Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
tuxon
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 21 2004
Location: plugged-in
Status: Offline
Points: 5502
|
Topic: Saga Posted: December 07 2006 at 10:30 |
definetly neo-prog.
prog-related is a wrong place for them, they are certainly progressive, be it rather commercial.
anyone who doubts, please listen to Marillion, Pendragon, IQ, Twelfth Night, Clepsydra, Collage, Pallas, Shadowland, Saens, Satellite, Jadis, Like Wendy.
when your done listening to those bands, you are unlikely to listen to Saga again, but at least you'd know under which subgenre to put them.
Edited by tuxon - December 07 2006 at 10:33
|
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
|
|
Peter
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: January 31 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 9669
|
Posted: December 07 2006 at 08:58 |
Never liked them (at least what was on the radio), but file them where the more commercial, "prog-lite" bands like Styx are listed, I guess
Edited by Peter Rideout - December 07 2006 at 08:58
|
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock? Come to my arms, my beamish boy! O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!' He chortled in his joy.
|
|
The T
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
|
Posted: December 06 2006 at 23:07 |
there should be a category RUSH-RELATED....
off course, art rock...
when it comes to lyrics, POOR rock....
Good band, awful lyricists
|
|
|
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
|
Posted: December 06 2006 at 17:51 |
Bastille Dude wrote:
Would a band be considered neo-prog if their career began in the 70's? I think art-rock would be a worthy categorization. |
Yeah, but we tend to view Neo-Prog as more of a musical sound sort of thing, not related to time too much, though it would be a bit hard for a band to logically be considered Neo if they started before '77 or '78.
|
|
|
Bastille Dude
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 30 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 906
|
Posted: December 06 2006 at 17:46 |
Would a band be considered neo-prog if their career began in the 70's? I think art-rock would be a worthy categorization.
|
DEATH TO FALSE PROG!
|
|
lucas
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 06 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 8138
|
Posted: December 06 2006 at 16:48 |
One of the very first neo-prog bands...
Edited by lucas - December 06 2006 at 16:49
|
"Magma was the very first gothic rock band" (Didier Lockwood)
|
|
akin
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 06 2004
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 976
|
Posted: December 06 2006 at 15:41 |
For what I've listened so far Art-Rock, but maybe the few things I've listened are not representative of their sound.
|
|
Melomaniac
Prog Reviewer
Joined: May 07 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 4088
|
Posted: December 06 2006 at 15:03 |
Saga are now in prog-related, but I feel they have more and more prog albums under their belt, and I for one would put them in Art Rock.
Where would you put them ?
|
"One likes to believe in the freedom of Music" - Neil Peart, The Spirit of Radio
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.