The Black Codex (NL) for Symphonic Prog |
Post Reply | Page 123 5> |
Author | ||
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19535 |
Topic: The Black Codex (NL) for Symphonic Prog Posted: September 14 2015 at 14:39 |
|
I agree. Somebody close the thread, because the band was added
|
||
|
||
Nogbad_The_Bad
Forum & Site Admin Group RIO/Avant/Zeuhl & Eclectic Team Joined: March 16 2007 Location: Boston Status: Offline Points: 20870 |
Posted: September 14 2015 at 14:00 | |
Ivan, I'm not sure why you're discussing this. Decision made and move on. He's never going to agree with you. He's had more than fair input.
|
||
Ian
Host of the Post-Avant Jazzcore Happy Hour on Progrock.com https://podcasts.progrock.com/post-avant-jazzcore-happy-hour/ |
||
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19535 |
Posted: September 14 2015 at 13:57 | |
Do you believe Wikipedia is more accurate than Prog Archives? Then what are you doing here?
|
||
|
||
amatala
Forum Groupie Joined: January 01 2008 Location: Brussels Status: Offline Points: 68 |
Posted: September 14 2015 at 13:32 | |
Quoting any source outside of PA is an exercise in futility anyway, I was just curious what reason to discard it you would find this time and I must say I was not disappointed! Edited by amatala - September 14 2015 at 13:33 |
||
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19535 |
Posted: September 14 2015 at 12:47 | |
Added
Episodes 1 - 13 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=50339 Episodes 14 - 26 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=50340 Episodes 27 - 39 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=50341 Episodes 40 - 52 http://www.progarchives.com/album.asp?id=50342 I could had placed all the episodes in one CD, but in this case, each one has independent release and it's own art cover, including two different years of release |
||
|
||
O666
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 20 2009 Location: TEHRAN-IRAN Status: Offline Points: 2619 |
Posted: September 14 2015 at 11:49 | |
I really don't understand why amatala continue this? I don't want to upset you or attack to you amatala. You said what you want to said and you fight hard for your opinion and I respect to you but continue this and using this kind of discuss not Normal . I think you try to force others to accept your opinion not Ivan or PA. Honestly I don't think its work for you. I'm sure you will attack to me or accuse me to ... but I don't care about that. If PA doesn't listen to anyone , you listen to others. |
||
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19535 |
Posted: September 14 2015 at 11:36 | |
Well, Musicbrainz is a site related with Wikipedia not specializaed in Prog and for anybody to edit, Prog Archives is the reference for any Prog site, so we must be doing our job well.
If you don't like it, you can always leave, and don't let the door hit you where the good Lord split you.
Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - September 14 2015 at 11:39 |
||
|
||
amatala
Forum Groupie Joined: January 01 2008 Location: Brussels Status: Offline Points: 68 |
Posted: September 14 2015 at 09:11 | |
Well, none of those should be listed under VARIOUS ARTISTS as they do belong to one single main artist and they are not compilations.
If you don't listen to users like me, at least have a look at established references like Musicbrainz - none of those albums is listed as VA or COMPILATION on MB... http://musicbrainz.org/release-group/4dde8825-d003-3365-bc7d-41d5f2693d0f http://musicbrainz.org/release-group/0f8a9224-b44e-41d7-b395-c7f8b3b55296 http://musicbrainz.org/release-group/b9e6d9f7-0162-43de-9c51-25c1ca5bcb93 But, as always, PA knows best and does not listen to anyone. So let the mess be complete! Edited by amatala - September 14 2015 at 09:20 |
||
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19535 |
Posted: September 13 2015 at 09:50 | |
No it doesn't We have at least two albums by one composer and guests 1.- Jesus Christ Superstar: Andrew Lloyd Webber and guest artists 2.- Ponder of the Mystery: William Shatner & Billy Sherwood with guests 3.- The Black Codex: Chris Bruin & Guests
|
||
|
||
mogol
Forum Groupie Joined: September 26 2011 Status: Offline Points: 42 |
Posted: September 13 2015 at 06:51 | |
IMHO it's a mistake. There is no various artists in this project, so you are creating a dangerous precedent, which may cause a lot of headache in the future. If Black Codex is accepted as progressive rock artist, then it should be added to one of the usual subgenres, otherwise - just close this thread and forget it.
|
||
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19535 |
Posted: September 11 2015 at 12:34 | |
OK: I received EXPRESS authorization from a member of the Adm Team to add The Black Codex to VARIOUS ARTISTS (CONCEPT ALBUMS & THEMED COMPILATIONS)
Will be added next week if no complains. Iván
|
||
|
||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Online Points: 65268 |
Posted: September 08 2015 at 13:11 | |
Yes that's quite right. What about it? |
||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
||
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19535 |
Posted: September 08 2015 at 12:56 | |
Ask the Neo Prog Team
|
||
|
||
amatala
Forum Groupie Joined: January 01 2008 Location: Brussels Status: Offline Points: 68 |
Posted: September 08 2015 at 12:50 | |
The reason I did not want initially to have these albums added to Chris's page was because Chris stated that the correct artist name is The Black Codex, not Chris. Moreover, Chris is currently listed as Neo-prog and this project clearly is not Neo-prog, that much we can all agree upon. So I was hoping for a more accurate listing for this album.
But since that is no longer possible, I can add these albums to Chris's page with the artist name between brackets e.g. Episodes 1-14 (The Black Codex), if everyone is happy with this workaround and be done with this discussion. |
||
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19535 |
Posted: September 08 2015 at 11:45 | |
Well, it's time to talk clear.
1.- The Black Codex is one of those bands we checked more, it took us countless hours to listen the huge amount of music 2.- Yes they have orchestral music with Symphonic tendencies that honestly made me vote yes 3.- But after reading the opinions of my teammates and after the painfully long process of listening all the music again, we noticed that this is one of the cases in which orchestral doesn't mean Symphonic Prog. 4.- Being that Chris is in Neo Prog, we asked to add this material to Chris Bruin's database 5.- Amatala replied "Chris doesn't want the Black Codex to be added with his material. 6.- Still we sent The Black Codex to Neo Prog 7.- The Neo Team replied NO, with this post by Roland:
8.- Now it isn't only the Symphonic Team, it's also at least 1/2 of the Neo Team. BTW: We changed our decision several times after receiving good feedback and well supported opinions, but telling us it's Symphonic because it is Symphonic or "All Symphonic Rock is Symphonic Prog" is not enough. My opinion is Prog Related or MAYBE...............Crossover, but that's for the Xover team to decide. Iván PS: In several years we haven't received a complain about rejections except Georg Voros who after talking with me understood our perspective and was kind enough to accept what we decided
So, we won't change our perspective, it's a waste of time and space to continue on this, because we won't accept The Black Codex in Symphonic because it's not Symphonic.
Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - September 08 2015 at 12:33 |
||
|
||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: September 08 2015 at 11:14 | |
Strange it may seem, this has been suggested before and I have looked into the logistics of how it can work and I'm sorry to report, but it simply cannot work, and it simply will not work. You have inadvertently hit upon the snag in your explanation... "If enough users vote" ... and the truth is not enough users will vote so what we will have would be an ad hoc team formed of those 'members' with a vested interest in adding an artist. For example I guess you would vote for Black Codex and you would vote "yes", but would you vote for every suggestion we have, even for bands that you don't like, and in subgenres you are not interested in? So now how representative would that ad hoc team be of the whole membership compared to the official subgenre team? The answer to that is "not very" because it is a skewed team that will always vote in favour of the suggestion, whereas the official subgenre team are (as near as dammit) impartial and therefore unbiased. Team members do not vote based on whether they like the music or not; their vote is determined by whether they think the music fits the subgenre or not. If we really had 54,000 active members to get a majority vote each suggestion would require 27,001 yes votes. Of course we can never get half the membership to vote on every suggestions so we'd take a sample of the total membership that we would hope represented a fair cross-section of that population. So for the sake of argument let's say that the minimum number of votes that each suggestion would need could be a tenth of that number, say 2,700 votes. Of course that is still an unreasonable number, and so 270, and even 27 would be an unreasonable expectation (trust me, getting 27 people interested enough in an obscure prog band to register a vote would be a major task and doomed to failure). So would 2.7 people be enough? Also, at any one time we have a list of over 100 artist suggestions, each of those artists has a discography of one or more albums and to give a fair assessment we have to listen to as much of their output as is humanly possible, so each voter would need to listen to a minimum of 45 minutes of music per suggestion, so to vote on all evaluations that would equate to 75 hours of their time. Since we continue to get suggestions, each member would need to commit to this level of activity on regular, continuing basis. And that my friend will never happen. Yet still the world spins on its axis.
Edited by Dean - September 08 2015 at 11:15 |
||
What?
|
||
Guldbamsen
Special Collaborator Retired Admin Joined: January 22 2009 Location: Magic Theatre Status: Offline Points: 23104 |
Posted: September 08 2015 at 11:06 | |
I know where you're coming from and it'd be great if such a thing could work, but it simply isn't feasible (nor very wise). It'd take forever to add any act. And as Olav (Windhawk) just wrote, we have so many crazy folks signing up with less than sympathetic intentions, and there is no easy way for us of spotting them. They would surely feck this up or at the very least make the process of including an act on PA even more tiresome than it is today. Trust me when I say that we've all had ideas on how to better this particular area on PA, yet there is no simple solution. You simply cannot make a flawless system. There will always be decisions you don't agree with. As for the last bit of your post You should try out Faust's collab with Dalek. Hip hop meets experimental rock in an abandoned factory hall |
||
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”
- Douglas Adams |
||
amatala
Forum Groupie Joined: January 01 2008 Location: Brussels Status: Offline Points: 68 |
Posted: September 08 2015 at 10:45 | |
I never said you have to include me (or any user) in the decision making process. I was just suggesting a voting system where the votes would only be visible to the teams as guidelines. If enough users vote in a certain direction, then they may be onto something there... You know what they say: "If enough people tell you that you're drunk, then maybe you should go to bed!" And btw, I am a hip hop producer from Brussels, you got me there! Anyone recommend some good Prog? |
||
Windhawk
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: December 28 2006 Location: Norway Status: Offline Points: 11401 |
Posted: September 08 2015 at 10:24 | |
If it is vital for this project to be regarded as prog, their best call would be to send promos out to the big and/or influential prog sites, get it reviewed there, and if the verdict comes out as prog by them then there would be a reason for an appeal to give this one a second run.
Active user interaction on the build of the database isn't a solution I see as viable. For starters it would lead to some confused artist at some point sending new people in to the forums merely to vote them in here. As well as people making fake accounts to get their favorites in: There has been some crazy stuff going on in that department over the years instigated by people either bored, drunk, high or just mentally unstable. Sometimes by people dealing with a combination of several of these factors. One might like or dislike the system here, but if one think it is failing: Create a new one. It's as simple as that really. Voicing a dislike for a decision isn't uncalled for, but when the dead horse whipped is well beyond the point of smelling funny, why keep on going? Being the loudmouthed child yelling in the sandpit that "I want it this way" is generally an approach that comes with failure as the end result. |
||
Websites I work with:
http://www.progressor.net http://www.houseofprog.com My profile on Mixcloud: https://www.mixcloud.com/haukevind/ |
||
Guldbamsen
Special Collaborator Retired Admin Joined: January 22 2009 Location: Magic Theatre Status: Offline Points: 23104 |
Posted: September 08 2015 at 10:24 | |
It doesn't work like that though. We have to have some bearing on the people we chose to listen to. We need to know that the folks who are part of the decision making have some knowledge on the genre. That is the main reason we read through a member's reviews and posts before we go any further. Like any other workplace out there; you need to prove yourself before the gig is your's. If you have a passion for prog rock or indeed how this site operates, then start talking to the members over the forum. Get a few discussions under your belt, before you start accusing PA of being negligent of their members. You have written some 50 posts yet I only see you here in the suggest new bands forum. How are we ever to know where you're coming from? For all we know you could be a hip hop producer out of Brussels who's heard exactly three prog albums from the 70s. If that were the case, then it'd be a crazy move to include you in the decisions-making. Edited by Guldbamsen - September 08 2015 at 10:30 |
||
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”
- Douglas Adams |
||
Post Reply | Page 123 5> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |