Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Proto-Prog and Prog-Related Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Gabriel’s solo career-Prog or not?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedGabriel’s solo career-Prog or not?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Gabriel’s solo career-Prog or not?
    Posted: September 14 2007 at 21:44
Clap
we discussed Gabriel, along with some others some time ago.. .  just had to wait till the time was right.  I had a little birdie telling me that a category that would be right for him and others like him would be coming here.  
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
bhikkhu View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 06 2006
Location: A² Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 5109
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 14 2007 at 21:40
'bout time.
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46838
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 14 2007 at 21:20
well this has been settled in the smoky back rooms of PA's...


Peter Gabriel is being moved to Crossover....
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
memowakeman View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 19 2005
Location: Mexico City
Status: Offline
Points: 13032
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 13 2007 at 23:54
Originally posted by Ghost Rider Ghost Rider wrote:

Originally posted by darqdean darqdean wrote:

Now that Art Rock has split into three more easily managable sub-genres is there room for Peter Gabriel in Crossover Prog?
 
I think so, eventhough individual songs may not exactly fit the definition, the way the albums are constructed, the flow of songs, the instrumentation, unusual influences, lyrical structure and 'concepts' are prog. Also, as a musician he writes sublimely progressive music on those instrumental albums that occasionally get over looked when discussing his solo output (Birdy, Passion, Ovo, The Long Walk), some of which would almost qualify as Advant Prog.


Yes, definitely - Micky and I have discussed that quite often, and he intends moving PG to Crossover ASAP. In fact, a few months ago (before I temporarily retired from the site), there was a poll about moving PG to Art Rock, but the results were unclear, and the idea was abandoned for the time being. However, now the time is ripe for him to be moved to a category which is much more suitable to his music, because of the features you have just highlighted.
 
Moving him to Crossover (if that is the most accurate prog genre for his music) would be great and a wise decision, i am agree with you guysClap, also last week-end i had a PG`s DVD show with P.O.V., Secret World and Growing Up, damn all of them are outstanding, the Growing Up DVD will be played next week here in a local cinema, that will be great Big%20smile

Follow me on twitter @memowakeman
Back to Top
Raff View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 29 2005
Location: None
Status: Offline
Points: 24429
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 13 2007 at 14:34
Originally posted by darqdean darqdean wrote:

Now that Art Rock has split into three more easily managable sub-genres is there room for Peter Gabriel in Crossover Prog?
 
I think so, eventhough individual songs may not exactly fit the definition, the way the albums are constructed, the flow of songs, the instrumentation, unusual influences, lyrical structure and 'concepts' are prog. Also, as a musician he writes sublimely progressive music on those instrumental albums that occasionally get over looked when discussing his solo output (Birdy, Passion, Ovo, The Long Walk), some of which would almost qualify as Advant Prog.


Yes, definitely - Micky and I have discussed that quite often, and he intends moving PG to Crossover ASAP. In fact, a few months ago (before I temporarily retired from the site), there was a poll about moving PG to Art Rock, but the results were unclear, and the idea was abandoned for the time being. However, now the time is ripe for him to be moved to a category which is much more suitable to his music, because of the features you have just highlighted.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 13 2007 at 14:28
Now that Art Rock has split into three more easily managable sub-genres is there room for Peter Gabriel in Crossover Prog?
 
I think so, eventhough individual songs may not exactly fit the definition, the way the albums are constructed, the flow of songs, the instrumentation, unusual influences, lyrical structure and 'concepts' are prog. Also, as a musician he writes sublimely progressive music on those instrumental albums that occasionally get over looked when discussing his solo output (Birdy, Passion, Ovo, The Long Walk), some of which would almost qualify as Advant Prog.
What?
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 13 2007 at 14:08
Yes, he IS. His music may be poppy, but outstanding, worldy, interesting, progresive rock/pop at that. Even in his definitely poppy album SO, he still manages to give his songs an special atmosphere, use special instrumentations, he makes the album sound proggier than it is. UP and MELT are prog. US (to comment on all 4 PG albums that I have), well, kind of sucks but it's still an "elegant" album to use a good adjective.
Back to Top
Raff View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 29 2005
Location: None
Status: Offline
Points: 24429
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 13 2007 at 13:03
Originally posted by convocation convocation wrote:

Peter Gabriel is a progressive rock artist. For eample, nobody really faults Yes for having a hit on Fragile - Roundabout, refering to the good old days.  Besides, good progressive rockers evolve and reinvent themselves continually; sometimes testing the water in other genres.  His (PG) influences are eclectic, and he's always original.  Those who don't accept Gabriel as continuing to be active in prog after departing Genesis simple have too rigid a definition of what "progressive" rock is all about.


ClapClapClap

There may be a few commercial (though excellent) songs on his solo albums, but his overall output is definitely progressive. Anyway, I'm one of the few people who prefer Gabriel's solo career to what he did with Genesis...
Back to Top
convocation View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: August 17 2006
Location: NYC
Status: Offline
Points: 70
Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 13 2007 at 12:57
Peter Gabriel is a progressive rock artist. For eample, nobody really faults Yes for having a hit on Fragile - Roundabout, refering to the good old days.  Besides, good progressive rockers evolve and reinvent themselves continually; sometimes testing the water in other genres.  His (PG) influences are eclectic, and he's always original.  Those who don't accept Gabriel as continuing to be active in prog after departing Genesis simple have too rigid a definition of what "progressive" rock is all about.
Back to Top
Christine View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 27 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 184
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 12 2007 at 07:24
Petey G. is definitely prog related. Even though the layers of composition that he puts into his music aren't as apparent as the ones defined in Genesis, they're still there & if you listen just as closely as you would to prog you notice a lot. Whenever I listen to "Up" I notice something different every time!
catsfootironclaw
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65289
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2007 at 00:24
I love 'So' (and all his albums) as well, but remember that according to this site's current definition, Art Rockers, as wide-ranging as they may be, must 100% Prog. Last time this came up I felt Gabriel belonged in Art, but now I think ProgRelated is just about right.








Edited by Atavachron - April 10 2007 at 00:25
Back to Top
Floydian42 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 13 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 846
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 10 2007 at 00:04
Originally posted by rockandrail rockandrail wrote:

It started with progressive reminiscences, especially in the minimalist collaboration with Fripp. But since the release of the (awfull for me) "So", it was only MTV dance musak. With "Up", we have a slight come back to progressive intend but still not remarkable.


Nothing Remarkable? My Dear Sir, we both have heard different albums.
Back to Top
Zargus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 08 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 3491
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 07 2007 at 18:17
No nit not.
Nit no not.
Nit nit folly bololey.
Back to Top
Peter View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: January 31 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 9669
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 02 2007 at 16:59
He's "prog" in MY house.
 
I don't care whether or not he is in yours -- I don't live there, or even know you.
(Not that it matters, as long as we enjoy his music -- you can call it prog, "prop" rock, "flibbertigibbet," or "Bob," for all the difference it makes.
 
 
"What's in a name? A rose by any other would smell as sweet...." Ermm
 
Labels schmabels! Thumbs%20Down
 
'Tis damned good, and creative, in any case!Stern%20Smile 
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy!
O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!'
He chortled in his joy.
Back to Top
StyLaZyn View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 22 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4079
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 02 2007 at 12:17
I think his post Genesis material at best is Prog-Related. I give him the nod only because of his contribution during the Prog years and his first solo album, which was very creative. After that, his albums seemed more standard weird. Wink

Edited by StyLaZyn - April 02 2007 at 12:18
Back to Top
NetsNJFan View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: April 12 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3047
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 28 2005 at 17:18
If PG isn't art-rock I don't know what is.
Back to Top
OldFatherThames View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 02 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 317
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 28 2005 at 14:14
I think it's not progressive but have some elements, but honestly, I absolutely don't care. I love many of his work, especially PG1, PG3, Up, progressive or not ! Call it what you want ! Don't waste your time, just listen and appreciated the talent of this master !
Back to Top
hcnoer View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: October 28 2005
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 49
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 28 2005 at 13:49
I don't look upon it is prog, but that doesn't mean i don't like it. I find it kinda interesting.
Back to Top
Saviorts View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: January 29 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 30
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 28 2005 at 12:44
I think Peter Gabriel's solo work is progressive, in the sense that the style of his music has certainly had changes and taken influences from different types of music through the years.

But is it PROG?

Short answer: no.  If I were to describe prog rock as a general term to someone, and mention a list of bands as examples, I wouldn't mention PG.

Long answer: yes.  Since the term "prog" has about as many alternative defenitions as the music itself has sub-genres, it could be comfortably called prog among other prog enthusiasts, and those enthusiasts would certainly know what you mean (even if they don't necessarily accept it).  If you called it prog to a layman, they might get confused.

Either way I'm glad solo PG is listed on this site, or else I may have never started listening to it and loving it.

Thanks to eduardossc for justifying some of Phil Collins work too, always a good thing to do on this site.
For the love of goldens.
Back to Top
ProgPartin View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: August 15 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 60
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 28 2005 at 11:41
The way PG is able to put song together and change sound and direction from cd to cd is incredible. Prog or not, his music is still some of the best crafted I have ever heard.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.461 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.