Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
|
Topic: Gabriel’s solo career-Prog or not? Posted: September 14 2007 at 21:44 |
we discussed Gabriel, along with some others some time ago.. .
just had to wait till the time was right. I had a little birdie
telling me that a category that would be right for him and others like
him would be coming here.
|
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|
bhikkhu
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 06 2006
Location: A² Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 5109
|
Posted: September 14 2007 at 21:40 |
|
|
|
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
|
Posted: September 14 2007 at 21:20 |
well this has been settled in the smoky back rooms of PA's...
Peter Gabriel is being moved to Crossover....
|
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|
memowakeman
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 19 2005
Location: Mexico City
Status: Offline
Points: 13032
|
Posted: September 13 2007 at 23:54 |
Ghost Rider wrote:
darqdean wrote:
Now that Art Rock has split into three more easily managable sub-genres is there room for Peter Gabriel in Crossover Prog?
I think so, eventhough individual songs may not exactly fit the definition, the way the albums are constructed, the flow of songs, the instrumentation, unusual influences, lyrical structure and 'concepts' are prog. Also, as a musician he writes sublimely progressive music on those instrumental albums that occasionally get over looked when discussing his solo output (Birdy, Passion, Ovo, The Long Walk), some of which would almost qualify as Advant Prog. |
Yes, definitely - Micky and I have discussed that quite often, and he intends moving PG to Crossover ASAP. In fact, a few months ago (before I temporarily retired from the site), there was a poll about moving PG to Art Rock, but the results were unclear, and the idea was abandoned for the time being. However, now the time is ripe for him to be moved to a category which is much more suitable to his music, because of the features you have just highlighted.
|
Moving him to Crossover (if that is the most accurate prog genre for his music) would be great and a wise decision, i am agree with you guys , also last week-end i had a PG`s DVD show with P.O.V., Secret World and Growing Up, damn all of them are outstanding, the Growing Up DVD will be played next week here in a local cinema, that will be great
|
Follow me on twitter @memowakeman
|
|
Raff
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: July 29 2005
Location: None
Status: Offline
Points: 24429
|
Posted: September 13 2007 at 14:34 |
darqdean wrote:
Now that Art Rock has split into three more easily managable sub-genres is there room for Peter Gabriel in Crossover Prog?
I think so, eventhough individual songs may not exactly fit the definition, the way the albums are constructed, the flow of songs, the instrumentation, unusual influences, lyrical structure and 'concepts' are prog. Also, as a musician he writes sublimely progressive music on those instrumental albums that occasionally get over looked when discussing his solo output (Birdy, Passion, Ovo, The Long Walk), some of which would almost qualify as Advant Prog. |
Yes, definitely - Micky and I have discussed that quite often, and he intends moving PG to Crossover ASAP. In fact, a few months ago (before I temporarily retired from the site), there was a poll about moving PG to Art Rock, but the results were unclear, and the idea was abandoned for the time being. However, now the time is ripe for him to be moved to a category which is much more suitable to his music, because of the features you have just highlighted.
|
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: September 13 2007 at 14:28 |
Now that Art Rock has split into three more easily managable sub-genres is there room for Peter Gabriel in Crossover Prog?
I think so, eventhough individual songs may not exactly fit the definition, the way the albums are constructed, the flow of songs, the instrumentation, unusual influences, lyrical structure and 'concepts' are prog. Also, as a musician he writes sublimely progressive music on those instrumental albums that occasionally get over looked when discussing his solo output (Birdy, Passion, Ovo, The Long Walk), some of which would almost qualify as Advant Prog.
|
What?
|
|
The T
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
|
Posted: September 13 2007 at 14:08 |
Yes, he IS. His music may be poppy, but outstanding, worldy, interesting, progresive rock/pop at that. Even in his definitely poppy album SO, he still manages to give his songs an special atmosphere, use special instrumentations, he makes the album sound proggier than it is. UP and MELT are prog. US (to comment on all 4 PG albums that I have), well, kind of sucks but it's still an "elegant" album to use a good adjective.
|
|
Raff
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: July 29 2005
Location: None
Status: Offline
Points: 24429
|
Posted: September 13 2007 at 13:03 |
|
|
convocation
Forum Groupie
Joined: August 17 2006
Location: NYC
Status: Offline
Points: 70
|
Posted: September 13 2007 at 12:57 |
Peter Gabriel is a progressive rock artist. For eample, nobody really faults Yes for having a hit on Fragile - Roundabout, refering to the good old days. Besides, good progressive rockers evolve and reinvent themselves continually; sometimes testing the water in other genres. His (PG) influences are eclectic, and he's always original. Those who don't accept Gabriel as continuing to be active in prog after departing Genesis simple have too rigid a definition of what "progressive" rock is all about.
|
|
Christine
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 27 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 184
|
Posted: April 12 2007 at 07:24 |
Petey G. is definitely prog related. Even though the layers of composition that he puts into his music aren't as apparent as the ones defined in Genesis, they're still there & if you listen just as closely as you would to prog you notice a lot. Whenever I listen to "Up" I notice something different every time!
|
catsfootironclaw
|
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65289
|
Posted: April 10 2007 at 00:24 |
I love 'So' (and all his albums) as well, but remember that according to this site's current definition, Art Rockers, as wide-ranging as they may be, must 100% Prog. Last time this came up I felt Gabriel belonged in Art, but now I think ProgRelated is just about right.
Edited by Atavachron - April 10 2007 at 00:25
|
|
Floydian42
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 13 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 846
|
Posted: April 10 2007 at 00:04 |
rockandrail wrote:
It started with progressive reminiscences, especially in the minimalist collaboration with Fripp. But since the release of the (awfull for me) "So", it was only MTV dance musak. With "Up", we have a slight come back to progressive intend but still not remarkable. |
Nothing Remarkable? My Dear Sir, we both have heard different albums.
|
|
Zargus
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 08 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 3491
|
Posted: April 07 2007 at 18:17 |
No nit not.
Nit no not.
Nit nit folly bololey.
|
|
|
Peter
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: January 31 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 9669
|
Posted: April 02 2007 at 16:59 |
He's "prog" in MY house.
I don't care whether or not he is in yours -- I don't live there, or even know you.
(Not that it matters, as long as we enjoy his music -- you can call it prog, "prop" rock, "flibbertigibbet," or "Bob," for all the difference it makes.
"What's in a name? A rose by any other would smell as sweet...."
Labels schmabels!
'Tis damned good, and creative, in any case!
|
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock? Come to my arms, my beamish boy! O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!' He chortled in his joy.
|
|
StyLaZyn
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 22 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4079
|
Posted: April 02 2007 at 12:17 |
I think his post Genesis material at best is Prog-Related. I give him the nod only because of his contribution during the Prog years and his first solo album, which was very creative. After that, his albums seemed more standard weird.
Edited by StyLaZyn - April 02 2007 at 12:18
|
|
|
NetsNJFan
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 12 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3047
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 17:18 |
If PG isn't art-rock I don't know what is.
|
|
|
OldFatherThames
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 02 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 317
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 14:14 |
I think it's not progressive but have some elements, but honestly, I absolutely don't care. I love many of his work, especially PG1, PG3, Up, progressive or not ! Call it what you want ! Don't waste your time, just listen and appreciated the talent of this master !
|
|
hcnoer
Forum Groupie
Joined: October 28 2005
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 49
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 13:49 |
I don't look upon it is prog, but that doesn't mean i don't like it. I find it kinda interesting.
|
|
Saviorts
Forum Newbie
Joined: January 29 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 30
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 12:44 |
I think Peter Gabriel's solo work is progressive,
in the sense that the style of his music has certainly had changes and
taken influences from different types of music through the years.
But is it PROG?
Short answer: no. If I were to describe prog rock as a general
term to someone, and mention a list of bands as examples, I wouldn't
mention PG.
Long answer: yes. Since the term "prog" has about as many
alternative defenitions as the music itself has sub-genres, it could be
comfortably called prog among
other prog enthusiasts, and those enthusiasts would certainly know what
you mean (even if they don't necessarily accept it). If you
called it prog to a layman, they might get confused.
Either way I'm glad solo PG is listed on this site, or else I may have never started listening to it and loving it.
Thanks to eduardossc for justifying some of Phil Collins work too, always a good thing to do on this site.
|
For the love of goldens.
|
|
ProgPartin
Forum Groupie
Joined: August 15 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 60
|
Posted: October 28 2005 at 11:41 |
The way PG is able to put song together and change sound and direction
from cd to cd is incredible. Prog or not, his music is still some of
the best crafted I have ever heard.
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.