Another religion poll

D

At least you were the one who finally filled it up < 3



But suuuuummer is a coming and, arise. Ariiise.
But suuuuummer is a coming and, arise. Ariiise!

I never had a good way with words on the topic, here's some cheery lads who do a far superior job

I put it beside the keys how could you have already lost it?

frippism wrote: AtomicCrimsonRush wrote: God exists. He speaks to me all the time. Oh come on, me whispering things to you in your sleep does not make me a God.

You sure baby?

That is interesting though, I assume ACR means that as something symbolic, or god speaks to him all the time through prayer, or things he sees/feels.

Because if you mean literal talking to prophet type stuff, I'd say ACR you need to get your head checked, or we're in the presence of the savior of our time!



I still am completely unsure, I always am hovering in some gray area between agnostic and deist...the problem usually being semantics.
This is why I like to go with extreme agnostic. I ain't just unsure, I am 100% absolutely sure I am unsure

AtomicCrimsonRush wrote: God exists. He speaks to me all the time.

Epignosis wrote: The T wrote: Epignosis wrote: Dean wrote: The people who use the internet are antisemantic Oh, they are!  They make me so angry I literally stab myself in the face! I can't find the link now but the same source you used yesterday in an article about politicians recently had one where it was said that you can definitely, totally, literally use 'literally' in the way you just used it and be correct in your use of the language.  Yes, I read that Cracked article.  I'll post it so people can read it.  It's mostly bullsh*t, sorry.  This author seems to think that just because people do something wrongly for a long period of time automatically makes the mistake right.  Historically, that's true sometimes. Just because people misuse words for a long time doesn't make it proper- it only makes it proper in their linguistic milieu.  The author of that article took one form of English and said, "This is correct in all versions of English" and he is ridiculously wrong.  Grammar and usage is (supposed) to make communication as clear as possible; misusing words very often works against the communicator and the intended message. The writer then made the Linguistics 101 black and white distinction between descriptivism and prescriptivism, which is stupid.  Both are right, but neither one absolutely.  Language is Silly Putty.  We can mold it as we like it, but we cannot turn it into a living bird or a stack of $100s.

I understand. Though remember English is my second language so you can be a little more forgiving of my silly ways

You can't put an s on the end of a number like that.

My head hurts a lot. I voted for E. I liked that one the best. Where's F? I love the idea of God, even if I don't believe in it. I want my mom to believe in God. She's calmer and happier when she does. 

Oh come on, it's not as if Epignosis ever follows people around criticising them for not using words correctly. "Do unto others" and all that, he lives by such credo.