Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
necromancing
Forum Groupie
Joined: April 27 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 39
|
Topic: Is Radiohead prog? Posted: May 13 2004 at 23:48 |
Well, I think Radiohead qualifies as prog.
Let's face it, if Marillion does a live cover of "Fake Plastic Trees", I think it's safe to say they have some important fans in the prog world.
Edited by necromancing
|
|
Jim Garten
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin & Razor Guru
Joined: February 02 2004
Location: South England
Status: Offline
Points: 14693
|
Posted: May 13 2004 at 08:00 |
OK Computer definitely contains some heavily prog-influenced tracks; the use of the Mellotron in 'Exit Music', and the whole feel of 'Lucky' (if ever there was a song where the guitar solo at the end should just go on, and on.....)
|
Jon Lord 1941 - 2012
|
|
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Posted: May 13 2004 at 02:15 |
Gaston:
Aren't Porcupine Tree a 1990s-2000s band? And what about Spock's Beard and all the other modern prog bands you seem to be overlooking?
Marillion are definitely prog - and still going strong - and much of the Fish-era material is highly political, touching on the troubles in Northern Ireland, the record industry, and social politics.
Forgotten Sons:
You're just another coffin on its way down the emerald aisle When your children's stony glances mourn Your death in a terrorist's smile The bomber's arm placing fiery gifts on the supermarket shelves Alley sings with shrapnel detonate a temporary hell
Radiohead are much less political than Marillion - and "Karma Police" has incredible lyrics, not to mention the wonderful coda;
Karma police arrest this man, he talks in maths, he buzzes like a fridge, he's like a detuned radio.
Karma police arrest this girl, her Hitler hairdo is making me feel ill and we have crashed her party.
Finally, "Paranoid Android" is over 7 minutes long - longer than, for example "Garden Party". "Supper's Ready" is in fact 5 pieces, each around the 3-4 minute-mark. 2 of those 5 pieces are repeated, and thematic material is used from the 1st to give continuity.
|
|
Gaston
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 26 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 401
|
Posted: May 12 2004 at 15:18 |
Peter Rideout wrote:
The boundaries of "prog" are amorphous, semi-permeable, and subjective.
This type of question has no real answer, but could be voted upon....
|
My thoughts exactly. While Radiohead are one of my favourite bands, their musci cannot be described as prog because there really is no such thing anymore. Older music, maybe from 60s - early 80s is considered to be labeled as "prog" but nothing recent should be in that category. I created a thread about this a few weeks ago but not too many people responded. Radiohead is more political now than anything, and that's what separates them from Porcupine Tree et al. Thom has too much to share about current world events and such. I could see them being an art rock band, or even post modernist political rock, but not prog, since the term is oversimplified anyways. If anything, Paranoid Android, yes, kind of proggish, but Kid A would be considered the prog album, if there was one. They often rely on thematic visuals within their albums, such as Pink Floyd, but since the songs are shorter, there isn't enough room for exploration. This may change soon though, so I hear. The next album is sheduled for next year. I hope it is more along the lines of Floyd, but I fear that if this happens, the mundane Radiohead listeners (you know, the one's who bought OK computer for Karma Police lol) won't really like them anymore, and they therefore would not be reaching as many people. Oh, and these same people disliked Kid A too. That's a pretty good explanation, I guess.
Gaston
|
It's the same guy. Great minds think alike.
|
|
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Posted: May 12 2004 at 07:01 |
The "prog" element is the elusive part that is missing from the Beatles as not one of their albums truly deserves the tag "prog", even Sergeant Pepper.
Try this experiment: Listen to DSOTM, then a prog album of your choice (using one of the 5000+ listed here as a guide) then OK Computer, then an album by any of the bands you have mentioned. I'm confident you will then understand why many believe Radiohead are a special case. They certainly don't deserve the straight "Indie" tag, IMO.
If not, you will have had a superb chill-out session - particularly when armed with the tipple of your choice
BTW, if you can track down a copy of the video of the set they performed at Glastonbury in 1997, I almost guarantee you will be "converted". There is something magical about it - Q Magazine recently voted it the #1 live set of all time. Not sure I'd agree, but it's up there with the very best!
|
|
The Analog Kid
Forum Groupie
Joined: April 14 2004
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 64
|
Posted: May 12 2004 at 06:43 |
There are so many cross-overs/combined styles/ or whatever, since back when The Beatles arrived. I'm aware that there's a difference in 'Prog' as a genre and 'Progressive Music'. Radiohead might as well be a combination of Prog, Progressive music, Indie and maybe Spacerock. Other 'Alternative' bands like Smashing Pumpkins and even Soundgarden have made a few hints at Prog. And BTW, most good bands do combinations, have their own style and progress within themselves until some point.
|
|
landofcake
Forum Newbie
Joined: April 28 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 6
|
Posted: May 11 2004 at 18:04 |
Thats an interesting question ... i dont know if i would call Radiohead
prog ... because i personally think they're more of an indie band. But
bearing this in mind O.K. Computer is a very experimental album
(considering they're an indie band) and a good album too. I wouldn't
personally classify them as Prog myself.
|
|
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Posted: May 11 2004 at 15:39 |
Ah - that explains it - if you've only seen the videos on MTV, then you've only seen the "commercial" side of Radiohead - although "Paranoid Android" does get some airing, and I've even seen the video for "No Surprises" and "Karma Police" a few times.
Both the latter are deceptive in their simplicity and commercial appeal - especially "Karma Police", which has that wonderful "For a minute there I lost myself" section at the end. The lyrics to "Karma Police" are very different to the norm as well, as they paint very vivid pictures. The videos make absolutely no attempt to bring the words to life in Radiohead's typically obtuse fashion. The rest of the OK Computer album is worth exploring no matter what your tastes.
On a final note; Other prog bands have made singles - and videos (Marillion, Genesis, Pink Floyd, etc.), but that does not stop them being prog. I think that Marillion lay claim to being the only prog band ever to get a true prog song (Garden Party) into the charts. But that's another debate
|
|
Marcelo
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 15 2004
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 310
|
Posted: May 11 2004 at 14:53 |
Another point (very subjective this time) is the fact that I would love to see my favorite bands on TV... but I can't imagine VDGG (i.e.) beside a Britney Spears clip, even in case of success. Thinking about characteristics of progressive music, surely, comes to my mind the non-commercial but artistic intentions. So, when I see Radiohead in MTV, I'm glad because their music isn't so bad like most of the "TV bands", but prog? No way!
|
|
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Posted: May 11 2004 at 14:02 |
Marcelo wrote:
A prog fan couldn't resist the "progressive rock death" idea. So, any prog fan tries to keep alive the beloved genre, trying to hear "progressive" any kind of music a little bit different from the FM radio hits. Radiohead is a good alternative band, or we must consider Coldplay, Anathema, Oasis, etc etc as prog bands too?
|
There is not much that I can hear that is progressive about Oasis or Coldplay - Coldplay, particularly, adhere to a fairly rigid formula, although the formula itself has developed since Parachutes. Oasis are little better, progressively speaking (although I like their music). I haven't heard Anathema so can't comment.
I believe Radiohead are different because they deliberately try to push the boundaries and know that they abhor formula. This is apparent in most of their material, even the singles. There's not many "cookie-cutter" chord sequences here, although the earlier material did stick to the ABABCAB form on the whole.
OK Computer is a different ball game - it's in a class of its own, IMO.
|
|
Joren
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 07 2004
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 6667
|
Posted: May 11 2004 at 13:26 |
Peter Rideout wrote:
The boundaries of "prog" are amorphous, semi-permeable, and subjective.
This type of question has no real answer, but could be voted upon....
|
Yes, maybe we should make a poll?
EDIT: oops, there is one!
Edited by Joren
|
|
raggy
Forum Groupie
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 85
|
Posted: May 11 2004 at 11:54 |
I can certainly see why prog fans appreciate RH, but Marcelo has a good point. Anyway, if RH are Prog, then Kula Shaker can definitly lay claim to a place in the archive. Their sound is much closer to what I call prog!
|
Now is tomorrow afternoon
|
|
Marcelo
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 15 2004
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 310
|
Posted: May 11 2004 at 11:21 |
A prog fan couldn't resist the "progressive rock death" idea. So, any prog fan tries to keep alive the beloved genre, trying to hear "progressive" any kind of music a little bit different from the FM radio hits. Radiohead is a good alternative band, or we must consider Coldplay, Anathema, Oasis, etc etc as prog bands too?
|
|
Peter
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: January 31 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 9669
|
Posted: May 11 2004 at 02:04 |
The boundaries of "prog" are amorphous, semi-permeable, and subjective.
This type of question has no real answer, but could be voted upon....
|
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock? Come to my arms, my beamish boy! O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!' He chortled in his joy.
|
|
necromancing
Forum Groupie
Joined: April 27 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 39
|
Posted: May 11 2004 at 01:54 |
The articles that I've read, make it seem that the band is shy about fielding the whole "prog" rock question. I have a magazine where the interviewer asked Jonny Greenwood if he was familiar with the Peter Gabriel-era Genesis, and he mentioned he was to some extent, but that the band doesn't reference classic prog music directly. However, there seems no doubt that some of the band's music is heavily influenced by Brian Eno. Also, Thom Yorke has said that Miles Davis "Bitches Brew" influenced the choatic horn part at the end of "The National Anthem".
"OK Computer" is very prog in nature - "Exit Music (For A Film)", "Paranoid Andriod", "Subterranean Homesick Alien", "Climbing Up the Walls", etc. IMO, Radiohead are VERY experimental, but they don't play "shredder" guitar or 10+ minute songs. So I don't know if that qualifies as prog in the classis sense. Though they do use Moogs and Mellotrons with creepy sound effects, which to me is prog enough. Like someone already said, "OK Computer" is the 90's "Dark Side of the Moon" in a sense.
"Cuttooth" (Kid A/Amnesiac B Side) is very Krautrock and reminds me of the 70's German band Neu! (David Bowie fans will be familair with this influence on the Berlin Trilogy (Low/Heroes/Lodger). And if you listen to "2+2+5" or "Everything In It's Right Place", it sounds prog to me. If "prog-rock" means "progressive rock music", than I think by today's standards, Radiohead should at least be considered on the boderline of "prog" and "alternative".
Edited by necromancing
|
|
headboy
Forum Groupie
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 67
|
Posted: May 10 2004 at 16:28 |
er, no
|
|
Dan Bobrowski
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 02 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5243
|
Posted: May 10 2004 at 16:25 |
I like Radiohead. Until someone said they were prog, I never really saw them in that light. Still don't... I thought we covered this earlier, Fringe-Prog. Good Band- Fringe Prog.
|
|
alonsin
Forum Newbie
Joined: May 10 2004
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 8
|
Posted: May 10 2004 at 15:31 |
Shure has a lot of elements of what is consider "prog", other bands have had similar beginigs... from "hard rock" (Rush)"jazz", (Soft Works) or "alternative" ...Radiohead... any way the are a great band...........
|
...Begin with the posible and move towards the imposible
|
|
Velvetclown
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 8548
|
Posted: May 10 2004 at 12:31 |
Four Chords That Made a Million
|
|
Joren
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 07 2004
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 6667
|
Posted: May 10 2004 at 07:56 |
I'm not sure if PT want commercial succes...
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.