Moraz-Bruford

BaldJean wrote: since they were equal partners in this and made two albums they should have an entry of their ow, in my opinion, as "Moraz, , Patrick & Bruford, Bill". the other possibility would be to list their albums twice, under Bruford, Bill and under Moraz, Patrick, but that does not convince me. actually I believe the entry "Bill Bruford" should be deleted entirely; the albums listed there are either by him and Patrick Moraz or by a band called "Bruford"; they did not appear under the name "Bill Bruford" at all. you may think this is splitting hairs, but go and have a look at your record covers

Slartibartfast wrote: What about for this one?  I'm not so cool with the double listings such as Goodman & Hammer's Like Children being listed under Goodman and Hammer unless there were a way to link them so that a review in one place would show up under the other.  Sometimes you just have to lump an artists various projects under one category.  I think Les Claypool should have his own entry and that should include Frog Brigade, Oysterhead, Bucket of Bernie Brains, Holy Mackerel, as well as his "Les Claypool" albums.

this one is the exception which should be listed under "Bill Bruford"

since they were equal partners in this and made two albums they should have an entry of their ow, in my opinion, as "Moraz, , Patrick & Bruford, Bill". the other possibility would be to list their albums twice, under Bruford, Bill and under Moraz, Patrick, but that does not convince me.
actually I believe the entry "Bill Bruford" should be deleted entirely; the albums listed there are either by him and Patrick Moraz or by a band called "Bruford"; they did not appear under the name "Bill Bruford" at all. you may think this is splitting hairs, but go and have a look at your record covers