should proto prog and prog related removal |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | |||
cuncuna
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 29 2005 Location: Chile Status: Offline Points: 4318 |
Topic: should proto prog and prog related removal Posted: November 01 2006 at 00:04 |
||
Well, check the votes. That will give you an idea about my vote too... |
|||
¡Beware of the Bee!
|
|||
Norbert
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 20 2005 Location: Hungary Status: Offline Points: 2506 |
Posted: October 31 2006 at 08:25 | ||
Proto prog surely should not be removed and maybe prog related may stay as well.
|
|||
TheProgtologist
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: May 23 2005 Location: Baltimore,Md US Status: Offline Points: 27802 |
Posted: October 30 2006 at 09:59 | ||
No,because the owners of the site want them here.
|
|||
|
|||
andu
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 27 2006 Location: Romania Status: Offline Points: 3089 |
Posted: October 30 2006 at 09:40 | ||
still most of the old reviews were made without forum membership, so it's not an option.
|
|||
Tristan Mulders
Prog Reviewer Joined: September 28 2004 Status: Offline Points: 1723 |
Posted: October 30 2006 at 09:16 | ||
Neither should be removed.. Definitely since there are some high quality reviews added to the website!
Plus these bands DO have have something to do with progressive music in general. Let them stay is what I say |
|||
Interested in my reviews?
You can find them HERE "...He will search until He's found a Way to take the Days..." |
|||
Meddler
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 29 2005 Location: Massillon Status: Offline Points: 881 |
Posted: October 29 2006 at 15:56 | ||
QTF |
|||
[IMG]http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i165/amorfous/astro-1.jpg">
|
|||
Philéas
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 14 2006 Status: Offline Points: 6419 |
Posted: October 29 2006 at 15:32 | ||
One has to post his forum membership email address when writing a review. The admins could send the reviewer an email, explaining why the band(s) was removed. They could also include the original review(s) in the email. It isn't very hard to copy that text into an email.
Why not try to see it from the other side? Let's say that some of the members are against a certain addition. Wouldn't they think that the time someone spent to add that artist had been spent in vain? Wouldn't you say so about the additions you disagree with? As for the "live with it" thing, I am going to use an old cliché: "This is a discussion forum, we're here to discuss things".
Good idea! If we're going to have Prog Related we need a specialist, that's the least we can ask. Perhaps that would reduce the number of questionable additions. I'd prefer seeing both a specialist and a much stricter policy regarding the addition of bands in the Prog Related category though. |
|||
sleeper
Prog Reviewer Joined: October 09 2005 Location: Entropia Status: Offline Points: 16449 |
Posted: October 29 2006 at 15:30 | ||
I think this is all that needs to be said on the matter. |
|||
Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005
|
|||
bhikkhu
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 06 2006 Location: A² Michigan Status: Offline Points: 5109 |
Posted: October 29 2006 at 13:44 | ||
Be honest James. Your reviews don't take up much space on your hard drive. |
|||
VanderGraafKommandöh
Prog Reviewer Joined: July 04 2005 Location: Malaria Status: Offline Points: 89372 |
Posted: October 29 2006 at 12:11 | ||
I agree with Easy Livin'.
I do believe there is scope for some kind of re-naming process, especially for prog-related. The definition is a tad ambiguous. You can't delete bands though once they're here. People work hard writing reviews, many reviewers aren't posters on the forum (even though you have to be a member), so if you deleted swathes of bands, they may suddenly wonder why and where their reviews are. Not everyone saves their reviews as Word files before either (I do, however). I wouldn't even recommend removing those bands without reviews, because someone worked hard in getting them included in the first place. True, many many bands inclusion I disagree with, but they're here to stay and there is little we can do. Live with it people. I do believe though, that a new initiative needs to be installed for future additions, particularly in the prog-related genre. A lot of bands that seem not suitable for other genres, seem to be put here, is this just? There needs to be some kind of prog-related specialist, or someone needs to work closer with this genre. |
|||
|
|||
Philéas
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 14 2006 Status: Offline Points: 6419 |
Posted: October 29 2006 at 12:05 | ||
I think we could replace these two sections with articles describing
the idea of "Prog Relation" and the origins of Prog, aswell as
mentioning influential/important artists and records in each field.
Edited by Philéas - October 29 2006 at 12:06 |
|||
Easy Livin
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: February 21 2004 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 15585 |
Posted: October 29 2006 at 11:59 | ||
Let's start from the understanding that these categories are here because the site owners consider them to be an important part of the site.
The discussion could perhaps be more constructive and fruitful if it shifted to examining the best way to incorporate these sections into the site. I'm not suggesting any immediate prospect of changes, but if a good suggestion is made, it would of course be considered. Removing the categories and their associated bands will not.
|
|||
Philéas
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 14 2006 Status: Offline Points: 6419 |
Posted: October 29 2006 at 09:31 | ||
Both should be removed. Non-Prog categories don't belong on a Prog
site. If you're interested in my arguments, you can find them in the
recent thread in the Suggest New Bands section suggesting the addition
of Black Sabbath.
|
|||
Ricochet
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 27 2005 Location: Nauru Status: Offline Points: 46301 |
Posted: October 29 2006 at 09:21 | ||
not to (necesarily) come in opposition with your opinion, monsieur Philippe, but I think that the related scene of progressive rock has its share of value. by the exact judgement you acknowledged over at proto-prog (though here very relative, whilst there in a definite way), I think the concept of prog-related is just about another interesting view upon influences, upon derived motifs, upon the diversity that "still stands-by", upon the imaginated connection and upon similar things. In other words, it's fine for me to see bands that have had the relation with prog/ have made the idea of prog a possibility/ have made an inclination towards the prog succint definition/ were at a point a prog's musicians or band / and so on to be motivated and mentioned as the related factor. of course, controversy constantly (and recently) goes towards how related can you be and how expanded can we reach the domain. nonetheless, there are bands or musicians that are satisfyingly, if not great eligible artists, of the prog-related context. progressive music isn't an intangible discipline in my opinion and this related factor shows an outside rim. |
|||
|
|||
Vompatti
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: October 22 2005 Location: elsewhere Status: Online Points: 67441 |
Posted: October 29 2006 at 09:07 | ||
NO! Neither should be removed. We would lose many bands that are important for prog but don't really fit into any of the other genres.
Edited by Vompatti - October 29 2006 at 09:07 |
|||
mystic fred
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 13 2006 Location: Londinium Status: Offline Points: 4252 |
Posted: October 29 2006 at 07:49 | ||
REMOVAL??? - NO DEFINITELY NOT- these sections contain bands which were important influences in the development of prog, and enable you to see the whole picture!
|
|||
Prog Archives Tour Van
|
|||
bhikkhu
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 06 2006 Location: A² Michigan Status: Offline Points: 5109 |
Posted: October 29 2006 at 07:35 | ||
This is an inclusive site. The fact that they are here makes us more of a complete database. It also shows that the scope of prog is not isolated. It's not just some weird little genre, existing on the fringe. Its influence can be felt throughout many other genres. Not having these categories would makes us less complete.
|
|||
philippe
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 14 2004 Location: noosphere Status: Offline Points: 3597 |
Posted: October 29 2006 at 06:51 | ||
"only the prog related genre should be removed" : yes, it's boring like hell and totally pointless, pure confusion.
the proto-prog category should stay because it gives us informations about the origins, sources and developement of progressive rock in its all diversity.
Edited by philippe - October 29 2006 at 06:54 |
|||
|
|||
Joolz
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 24 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1377 |
Posted: October 29 2006 at 05:49 | ||
The problem is ..... your opinion of which bands deserve to be there probably differs from mine. Which of us is right? And, who decides? |
|||
the icon of sin
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 29 2005 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 588 |
Posted: October 29 2006 at 05:39 | ||
I think Proto Prog is quite important, but Prog Related has quite a few bands in which just shouldn't be here. Problem is, where will some of the Prog Related bands go which do deserve to be here? If we make another category for them, we'll eventually come round to a similar problem, and we can't chuck some out forever...
|
|||
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |