Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
aaroncliftmusic
Forum Newbie
Joined: March 25 2014
Location: Austin, TX
Status: Offline
Points: 41
|
Topic: Deep Purple I or II ? Posted: September 19 2014 at 11:50 |
Deep Purple I is underrated, but then again, Deep Purple II made "Child in Time" and gave us one the greatest live albums of all time ("Made in Japan"), so I'm going to go with Deep Purple II.
|
|
PrognosticMind
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 02 2014
Location: New Hampshire
Status: Offline
Points: 1195
|
Posted: September 15 2014 at 16:10 |
Deep Purple II!
|
"A squid eating dough in a polyethylene bag is fast and bulbous. Got me?"
|
|
dr wu23
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 22 2010
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 20631
|
Posted: September 15 2014 at 14:55 |
Chose Purple 2 due to Deep Purple In Rock.......but I like the earlier ones better than the more commercial later ones.
|
One does nothing yet nothing is left undone. Haquin
|
|
SteveG
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20616
|
Posted: September 15 2014 at 14:42 |
Mark 2 it is! Everyone knows that the second son always makes out.
|
|
Intruder
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 13 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 2206
|
Posted: September 15 2014 at 14:36 |
Is Mach I the Jon Lord led early albums (Book of Talyson, Deep Purple) or the more Blackmore led albums that followed (In Rock, Fireball, etc.), or do you mean the Tommy Bolin band (Burn, Taste the Band)?
I dig the first LPs....they may have a more "pop" sound, but there was some groovy innovation (especially the Donovan cover!).
|
I like to feel the suspense when you're certain you know I am there.....
|
|
charles_ryder
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 15 2014
Location: St.Petersburg
Status: Offline
Points: 173
|
Posted: September 14 2014 at 12:55 |
I don't like Gillan, Evans was best. And their first three albums was best IMO.
|
om mani padme hum
|
|
Sagichim
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: November 29 2006
Location: Israel
Status: Offline
Points: 6632
|
Posted: April 03 2012 at 13:11 |
Actually the two first albums by the band are inferior to the MK II albums but the third 'Deep Purple' is something else, everything about it is perfect, the sound, the mood, the playing and of course the songs. It has that extra something that i don't get from the MK II albums as amazing as they are. I decided to go with it.
|
|
PyramidMeetsTheEye
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 02 2012
Location: Slovenia
Status: Offline
Points: 118
|
Posted: April 03 2012 at 12:49 |
deep purple 1 will do just fine
|
|
|
KingCrInuYasha
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 26 2010
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1281
|
Posted: April 01 2012 at 19:43 |
Guldbamsen wrote:
I actually think mark one had more influence on the prog scene than the 2. Firstly because they incorporated that symphonic and slightly proto-heavy prog flavour into their sound before that was mainstream and "normal". Few acts of the time could pull a track like April off, and I think it had infinitely more to say on the Brit part of the equation than Child in Time ever did. By the time of In Rock the rock scene had shifted immensely, and what Deep Purple were doing was not really that game-changing. They just did it with style and pomp, and nobody can really take that away from them.
Just so you know, mark one is also my fave - so I am completely biased
|
Well, a lot of the musical elements of the first line-up were inspired by other groups like the Moody Blues, The Nice and Vanilla Fudge, all of which at one significant album to them ( Days Of Future Passed, The Thoughts Of Emerlist Davjack and Vanilla Fudge), by the time Deep Purple Mk 1 released their first album. As for In Rock not being game-changing, a lot of the metal groups that emerged in the second half of the 1970s like Judas Priest and Schenker-era UFO show a lot of influence in that album. To be fair though, in Priest's case, Purple was by no means their only influence. On the other hand, you can hear a lot of Mk 1 in groups like Andromeda and Uriah Heep, not to mention that Purple's Mk 2 lineup was simply a logical extension of the previous one - this is especially apparent with Fireball. Yeah, it's kind of complicated. There's just as many arguments to go with that analysis as there are that go against it. About the only thing I can safely say is that both had something to them that contributed to the scene, not to mention are quite enjoyable.
|
He looks at this world and wants it all... so he strikes, like Thunderball!
|
|
Guldbamsen
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin
Joined: January 22 2009
Location: Magic Theatre
Status: Offline
Points: 23104
|
Posted: March 31 2012 at 13:45 |
I actually think mark one had more influence on the prog scene than the 2. Firstly because they incorporated that symphonic and slightly proto-heavy prog flavour into their sound before that was mainstream and "normal". Few acts of the time could pull a track like April off, and I think it had infinitely more to say on the Brit part of the equation than Child in Time ever did. By the time of In Rock the rock scene had shifted immensely, and what Deep Purple were doing was not really that game-changing. They just did it with style and pomp, and nobody can really take that away from them.
Just so you know, mark one is also my fave - so I am completely biased
Edited by Guldbamsen - March 31 2012 at 13:47
|
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”
- Douglas Adams
|
|
Sagichim
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: November 29 2006
Location: Israel
Status: Offline
Points: 6632
|
Posted: February 23 2012 at 15:55 |
I just have to say that MK3 and even MK4 are superb.
|
|
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
|
Posted: February 23 2012 at 15:45 |
RedSheep wrote:
Are we Talking dp 1 mark 1,2,3,4 or 5?
Definately a Deep purple 1 fan, I learned smoke on the water's solo with a broken arm and I've never forgotten it since! Child in time was mind blowing |
You say you are a Mark 1 fan but then go on about Mark 2 Purple as if you prefered that!
|
|
|
Sagichim
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: November 29 2006
Location: Israel
Status: Offline
Points: 6632
|
Posted: February 23 2012 at 15:29 |
The album deep purple is rooted in my heart and is my favourite DP album
I also adore Mk2 i decide not to decide between them
Edited by sagichim - April 03 2012 at 13:12
|
|
Abstrakt
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 18 2005
Location: Soundgarden
Status: Offline
Points: 18292
|
Posted: February 15 2012 at 13:22 |
Snow Dog wrote:
I feel people are voting for their favourite rather than addressing the poll question.
Shame. |
I feel that Mk I are progressive, but kinda went along with the late 60's sound and spirit (bands like iron butterfly, the doors & love doesn't sound THAT diffrent from them), while Mk II would influence many later more or less PROGRESSIVE bands in the heavier,or even metal vein. I voted for MK II, too. Not that Mk I wasn't influential, but Mk II was wider known, and able to reach out to and influence more people and bands.
|
|
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
|
Posted: February 11 2012 at 15:04 |
I feel people are voting for their favourite rather than addressing the poll question.
Shame.
|
|
|
dr prog
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 25 2010
Location: Melbourne
Status: Offline
Points: 2516
|
Posted: February 11 2012 at 14:49 |
Mark 1 is fairly prog,
Mark 2 is mild prog, similar to Sabbath
When you have Lords classical influence, Blackmores jazz influence and Paices jazz/classical influence, you're usually going to get prog related music when it's recorded in the late 60s and early 70s. The closest they got to hard rock was Smoke on the water, Demons eye and Black Night, while Lazy and Why didn't Rosemary are blues rock. But almost everything else up to 1976 was heavy rock which is heavy prog
|
|
Svetonio
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 20 2010
Location: Serbia
Status: Offline
Points: 10213
|
Posted: February 11 2012 at 00:13 |
|
|
KingCrInuYasha
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 26 2010
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1281
|
Posted: February 07 2012 at 13:26 |
Mark II.
Not that Mark I was anything to sneeze at, but I think when Gillan and Glover joined, the band's songwriting was starting to reach its peak.
|
He looks at this world and wants it all... so he strikes, like Thunderball!
|
|
tamijo
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 06 2009
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 4287
|
Posted: February 07 2012 at 11:26 |
Deep Purple II
|
Prog is whatevey you want it to be. So dont diss other peoples prog, and they wont diss yours
|
|
Abstrakt
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 18 2005
Location: Soundgarden
Status: Offline
Points: 18292
|
Posted: February 07 2012 at 11:14 |
Like both, but like Mk II slightly more.
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.