Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Topic: New trend in album reviews? Posted: November 10 2005 at 03:32 |
I think that reviewing is a very personal thing, and different reviewers take different approaches... sometimes from one review to another.
If I don't like a reviewer's style, I may not bother reading the review - but I'm not going to waste my time getting annoyed about it unless it's offensive to the band, this site or its members.
In the latter cases I'll just flag it with Easy in the "Abuse" thread to get it booted off
|
|
Syzygy
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 16 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 7003
|
Posted: November 09 2005 at 17:44 |
I'm not a big fan of reviewing by numbers, but it's a lot easier to follow than the kind of waffle I come out with. If people find it useful, and if the reviewers also make insightful comments about the music, that's fime by me.
|
'Like so many of you
I've got my doubts about how much to contribute
to the already rich among us...'
Robert Wyatt, Gloria Gloom
|
|
Easy Livin
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
|
Posted: November 05 2005 at 04:36 |
I'm not inclined to do that Cobb. We have to trust people to arrive at the rating they think is appropriate by whatever means they chose. The guidelines are there to help them, but at the end of the day, it's the reviewer's call.
|
|
cobb
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 10 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 1149
|
Posted: November 04 2005 at 19:16 |
Easy Livin wrote:
I agree with the original point. Reading those type of reviews though, I often get the impression the reviewers manipulate their track ratings to arrive at the album rating they want!
It is a bit of a waste of space though, like showing your working in an exam. |
Showing working in an exam has merits. If you get the question wrong simply because copied out in incorrect number, the examiner can at least see that you know the formula. These reviews show a total lack of understanding of how the review formula works in PA and as such should get no marks. Reviewers should have to pass a prog test before being allowed to review. [edit] This trend should be jumped on by the Review Admins or risk setting the trend- the dejure standard could become the defacto standard.
Edited by cobb
|
|
Easy Livin
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
|
Posted: November 04 2005 at 14:43 |
I agree with the original point. Reading those type of reviews though, I often get the impression the reviewers manipulate their track ratings to arrive at the album rating they want!
It is a bit of a waste of space though, like showing your working in an exam.
|
|
Snow Dog
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
|
Posted: November 04 2005 at 14:27 |
^ I think Horza's going laughing mad!
|
|
|
horza
Prog Reviewer
Joined: August 31 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 2530
|
Posted: November 04 2005 at 14:24 |
album reviews are only personal opinions
|
Originally posted by darkshade:
Calling Mike Portnoy a bad drummer is like calling Stephen Hawking an idiot.
|
|
R_DeNIRO
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 17 2005
Location: Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 431
|
Posted: November 04 2005 at 13:48 |
Totally agree
|
We were always be much human than we whish to be.
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21196
|
Posted: November 04 2005 at 13:37 |
I think that it makes much sense to comment on each songs specifically, but I would not try to rate them.
|
|
|
bluetailfly
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 28 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1383
|
Posted: November 04 2005 at 13:06 |
I completely agree kokoryn. This numerical rating approach is not a meaningful way to express aesthetic appreciation.
Secondly, many of these review are overly long, song-by-song, uncritical listener-response type reviews that are frankly unreadable. I think there needs to be some standards proposed regarding how to write a concise review, that is interesting, insightful, focused, and that makes a point that the reader can take away from it.
Otherwise, these reviews are just exercises in cerebral masterbation, which I don't have a problem with personally, but please keep the idiosyncratic results private and to yourself.
Bottom line: Write the review with your reader in mind. Try to keep in mind the reviews you like to read and the reviews that turn you off.
Thank you. I'm really a nice guy, really...
Edited by bluetailfly
|
"The red polygon's only desire / is to get to the blue triangle."
|
|
Marc Baum
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 30 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 259
|
Posted: November 04 2005 at 12:55 |
That's an interesting point kokoryn. I started for about a half year to rate songs with points (from zero - 10 points) and count them together and take the difference out of it. It's something like a trend that many people do something similar now. Well, concept albums, or records where the songs only work together, I rate with a whole record rating. I don't only use the points to get somehow a rating for the record, but I try to make up my mind how many stars I would give a record before I start to write a review, without getting nearer to the songs in particular. The solution can be very different sometimes. For me it started as something like an experiment, but it simply doesn't work with all records. You need a good ear to figure out these ones, where you only can rate the whole album, without particular song ratings. If you can handle it, it's a good thing, if not, it's even not. To give the song star-ratings (1-5) makes non-sence IMHO, but if you give points from 0 - 10 or even more, it works. You only must know, how to rate.
|
"All you need to do is sit back, and acquire the taste." - GENTLE GIANT
|
|
Lindsay Lohan
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 25 2005
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 3254
|
Posted: November 04 2005 at 12:17 |
Yep i think also the number freaks that just sums up some different numbers and stuff and then just calculates how many stars the albums deserve have missed the point...As the stars themselves are more than just ratings...there is also many different ways of summing these up and some is just plain silly
|
|
|
kokoryn
Forum Newbie
Joined: August 25 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 9
|
Posted: November 04 2005 at 12:14 |
I don't participate in forum discussions very much (well, in fact I
hardly do). but there is one thing I've noticed recently that disturbs
me a bit. What I observe is growing number of reviews in PA that
include album rating calculated as the average of song ratings. That is
an utter nonsense in my opinion. Is an album just a sum of its songs?
No way, especially in progressive rock where albums are very often
meant to be a musical concept and have much more meaning than just a
bunch of songs recorded on one CD.
My point is that we shouldn't take such a "scientific" approach when
talking about music. It leads nowhere - just think about it. If you
start to calculate overall rating as the arithmetic mean of song
ratings than why not the geometric mean or maybe harmonic? And why the
hell should the 1-minute song be treated just like the 20-minute one?
Take the weighted mean with song lengths as the weights - then you will
get more accurate general rating! As you can see this way of thinking
leads to more and more complicated but completely useless ideas.
I suggest we should stop thinking about ratings in terms of numbers as it
involves too many false assumptions one may make when for example
comparing two album ratings. Of course we can start a new discussion
about improving the rating system, but it would be probably pointless.
I believe it would be much more resonable to encourage people to treat
ratings as categories not numbers. My idea would be to replace the
stars reviewers give to each album with just one star but of different
colours, for example bronze, silver, gold, platinum.. or something like
that. Of course they would still have the same numeric meaning for
purposes of average ratings, but maybe people wouldn't be so tempted to
calculate the ratings. For example one may suppose that 5-star album is
as better than 4-star album as 4-star album is better than 3-star album
which is simply false. With a single star you can just say that
platinum-star album is better than gold-star album which is better than
silver-star one which is true or at least much closer to the truth than
the former statement.
I'd like to hear what do you think about the whole thing.
Edited by kokoryn
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.