Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Alternative Fuels
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedAlternative Fuels

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Poll Question: What do you think is the best choice for an alternative fuel?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
2 [22.22%]
0 [0.00%]
1 [11.11%]
4 [44.44%]
2 [22.22%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
markosherrera View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 01 2006
Location: World
Status: Offline
Points: 3252
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Alternative Fuels
    Posted: June 19 2008 at 22:55
BIO FUEL WITH GARBAGE
Hi progmaniacs of all the world
Back to Top
Garion81 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4338
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 19 2008 at 18:57

^ Thanks for sharing Sean here are some links (although some are no longer good) on the subject



"What are you going to do when that damn thing rusts?"
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20240
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 19 2008 at 08:06
None of the above: all those bio-ethanols are running up food inflation rates, and will have to be abadonned.
 
THE REAL SOLUTION!!!!
 
 
Remember that you've read here first.
 
The solution will be the car that runs on compressed air
 
Held in big 300 l tanks and 300 bar, there won't be anymore explosion or fumesor even excessive heat.
 
picture your Once the piston is above, you inject 300 bar air and the detention of the gas to 1 or 2 bar will push the cylinder down. No explosion, just a gas gaining back its proper state, and even provoking some cooling (rather than heating), probably causing some condension on the engine surface.
 
A french manufacturer has those vehicles close to join the marke^place and the car have autonomy of  km (better than electric, which take up hours to recharge the batteries)).
 
Tank stations you ask?: place every ten Km a windmikll (the most powerful can develop up to 2 MW) to drive a HP compressor to fill up a tank  of the station (in case of prolonged lack of wind, the compressor can work on electricuty as well): >>> the driver comes up to the tank and connects to his empty car tanks the hoses between the two, opens the valves and within 20 seconds, his car tanks are filled again....
 
No explosion, flame or fume. no air pollution both in driving around and producing the "fuel", this is almost like a miracle..... And it's about to happen (I'm fighting for it), too!!!
 
Compressed air is cheap and can be compressed cleanly (but must be filtered from water, oil and dust before reaching the "combustion chamber"
 
The big downside: if car makers don't lose jobs, anyone owning a compressor can have undefined access to an unlimited source of energy (ths isan enormous plus for you and I), which NOBODY amongst politicians and economists want >> too much loses in revenues. and a whole side of petro-industries becoming almost useless.
 
 
 
 
 
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
BroSpence View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 05 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2614
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2008 at 23:59
Originally posted by crimhead crimhead wrote:



Originally posted by Visitor13 Visitor13 wrote:

If someone out there has the clout to make us pay for gas as much as we do now, they also have the clout to prevent any alternative fules from gaining the upper hand. Learn to live on air/sunlight, and take the bus or walk. End of story.
This from the oil minister of the UAEALGARY, Alberta (Reuters) - Recent huge spikes in oil prices are
"crazy" and unrelated to supply and demand fundamentals as world
markets are adequately supplied with crude, the United Arab Emirates
energy minister told Reuters on Tuesday.<span id="midArticle_1"></span>
    

Still, the OPEC member would be pleased to join in a meeting with
oil-consuming countries to discuss runaway prices because they are
hurting economies, Mohammed al-Hamli said. Saudi Arabia will host such
a gathering later this month.

<span id="midArticle_2"></span>
    

"There is no shortage of crude oil in the market. Inventory levels
are huge," Hamli said after speaking at a conference in Canada.

<span id="midArticle_3"></span>
    

On Friday, U.S. crude jumped $10.75 to a record close of $138.54 a
barrel, capping a two-day surge of more than $16 and stunning analysts
who saw little fundamental reason for the spike.

<span id="midArticle_4"></span>
    

"If you look at prices moving by $10 a day, that doesn't make sense," Hamli said.

<span id="midArticle_5"></span>
    

"That's crazy."

<span id="midArticle_6"></span>
    

The UAE has spare capacity and is "quite happy" to supply more oil if called upon, he said.

So who is setting the price of this commodity if the suppliers are saying they have a glut of it? I agree that we have to get off of oil but our leaders are doing little to do so. Who is pulling their strings?




However, these are all statements coming from a man that works for a government that has built the majority of its wealth from oil production and is currently building an island because of that wealth.
Back to Top
BroSpence View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 05 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2614
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2008 at 23:53
Bio-Diesel and BioMass are the two best options as of now. Hemp is an incredible plant that is adaptable and can grow in almost any environment. It can produce over 20,000 different products that are now oil based. It was once an almost billion dollar crop before it was banned. The US constitution was written on a piece of paper made of hemp. Jefferson was a proponent of hemp. It would not legalize marijuana as the two are different derivatives of the cannabis plant. Hemp contains almost very little THC (not even a significant amount to get high off of) and can even be bred to have 0 (or extremely close to it). Hemp would not only help the oil dependency situation but also significantly reduce the number of trees that are cut down, but then all the loggers and oilmen would be very very upset. All restaurants use oils to cook food and then they just toss the stuff. Why not reuse it for your vehicle?

Also the hemp plant grows quite efficiently and is incredibly sustainable. Possibly more so than any other plant.


Ethanol is crap. Not only are the effects from using it terrible, but it also puts even more reliance on corn in the US. Corn is a bad. Or more accurately, Corn is good, but has become a legalized, abused whore and has messed up our agricultural system. You can thank the idiots on and around capital hill for that though.
Back to Top
Garion81 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4338
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2008 at 14:44
Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

Originally posted by Garion81 Garion81 wrote:

Stonie you really from San Bernardino?


Nah, Indiana...the ethanol capital of the world. LOL
 
Good to know the heartland is so well supplied. Wink
 
The reasonI asked is I actually live about 30-40 minutes from that notorious city.  It is everything Zappa wrote about and worse. 
LOL


"What are you going to do when that damn thing rusts?"
Back to Top
Relayer09 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 31 2007
Location: Ohio
Status: Offline
Points: 314
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2008 at 11:16
Originally posted by HughesJB4 HughesJB4 wrote:

I can't picture Hydrogen becoming a really viable solution for at least 20 years yet. Hell, the hybrid car hasn't even really taken off.
 
Not according to Honda, they are unable to keep up with demand for hybrids now.
 
If you lose your temper, you've lost the arguement. -Proverb
Back to Top
Relayer09 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 31 2007
Location: Ohio
Status: Offline
Points: 314
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2008 at 11:14
Originally posted by crimhead crimhead wrote:

Originally posted by Relayer09 Relayer09 wrote:

Honda rolled it's hydrogen car out today. Too bad I don't live in southern California.
 


With only 3 places to fuel up in the L.A. metro I wouldn't run out and get one. The $600 a month lease would be another stumbling block as well.

Agreed, but this is the first step in the right direction for emisson free vehicles. This is only in the prototype stage and once the refueling infrastructure is in place prices for these vehicles would drop dramatically for consumers.
If you lose your temper, you've lost the arguement. -Proverb
Back to Top
Petrovsk Mizinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 17 2008 at 09:22
I can't picture Hydrogen becoming a really viable solution for at least 20 years yet. Hell, the hybrid car hasn't even really taken off.
Back to Top
crimhead View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: October 10 2006
Location: Missouri
Status: Offline
Points: 19236
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 16 2008 at 18:49
Originally posted by Relayer09 Relayer09 wrote:

Honda rolled it's hydrogen car out today. Too bad I don't live in southern California.
 


With only 3 places to fuel up in the L.A. metro I wouldn't run out and get one. The $600 a month lease would be another stumbling block as well.
Back to Top
Relayer09 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 31 2007
Location: Ohio
Status: Offline
Points: 314
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 16 2008 at 15:47
Honda rolled it's hydrogen car out today. Too bad I don't live in southern California.
 
If you lose your temper, you've lost the arguement. -Proverb
Back to Top
Visitor13 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member

VIP Member

Joined: February 02 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 4702
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 16 2008 at 05:42
Originally posted by Passionist Passionist wrote:


There's a petition or something at Facebook, that's gathering names for lower gasoline prices. A friend of mine joined and asked me to join too. I told her, that I find the whole idea sh*t and I'd rather bring down any price in the world than gasoline.


To do that first you'd need to bring down the price of gasoline.
Back to Top
Passionist View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 14 2005
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 1119
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 16 2008 at 05:09
I think the whole idea of driving 100 miles just for the sake of it is pretty f***ed up. Yeah, sure, electricity won't last that long, but hey... Personally I'd take a train. I happen to be blessed enough to have a nice train system and when i move to Helsinki there'll be trams everywhere so I won't have to go allt he way by bike. Though back in the old days it was no problem for the old people to just ride 100 miles to go look for work, or that's what they say all the time. In fact, cycling some 50 miles a day wouldn't hurt anyone either. I myself only go 20 or so miles a day, to the shop and back.

There's a petition or something at Facebook, that's gathering names for lower gasoline prices. A friend of mine joined and asked me to join too. I told her, that I find the whole idea sh*t and I'd rather bring down any price in the world than gasoline. Not that I hate it, but seriously, using all the gas 'till we have none left isn't really the solution we should be looking for. I personalyl don't think, that with cars, the reason we should develope them further is the growing lack of oil but what a million or more gas motors are doing to the environment.

Also, notice, that china is currently building up their "car culture" faster than anything. I find people moralizing over it, though still driving their own cars and saying that they have one already, there shouldn't be more. But the truth is, in 20-30 years we'll most likely have twice as much cars and individual personal forms of transportation than what we have now. Well, if the east is innovative, they might build a society around electric cars or rice-field ethanol. After all, rice-wine is too awful to drink anyway.

Personally I'd prefer transportation gates like the ones in Baldur's Gate2, or motorbikes that run on squirrel juice and play a happy ice-cream van tunes while triving. Oops, and I ranted again...
Back to Top
KoS View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 17 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Points: 16310
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 15 2008 at 23:01
From Syriana:
"You know what the business world thinks of you? They think a hundred years ago you were living in tents out here in the desert chopping each other's heads off and that's exactly where you'll be in another hundred years"
Back to Top
Relayer09 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 31 2007
Location: Ohio
Status: Offline
Points: 314
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 15 2008 at 19:13

AP
UN chief: Saudi to boost oil production
Sunday June 15, 5:46 pm ET

UN chief says Saudi Arabia plans to increase oil production by 200,000 barrels a day

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia (AP) -- Saudi Arabia plans to increase its oil production by 200,000 barrels a day next month, the kingdom's oil minister told U.N. chief Ban Ki-moon on Sunday, according to Ban's spokesman.
 
The U.N. secretary-general met with Oil Minister Ali al-Naimi in the port city of Jiddah during a one-day trip to the world's largest oil producer.

Farhan Haq, a spokesman who is traveling with Ban, said in an e-mail that the U.N. chief said al-Naimi told him Saudi Arabia would increase oil production by 200,000 barrels a day from June to July. In May, the kingdom increased its production by 300,000.

By July, production should be at 9.7 million barrels a day, Haq said.

Ban also said Saudi Arabia understands that the current price of oil, which topped $139 per barrel earlier this month, is not normal, according to the official Saudi Press Agency.

"The king believes that the current oil prices are abnormally high, and he is ready to restore prices to their appropriate levels," SPA quoted Ban as telling reporters in Jiddah. The report carried by SPA was in Arabic, and it did not say what language Ban spoke in.

Saudi Arabia is concerned that sustained high oil prices will eventually slacken the world's appetite for oil, affecting the kingdom in the long run.

The kingdom has called for a meeting of oil producing and consuming countries on June 22 in Jiddah to discuss ways of dealing with soaring energy prices.

I Think they're getting a little concerned that western countries are fed up and may very well be serious this time about alternative fuels. I guess having oil become as worthless as sand doesn't sound like a very lucrative prospect for them. I say we convert anyway just for laughs. LOLLOLLOLLOLLOL
If you lose your temper, you've lost the arguement. -Proverb
Back to Top
rileydog22 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: August 24 2005
Location: New Jersey
Status: Offline
Points: 8844
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 14 2008 at 23:59
I think that fuel gel should be looked into as an energy source.

Which way is it to Bryyo? 

Back to Top
Henry Plainview View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 14 2008 at 19:48
Ethanol is a very well publicized scam. It's barely an energy gain, if at all.

Also, ETHANOL INTO FOOD!! isn't quite true yet.
if you own a sodastream i hate you
Back to Top
Visitor13 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member

VIP Member

Joined: February 02 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 4702
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 14 2008 at 14:15
^ well, there you go. Someone's making billions on oil out there and they're getting away with it.
Back to Top
crimhead View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: October 10 2006
Location: Missouri
Status: Offline
Points: 19236
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 14 2008 at 13:37
Originally posted by Visitor13 Visitor13 wrote:

If someone out there has the clout to make us pay for gas as much as we do now, they also have the clout to prevent any alternative fules from gaining the upper hand. Learn to live on air/sunlight, and take the bus or walk. End of story.


This from the oil minister of the UAE


ALGARY, Alberta (Reuters) - Recent huge spikes in oil prices are "crazy" and unrelated to supply and demand fundamentals as world markets are adequately supplied with crude, the United Arab Emirates energy minister told Reuters on Tuesday.

Still, the OPEC member would be pleased to join in a meeting with oil-consuming countries to discuss runaway prices because they are hurting economies, Mohammed al-Hamli said. Saudi Arabia will host such a gathering later this month.

"There is no shortage of crude oil in the market. Inventory levels are huge," Hamli said after speaking at a conference in Canada.

On Friday, U.S. crude jumped $10.75 to a record close of $138.54 a barrel, capping a two-day surge of more than $16 and stunning analysts who saw little fundamental reason for the spike.

"If you look at prices moving by $10 a day, that doesn't make sense," Hamli said.

"That's crazy."

The UAE has spare capacity and is "quite happy" to supply more oil if called upon, he said.



So who is setting the price of this commodity if the suppliers are saying they have a glut of it? I agree that we have to get off of oil but our leaders are doing little to do so. Who is pulling their strings?




Edited by crimhead - June 15 2008 at 13:40
Back to Top
Petrovsk Mizinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 14 2008 at 06:48
Originally posted by KoS KoS wrote:

Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

Originally posted by KoS KoS wrote:

The only problem is the charging cycle.
No way in hell am I(or the public in general) going to go about 100 miles and then have to charge for more than 4 hours just to go 100 miles more.


That doesn't sound bad to me at all! Only problematic for long road trips. Who makes a commute to work of more than 100 miles a day? Just charge it overnight...
Me, when I'm bored.
So I wouldn't be able to go to San Francisco not even Santa Barbara without renting a car or making it a multi-day trip.
Plus, what about the Summer and Winter storms.
You think with all those storms that power is going to be continuous.
Just last winter some people had no power for weeks.


Siam's got a good point here.
Storms in Melbourne are fortunately not as harsh as they are in some of the other state capital cities, although back in January literally hundreds of thousands of people had no power to their homes after a storm for well over a week, even maybe 2 weeks or more. I was lucky in that my western inner south west suburban area was only affected for 6-8 hours at most.
In the next few years/decades a lot of work should be done to ensure electricity infrastructure is more weather resistant.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.207 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.