Forum Home Forum Home > Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements > Help us improve the site
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - A change of location needed?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedA change of location needed?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 4>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
sircosick View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: January 29 2007
Location: Chile
Status: Offline
Points: 1264
Direct Link To This Post Topic: A change of location needed?
    Posted: October 09 2007 at 17:26
You're right Frump; for that reason I put the starting statement as senseless; just turn back the page, scroll up and take a look Smile
The best you can is good enough...
Back to Top
FruMp View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 16 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 322
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 08 2007 at 05:40
Originally posted by sircosick sircosick wrote:

Originally posted by FruMp FruMp wrote:

Originally posted by sircosick sircosick wrote:

Originally posted by FruMp FruMp wrote:

Radiohead?...

 Krautrock?...


Check some wikipedia articles. I dunno that much about krautrock, but if you search there you'll find a few articles related, in which I'm sure I did read something about Radiohead influences..... say they took, certainly, influences from that sub-genre, specially Can.


Influences.

A lot of my favourite metal bands have jazz influences.


And what were we talkin' about? Wink


Well my point was those metal bands have jazz influences but are not even remotely close to being anything like jazz, they're on the opposite side of the musical spectrum. Same applies to Radiohead and Krautrock.
Back to Top
sircosick View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: January 29 2007
Location: Chile
Status: Offline
Points: 1264
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 06 2007 at 08:58
Originally posted by FruMp FruMp wrote:

Originally posted by sircosick sircosick wrote:

Originally posted by FruMp FruMp wrote:

Radiohead?...

 Krautrock?...


Check some wikipedia articles. I dunno that much about krautrock, but if you search there you'll find a few articles related, in which I'm sure I did read something about Radiohead influences..... say they took, certainly, influences from that sub-genre, specially Can.


Influences.

A lot of my favourite metal bands have jazz influences.


And what were we talkin' about? Wink
The best you can is good enough...
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 05 2007 at 07:56
and so for all those reasons and many more, that's where they're staying Stern%20Smile

Edited by darqdean - October 05 2007 at 08:05
What?
Back to Top
chamberry View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 24 2005
Location: Puerto Rico
Status: Offline
Points: 9008
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 05 2007 at 07:52
Krautrock is more of a movement than a genre so only 70's band can get in. There are A LOT of krautrock sounding bands in the psychedelic / space rock genre because they aren't from that certain time span where Krautrock ruled the world.

Although I agree that Kid A and Amnesiac do have a strong Krautrock influence, they wont get in because of what I previously mentioned.

They where kicked out of Post-Rock because they simply aren't a Post-Rock (Unless you're reading it literally). People where implying that they invented the whole Post-Rock genre! Now that's scary...

I think Radiohead are prog. OK Computer was a prog album every way you look at it (it even had a mellotron!!!Tongue) and they continued their prog explorations by going all German on us with Kid A  and Amnesiac to a slight extent which if you consider Krautrock as part of the prog umbrella (like most of us do) then they're still being prog.

Don't know much of them after Amnesiac or before The Bends so I can't comment on the rest of their albums, but they certainly didn't started as a prog band and from what I've heard they left their experimental ways in their 2003 album...

I say Crossover Prog!



Back to Top
FruMp View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 16 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 322
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 05 2007 at 07:14
Originally posted by sircosick sircosick wrote:

Originally posted by FruMp FruMp wrote:

Radiohead?...

 Krautrock?...


Check some wikipedia articles. I dunno that much about krautrock, but if you search there you'll find a few articles related, in which I'm sure I did read something about Radiohead influences..... say they took, certainly, influences from that sub-genre, specially Can.


Influences.

A lot of my favourite metal bands have jazz influences.
Back to Top
sircosick View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: January 29 2007
Location: Chile
Status: Offline
Points: 1264
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 04 2007 at 22:22
Originally posted by FruMp FruMp wrote:

Radiohead?...

 Krautrock?...


Check some wikipedia articles. I dunno that much about krautrock, but if you search there you'll find a few articles related, in which I'm sure I did read something about Radiohead influences..... say they took, certainly, influences from that sub-genre, specially Can.
The best you can is good enough...
Back to Top
FruMp View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 16 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 322
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 03 2007 at 06:06
Radiohead?...

 Krautrock?...
Back to Top
sircosick View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: January 29 2007
Location: Chile
Status: Offline
Points: 1264
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 30 2007 at 19:25
^ Mike is right. In that case, I would also call 'em progressive electronic or krautrock, since both Kid A and Amnesiac have respective influences..... but that's not enough for a label.
The best you can is good enough...
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21680
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2007 at 11:02
Originally posted by FruMp FruMp wrote:


I don't think radiohead are prog, relativity shouldn't come into it, there should be benchmark standards (although these can only be arbitrary as it's subjective in the end)

Also I don't know what anyone else thinks but if radiohead aren't in prog related then I think they would be better suited to post-rock/experimental, anyone agree?


IMHO only Kid A qualifies as Post Rock/Experimental ... so: no, they would not fit in that category very well.
Release Polls

Listened to:
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2007 at 06:26
Originally posted by Terra Australis Terra Australis wrote:

Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Originally posted by FruMp FruMp wrote:

Well to me post rock is taking the rock format and extrapolating it into longer mainly instrumental non-standard rock songs, almost ambient music with rock instrumentation (not to say that it excludes any other instruments).

Like any progressive sub-genre though the boundaries blur and there is always a lot of debate between what is and isn't in certain genres - the best way to get a grip of what defines post-rock is really to listen to a whole lot of post-rock bands, which is how I came to know.


I havne't heard enough of it to form a defintion in my head... always been curious about it though.

Anyhow... take a read of this...  explains better than I could our thoughts on Radiohead

One of favorite albums...

http://www.progarchives.com/Review.asp?id=33814

they stay Xover...


I agree, Radiohead are progressive in the sense they make what they like and it is different (or was when it was made).

OK Computer is a great CD.


Clap
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Terra Australis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 03 2006
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 809
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2007 at 06:01
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

Originally posted by FruMp FruMp wrote:

Well to me post rock is taking the rock format and extrapolating it into longer mainly instrumental non-standard rock songs, almost ambient music with rock instrumentation (not to say that it excludes any other instruments).

Like any progressive sub-genre though the boundaries blur and there is always a lot of debate between what is and isn't in certain genres - the best way to get a grip of what defines post-rock is really to listen to a whole lot of post-rock bands, which is how I came to know.


I havne't heard enough of it to form a defintion in my head... always been curious about it though.

Anyhow... take a read of this...  explains better than I could our thoughts on Radiohead

One of favorite albums...

http://www.progarchives.com/Review.asp?id=33814

they stay Xover...


I agree, Radiohead are progressive in the sense they make what they like and it is different (or was when it was made).

OK Computer is a great CD.
Allomerus. Music with progressive intent.

http://allomerus.bandcamp.com
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2007 at 05:44
Originally posted by FruMp FruMp wrote:

Well to me post rock is taking the rock format and extrapolating it into longer mainly instrumental non-standard rock songs, almost ambient music with rock instrumentation (not to say that it excludes any other instruments).

Like any progressive sub-genre though the boundaries blur and there is always a lot of debate between what is and isn't in certain genres - the best way to get a grip of what defines post-rock is really to listen to a whole lot of post-rock bands, which is how I came to know.


I havne't heard enough of it to form a defintion in my head... always been curious about it though.

Anyhow... take a read of this...  explains better than I could our thoughts on Radiohead

One of favorite albums...

http://www.progarchives.com/Review.asp?id=33814

they stay Xover...
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
FruMp View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 16 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 322
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2007 at 05:32
Well to me post rock is taking the rock format and extrapolating it into longer mainly instrumental non-standard rock songs, almost ambient music with rock instrumentation (not to say that it excludes any other instruments).

Like any progressive sub-genre though the boundaries blur and there is always a lot of debate between what is and isn't in certain genres - the best way to get a grip of what defines post-rock is really to listen to a whole lot of post-rock bands, which is how I came to know.

I don't really mind where Radiohead are put to be honest I'm not a fan or active listener, and I don't think it's possible to give an exact definition of post-rock.


Edited by FruMp - September 29 2007 at 05:34
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 28 2007 at 23:36
Originally posted by FruMp FruMp wrote:



I don't think radiohead are prog, relativity shouldn't come into it, there should be benchmark standards (although these can only be arbitrary as it's subjective in the end)

Also I don't know what anyone else thinks but if radiohead aren't in prog related then I think they would be better suited to post-rock/experimental, anyone agree?


hahhaha.... I'll make you a deal.... I will bring up with Dean the idea of moving Radiohead.. IF....IF you can define exactly what post-rock is.  I have have searching for an answer to that  since I came to PA's LOL Let's see if you can answer the question that even the collabs that manage it can't answer.. unless you count... you know it when you hear it hahhahaha.


Edited by micky - September 28 2007 at 23:37
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
FruMp View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 16 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 322
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 28 2007 at 02:25
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Originally posted by P.H.P. P.H.P. wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:



Wow ... remind me to never take anything you say seriously again. Even on Pablo Honey Radiohead were like 10x more progressive than anything Oasis ever did - and don't get me started about Coldplay either. And of course Radiohead didn't stop there - it's their least progressive album.

So Oasis is Prog then?!?! LOLLOL at least you're implying that, be careful you too with that kind of considerations hehe. Wink



I'm not implying that at all ...

"progressive" is just an attribute of music ... a piece of music can be progressive and still not qualify to be called "prog" - or "prog-related". Also when I say that "x is more progressive than y" that doesn't imply that y is progressive ... in the above case it's kind of obvious that I don't consider Oasis to be progressive.

Originally posted by P.H.P. P.H.P. wrote:



So you're also saying that every Radiohead album is Progressive, well then you should also tell me when you're kidding and when you're not, because that remains a joke to me, really. LOLLOL




I'm not saying that. Pablo Honey contains some remarkable songs with twisted time signatures and harmonic concepts that could not be found in any Oasis song (for example). This doesn't make the album prog, but it's still more progressive than Oasis.



I don't think radiohead are prog, relativity shouldn't come into it, there should be benchmark standards (although these can only be arbitrary as it's subjective in the end)

Also I don't know what anyone else thinks but if radiohead aren't in prog related then I think they would be better suited to post-rock/experimental, anyone agree?
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21680
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 26 2007 at 03:28
Originally posted by P.H.P. P.H.P. wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:



Wow ... remind me to never take anything you say seriously again. Even on Pablo Honey Radiohead were like 10x more progressive than anything Oasis ever did - and don't get me started about Coldplay either. And of course Radiohead didn't stop there - it's their least progressive album.

So Oasis is Prog then?!?! LOLLOL at least you're implying that, be careful you too with that kind of considerations hehe. Wink



I'm not implying that at all ...

"progressive" is just an attribute of music ... a piece of music can be progressive and still not qualify to be called "prog" - or "prog-related". Also when I say that "x is more progressive than y" that doesn't imply that y is progressive ... in the above case it's kind of obvious that I don't consider Oasis to be progressive.

Originally posted by P.H.P. P.H.P. wrote:



So you're also saying that every Radiohead album is Progressive, well then you should also tell me when you're kidding and when you're not, because that remains a joke to me, really. LOLLOL




I'm not saying that. Pablo Honey contains some remarkable songs with twisted time signatures and harmonic concepts that could not be found in any Oasis song (for example). This doesn't make the album prog, but it's still more progressive than Oasis.



Edited by MikeEnRegalia - September 26 2007 at 03:37
Release Polls

Listened to:
Back to Top
P.H.P. View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 01 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 334
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 25 2007 at 22:58
Originally posted by sircosick sircosick wrote:

Micky is right from wherever you see it, PHP. The crossover team supposes to have expert guys on the matter (and I personally don't suppose that; I consider it as a fact), and you're far from being an expert in a music area you don't aprecciate and, according to your posts, also don't listen to enough to give strong arguments.

Simply, you cannot get Radiohead maybe as the average prog band uses to do with you and then you say they aren't prog at all. And that's valid and arguably, I also doubt their progressiveness, but the arguments you gave simply reveal your lack of knowledge about the band in question, like comparing them with Coldplay. Obviously, we all have different ways to get the prog and say how pure it is or not..... In other words, it's you alone against the crossover team, despite I'm with you in some points.

You've demonstrated a great knowledge in a huge lot of prog areas, but this time I think you're in a small boat. WinkBig%20smile


Thanks. Embarrassed

but em, I mentioned Coldplay or Oasis because they both are alternative, and both are what is known as brit-pop, so as Radiohead is, but this last band I admit it is a bit different from those I named. Tongue

I can appreciate music in many forms, just I can't like everything, we all have our own tastes, but just as a Prog dude told me there's music that is "useless", like some alternative bands like Portishead, I can agree with him in many points, so be aware that alternative isn't always good, it's rather just average and poor music, IMO, I don't find there much to like.
 
Back to Top
P.H.P. View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 01 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 334
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 25 2007 at 22:41
Yeah, certainly I'm far from being an alterno-guy. LOL
...I've heard some alternative music but it just can't reach me, hahah, Prog is my cup of tea! Big%20smile

EDIT: But remember we're in a Prog site, and I'm giving my oppinion. Embarrassed



Edited by P.H.P. - September 25 2007 at 22:48
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 25 2007 at 21:54
Originally posted by sircosick sircosick wrote:

Micky is right from wherever you see it, PHP. The crossover team supposes to have expert guys on the matter (and I personally don't suppose that; I consider it as a fact), and you're far from being an expert in a music area you don't aprecciate and, according to your posts, also don't listen to enough to give strong arguments.

Simply, you cannot get Radiohead maybe as the average prog band uses to do with you and then you say they aren't prog at all. And that's valid and arguably, I also doubt their progressiveness, but the arguments you gave simply reveal your lack of knowledge about the band in question, like comparing them with Coldplay. Obviously, we all have different ways to get the prog and say how pure it is or not..... In other words, it's you alone against the crossover team, despite I'm with you in some points.

You've demonstrated a great knowledge in a huge lot of prog areas, but this time I think you're in a small boat. WinkBig%20smile



boat?.... maybe a rubber dingy perhaps.... and Dean and I ride in style in one of those supped up submarines with a bitchin sound system and... oh yeah....live nukes . .which we like to drop on the heads of those who displease us.  For the 100th time...  these  subs are not exact.. just a guide to help you stear your PROG listening tastes. 


Edited by micky - September 25 2007 at 21:54
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 4>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.171 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.