Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - should proto prog and prog related removal
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic Closedshould proto prog and prog related removal

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Poll Question: Should proto prog and/or prog related sub genres be removed?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
5 [16.67%]
22 [73.33%]
0 [0.00%]
3 [10.00%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
cuncuna View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 29 2005
Location: Chile
Status: Offline
Points: 4318
Direct Link To This Post Topic: should proto prog and prog related removal
    Posted: November 01 2006 at 00:04
Originally posted by Psychedelia Psychedelia wrote:

There has been much discussion over the validity of these two supposed areas of prog. I believe that by having them the integrity of the site is compromised as bands that dont belong in the prog category are added. This site is meant for progressive rock and by definition these two areas aren't progressive


   On the other hand proto prog could have a place as it shows the history of progressive music while both categories contain bands that some will think deserve if not to be in these genres then in true prog genres.


Well, check the votes. That will give you an idea about my vote too...
    
¡Beware of the Bee!
   
Back to Top
Norbert View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 20 2005
Location: Hungary
Status: Offline
Points: 2506
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 31 2006 at 08:25
Proto prog surely should not be removed and maybe prog related may stay as well.
Back to Top
TheProgtologist View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 30 2006 at 09:59
No,because the owners of the site want them here.


Back to Top
andu View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 27 2006
Location: Romania
Status: Offline
Points: 3089
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 30 2006 at 09:40
Originally posted by Philéas Philéas wrote:

One has to post his forum membership email address when writing a review. The admins could send the reviewer an email, explaining why the band(s) was removed. They could also include the original review(s) in the email. It isn't very hard to copy that text into an email.
 
still most of the old reviews were made without forum membership, so it's not an option.
Back to Top
Tristan Mulders View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 28 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 1723
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 30 2006 at 09:16
Neither should be removed.. Definitely since there are some high quality reviews added to the website!

Plus these bands DO have have something to do with progressive music in general.

Let them stay is what I say Wink
Interested in my reviews?
You can find them HERE

"...He will search until He's found a Way to take the Days..."
Back to Top
Meddler View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: September 29 2005
Location: Massillon
Status: Offline
Points: 881
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 29 2006 at 15:56
Originally posted by bhikkhu bhikkhu wrote:

This is an inclusive site. The fact that they are here makes us more of a complete database. It also shows that the scope of prog is not isolated. It's not just some weird little genre, existing on the fringe. Its influence can be felt throughout many other genres. Not having these categories would makes us less complete.    

QTF
[IMG]http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i165/amorfous/astro-1.jpg">

Back to Top
Philéas View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 14 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 6419
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 29 2006 at 15:32
Originally posted by Geck0 Geck0 wrote:

I agree with Easy Livin'.

I do believe there is scope for some kind of re-naming process, especially for prog-related.  The definition is a tad ambiguous.

You can't delete bands though once they're here.  People work hard writing reviews, many reviewers aren't posters on the forum (even though you have to be a member), so if you deleted swathes of bands, they may suddenly wonder why and where their reviews are.  Not everyone saves their reviews as Word files before either (I do, however).


One has to post his forum membership email address when writing a review. The admins could send the reviewer an email, explaining why the band(s) was removed. They could also include the original review(s) in the email. It isn't very hard to copy that text into an email.

Originally posted by Geck0 Geck0 wrote:

I wouldn't even recommend removing those bands without reviews, because someone worked hard in getting them included in the first place.

True, many many bands inclusion I disagree with, but they're here to stay and there is little we can do.

Live with it people.


Why not try to see it from the other side? Let's say that some of the members are against a certain addition. Wouldn't they think that the time someone spent to add that artist had been spent in vain? Wouldn't you say so about the additions you disagree with?

As for the "live with it" thing, I am going to use an old cliché: "This is a discussion forum, we're here to discuss things". Wink

Originally posted by Geck0 Geck0 wrote:

I do believe though, that a new initiative needs to be installed for future additions, particularly in the prog-related genre.  A lot of bands that seem not suitable for other genres, seem to be put here, is this just?

There needs to be some kind of prog-related specialist, or someone needs to work closer with this genre.


Good idea! Thumbs Up If we're going to have Prog Related we need a specialist, that's the least we can ask. Perhaps that would reduce the number of questionable additions. I'd prefer seeing both a specialist and a much stricter policy regarding the addition of bands in the Prog Related category though.
Back to Top
sleeper View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 09 2005
Location: Entropia
Status: Offline
Points: 16449
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 29 2006 at 15:30
Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

1. Neither should nor will be removed
2. Neither is acknowledged as being part of progressive rock
3. The site is whatever the owners want it to be


I think this is all that needs to be said on the matter.
Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005

Back to Top
bhikkhu View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 06 2006
Location: A² Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 5109
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 29 2006 at 13:44
Originally posted by Geck0 Geck0 wrote:

I agree with Easy Livin'.I do believe there is scope for some kind of re-naming process, especially for prog-related.  The definition is a tad ambiguous.You can't delete bands though once they're here.  People work hard writing reviews, many reviewers aren't posters on the forum (even though you have to be a member), so if you deleted swathes of bands, they may suddenly wonder why and where their reviews are.  Not everyone saves their reviews as Word files before either (I do, however).I wouldn't even recommend removing those bands without reviews, because someone worked hard in getting them included in the first place.True, many many bands inclusion I disagree with, but they're here to stay and there is little we can do.Live with it people.I do believe though, that a new initiative needs to be installed for future additions, particularly in the prog-related genre.  A lot of bands that seem not suitable for other genres, seem to be put here, is this just?There needs to be some kind of prog-related specialist, or someone needs to work closer with this genre.


Be honest James. Your reviews don't take up much space on your hard drive.



Back to Top
VanderGraafKommandöh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 29 2006 at 12:11
I agree with Easy Livin'.

I do believe there is scope for some kind of re-naming process, especially for prog-related.  The definition is a tad ambiguous.

You can't delete bands though once they're here.  People work hard writing reviews, many reviewers aren't posters on the forum (even though you have to be a member), so if you deleted swathes of bands, they may suddenly wonder why and where their reviews are.  Not everyone saves their reviews as Word files before either (I do, however).

I wouldn't even recommend removing those bands without reviews, because someone worked hard in getting them included in the first place.

True, many many bands inclusion I disagree with, but they're here to stay and there is little we can do.

Live with it people.

I do believe though, that a new initiative needs to be installed for future additions, particularly in the prog-related genre.  A lot of bands that seem not suitable for other genres, seem to be put here, is this just?

There needs to be some kind of prog-related specialist, or someone needs to work closer with this genre.
Back to Top
Philéas View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 14 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 6419
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 29 2006 at 12:05
I think we could replace these two sections with articles describing the idea of "Prog Relation" and the origins of Prog, aswell as mentioning influential/important artists and records in each field.

Edited by Philéas - October 29 2006 at 12:06
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 29 2006 at 11:59
Let's start from the understanding that these categories are here because the site owners consider them to be an important part of the site.
 
The discussion could perhaps be more constructive and fruitful if it shifted to examining the best way to incorporate these sections into the site. I'm not suggesting any immediate prospect of changes, but if a good suggestion is made, it would of course be considered. Removing the categories and their associated bands will not.
Back to Top
Philéas View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 14 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 6419
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 29 2006 at 09:31
Both should be removed. Non-Prog categories don't belong on a Prog site. If you're interested in my arguments, you can find them in the recent thread in the Suggest New Bands section suggesting the addition of Black Sabbath.
Back to Top
Ricochet View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 27 2005
Location: Nauru
Status: Offline
Points: 46301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 29 2006 at 09:21
Originally posted by philippe philippe wrote:

"only the prog related genre should be removed" : yes, it's boring like hell and totally pointless, pure confusion.
 


not to (necesarily) come in opposition with your opinion, monsieur Philippe, but I think that the related scene of progressive rock has its share of value. by the exact judgement you acknowledged over at proto-prog (though here very relative, whilst there in a definite way), I think the concept of prog-related is just about another interesting view upon influences, upon derived motifs, upon the diversity that "still stands-by", upon the imaginated connection and upon similar things. In other words, it's fine for me to see bands that have had the relation with prog/ have made the idea of prog a possibility/ have made an inclination towards the prog succint definition/ were at a point a prog's musicians or band / and so on to be motivated and mentioned as the related factor.

of course, controversy constantly (and recently) goes towards how related can you be and how expanded can we reach the domain. nonetheless, there are bands or musicians that are satisfyingly, if not great eligible artists, of the prog-related context.

progressive music isn't an intangible discipline in my opinion and this related factor shows an outside rim.
Back to Top
Vompatti View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: elsewhere
Status: Online
Points: 67441
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 29 2006 at 09:07
NO! Neither should be removed. We would lose many bands that are important for prog but don't really fit into any of the other genres.

Edited by Vompatti - October 29 2006 at 09:07
Back to Top
mystic fred View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 13 2006
Location: Londinium
Status: Offline
Points: 4252
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 29 2006 at 07:49
REMOVAL??? - NO DEFINITELY NOT- these sections contain bands which were  important influences in the development of prog, and enable you to see the whole picture!Smile
 
Prog Archives Tour Van
Back to Top
bhikkhu View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 06 2006
Location: A² Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 5109
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 29 2006 at 07:35
This is an inclusive site. The fact that they are here makes us more of a complete database. It also shows that the scope of prog is not isolated. It's not just some weird little genre, existing on the fringe. Its influence can be felt throughout many other genres. Not having these categories would makes us less complete.    
Back to Top
philippe View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 14 2004
Location: noosphere
Status: Offline
Points: 3597
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 29 2006 at 06:51
"only the prog related genre should be removed" : yes, it's boring like hell and totally pointless, pure confusion.
 
the proto-prog category should stay because it gives us informations about the origins, sources and developement of progressive rock in its all diversity.
 


Edited by philippe - October 29 2006 at 06:54
Back to Top
Joolz View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 24 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1377
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 29 2006 at 05:49
Originally posted by the icon of sin the icon of sin wrote:

I think Proto Prog is quite important, but Prog Related has quite a few bands in which just shouldn't be here. Problem is, where will some of the Prog Related bands go which do deserve to be here? If we make another category for them, we'll eventually come round to a similar problem, and we can't chuck some out forever...


The problem is ..... your opinion of which bands deserve to be there probably differs from mine. Which of us is right? And, who decides?
Back to Top
the icon of sin View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 29 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 588
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 29 2006 at 05:39
I think Proto Prog is quite important, but Prog Related has quite a few bands in which just shouldn't be here. Problem is, where will some of the Prog Related bands go which do deserve to be here? If we make another category for them, we'll eventually come round to a similar problem, and we can't chuck some out forever...
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.247 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.