Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Wilcey
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: August 11 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 2696
|
Topic: Looking for that special MP3 ? Posted: December 15 2005 at 15:46 |
I would rather indulge in some prog gossip to be honest, but when this subject comes up......... so do my hackles!
But thanks for your comment! 
|
 |
Catholic Flame
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 17 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 295
|
Posted: December 15 2005 at 15:32 |
prog-chick wrote:
to up load copywrite material for commercial or file share downloading is illegal without the permission of the copywrite owner. To download said material is illegal in some countries, not in others.
The whole practice is unethical & morally wrong.
The practice has become SO common place tho, that there is a generation of computer kids who think that it is ok cos others do it too, for who the culture of downloading is so commonplace that they have probably not asked themselves questions about this practice. I am on a bit of a crusade, I will acknowledge that. I do know I am annoying folk whole heartedly, But I do feel that this is an important issue, and one that folk should understand. Ignorance is no defence, but is more defence than blatant theft. Really it's the blatant thieves that get my goat, the rest just need informing!
|
You certainly have every right to launch a crusade on a subject that you feel strongly about!
|
“Great things are not accomplished by those who yield to trends and fads and popular opinion.”
~Jack Kerouac
|
 |
Catholic Flame
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 17 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 295
|
Posted: December 15 2005 at 15:30 |
goose wrote:
I'd expect export, rather than import would be illegal. |
Export from Russia to another country or the Russian site importing the music for distribution?
|
“Great things are not accomplished by those who yield to trends and fads and popular opinion.”
~Jack Kerouac
|
 |
Wilcey
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: August 11 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 2696
|
Posted: December 15 2005 at 15:24 |
to up load copywrite material for commercial or file share downloading is illegal without the permission of the copywrite owner. To download said material is illegal in some countries, not in others.
The whole practice is unethical & morally wrong.
The practice has become SO common place tho, that there is a generation of computer kids who think that it is ok cos others do it too, for who the culture of downloading is so commonplace that they have probably not asked themselves questions about this practice. I am on a bit of a crusade, I will acknowledge that. I do know I am annoying folk whole heartedly, But I do feel that this is an important issue, and one that folk should understand. Ignorance is no defence, but is more defence than blatant theft. Really it's the blatant thieves that get my goat, the rest just need informing!
|
 |
goose
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 4097
|
Posted: December 15 2005 at 15:18 |
I'd expect export, rather than import would be illegal.
|
 |
Catholic Flame
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 17 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 295
|
Posted: December 15 2005 at 15:16 |
prog-chick wrote:
ok, someone I know has had his music uploaded onto this russian site, where it is being sold to folk all over the world. Legal action and advice has been sought, it IS illegal, and steps are being taken.
but it is like a bush fire, put one out, another springs up.
|
Is the import illegal in the UK?
|
“Great things are not accomplished by those who yield to trends and fads and popular opinion.”
~Jack Kerouac
|
 |
Wilcey
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: August 11 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 2696
|
Posted: December 15 2005 at 15:07 |
ok, someone I know has had his music uploaded onto this russian site, where it is being sold to folk all over the world. Legal action and advice has been sought, it IS illegal, and steps are being taken.
but it is like a bush fire, put one out, another springs up.
|
 |
Catholic Flame
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 17 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 295
|
Posted: December 15 2005 at 14:37 |
prog-chick wrote:
con safo wrote:
Yes but some bands would have little to no chance of selling their albums if it wasnt for internet publicity, so they have alot to gain as well.
|
publicity is different from having your music stolen. Get over the publicity thing.
@ Catholic Flame. To take something that is copywrited, and sell it in this way (even at low prices) is AGAINST copywrite law, therefore ilegal.
There is NO justification for downloading music from a site unethically. I have not heard one argument for this practise that is not just weak reasoning to create a conscience clearer.
It is a fact that it is damaging to business, to livliehoods, and to the continuation of bands that we love. It is extremely damaging to folk who make music.
PLEASE DON'T DO IT!
|
But the point is it is not illegal. They are not breaking the laws in Russia. The import to the US is not illegal.
Legal and ethical are two seperate issues. What is legal is not always just and justice is not always legal.
|
“Great things are not accomplished by those who yield to trends and fads and popular opinion.”
~Jack Kerouac
|
 |
horza
Prog Reviewer
Joined: August 31 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 2530
|
Posted: December 15 2005 at 14:26 |
I downloaded Opeth - liked what i heard - bought two concert tickets - bought the t-shirt - spread the word
|
Originally posted by darkshade:
Calling Mike Portnoy a bad drummer is like calling Stephen Hawking an idiot.
|
 |
Wilcey
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: August 11 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 2696
|
Posted: December 15 2005 at 14:18 |
con safo wrote:
Yes but some bands would have little to no chance of selling their albums if it wasnt for internet publicity, so they have alot to gain as well.
|
publicity is different from having your music stolen. Get over the publicity thing.
@ Catholic Flame. To take something that is copywrited, and sell it in this way (even at low prices) is AGAINST copywrite law, therefore ilegal.
There is NO justification for downloading music from a site unethically. I have not heard one argument for this practise that is not just weak reasoning to create a conscience clearer.
It is a fact that it is damaging to business, to livliehoods, and to the continuation of bands that we love. It is extremely damaging to folk who make music.
PLEASE DON'T DO IT!
|
 |
goose
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 4097
|
Posted: December 15 2005 at 07:58 |
con safo wrote:
Just to fill you in - record companies take a VAST majority of their bands record sale profit, so the artists dont even see this money that is supposedly being stolen. Whos the theif here? |
The band signs the contract, the band is bound to it. Not every band has a deal, but you don't hear much about the ones that don't, do you? And that's because of the record label. If a band has a choice between keeping all the profit of 500 CDs, and a tiny bit of the profit of 50,000, the latter is obviously a better deal for most!
|
 |
goose
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 4097
|
Posted: December 15 2005 at 07:55 |
MikeEnRegalia wrote:
goose wrote:
No one (much) shares files that are the same quality as CD. MP3 throws away at least half of the information even in the best possible circumstances, and they're generally less useful. I don't try and justify sharing music, because of course it is illegal, but on the other hand when I have some money I will buy all the hard copies I can. Right now I'm a student..! |
My recommendation: Napster music flat rate. |
I don't think I could spare five pounds a month, to be honest.
|
 |
Catholic Flame
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 17 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 295
|
Posted: December 14 2005 at 16:51 |
They are not breaking any laws in Russia -- right now. Also the import of the music is not illegal in the US -- right now. Both may change soon but -- right now-- it is legal.
|
“Great things are not accomplished by those who yield to trends and fads and popular opinion.”
~Jack Kerouac
|
 |
con safo
Prog Reviewer
Joined: March 17 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1230
|
Posted: December 14 2005 at 16:35 |
prog-chick wrote:
con safo wrote:
. But the amount of good music sharing has done for lesser known bands cant be denied. |
Yes I think the sharing of a file that belongs to you, ie. mp3
available on the website of a band signed or unsigned, can be a
incredibly positive thing. But I don't agree that this makes the theft
or illegal downloading ok!
I think we should agree to differ on this point.
yes, comparing a 15 dollar cd with a donut is crazy, the musician has SO much more to lose! |
Yes but some bands would have little to no chance of selling their
albums if it wasnt for internet publicity, so they have alot to gain as
well.
|
|
 |
chopper
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20035
|
Posted: December 14 2005 at 15:30 |
prog-chick wrote:
Thanks for that info Chopper, I was beginning to feel like a lone music-nazi!!!

|
No problem. Tricky point this one - I'm sure we've all taped a mate's
album before. My feeling is that bands should make sample tracks or
excerpts available for download, then if you like them, you buy the CD.
|
 |
Wilcey
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: August 11 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 2696
|
Posted: December 14 2005 at 15:12 |
con safo wrote:
. But the amount of good music sharing has done for lesser known bands cant be denied. |
Yes I think the sharing of a file that belongs to you, ie. mp3 available on the website of a band signed or unsigned, can be a incredibly positive thing. But I don't agree that this makes the theft or illegal downloading ok!
I think we should agree to differ on this point.
yes, comparing a 15 dollar cd with a donut is crazy, the musician has SO much more to lose!
|
 |
con safo
Prog Reviewer
Joined: March 17 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1230
|
Posted: December 14 2005 at 14:12 |
Maybe so, but the amount of bands who benefit from this exposure
outweights it greatly. I agree with you that downloading thousands of
albums without buying one is pretty selfish. But honestly, the baker
analogy is a bit silly... donuts are alot cheaper than albums... If im
going to pay upwards of 15 dollars for an album i need to hear it
beforehand. There will be always be selfish people, in all walks of
life and all situations, you cant avoid it. But the amount of good
music sharing has done for lesser known bands cant be denied.
|
|
 |
Wilcey
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: August 11 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 2696
|
Posted: December 14 2005 at 13:41 |
Thanks for that info Chopper, I was beginning to feel like a lone music-nazi!!!

|
 |
chopper
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20035
|
Posted: December 14 2005 at 13:28 |
con safo wrote:
prog-chick wrote:
does that make it morally right to steal? or does it just make you feel clever?
what do you do for a living? would you do it for free, knowing that
someone else was making a profit out of your work.................... I
think NOT!
|
Excuse me but if it wasnt for "stealing" i wouldnt own a quarter of
the albums i do now. I've said it so many times before but i guess i
have to repeat it: music sharing is the best thing to happen to music
in years. I dont care if Lars Ulrich cant afford his new gold plated
ferrari the fact is bands who would otherwise be swept under the rug
forever are getting their due praise. Do you think Comus - First
Utterance would be getting the recognition it does now if it wasnt for
the internet? I LOVE buying CD's but i also love hearing them before i
fork out my money for them. Face it, the only people who lose money from file sharing is huge record companies, and i dont have a lick of sympathy for them.
And yes, i feel pretty clever.
|
You're wrong there, my friend. Try telling that to Nick Barrett of
Pendragon, who had to re-mortgage his house to finance the latest
(excellent) Pendragon CD and whose CDs are available for download on
mp3search.ru (AND who does not receive a penny from them).
|
 |
Wilcey
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: August 11 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 2696
|
Posted: December 14 2005 at 13:15 |
Ok, I will be open with you, I work for a record label. I work VERY hard. I know exactly how much money an artist gets per cd, and I also know that it is MORE than they get if the album is downloaded instead. I also know if an artist does not meet a 'quota' of sales then they will be dumped by the label or distributor.
I understand and except that the internet has been revoloutionary for the promotion of music (amongst other things!) In fact it never ceases to fill me with wonder that here I am the other side of the atlantic debating an issue with you, I really do. I love that I can share my opinions on music, chat about something I love with likeminded folk, cos yes, you are right there is not a great prog scene in my village!
I don't except that I am going in circles, I stand solid on this issue.
If you swap a music file, and enjoy what you hear and buy the album GREAT, FANTASTIC, but please, please accept that there are thousands, probably millions of folk out there that will download a swapped file think that they have got something for free/cheap and feel pretty clever/smug............ with absoloutely NO intention of actually buying the product. THAT IS A GENUINE FACT!
and YES I do know, personally, musicians that have been effected by the negative side of the internet, as well as knowing many who enjoy the positive.
I also know folk who were happy getting music from p2p without really realising that there were taking something for nothing, I know someone who has downloaded over a thousand albums, (without later buying them) and thought you were 'allowed to cos it was on the net' Niave, yes, but it happens. it happens an awful blinkin lot.
The downloading argument is intense, some one recently said to me, that if they went to the bakers and licked all the donuts, only buying the ones they liked, it would not be long before that baker would be in trouble. This is a valid a nd real problem.
If you buy all the albums you download then thats ok. and I think that more folk should stand up together on this issue to educate the niave or simply misinformed.
Downloading without buying is theft. There is no excape from that. Most bands have downloads freely availble. If I hear of a band I like the sound of here, I look the up, and try get a mp3 from the band legally, if I like it I might then buy the album, but I base that choice on the bits that I do have the opportunity to hear.........and yes sometimes I buy a turkey! If I hear of a band here and am unable to get to hear some by a legal method then I make an educated choice, some I buy, some I don't.
I don't have a lot of money to spend on cd's, my wish list is generally greater than my have list, but thats ok with me. I am not motivated by selfishness. I have more music than I could listen to in a month, there is no rush for more, just want. and want can be controlled surely?
I might sound like a crusader on this issue. But I believe in it strongly. Ido not start threads about this, I joined in on a thread where the site mentioned was decidedly dodgey, and I wanted to inform.
PCx
|
 |