Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
|
Topic: Is it legal to do a cover without permiss Posted: April 13 2007 at 18:57 |
Jim Garten wrote:
How does this affect the UK's own Cliff Richard, who recorded a cover version of 'The Lord's Prayer' a couple of years ago? Would he have to obtain permission from the one and living God, or being a Christian himself, is consent implicit? data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d56eb/d56ebc11a00088a4d36a1a4e38a42ee662e96f2d" alt="" |
Well, it's hard because the limit for an artistic material to be public domain is 120 years after the death of the author.
Independently that Jesus resurrected, his official dead was in 33 AD, so the official date in which the Lord's Prayer becomes public domain is 158 AD data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de800/de8000c24f6526755c7a3cf350454d63e906faa1" alt="Wink"
BTW: I don't believe that Israel or Rome had signed WIPO or Berne Conventions in 32 or 31 AD,. To be honest I doubt Jesius copyrighted the prayer because in those days there was no copyright. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/959ca/959ca2d6d88148d24699142aaed89a741d71a1b9" alt="LOL"
Iván
Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - April 13 2007 at 18:59
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Kid-A
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 613
|
Posted: April 13 2007 at 16:14 |
I'm sorry, but that's the sort of law which can f*ck right off. I'm sure no artists mind their songs being covered by pub bands, and why is that a problem to anyone? It's just another example of money-greedy record companies trying to rip people off.
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
NutterAlert
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 07 2005
Location: In transition
Status: Offline
Points: 2808
|
Posted: April 13 2007 at 09:06 |
I misread the title of this thread and thought it said "cover without a penis"
But it didn't, so no alarms.
|
Proud to be an un-banned member since 2005
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Jim Garten
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin & Razor Guru
Joined: February 02 2004
Location: South England
Status: Offline
Points: 14693
|
Posted: April 13 2007 at 08:59 |
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
Atkingani wrote:
Vatican is out.... this means the padres can record Black Sabbath and give nothing to Ozzy & Co. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/752fa/752fab6abb71de262ef9322bd8091285529736ae" alt="Evil%20Smile" |
Vatican is not part of the UN (To avoid political participation), but it's a nation and have signed the WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization), you can find them in the above list as Holy See.
Even more, The Holy See signed the WIPO in 1975, so was one of the first countries toi do it.
So, no you can't copy Black Sabbath neither Hells Bells by AC/DC data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de800/de8000c24f6526755c7a3cf350454d63e906faa1" alt="Wink"
Iván |
How does this affect the UK's own Cliff Richard, who recorded a cover version of 'The Lord's Prayer' a couple of years ago? Would he have to obtain permission from the one and living God, or being a Christian himself, is consent implicit?
|
Jon Lord 1941 - 2012
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
MarkOne
Forum Groupie
Joined: August 18 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 90
|
Posted: April 12 2007 at 10:51 |
Having looked into this in some detail, I can give you the UK situation, and probably the US one too, in outline at least. With the caveat that I am not a lawyer and if you are unsure you should seek proper independent advice.
Live music. As someone stated above, live music venues pay money to be licenced. In the UK this is administered by the PRS. So you can play those cover versions OK.
Recorded music. This is administered in the UK by the MCPS. If you record it, you need to get it cleared. There is no exception to this. If you post a cover on myspace and it's not cleared, it's illegal. Even if you don't sell anything.
If a cover song is going to appear on a CD you need to obtain a "mechanical licence" which is my reading of the MCPS info means that you need to pay 8.5% of the unit price pro-rata in time by the total length of the CD. (I.e. if you have a 6 minute track which is the only cover on a 60 minute disk, then you need to pay 8.5% of 10% of the cover price to the MCPS.)
if it is web-based you need to obtain a digital licence. In the UK if this is likely to mean less than 45,000 streams it will cost you ... wait for it... £100 for a "Limited Online Exploitation Licence "
In the US things are a little easier. the Harry Fox agency ( http://www.harryfox.com/index.jsp) handle things painlessly on behalf of most publishers and you can even pay by credit card online.
Other countries have similar schemes. You will have to research it for yourself.
But basically. If you are going to present a version of someone's music in any form, CD, MP3, stream, wax cylinder, or crystalline lattice memory player... THAT SOMEONE IS DUE A CUT, AND NEEDS TO GET PAID.
Hope this is helpful
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Atkingani
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: October 21 2005
Location: Terra Brasilis
Status: Offline
Points: 12288
|
Posted: April 11 2007 at 22:49 |
|
Guigo
~~~~~~
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
andu
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 27 2006
Location: Romania
Status: Offline
Points: 3089
|
Posted: April 09 2007 at 13:38 |
Atkingani wrote:
Other "sees" existed in the past like some muslim sultanates in the Middle East, North Africa and Asia Major, that were independent then; also some buddhist holy cities. I think that some of them have until now some autonomous status but nothing compared with The Vatican - a real nation. |
I see you have knowledge on international affairs... I knew I was right about you being a state president (or a Prime Minister, maybe?) !!! data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f640e/f640e972ca4e739e7a74acbcde0b0a6b6023d619" alt="Tongue" Stop hiding, reveal yourself!
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Barla
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 13 2006
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 4309
|
Posted: April 09 2007 at 13:30 |
I remember on the 15th birthday of a female friend we had to pay some extra monay directed to the copyright of the songs we were covering just to prevent future problems. It wasn't more than $50 (17 dollars) and we played like 7 songs. But I don't know what's the situation with myspace.com, I suppose they don't control anything!
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Atkingani
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: October 21 2005
Location: Terra Brasilis
Status: Offline
Points: 12288
|
Posted: April 08 2007 at 15:56 |
andu wrote:
The Holy Mountain of Athos (whatever it's actual name is) is also a state, but I don't know how it's special status is defined in the international community. They have a capital "city" and a government, the "Protaton", which consist of the council of protos (the leaders of the monasteries). They have their own legislation only on the matters important to them, for the rest they follow Greece's policy (like in external and internal affairs). They have their own economy laws, for example they don't apply some taxes, so if you buy a candle, an icon, an art album, a CD or something to eat, it will be around 30% cheaper than in inland Greece. They have foreigner rules: one has to get a residence permit in order to be allowed to enter; there is a bureau in the town where you take the boat to sail to the Mountain's ports (there is no terrestrial connection) which serves as a kind of consulate; one needs to take the short permit there, or show an invitation from one of the monasteries to get the extended permit.
I've been there, it's special. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78bd8/78bd82ab230f22fe8ea2a5f9673062e3f4e970e7" alt="Smile"
|
Other "sees" existed in the past like some muslim sultanates in the Middle East, North Africa and Asia Major, that were independent then; also some buddhist holy cities. I think that some of them have until now some autonomous status but nothing compared with The Vatican - a real nation.
|
Guigo
~~~~~~
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
andu
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 27 2006
Location: Romania
Status: Offline
Points: 3089
|
Posted: April 08 2007 at 14:27 |
The Holy Mountain of Athos (whatever it's actual name is) is also a state, but I don't know how it's special status is defined in the international community. They have a capital "city" and a government, the "Protaton", which consist of the council of protos (the leaders of the monasteries). They have their own legislation only on the matters important to them, for the rest they follow Greece's policy (like in external and internal affairs). They have their own economy laws, for example they don't apply some taxes, so if you buy a candle, an icon, an art album, a CD or something to eat, it will be around 30% cheaper than in inland Greece. They have foreigner rules: one has to get a residence permit in order to be allowed to enter; there is a bureau in the town where you take the boat to sail to the Mountain's ports (there is no terrestrial connection) which serves as a kind of consulate; one needs to take the short permit there, or show an invitation from one of the monasteries to get the extended permit. I've been there, it's special.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
|
Posted: April 08 2007 at 13:05 |
Atkingani wrote:
Madre de Diós, Iván! I searched City of Vatican, The Vatican... never was able to figure that the only Holy See in the World is from our beloved RC Church! data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b5f7/7b5f7509da8c945afbea45412cf846bc15abd048" alt="Embarrassed"
|
Yep, it's the only Holy See with status of nation.
I also thought Vatican was the official name, but this is copied from the WIPO page, so seems the real name accepted by other nations is Holy See.
Iván
Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - April 08 2007 at 13:30
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Atkingani
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: October 21 2005
Location: Terra Brasilis
Status: Offline
Points: 12288
|
Posted: April 08 2007 at 12:45 |
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
Atkingani wrote:
Vatican is out.... this means the padres can record Black Sabbath and give nothing to Ozzy & Co. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/752fa/752fab6abb71de262ef9322bd8091285529736ae" alt="Evil%20Smile" |
Vatican is not part of the UN (To avoid political participation), but it's a nation and have signed the WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization), you can find them in the above list as Holy See.
Even more, The Holy See signed the WIPO in 1975, so was one of the first countries toi do it.
So, no you can't copy Black Sabbath neither Hells Bells by AC/DC data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de800/de8000c24f6526755c7a3cf350454d63e906faa1" alt="Wink"
Iván |
Madre de Diós, Iván! I searched City of Vatican, The Vatican... never was able to figure that the only Holy See in the World is from our beloved RC Church! data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b5f7/7b5f7509da8c945afbea45412cf846bc15abd048" alt="Embarrassed"
|
Guigo
~~~~~~
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
|
Posted: April 08 2007 at 12:42 |
Atkingani wrote:
Vatican is out.... this means the padres can record Black Sabbath and give nothing to Ozzy & Co. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/752fa/752fab6abb71de262ef9322bd8091285529736ae" alt="Evil%20Smile" |
Vatican is not part of the UN (To avoid political participation), but it's a nation and have signed the WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization), you can find them in the above list as Holy See.
Even more, The Holy See signed the WIPO in 1975, so was one of the first countries toi do it.
So, no you can't copy Black Sabbath neither Hells Bells by AC/DC data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de800/de8000c24f6526755c7a3cf350454d63e906faa1" alt="Wink"
Iván
Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - April 08 2007 at 12:43
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Atkingani
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: October 21 2005
Location: Terra Brasilis
Status: Offline
Points: 12288
|
Posted: April 08 2007 at 12:38 |
Vatican is out.... this means the padres can record Black Sabbath and give nothing to Ozzy & Co.
|
Guigo
~~~~~~
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
|
Posted: April 08 2007 at 12:33 |
Easy Livin wrote:
Can't be many more than 184 countries in the world, can there? |
Yes you're right Bob, there are 192 nations recognized by the UN (This makes 193 because the Vatican has chosen not to be a member of the UN and one that used to be a country but no longer is Taiwan) but not sure how many more not recogtnized there are, because every day a small country appears somewhere splitting from an already small country.
Most of the countries that have not signed the treaty are those who are in terrible civil wars and have other issues to worry about.
Iván
Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - April 08 2007 at 12:38
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Easy Livin
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
|
Posted: April 08 2007 at 11:07 |
Can't be many more than 184 countries in the world, can there?
Edited by Easy Livin - April 08 2007 at 11:08
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
bhikkhu
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 06 2006
Location: A² Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 5109
|
Posted: April 08 2007 at 05:26 |
Chus wrote:
bhikkhu wrote:
In an establishment that offers live music, they pay a fee to AASCAP and BMI. That is supposed to cover the copyright problem. If you put it on the net, it could be considered a broadcast, and therefore an infringement. I wouldn't chance it. |
Yes, I got more or less the same answer from Ivan. Thanks bhikkhu data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a3e3f/a3e3fe75ebb670798515bab1905bd87e3c3c70a4" alt="Smile" . |
Wow, and I'm not even an attorney. I guess we do spend too much time together.
Actually, I know this from having worked in several places with live music.
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Chus
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: Venezuela
Status: Offline
Points: 1991
|
Posted: April 08 2007 at 02:34 |
The Whistler wrote:
Crap. Guess that'll go into my email to Ian too. |
Yes, you can ask him permission while giving him a brown moose ice cream data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de800/de8000c24f6526755c7a3cf350454d63e906faa1" alt="Wink" .
And Thanks again Ivan, I'm sure this post made public will answer people here with the same question.
|
Jesus Gabriel
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
The Whistler
Prog Reviewer
Joined: August 30 2006
Location: LA, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 7113
|
Posted: April 08 2007 at 01:36 |
Crap. Guess that'll go into my email to Ian too.
|
"There seem to be quite a large percentage of young American boys out there tonight. A long way from home, eh? Well so are we... Gotta stick together." -I. Anderson
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
|
Posted: April 08 2007 at 01:34 |
As I toild you omn a PM Chus, if you live in one of the 163 countries that signed the Berne Convention, it's illegal because the article 6 says:
(1) Independently of the author's economic rights, and even after the transfer of the said rights, the author shall have the right to claim authorship of the work and to object to any distortion, mutilation or other modification of, or other derogatory action in relation to, the said work, which would be prejudicial to his honor or reputation. |
The text doesn't mention if there must be profit or not.
Now I have to give you worst news, the list of coutries who signed the WIPO Convention (Which accepts the Berne Convention) is bigger, 184 nations:
Afghanistan |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
December 13, 2005 |
Details |
Albania |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
June 30, 1992 |
Details |
Algeria |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
April 16, 1975 |
Details |
Andorra |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
October 28, 1994 |
Details |
Angola |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
April 15, 1985 |
Details |
Antigua and Barbuda |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
March 17, 2000 |
Details |
Argentina |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
October 8, 1980 |
Details |
Armenia |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
April 22, 1993 |
Details |
Australia |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
August 10, 1972 |
Details |
Austria |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
August 11, 1973 |
Details |
Azerbaijan |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
December 25, 1995 |
Details |
Bahamas |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
January 4, 1977 |
Details |
Bahrain |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
June 22, 1995 |
Details |
Bangladesh |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
May 11, 1985 |
Details |
Barbados |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
October 5, 1979 |
Details |
Belarus |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
April 26, 1970 |
Details |
Belgium |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
January 31, 1975 |
Details |
Belize |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
June 17, 2000 |
Details |
Benin |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
March 9, 1975 |
Details |
Bhutan |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
March 16, 1994 |
Details |
Bolivia |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
July 6, 1993 |
Details |
Bosnia and Herzegovina |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
March 1, 1992 |
Details |
Botswana |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
April 15, 1998 |
Details |
Brazil |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
March 20, 1975 |
Details |
Brunei Darussalam |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
April 21, 1994 |
Details |
Bulgaria |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
May 19, 1970 |
Details |
Burkina Faso |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
August 23, 1975 |
Details |
Burundi |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
March 30, 1977 |
Details |
Cambodia |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
July 25, 1995 |
Details |
Cameroon |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
November 3, 1973 |
Details |
Canada |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
June 26, 1970 |
Details |
Cape Verde |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
July 7, 1997 |
Details |
Central African Republic |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
August 23, 1978 |
Details |
Chad |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
September 26, 1970 |
Details |
Chile |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
June 25, 1975 |
Details |
China |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
June 3, 1980 |
Details |
Colombia |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
May 4, 1980 |
Details |
Comoros |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
April 3, 2005 |
Details |
Congo |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
December 2, 1975 |
Details |
Costa Rica |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
June 10, 1981 |
Details |
Côte d'Ivoire |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
May 1, 1974 |
Details |
Croatia |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
October 8, 1991 |
Details |
Cuba |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
March 27, 1975 |
Details |
Cyprus |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
October 26, 1984 |
Details |
Czech Republic |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
January 1, 1993 |
Details |
Democratic People's Republic of Korea |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
August 17, 1974 |
Details |
Democratic Republic of the Congo |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
January 28, 1975 |
Details |
Denmark |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
April 26, 1970 |
Details |
Djibouti |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
May 13, 2002 |
Details |
Dominica |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
September 26, 1998 |
Details |
Dominican Republic |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
June 27, 2000 |
Details |
Ecuador |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
May 22, 1988 |
Details |
Egypt |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
April 21, 1975 |
Details |
El Salvador |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
September 18, 1979 |
Details |
Equatorial Guinea |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
June 26, 1997 |
Details |
Eritrea |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
February 20, 1997 |
Details |
Estonia |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
February 5, 1994 |
Details |
Ethiopia |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
February 19, 1998 |
Details |
Fiji |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
March 11, 1972 |
Details |
Finland |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
September 8, 1970 |
Details |
France |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
October 18, 1974 |
Details |
Gabon |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
June 6, 1975 |
Details |
Gambia |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
December 10, 1980 |
Details |
Georgia |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
December 25, 1991 |
Details |
Germany |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
September 19, 1970 |
Details |
Ghana |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
June 12, 1976 |
Details |
Greece |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
March 4, 1976 |
Details |
Grenada |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
September 22, 1998 |
Details |
Guatemala |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
April 30, 1983 |
Details |
Guinea |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
November 13, 1980 |
Details |
Guinea-Bissau |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
June 28, 1988 |
Details |
Guyana |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
October 25, 1994 |
Details |
Haiti |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
November 2, 1983 |
Details |
Holy See |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
April 20, 1975 |
Details |
Honduras |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
November 15, 1983 |
Details |
Hungary |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
April 26, 1970 |
Details |
Iceland |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
September 13, 1986 |
Details |
India |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
May 1, 1975 |
Details |
Indonesia |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
December 18, 1979 |
Details |
Iran (Islamic Republic of) |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
March 14, 2002 |
Details |
Iraq |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
January 21, 1976 |
Details |
Ireland |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
April 26, 1970 |
Details |
Israel |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
April 26, 1970 |
Details |
Italy |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
April 20, 1977 |
Details |
Jamaica |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
December 25, 1978 |
Details |
Japan |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
April 20, 1975 |
Details |
Jordan |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
July 12, 1972 |
Details |
Kazakhstan |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
December 25, 1991 |
Details |
Kenya |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
October 5, 1971 |
Details |
Kuwait |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
July 14, 1998 |
Details |
Kyrgyzstan |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
December 25, 1991 |
Details |
Lao People's Democratic Republic |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
January 17, 1995 |
Details |
Latvia |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
January 21, 1993 |
Details |
Lebanon |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
December 30, 1986 |
Details |
Lesotho |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
November 18, 1986 |
Details |
Liberia |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
March 8, 1989 |
Details |
Libyan Arab Jamahiriya |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
September 28, 1976 |
Details |
Liechtenstein |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
May 21, 1972 |
Details |
Lithuania |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
April 30, 1992 |
Details |
Luxembourg |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
March 19, 1975 |
Details |
Madagascar |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
December 22, 1989 |
Details |
Malawi |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
June 11, 1970 |
Details |
Malaysia |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
January 1, 1989 |
Details |
Maldives |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
May 12, 2004 |
Details |
Mali |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
August 14, 1982 |
Details |
Malta |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
December 7, 1977 |
Details |
Mauritania |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
September 17, 1976 |
Details |
Mauritius |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
September 21, 1976 |
Details |
Mexico |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
June 14, 1975 |
Details |
Moldova |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
December 25, 1991 |
Details |
Monaco |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
March 3, 1975 |
Details |
Mongolia |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
February 28, 1979 |
Details |
Montenegro |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
June 3, 2006 |
Details |
Morocco |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
July 27, 1971 |
Details |
Mozambique |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
December 23, 1996 |
Details |
Myanmar |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
May 15, 2001 |
Details |
Namibia |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
December 23, 1991 |
Details |
Nepal |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
February 4, 1997 |
Details |
Netherlands |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
January 9, 1975 |
Details |
New Zealand |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
June 20, 1984 |
Details |
Nicaragua |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
May 5, 1985 |
Details |
Niger |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
May 18, 1975 |
Details |
Nigeria |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
April 9, 1995 |
Details |
Norway |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
June 8, 1974 |
Details |
Oman |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
February 19, 1997 |
Details |
Pakistan |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
January 6, 1977 |
Details |
Panama |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
September 17, 1983 |
Details |
Papua New Guinea |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
July 10, 1997 |
Details |
Paraguay |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
June 20, 1987 |
Details |
Peru |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
September 4, 1980 |
Details |
Philippines |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
July 14, 1980 |
Details |
Poland |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
March 23, 1975 |
Details |
Portugal |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
April 27, 1975 |
Details |
Qatar |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
September 3, 1976 |
Details |
Republic of Korea |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
March 1, 1979 |
Details |
Romania |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
April 26, 1970 |
Details |
Russian Federation |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
April 26, 1970 |
Details |
Rwanda |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
February 3, 1984 |
Details |
Saint Kitts and Nevis |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
November 16, 1995 |
Details |
Saint Lucia |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
August 21, 1993 |
Details |
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
August 29, 1995 |
Details |
Samoa |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
October 11, 1997 |
Details |
San Marino |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
June 26, 1991 |
Details |
Sao Tome and Principe |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
May 12, 1998 |
Details |
Saudi Arabia |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
May 22, 1982 |
Details |
Senegal |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
April 26, 1970 |
Details |
Serbia |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
April 27, 1992 |
Details |
Seychelles |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
March 16, 2000 |
Details |
Sierra Leone |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
May 18, 1986 |
Details |
Singapore |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
December 10, 1990 |
Details |
Slovakia |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
January 1, 1993 |
Details |
Slovenia |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
June 25, 1991 |
Details |
Somalia |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
November 18, 1982 |
Details |
South Africa |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
March 23, 1975 |
Details |
Spain |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
April 26, 1970 |
Details |
Sri Lanka |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
September 20, 1978 |
Details |
Sudan |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
February 15, 1974 |
Details |
Suriname |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
November 25, 1975 |
Details |
Swaziland |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
August 18, 1988 |
Details |
Sweden |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
April 26, 1970 |
Details |
Switzerland |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
April 26, 1970 |
Details |
Syrian Arab Republic |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
November 18, 2004 |
Details |
Tajikistan |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
December 25, 1991 |
Details |
Thailand |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
December 25, 1989 |
Details |
The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
September 8, 1991 |
Details |
Togo |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
April 28, 1975 |
Details |
Tonga |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
June 14, 2001 |
Details |
Trinidad and Tobago |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
August 16, 1988 |
Details |
Tunisia |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
November 28, 1975 |
Details |
Turkey |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
May 12, 1976 |
Details |
Turkmenistan |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
December 25, 1991 |
Details |
Uganda |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
October 18, 1973 |
Details |
Ukraine |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
April 26, 1970 |
Details |
United Arab Emirates |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
September 24, 1974 |
Details |
United Kingdom |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
April 26, 1970 |
Details |
United Republic of Tanzania |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
December 30, 1983 |
Details |
United States of America |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
August 25, 1970 |
Details |
Uruguay |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
December 21, 1979 |
Details |
Uzbekistan |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
December 25, 1991 |
Details |
Venezuela |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
November 23, 1984 |
Details |
Viet Nam |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
July 2, 1976 |
Details |
Yemen |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
March 29, 1979 |
Details |
Zambia |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
May 14, 1977 |
Details |
Zimbabwe |
WIPO Convention |
In Force |
December 29, 1981 |
Details | |
So unless you live in a country not mentioned there (Not your case being from Venezuela) and you're modifying the work of a musician from another country not mentioned there you're fried, so not being your case, better ask permission.
Iván
Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - April 08 2007 at 12:35
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6893/c68932909c0703a6f8f86011be6655acd8896efc" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |