![]() |
|
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123 4> |
Author | |
FusionKing ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: December 28 2009 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 522 |
![]() Posted: January 02 2010 at 17:48 |
No. Toto in my opinion is an A.O.R. band.
|
|
![]() |
|
octopus-4 ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() RIO/Avant/Zeuhl,Neo & Post/Math Teams Joined: October 31 2006 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 14550 |
![]() |
Great group, but nothing to do with prog, even if Jeff Porcaro played in Gilmour's about face. Too few to be prog.
|
|
![]() |
|
ghost_of_morphy ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: March 08 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2755 |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Raff ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 29 2005 Location: None Status: Offline Points: 24429 |
![]() |
100% in agreement with you, Greg - since I started reviewing for another site I've been exposed to a lot of music that would probably never find a place here, but which is absolutely worth exploring, as well as authentically progressive. However, I am afraid it's not going to happen in the short term at least. |
|
![]() |
|
Logan ![]() Forum & Site Admin Group ![]() ![]() Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 37232 |
![]() |
I've read that quote before -- very good point, Raff.
{Irrelevant, but what I've wished with prog-related (and particularly proto-prog which I consider a much more important category) was a diverse and reasonably well-balanced representation of bands/artists related to the various "progressive" movements listed in the archives, but this would involve a different way of approaching the categories. I think it could turn this into a much better research site. It's too mainstream-oriented, I feel.} |
|
![]() |
|
Raff ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 29 2005 Location: None Status: Offline Points: 24429 |
![]() |
Though I am not a fan of AOR/stadium rock/arena rock/pomp rock (call it whatever you like), I'd like to point out something that many people seem to overlook: if there is a subgenre of rock that deserved the tag of 'prog-related', this is it. Check what Edward Macan says on page 154 of his book Rocking the Classics (an essential read for any prog fan, even if I don't necessarily agree with everything he says):
"...the American stadium rock style, which essentially involves a progressive rock/heavy metal fusion..." And on page 186: "Stadium rock bands especially admired progressive rock's virtuosity.... Indeed, certain stylistic elements of progressive rock were used over and over again by these bands until they were reduced to clichés: toccata-like organ and synthesizer solos, sudden juxtapositions of acoustic and electric sections, and three- or four-part vocal arrangements dominated by high tenors." If this doesn't clearly spell 'prog-related', I wonder what does. I'd also like to remind people that some bands included here, and considered fully prog by most (Kansas and Starcastle, for instance) are held by others to be AOR/pomp rock rather than prog. All of the above, anyway, has the main purpose of playing devil's advocate - I have never been overly concerned with what is added or not, and have never thrown tantrums over any addition. |
|
![]() |
|
Logan ![]() Forum & Site Admin Group ![]() ![]() Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 37232 |
![]() |
I don't know that Asia would be here were it not for the musicians involved -- ditto for GTR. I've hears some Magnum, but don't remember them. While consistency is important, it should be noted that the conditions for PR entry are more stringent now. I'm not sure that musically-speaking, any of those should be here. And I'm not sure when they were added, if the definition was in place then, as it states in Prog Related: "We specify the word MUSICAL because simple performance of a determined instrument in a Prog or mainstream band is not justification enough to include an artist, no matter how virtuoso he/she may be, Prog Archives has to evaluate their compositional work because the music is what determines the characteristics of a band or an artist." A lot of acts were added in the early days before the proper teams were in place that would not make the cut now. |
|
![]() |
|
lucas ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 06 2004 Location: France Status: Offline Points: 8138 |
![]() |
Well, if ASIA, Magnum and GTR are in PA, I don't see why TOTO would not be here. TOTO are much more divese and complex than ASIA. But there would be a lot more AOR artists to add : O'Ryan, Leroux, Life on mars, Heart...
Edited by lucas - December 27 2009 at 13:34 |
|
"Magma was the very first gothic rock band" (Didier Lockwood)
|
|
![]() |
|
Logan ![]() Forum & Site Admin Group ![]() ![]() Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 37232 |
![]() |
Boston certainly has had much support for inclusion in Prog-Related due to the first LP.
|
|
![]() |
|
snobb ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: August 20 2009 Location: Vilnius,LT,EU Status: Offline Points: 3584 |
![]() |
If Toto, why not Boston?
|
|
![]() |
|
ghost_of_morphy ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: March 08 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2755 |
![]() |
I thought Toto was already in prog archives. Isn't this a Toto album?
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Takeshi Kovacs ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: September 27 2005 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 2454 |
![]() |
I suggested After The Fire because their debut album was clearly a prime example of symphonic prog. I acknowledged that nothing else in their catalogue could be described as symphonic apart from that album. Is this a case of classifying an artist without hearing the album, Man Erg or do you deny Signs of Change is a symphonic prog album? As for Toto, I've only heard Hold The Line and Africa, and would say those two tracks are more AOR than prog. |
|
![]() Check out my music taste: http://www.last.fm/user/TakeshiKovacs/ |
|
![]() |
|
Icarium ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() VIP Member Joined: March 21 2008 Location: Tigerstaden Status: Offline Points: 34083 |
![]() |
Probably not eclectic just aired the thought
but as for their relation to Crossover prog they fit the Prog mould if you compare them to bands like Alan Parsons Project and ELO their 4 albums from 93 to falling in Between is clearly made other an Progressive aproach Kingdom of Desire have the eery, hounting sound over it, verry heavy at times, grate atmospheres, some instrument parts which shows off their techincal power as well as outstanding composisions and arrangements and the songs flow so well the trancendece between the Intro, verse chorus is so well done. it is less synth driven but the layers of sound on this album gives you the chills, the most metal sounding toto album, hard rock, heavy prog, jazz fuison and long constructed art rock (Wings of Time, the title track, Only You and How many times) Tambu is more organic sounding but all the songs on this album is made out of the new aproch for the bands ano 90s with more longer songs, not so melodic drivven more Organ and rhodes pianos, exploration of differents styles, Jazz/fusion, heavy metal, funk, even Hip hop, art rock and other styles the same grate arrangements. deeper lyrics, Mindefields is labeld as Neo prog on Wikipedia (but you dont need too relate to much on that you only need to listen to the album) many of the songs here is verry rich on texture, layerd sound, could be compared to bands like Marillion and Arena, some also more Prog Metal like Better World, its a 14 track long album and the album vere most styles of rock is presented, Falling in Between their last album starts with a bang with the splenid title track (which blends Dream Theater with more mideleastern, Daying on my Feet is Jazz/fusion track, Bottom of your Soul is art rock and the rest of the album follows this with technical and melodic music with rich istrumentation, solos, exprementation and varied in styles |
|
![]() |
|
snobb ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: August 20 2009 Location: Vilnius,LT,EU Status: Offline Points: 3584 |
![]() |
Toto has nothing in common with prog (or almost nothing, what is the same). Listened many their albums for years. Nice AOR/pop-rock. Even seem them live ( last time -3-4 yrs ago in Budapest). NOTHING in common with prog, believe me!
Steve Lukather have some solo/ colaboartive records, which could be more related, but again, never too proggy.
|
|
![]() |
|
clarke2001 ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: June 14 2006 Location: Croatia Status: Offline Points: 4160 |
![]() |
Toto. In Eclectic. Over my dead, eyeless, green, mould-covered body. ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Icarium ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() VIP Member Joined: March 21 2008 Location: Tigerstaden Status: Offline Points: 34083 |
![]() |
i think based on what is said to be the merrits for inclusion to Crossover prog thet they would fitt there, but also Neo Prog is also a genre that I think Toto have a lot of similaritys with since they are more Synth and Keybord based then guitar and riff based.
but also Eclectic is one suited place to have them |
|
![]() |
|
Icarium ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() VIP Member Joined: March 21 2008 Location: Tigerstaden Status: Offline Points: 34083 |
![]() |
i saw a page where they mentiond Toto together with here http://www.wayango.com/genres/rock-art-rockexperimental-neo-prog/ i that makes that Totos music certenly have influenced som Progressive rock geners, i also strongly beleave they also have had a foot in influencing traditional Progressive Metal like Queensryche and Dream Theater.
Neo Prog The subgenre relies very much on clean, melodic and emotional electric guitar solos check combined with modern, lush, floating and atmospheric keyboards. check The main musical influences on the neo-prog genre are Genesis, Yes, Camel, Toto and Pink Floyd. indeed just pinpoint on some cases witch makes Toto influencal on Neo Prog Edited by aginor - September 07 2009 at 14:55 |
|
![]() |
|
Logan ![]() Forum & Site Admin Group ![]() ![]() Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 37232 |
![]() |
Such polls in and of themselves are usually pretty useless anyway, at least in terms of addition. For such additions, it's the arguments that count.
One could always add up the posts by people that express that they are in favour and those that are not (plus those that there undecided), anyway. I think that votes with posts to explain why they vote such a way are the ones that should be taken into consideration, anyway. Often people just vote with their gut-feeling or according to their biases (whether they like it or not), or not really knowing the music anyway, or without thinking about arguments for and/or against. What's funny is often the discrepancy between poll results and going through the posts to see who voted what. I've known polls were one option was ahead in the poll while most people in the posts preferred the other option. I don't trust votes without explanations, and really find them pretty worthless (that goes to political elections too), but at least those aren't quite so easily manipulated as this one. I'm a ambivalent by the way. I don't think it SHOULD be here, but I do think it has merit. Edited by Logan - August 26 2009 at 16:20 |
|
![]() |
|
Malve87 ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: December 19 2005 Location: Genova, Italy Status: Offline Points: 252 |
![]() |
then this poll's useless
|
|
]
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Logan ![]() Forum & Site Admin Group ![]() ![]() Site Admin Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Vancouver, BC Status: Offline Points: 37232 |
![]() |
Since multiple voting is allowed, the results lack validity (someone could have voted a bunch of times). |
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123 4> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |