arceo.
Back to Top
threefates View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 30 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4215
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 09:53

Pixel pretty much sums it up above.  Sean also hits it on the head with "men's misplaced honor".  And it started right from the beginning. 

We're led to believe by the Scriptures that women suffer in childbirth due to our eternal punishment for taking the first bite of knowledge.  Now there's one hell of a guilt trip if ever there was one....

Women were considered whores if they slept with more than one man.  Men could have several wives and comcubines...

Sorry, but I find it hard to believe that women were created to be submissive to the whims of men.  After all, it was women who had that first bite of knowledge....

THIS IS ELP
Back to Top
James Lee View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 05 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 3525
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 10:28

What about the fact that historically men are often seen as slaves to their desires for women, often making monumental decisions based on sexual attraction (Anthony, for example)? That would seem to give women inordinate power over men, at least in a very specific realm. And there's that old saying "Behind every great man..."

Again, I'm not arguing. Just raising ideas for discussion.

Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20338
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 10:38
Originally posted by threefates threefates wrote:

Pixel pretty much sums it up above.  Sean also hits it on the head with "men's misplaced honor".  And it started right from the beginning. 

We're led to believe by the Scriptures that women suffer in childbirth due to our eternal punishment for taking the first bite of knowledge.  Now there's one hell of a guilt trip if ever there was one....

Women were considered whores if they slept with more than one man.  Men could have several wives and comcubines...

Sorry, but I find it hard to believe that women were created to be submissive to the whims of men.  After all, it was women who had that first bite of knowledge....

Actually Three Fates , before the coming of monotheism , there were many societies that were believed to be matrimonial and in some rare case, the polygamism for women existed (and still does in some tribes nowadays) in Polynesia and in Papou lands.

 I really think that this misplaced honour in most males about women (especially in the Muslim world) is because men cannot act correctly with other sibblings(this would mean that they would try to sleep with their brother's wives if they had a chance to????) . Why should the woman be covered from head to toe because she must stay modest ? Why can it not be that men restrain their impulses better (murder, violence , rape/lust and greed).

We, the men, are usually guided by our own references which is our own mothers that we idolize , idealize , cherish for the love they gave us. What do we know of the real live of our mothers outside the motherhood they provided us. if we were to know more on their outside (but well concealed) endeavours/adventures we might just be in for a shock. Most of them were hardly perfect but since it is the only mother we had , we cannot really compare.

You should also know that women are also often the keeper of the tradition. It is women who forces their little girls into excision (cutting of the clitoris and sowing of the vagina) in parts of Africa, keep the girls at home in Arabia etc... This male supremacy is also maintained by women content to behave like their mother in the very traditional role they were shown.

let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
Garion81 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4338
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 11:35
Originally posted by maani maani wrote:

Garion:

I'm curious: While it is true that Christians believe that sex outside of (or prior to) marriage is wrong, what makes you say that Christians are not supposed to have anything other than "missionary style" sex?  I know of no Scripture, teaching, Papal bull or any other thing that says this.  A married Christian couple is permitted to "explore" just as much as a non-Christian married couple.  The idea that we are limited to "missionary style" is a myth.

Peace.

threefates:

There are over 100 specific and direct proscriptions against "sex for sex' sake" in the Scriptures - and not one supporting it.  I'm not sure you're reading the same Scriptures or practicing the same faith as I am.

Peace.

 

The point is that sex itself has been vilified in so many churches although somewhat that attitude changed slightly. (For sure in my parents generation and most of the way through mine.  It is one of the institutions the countercoultre of the late 60's and 70's attacked.)  But as almost as an aside have preachers said but it's ok in marriage.  People usually don't work that way Maani.  People do take it to heart and preachers in the past forget if you keep telling people something is bad and they trust you eventually they believe it. I grew up under the strictest teaching imaginable and it warped my view of sex for years. I know quite a few others that have had the same experience.



"What are you going to do when that damn thing rusts?"
Back to Top
JrKASperov View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 07 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 904
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 11:37
If only we'd start listening to Yeshua instead of preachers. 
Epic.
Back to Top
Velvetclown View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 8548
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 11:39
Any Muslim BURKA anyone ?????????? 
Back to Top
Garion81 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4338
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 11:43

 

ThreeFates touches on an interesting issue.  One other thing that needs to be noted is that a lot of the New Testament beliefs and laws came from Paul's letters to the churches.  Paul was himself a Pharisee and it is easy to see in his writings the struggle he had of telling people the freedom and relief salvation brings and on the other hand smash people over the head with the Law of Moses.  Paul had a problem with sex and it is obvious when you read his letters.   He did not take a wife for whatever reason. In my mind the church should rethink its position on this subject with a more enlightened look of his writings. The church has adopted these feelings of Paul as their own doctrine.



"What are you going to do when that damn thing rusts?"
Back to Top
Velvetclown View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 8548
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 11:48
Bilden “http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/han2/pictures/blueballs.gif” kan inte visas, då den innehåller fel.
Back to Top
Garion81 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4338
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 11:55

Originally posted by Velvetclown Velvetclown wrote:

Bilden “http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/han2/pictures/blueballs.gif” kan inte visas, då den innehåller fel.

 



"What are you going to do when that damn thing rusts?"
Back to Top
Velvetclown View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 8548
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 12:35
Back to Top
Reed Lover View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 14:44

Why is it that a man who gets loads of sex is a stud whilst a woman who does the same is a sl*g? Because of religion.The 3 major religions of the world seem to have taken great delight over the centuries in subjugating women.The Catholic Church venerates The Virgin Mary (against one of the Commandments as far as I can see) yet wont even consider the idea of women priests!!!

Sex is sex,lets just have loads of it as often as possible-with a few provisors:

1. If you are married only have sex with your partner-nobody forces you to get married so either make the commitment or dont marry.

2.Dont put yourself in a position where you can catch something nasty.

3.Sex should always be consensual.

4.Great sex does not have to be with another person (I like to look in the mirrorWink)

5.If you get sent to jail,NEVER PICK THE SOAP UP OFF THE FLOOR!

6.Never listen to advice from obnoxious,smuggy Brits.

Wink

 




Back to Top
Hangedman View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 03 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1261
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 05 2005 at 15:44
Originally posted by maani maani wrote:

threefates:

There are over 100 specific and direct proscriptions against "sex for sex' sake" in the Scriptures - and not one supporting it.  I'm not sure you're reading the same Scriptures or practicing the same faith as I am.

Peace.

There are also scriptures that when taken literally advocate the killing of homosexuals. In the ten commandments it says that any image or representation of god is a sin, catholics believe that jesus and god are one (lets not forget the holy ghost), so therefore having a cross with jesus on it is a sin. It also clearly says several times (and quite clearly) that women are inferior to men. dont want to make it seem like an attack but unless you start spouting that what god did to the sodomites was just and should be done again, then i have to say your not supporting your faith properly.

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 6>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.141 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.