Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Suggest New Bands and Artists
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Jimi Hendrix
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedJimi Hendrix

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 6>
Poll Question: should Jimi Hendrix be in Progarchives (Proto-prog)?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
105 [42.86%]
140 [57.14%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Jimi Hendrix
    Posted: January 14 2007 at 14:27
Unfortunately the voting here is meaningless, as the thread allows multiple votes.
 
I'd suggest a new poll is started with the multiple votes switched off.
 
I'll close this thread, and start a new one.
Back to Top
Mandrakeroot View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member

Italian Prog Specialist

Joined: March 01 2006
Location: San Foca, Friûl
Status: Offline
Points: 5851
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 14 2007 at 12:21
Originally posted by Witchwoodhermit Witchwoodhermit wrote:

I vote yes.
Progressive rock was born out of  psychedelic music. Psychedelia's vast noodling's and experimentation are the very corner stones of prog. As Jimi was clearly a psyche pioneer, and all pychedelic bands are proto-prog, I guess the choice is clear.

 
 
 
StarStarStarStarStar For this response!!!



Edited by MANDRAKEROOT - January 14 2007 at 12:21
Back to Top
Mandrakeroot View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member

Italian Prog Specialist

Joined: March 01 2006
Location: San Foca, Friûl
Status: Offline
Points: 5851
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 14 2007 at 12:20
I THINK YES!!!
Back to Top
Witchwoodhermit View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 23 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 871
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 09 2007 at 17:35
I vote yes.
Progressive rock was born out of  psychedelic music. Psychedelia's vast noodling's and experimentation are the very corner stones of prog. As Jimi was clearly a psyche pioneer, and all pychedelic bands are proto-prog, I guess the choice is clear.
Here I'm shadowed by a dragon fig tree's fan
ringed by ants and musing over man.
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 09 2007 at 12:08
How could Talk talk, Queen, Led zep be in (without talking about the whole "prog"metal and neo-prog genres) and not Hendrix? Recent Door's inclusion confirms it.
    

Edited by oliverstoned - January 09 2007 at 12:09
Back to Top
Philéas View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 14 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 6419
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 09 2007 at 12:07
Originally posted by progismylife progismylife wrote:




He has influenced every guitarist since. Too much of a wide influence to be specifically prog related or proto-prog.


Clap
Back to Top
Tuzvihar View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 18 2005
Location: C. Schinesghe
Status: Offline
Points: 13536
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 09 2007 at 11:56
Originally posted by progismylife progismylife wrote:

Originally posted by Chicapah Chicapah wrote:

Yes.  Definitely proto-prog in every sense of the word.  He influenced every prog guitarist since.



He has influenced every guitarist since. Too much of a wide influence to be specifically prog related or proto-prog.


Agreed. Smile
"Music is much like f**king, but some composers can't climax and others climax too often, leaving themselves and the listener jaded and spent."

Charles Bukowski
Back to Top
progismylife View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2006
Location: ibreathehelium
Status: Offline
Points: 15535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 09 2007 at 11:28
Originally posted by Chicapah Chicapah wrote:

Yes.  Definitely proto-prog in every sense of the word.  He influenced every prog guitarist since.



He has influenced every guitarist since. Too much of a wide influence to be specifically prog related or proto-prog.
Back to Top
1800iareyay View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: November 18 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2492
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 09 2007 at 11:22
Proto prog. Influenced every guitar player period, combined blues with psychedelia with some unknown style that is forever his. He could easily fit into proto, related, or psychedelic. He's as important as The Doors to psychedelic rock.
Back to Top
Chicapah View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 14 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8238
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 09 2007 at 11:15
Yes.  Definitely proto-prog in every sense of the word.  He influenced every prog guitarist since.
"Literature is well enough, as a time-passer, and for the improvement and general elevation and purification of mankind, but it has no practical value" - Mark Twain
Back to Top
Siddhartha View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: January 08 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 8
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 09 2007 at 08:57
yes. proto- prog or psykedelic
Back to Top
progismylife View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2006
Location: ibreathehelium
Status: Offline
Points: 15535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 23 2006 at 15:57
Pink Floyd toured with Jimi Hendrix, I think.
Back to Top
DallasBryan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 23 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3323
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 23 2006 at 15:54

Axis: Bold As Love and Electric Ladyland as whole albums are the definition of Progressive Rock, as much as Zappa's career of avant fusion output. Jimi definitely deserves to be included as Prog-Related or Proto-Prog because without him the whole english scene would not have had a benchmark for what psychedelic(progressive)music should sound like. Today many try to dismiss the fact that progressive rock was born from the psychedelics that people were ingesting during this time period, which I find as an interesting form of denial and applaud the media for there neverending deception. 

Interesting how the facts are so removed from the history today. What will intelligent morons do to rearrange the true facts via media hype in years to come? Confused
 
 
 
---------------------------------------
I guess eveyone will believe in the future that the US invaded Iraq because Hussein was a bad guy, not that the US was losing control of the oil exports from Iraq. March on soldier for the cause, though you may not be aware of it! Angry
 
Who has killed more at this point Bush or Hussein?Embarrassed
 


Edited by DallasBryan - December 23 2006 at 16:12
Back to Top
S Lang View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 01 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 441
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 17 2006 at 05:19
Originally posted by Tony R Tony R wrote:

Originally posted by Philéas Philéas wrote:



"I would say"

Well, obviously, he doesn't know what he's talking about. I won't
accept that Jimi Hendrix was a big influence on Prog, until I have solid
proof that he was. I have never heard enough Hendrix influence in any prog song to
justify his inclusion on this site as Proto-Prog, so I'm wondering how
this person can say that Hendrix started the Prog movement. I'm also
curious how he can consider Hendrix more influential to prog than
The Beatles.



He says that Hendrix played psychedelic music and psychedelic music influenced prog.

He doesnt say that Hendrix started the "Prog movement".

If you are unaware of Hendrix's influence on modern rock music,especially heavy rock,psych and guitar-based Prog,then maybe you need to do some research before making bold statements of disbelief.


    
 
Well said Tony and a big thank you!
Back to Top
Tony R View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: July 16 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 11979
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 09 2006 at 05:44
Originally posted by Philéas Philéas wrote:



"I would say"

Well, obviously, he doesn't know what he's talking about. I won't
accept that Jimi Hendrix was a big influence on Prog, until I have solid
proof that he was. I have never heard enough Hendrix influence in any prog song to
justify his inclusion on this site as Proto-Prog, so I'm wondering how
this person can say that Hendrix started the Prog movement. I'm also
curious how he can consider Hendrix more influential to prog than
The Beatles.



He says that Hendrix played psychedelic music and psychedelic music influenced prog.

He doesnt say that Hendrix started the "Prog movement".

If you are unaware of Hendrix's influence on modern rock music,especially heavy rock,psych and guitar-based Prog,then maybe you need to do some research before making bold statements of disbelief.


    
Back to Top
S Lang View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 01 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 441
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 09 2006 at 05:37
Originally posted by Philéas Philéas wrote:

Originally posted by S Lang S Lang wrote:

I am not sure if that's the case with you Phileas, but some people make an assessment on a "Best of" collection. Those are notoriously unrepresentative of an artist's true depth and tend focus on commercial success, ie: sales.
 
Hendrix provided inspiration to post-Beatles artists, offering a definitie psychedelic - and later more jazzy - flavour (Band of Gypsies), whilst he could play the Blues well, too. There is nothing wrong with that.
Many noted artists pay tribute to his legacy, Jaco Pastorius (Weather Report), John McLaughlin, Steve Morse (Deep Purple), The Kronos Quartet to name but a few.
Even Miles Davis was keen to record with him, only prevented by his untimely departure.
 
I am not one to talk you into Hendrix though, but you could be missing out... 


I own just about everything Hendrix has done. And I don't believe there's enough Prog in there to justify his inclusion as Proto-Prog.
 
 
Pleased to hear, but why bother spending money on something inferior.....?
To me, the Archives remains incomplete without the inclusion of Hendrix, Cream, etc. They did set the trend for Prog, as opposed to numerous Neo-Prog, Prog-Metal performers that are given undue prominence here, at the expense of genuine innovators.
 
I believe in "live and let live" and in that light, your dogged perseverence for exclusion is not very well received. I am sure that you could name a few that in your opinion don't belong here, but I don't recall such fierce opposition to them. Have I missed something?      


Edited by S Lang - November 09 2006 at 05:39
Back to Top
Philéas View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 14 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 6419
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 07 2006 at 15:15
Originally posted by S Lang S Lang wrote:

I am not sure if that's the case with you Phileas, but some people make an assessment on a "Best of" collection. Those are notoriously unrepresentative of an artist's true depth and tend focus on commercial success, ie: sales.
 
Hendrix provided inspiration to post-Beatles artists, offering a definitie psychedelic - and later more jazzy - flavour (Band of Gypsies), whilst he could play the Blues well, too. There is nothing wrong with that.
Many noted artists pay tribute to his legacy, Jaco Pastorius (Weather Report), John McLaughlin, Steve Morse (Deep Purple), The Kronos Quartet to name but a few.
Even Miles Davis was keen to record with him, only prevented by his untimely departure.
 
I am not one to talk you into Hendrix though, but you could be missing out... 


I own just about everything Hendrix has done. And I don't believe there's enough Prog in there to justify his inclusion as Proto-Prog.
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 07 2006 at 09:57
Originally posted by S Lang S Lang wrote:

Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:

Originally posted by Abstrakt Abstrakt wrote:

If, then he would need his own genre, "Blues Prog" together with "Cream", "Iron Butterfly" and others...

    

Yes, we could create a lof of sub genres in proto-prog, and so we could include Hendrix into psyche blues-rock or prog blues, Jefferson in "US psyche", etc...that would open the door to even more bands.
 
I'd see nothing wrong with that, but please drop that offensive Proto crap... that was mainly designed for the inclusion of the Beatles. I will never agree with such humiliating description to a number of other leading artists.
 
Hendrix was and is still Prog. Not Proto bullsh*t! Blues aside.... 



hmmmm....  I think proto is the only possible valid reason to see Hendrix in... and that is a stretch as it is.  He was a revolutionary guitarist of course  but the music itself is simply not prog...  or really that much of an influence on prog as a whole.  His playing, and what he did for the guitar is reverered as it should be. Musically though... no way LOLWink
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Bilek View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: July 05 2005
Location: Turkey
Status: Offline
Points: 1484
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 06 2006 at 06:59
^^Hendrix - Davis relationship is interesting, because Davis is said to have written the Mademoiselle Mabry track in Filles de Kilimanjaro album for Betty O. Mabry, who left him for Hendrix! Also, the same track is said to have quoted directly from Hendrix's "The Wind Cries Mary"...
Listen to Turkish psych/prog; you won't regret:
Baris Manco,Erkin Koray,Cem Karaca,Mogollar,3 Hürel,Selda,Edip Akbayram,Fikret Kizilok,Ersen (and Dadaslar) (but stick with the '70's, and 'early 80's!)
Back to Top
S Lang View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 01 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 441
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 04 2006 at 14:06
Originally posted by Philéas Philéas wrote:

  I won't accept that Jimi Hendrix was a big influence on Prog, until I have solid proof that he was. I have never heard enough Hendrix influence in any prog song to justify his inclusion on this site as Proto-Prog, so I'm wondering how this person can say that Hendrix started the Prog movement. I'm also curious how he can consider Hendrix more influential to prog than The Beatles.
 
I am not sure if that's the case with you Phileas, but some people make an assessment on a "Best of" collection. Those are notoriously unrepresentative of an artist's true depth and tend focus on commercial success, ie: sales.
 
Hendrix provided inspiration to post-Beatles artists, offering a definitie psychedelic - and later more jazzy - flavour (Band of Gypsies), whilst he could play the Blues well, too. There is nothing wrong with that.
Many noted artists pay tribute to his legacy, Jaco Pastorius (Weather Report), John McLaughlin, Steve Morse (Deep Purple), The Kronos Quartet to name but a few.
Even Miles Davis was keen to record with him, only prevented by his untimely departure.
 
I am not one to talk you into Hendrix though, but you could be missing out... 
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 6>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.237 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.