Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Progressive Rock and Drugs
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedProgressive Rock and Drugs

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 5>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Shatterwolf View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: November 11 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 60
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Progressive Rock and Drugs
    Posted: November 24 2004 at 15:41
Woah dude...
Back to Top
Velvetclown View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 8548
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2004 at 13:42
Back to Top
James Lee View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 05 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 3525
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2004 at 13:32

 

 me at age 16 

Back to Top
Reed Lover View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2004 at 12:56

Some Jim and Jimmy are out......glad you told me that!Wink

LOL




Back to Top
James Lee View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 05 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 3525
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2004 at 12:47

Jimbo's ok...reminds me of the Simpsons character, whom I did resemble a bit in the teen years

'Jamesie' was what a Welsh friend of mine used to call me (if you're out there, Matt, Pob dymuniad da!)...it's little used, but perfectly fine!

I'll pass on 'Jimmy', though...if that's ok

Back to Top
Reed Lover View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2004 at 12:41

What about Jimmy or Jamesie?

Jimbo?

LOL




Back to Top
James Lee View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 05 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 3525
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2004 at 12:29

no prob...happens all the time

"Jamie" is more acceptable, all my Irish relatives do it. Then again, several of them took me to the pub as a toddler, so maybe they're not such a good example of model behavior...

Back to Top
Reed Lover View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2004 at 12:15

Originally posted by James Lee James Lee wrote:

Don't call me Jim!!!!

Whoops,not even a typo!Embarrassed

Ouch




Back to Top
James Lee View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 05 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 3525
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2004 at 12:13
Don't call me Jim!!!!
Back to Top
Reed Lover View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2004 at 12:03
Originally posted by James Lee James Lee wrote:

Originally posted by Reed Lover Reed Lover wrote:

Originally posted by James Lee James Lee wrote:

Originally posted by Reed Lover Reed Lover wrote:

Most people who do drugs do them to appear cool.

Did them myself at Uni and had a fair bit of blow since (none since i gave up ciggies though). It is a game-beer, birds and blow. Got to do them or you're not cool.Anyone who thinks rock artists are making their best music whilst stoned out their minds are kidding themselves. If the music was designed to be enjoyed whilst stoned it would have been composed, recorded and mastered that way!Wink

Yeah, forget about feeling really good or having an addiction, it's the fashionable nature of drugs that makes them so darn irresistable

Is anyone saying that music should be made or listened to on drugs? I don't think so- it just happened that some music is made under the influence (for better or worse) and a heck of a lot of music is enjoyed under the influence (for better or worse). If it weren't for speed and other ilicit stimulants, for instance, a huge portion of the bands wouldn't have been quite so tirelessly prolific in the studio or on tour- The Beatles themselves were notorious speed freaks in the early days especially.

One might as well argue that you shouldn't use alcohol while participating in the dating ritual. Sure, there's been some drunken hook-ups that probably shouldn't have happened, but more than a few of us owe our very existence in some part to a few drinks.

If you're against it or don't need it, fine; more power to ya. But don't kid yourself that drugs aren't a major part of rock and roll.

"If there's sex and drugs, I guess I could do without the rock and roll." - from Spinal Tap

I think some of the replies here and in other threads suggest things like "you should try such or sucha album whilst high" and they are saying "look at me I am cool because I have done this"

I think you are being a tad ingenuous.

Smile

Oh, admittedly! But only as a response in kind

Honestly, I've never personally experienced a big peer-pressure or fashionable motivation in my history with drugs. I'm sure I've met people because of drugs that I wouldn't have met otherwise, but that doesn't strike me as a bad thing- we find lifelong friends in any number of ways, and in stranger circumstances than casual weed use. The main social effect I remember from those days was from people who I assumed to be friends suddenly deciding that part of their newfound refusal of drugs included dropping me as a friend because I was still doing them- despite the fact that I've never required or suggested drugs as a condition of my friendship. I'm not talking about people who needed to 'break the chain of addiction' to survive...we're talking weed here, a substance that never causes physical dependance.

But I do recognize that it plays a big part for a number of people who are more concerned with their social image, so in that sense I totally understand your point (despite my previous ingenuousness...or is that ingenuity? no, that's something else ). From what I understand, your experience with coke is not at all uncommon (though maybe less seen now than, say, the 70s or 80s ). But in that case drugs are no different than anything else you do to 'fit in' (except for potentially more serious consequences). If drugs were simply a social phenomenon, they wouldn't be such a big issue- people would drop drugs like they drop any trendy phase. It's the fact that people enjoy the feeling they provide, and/or develop a physical or mental need for them, that makes drugs such a persistent issue.

Smile

I agree with 99% of what you say Jim but it seems self-evident that most people do drop drugs after a relatively short while ( ie when they leave college and go get a job, and "grow up".) Let's be honest drugs only become uncool if you get addicted to them.Surely the vast majority of people dont get hooked....but that's another argument for another day.




Back to Top
James Lee View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 05 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 3525
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2004 at 11:53
Originally posted by Reed Lover Reed Lover wrote:

Originally posted by James Lee James Lee wrote:

Originally posted by Reed Lover Reed Lover wrote:

Most people who do drugs do them to appear cool.

Did them myself at Uni and had a fair bit of blow since (none since i gave up ciggies though). It is a game-beer, birds and blow. Got to do them or you're not cool.Anyone who thinks rock artists are making their best music whilst stoned out their minds are kidding themselves. If the music was designed to be enjoyed whilst stoned it would have been composed, recorded and mastered that way!Wink

Yeah, forget about feeling really good or having an addiction, it's the fashionable nature of drugs that makes them so darn irresistable

Is anyone saying that music should be made or listened to on drugs? I don't think so- it just happened that some music is made under the influence (for better or worse) and a heck of a lot of music is enjoyed under the influence (for better or worse). If it weren't for speed and other ilicit stimulants, for instance, a huge portion of the bands wouldn't have been quite so tirelessly prolific in the studio or on tour- The Beatles themselves were notorious speed freaks in the early days especially.

One might as well argue that you shouldn't use alcohol while participating in the dating ritual. Sure, there's been some drunken hook-ups that probably shouldn't have happened, but more than a few of us owe our very existence in some part to a few drinks.

If you're against it or don't need it, fine; more power to ya. But don't kid yourself that drugs aren't a major part of rock and roll.

"If there's sex and drugs, I guess I could do without the rock and roll." - from Spinal Tap

I think some of the replies here and in other threads suggest things like "you should try such or sucha album whilst high" and they are saying "look at me I am cool because I have done this"

I think you are being a tad ingenuous.

Smile

Oh, admittedly! But only as a response in kind

Honestly, I've never personally experienced a big peer-pressure or fashionable motivation in my history with drugs. I'm sure I've met people because of drugs that I wouldn't have met otherwise, but that doesn't strike me as a bad thing- we find lifelong friends in any number of ways, and in stranger circumstances than casual weed use. The main social effect I remember from those days was from people who I assumed to be friends suddenly deciding that part of their newfound refusal of drugs included dropping me as a friend because I was still doing them- despite the fact that I've never required or suggested drugs as a condition of my friendship. I'm not talking about people who needed to 'break the chain of addiction' to survive...we're talking weed here, a substance that never causes physical dependance.

But I do recognize that it plays a big part for a number of people who are more concerned with their social image, so in that sense I totally understand your point (despite my previous ingenuousness...or is that ingenuity? no, that's something else ). From what I understand, your experience with coke is not at all uncommon (though maybe less seen now than, say, the 70s or 80s ). But in that case drugs are no different than anything else you do to 'fit in' (except for potentially more serious consequences). If drugs were simply a social phenomenon, they wouldn't be such a big issue- people would drop drugs like they drop any trendy phase. It's the fact that people enjoy the feeling they provide, and/or develop a physical or mental need for them, that makes drugs such a persistent issue.

Back to Top
Reed Lover View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2004 at 11:11
Originally posted by James Lee James Lee wrote:

Originally posted by Reed Lover Reed Lover wrote:

Most people who do drugs do them to appear cool.

Did them myself at Uni and had a fair bit of blow since (none since i gave up ciggies though). It is a game-beer, birds and blow. Got to do them or you're not cool.Anyone who thinks rock artists are making their best music whilst stoned out their minds are kidding themselves. If the music was designed to be enjoyed whilst stoned it would have been composed, recorded and mastered that way!Wink

Yeah, forget about feeling really good or having an addiction, it's the fashionable nature of drugs that makes them so darn irresistable

Is anyone saying that music should be made or listened to on drugs? I don't think so- it just happened that some music is made under the influence (for better or worse) and a heck of a lot of music is enjoyed under the influence (for better or worse). If it weren't for speed and other ilicit stimulants, for instance, a huge portion of the bands wouldn't have been quite so tirelessly prolific in the studio or on tour- The Beatles themselves were notorious speed freaks in the early days especially.

One might as well argue that you shouldn't use alcohol while participating in the dating ritual. Sure, there's been some drunken hook-ups that probably shouldn't have happened, but more than a few of us owe our very existence in some part to a few drinks.

If you're against it or don't need it, fine; more power to ya. But don't kid yourself that drugs aren't a major part of rock and roll.

"If there's sex and drugs, I guess I could do without the rock and roll." - from Spinal Tap

I think some of the replies here and in other threads suggest things like "you should try such or sucha album whilst high" and they are saying "look at me I am cool because I have done this"

I think you are being a tad ingenuous.

Smile




Back to Top
James Lee View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 05 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 3525
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2004 at 11:03
Originally posted by Reed Lover Reed Lover wrote:

Most people who do drugs do them to appear cool.

Did them myself at Uni and had a fair bit of blow since (none since i gave up ciggies though). It is a game-beer, birds and blow. Got to do them or you're not cool.Anyone who thinks rock artists are making their best music whilst stoned out their minds are kidding themselves. If the music was designed to be enjoyed whilst stoned it would have been composed, recorded and mastered that way!Wink

Yeah, forget about feeling really good or having an addiction, it's the fashionable nature of drugs that makes them so darn irresistable

Is anyone saying that music should be made or listened to on drugs? I don't think so- it just happened that some music is made under the influence (for better or worse) and a heck of a lot of music is enjoyed under the influence (for better or worse). If it weren't for speed and other ilicit stimulants, for instance, a huge portion of the bands wouldn't have been quite so tirelessly prolific in the studio or on tour- The Beatles themselves were notorious speed freaks in the early days especially.

One might as well argue that you shouldn't use alcohol while participating in the dating ritual. Sure, there's been some drunken hook-ups that probably shouldn't have happened, but more than a few of us owe our very existence in some part to a few drinks.

If you're against it or don't need it, fine; more power to ya. But don't kid yourself that drugs aren't a major part of rock and roll.

"If there's sex and drugs, I guess I could do without the rock and roll." - from Spinal Tap

Back to Top
Reed Lover View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2004 at 10:22

Most people who do drugs do them to appear cool.

Did them myself at Uni and had a fair bit of blow since (none since i gave up ciggies though). It is a game-beer, birds and blow. Got to do them or you're not cool.Anyone who thinks rock artists are making their best music whilst stoned out their minds are kidding themselves. If the music was designed to be enjoyed whilst stoned it would have been composed, recorded and mastered that way!Wink




Back to Top
zappa123 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 13 2004
Location: Slovenia
Status: Offline
Points: 153
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2004 at 10:08
Music gets me high enough.Nowadays.But I have to admit that I took tons of drugs and at that times music seemed to be better.However,I'm over that S..T.
Back to Top
Azrael2112 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 19 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 246
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 24 2004 at 08:52
I'm gonna try to stay outta this one...but drugs + Pink Floyd =

Edited by Azrael2112
Back to Top
DallasBryan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 23 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3323
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 23 2004 at 23:58

for the advanced experience
you need
Mescaline/Hashish
Pilsner Urquell (pasteurized beer)

listen to Krautrock
Tangerine Dream - Force Majuere
Cluster - Zuckerzeit
Ashra - Best of
Conrad Schnitzler - Ballet Statique
Edgar Froese - Stuntman
are a few suggestion

music becomes color, but watch out for the horned
wonder, could visit as an alien imposter!
Back to Top
James Lee View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 05 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 3525
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 17 2004 at 07:47
You think alcohol is bad? I'm still trying to forget some of the things that I've danced to under MDMA ("come into my planet soul...setcha freeeee....setcha freee")
Back to Top
Nerevar View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: November 17 2004
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 61
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 17 2004 at 03:36
I feel that smoking hash has a really determining effect on one's perception of art. You allow yourself to become more at one with whatever you are focusing on. I've listened to several prog albums whilst smoking, and it sort of takes away the innate filter for all the beauty that surrounds me, and let's me take it all in at once. The sense of understanding and oneness with the music is really intense. Furthermore, I feel alchohol only dulls the senses and diminishes the listening experience, and besides that, it can make you dance to otherwise intolerable music. The vague memory of myself busting out dance moves to a Justin Timberlake song in a club, still lingers in my consciousness... and it really hurts
Hash=good, alchohol=bad. Consider this metaphor: Listening to prog sober is like drinking a large soda with a thin straw, whereas with the influnce of some herbs, you toss away the straw and drink straight from the cup.
"I'd rather have a bottle in front of me, than a frontal lobotomy."
Back to Top
James Lee View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 05 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 3525
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 16 2004 at 17:43

Sandwiches definitely should be criminalized. Look what they did to Mama Cass' music! Not to mention Elvis' fatal peanut butter and banana overdose.

And contrary to popular opinion, we lost Jimi Hendrix choking on a pastrami and rye...Jim Morrison should have gone to rehab for egg salad! When will people learn that it's the deli owners that are destroying today's youth!

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 5>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.430 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.