"alternative" and "progressive" rock |
Post Reply |
Author | |
laplace
Prog Reviewer Joined: October 06 2005 Location: popupControl(); Status: Offline Points: 7606 |
Topic: "alternative" and "progressive" rock Posted: February 17 2007 at 19:18 |
all UKers will remember the Manic Street Preachers who started as a glam rock band who said they'd release an album that would sell a billion copies and then split up forever. I have five of their albums and they got absorbed pretty quickly into the top 40 set while somehow managing to fool everyone that they were alternative and edgy.
Brilliant and biting lyrics, though, I suppose that helps. edit: it's practically internet legend now that the top three genre tags on last.fm are "rock", "alternative" and "indie." although of course what's pop in the real world is scorned there to some extent. but music listeners on the whole are being tricked about what's alternative. Edited by laplace - February 17 2007 at 19:20 |
|
clarke2001
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: June 14 2006 Location: Croatia Status: Offline Points: 4160 |
Posted: February 17 2007 at 19:10 |
And of course - how could I forgot - The Mars Volta. It's a good summary, Jeanie. But then again, the world "alternative" implies "different", "experimental". Why aren't those two genres overlaping more? Hm, it seem that alternative is almost opposite of prog, well if not opposite, it's certainly "on the other side". It may sound foolish, but that's my impression. Oh, speaking of "two different sets that partially overlap"...it would be interesting to see opinions about overlapings with other genres...I guess I will start another thread in the polls section. You don't mind, do you? Edited by clarke2001 - February 17 2007 at 19:15 |
|
Dick Heath
Special Collaborator Jazz-Rock Specialist Joined: April 19 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 12812 |
Posted: February 17 2007 at 15:40 |
In the UK originally meant indie bands (often initially signed to indie labels), that offered some alternative music to the late 80's established pop chart bands - however, within 2-3 years many of the alternative bands were the establishment e.g. James, Madchester groups.
Edited by Dick Heath - February 17 2007 at 15:40 |
|
The best eclectic music on the Web,8-11pm BST/GMT THURS.
CLICK ON: http://www.lborosu.org.uk/media/lcr/live.php Host by PA's Dick Heath. |
|
BaldJean
Prog Reviewer Joined: May 28 2005 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 10387 |
Posted: February 17 2007 at 15:15 |
they are neither opposites nor is one a subset of the other. they are 2 different sets that partially overlap. there is an intersection of artists who are both. examples are some RIO bands, in my opinion (the Residents); also a band like the Deep Freeze Mice. you might even say the Ozric Tentacles are alternative
|
|
A shot of me as High Priestess of Gaia during our fall festival. Ceterum censeo principiis obsta |
|
clarke2001
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: June 14 2006 Location: Croatia Status: Offline Points: 4160 |
Posted: February 17 2007 at 13:40 |
Here are two two terms from musical genres (or rather movements) that are both difficult to pinpoint. And while we are making endless debates what prog rock is (and is not), somehow we have an approximate idea. Wikipedia offers a good article about what "alternative" rock is. But I want to know: how are the terms progressive and alternative correlated to each other? The term progressive widened after 80's, and especially after 90's and 00's. The term alternative was closely related to post-punk music in the beginning, but I guess it's not the case any more. Nowadays, I got an impression that every "rock" band that is not cheap pop, rnb or some other crap is alternative. Or at least "lite alternative". Are we living in the times when the term rock is equal to term alternative? There are alternative bands that: a) are not suitable for PA because they're not prog (Sonic Youth, Stereolab) b) are included in PA as prog-related (Radiohead) c) are included in PA under some sub-genre (Sigur Ros) or they are not included here, but (in my opinion) they should be. (Pere Ubu) One more thing, in the "suggest new bands" section it's a common case that someone suggests some band for addition, while somebody else replies "they're not prog, they just have some alternative overtones" etc etc. So, are these two terms opposite to each other? Or one is sub-set of another? I'm quite puzzled... |
|
Post Reply | |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |