Albums better heard NOT on vinyl |
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Author | |||
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: December 23 2009 Location: Emerald City Status: Offline Points: 17847 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Posted: August 06 2023 at 22:46 |
||
Marillion Brave LP version gives you a double groove on side 4….You get either a downer ending or a happy ending, just depends where you start the stylus u don’t know which you get.
Rush FlyBy Night end of side one is a locked groove of bells at end of By Tor…. |
|||
|
|||
JD
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 07 2009 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 18446 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
|
|||
Thank you for supporting independently produced music
|
|||
Gentle and Giant
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 24 2019 Location: Blackpool Status: Offline Points: 4371 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Of course those metal bands couldn't slip in their satanic messages when played backwards on a CD could they - hehe.
|
|||
Oh, for the wings of any bird, other than a battery hen
|
|||
moshkito
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 04 2007 Location: Grok City Status: Offline Points: 17529 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Hi, But there were other bits that were more fun than a CD ... It's hard to find these days, but one Monty Python LP had 3 sides ... and the fun thing was hearing a DJ announcing one piece, and when he put it on ... was another ... which got me laughing really hard, and the moron never got any kind of idea what the 3rd side meant! Or asked about it. (It was an alternating groove on the LP. btw!!!!!) It can only happen on the LP. Another fun bit ... several folks did it, including Guy Guden on his album ... and it was when the side comes to an end, and becomes an endless loop. At least one German band did this. And even better ... is something that you can experience with an LP but not a CD ... the stuck bit, and someone knocking the needle forward ... you can hear it in many places, and even MP makes fun of it (...ohh you scratched the record!) ... and while I'm not sure of this, Frank Zappa was the first one to do this. The bad/good one is on the Amon Duul 1 album ... when it gets stuck, the needle is moved forwards and it continues. Sort of like ... interruptions don't matter! But what was better was that it was TIMED CORRECTLY ... you got annoyed, got up off the couch, and by the time you arrived at the turntable, it was back to normal! The joke was on you! A couple of other bits ... that are not do'able with a CD ... most radio station's turntables had adjustments for speed (at least Guy Guden's place in Santa Barbara did) and it allowed for some really big fun ... that Guy used for many comedy bits ... like the music wows and flutters, and goes faster and slower, and the joke might be about the composer being drunk ... or totally ripped ... but the best? The backwards stuff ... and specially the sound effects ... now you know why I was able to give Guy Guden some 300 plus hours of recordings of his shows in the 70's ... many gems in there, and I'm not even mentioning the crown jewel of them all ... that was copied by at least one other mula in the station. Guy plays many of these bits on his weekly show now. It will be about 5 to 10 more years before the CD grows up to become a more fun thing ... but all in all, the idea that the LP's did not have their place and they added a lot to the music ... is strange. Because of Guy's "audio alchemy" a lot of things are way better on vinyl, than they ever will be on CD or the history of the piece of the music! But, none of you guys will ever hear those things, unless Guy plays them ... but I think these bore him these days.
Edited by moshkito - August 06 2023 at 07:12 |
|||
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com |
|||
David_D
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 26 2010 Location: Copenhagen Status: Offline Points: 15135 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
|
|||
quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
|
|||
JD
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 07 2009 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 18446 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
|
|||
Thank you for supporting independently produced music
|
|||
Catcher10
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: December 23 2009 Location: Emerald City Status: Offline Points: 17847 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
(God this website is pure KRAPPP!!!!!! The only site on the WWW that gives me "Permission Denied" over and over and over.....Then try and post comment and it does not work, I have to refresh like 100x )
And JD asked for no technobabble talk, some just can't keep their panties on LOL!!! I've said before if I was a classical music listener I would probably be 100% digital due to the low dynamic passages. But even still if you listen to a live show those low level dynamic passages still have noise (moving chairs, people coughing, sneezing, talking.....musicians moving about flipping pages and so on) If you don't hear those things then it's not a live recording or normal experience. I have records that are 40+ yrs old and they still sound great and any surface noise I might hear does not bother me, but that's me.......I know of people who lose their sh*t when they hear a tick...
|
|||
|
|||
David_D
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 26 2010 Location: Copenhagen Status: Offline Points: 15135 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I guess, JD, your intention with this thread was to aim it for the people mostly being into vinyl.
|
|||
quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
|
|||
projeKct
Special Collaborator Errors & Omissions Team Joined: November 03 2013 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 2910 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
99% of the time, I listen to MP3 files (with highest quality VBR compression) so I agree with you. Very hard to tell the difference under "normal" listening conditions (in the car or at home on a basic sound system). But I also use FLAC for archiving purpose. I still wonder why bardberic says FLAC is a scam?!
|
|||
The Anders
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 02 2019 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Points: 3529 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Whether or not one sound format is better than another is largely a matter of taste, an trying to make it an objective thing doesn't really make sense to me.
For me, the basic distinction is between analog and digital. The latter produces less noise, but on the other hand, that can sometimes make the sound more tedious - I recall some "old boys" rock albums from circa 1990 and onward as an example of that. But it also depends on the type of music you are making, and of course on production. |
|||
David_D
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 26 2010 Location: Copenhagen Status: Offline Points: 15135 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I also prefer to hear on CD when it's a triple or even a double album with the vinyl sides 10-15 minutes long, and due to environmental considerations, especially if it's heavy vinyl release.
|
|||
quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
|
|||
Stressed Cheese
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 16 2022 Location: The Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 540 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
People buy vinyl because of the big sleeves (50% of people who buy vinyl don't own a record player, and that's not a statistic I'm pulling out of my ass, that's the reality). But they also buy it because somehow vinyl freaks have successfully spread the myth that vinyl is the superior format to the point where everytime I explain to people that CDs/Digital is better than vinyl, they are legit surprised. There's also a large amount of people who will believe any far-fetched explaination of why vinyl is supposedly better instead of just trusting the basic science behind digital audio we've known for many decades, but that's just the audiophile world in general. A lot of people also don't seem to understand that everything is done digitally these days, so any LP you buy from the last 4 decades has been worked on digitally, and thus is a digital album pressed on vinyl. Not that there can't be differences in the master they use for vinyl or CD/digital (just like how you can use a different master for an SACD compared to a CD to trick people into thinking SACDs are anything but a blatant scam). Making a truly analog recording requires doing the entire process without once converting it to digital along the way, and that's not a thing that happens anymore (unless with very, very specific niche instances). The biggest reason I still stick with CDs instead of downloads/streaming is because of sh*tty remasters. But you don't need to resort to vinyl for that. For most albums, just find an older CD pressing from the 80's or 90's. I always do some research and use the Dynamic Range DB before I buy anything (sometimes older CDs will have some issues fixed on later remasters, and sometimes new remasters are actually good), and I always use Discogs to ensure I get the exact pressing I need. On Spotify or YT, or when buying stuff from iTunes or what have you, you're 99% of the time stuck with only the most recent remaster, so I don't consider those serious options. Funnily enough, the supposed superiority of vinyl seems a lot more audible to a lot of audiophiles than the difference between a proper and a brickwalled master, which they often seem clueless about.
At a certain point, a lossy file is good enough quality that humans can't hear the difference between that and a lossless file. Or rather, there might be a small minority that can, but it depends on your ears, and your setup/headphones, so it might be worth it to do a blind test to see if you wouldn't be better off saving some drive space and just going for high quality lossy. I think my CD collection would take up like 2x as much space had I ripped it all in FLAC, but with no audible increase in audio quality to make that worth it. Edited by Stressed Cheese - August 05 2023 at 05:01 |
|||
Octopus II
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 21 2023 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 10489 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I never play any vinyl at all now. I still have a turntable but never use it.
I prefer CD or downloads now.
|
|||
Saperlipopette!
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 20 2010 Location: Tomorrowland Status: Offline Points: 11696 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I don't think everything sound better on vinyl (ok maybe I do, but I know it's just a preference). Putting on an record is a nice listening ritual that hightens my consentration, my patience and the actual listening experience. I mostly collect LP's because they are esthetically beautiful and I enjoy collecting. In my eyes the jewel case CD design look like cheap and ugly plastic crap, so outside of its musical content it has very little extra value to me. I've ripped all my CD's and placed them in the attic. I love going to record fairs, visit record shops and go crate digging in whichever new city I'm in etc...I don't sit at home buying overpriced albums on Discogs or anything like that. I find fairly priced gems, mostly 1960's, 1970's jazz, and I'm very good at it.
|
|||
richardh
Prog Reviewer Joined: February 18 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 28075 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
ELP - Brain Salad Surgery
only for 2 reasons. the synths on the vinyl version seem to disappear into the background and the CD ( I go for the Sony release) has the flexi disc bonus tracks that were not included on the original LP. Overwelmingly I now prefer vinyl to CD . I purchased a low end of the market turntable for about £280 and everything now sounds better when using the normal speakers I've used for years. I did buy a new amp but the previous one was knackered. However I now rely a lot more on streaming because I am pretty lazy. Hopefully I will never buy another CD, a technology that dramatically failed to live up to its early promise and I now regard as the biggest con/sham of my lifetime. Back in 1979/80 I can remember Tomorrows World demonstrating this new technology and thinking how wonderful. I got sucked in. If you have £20,000 to spend to make it work then cool. Thankfully streaming has now liberated us from this nonsense.
|
|||
projeKct
Special Collaborator Errors & Omissions Team Joined: November 03 2013 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 2910 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
Could you elaborate on that? I don't see why you say that. FLAC is the best audio format (and ALAC for Apple users).
|
|||
bardberic
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 02 2021 Location: PA, USA/Israel Status: Offline Points: 871 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I think the whole "everything sounds better on vinyl" thing is a load. I really don't get it. I don't understand why people drop head over heels for this outdated technology (actually I do - it's more about collecting the cover than listening to the music; I know some someone who don't even own a f**king turntable and they still buy vinyl). I'm certainly not willing to pay double to triple the price of a CD for it or 4-5 times the price of a digital download.I mean seriously, I can buy a King Gizzard album on Bandcamp for $8 USD. If I buy a vinyl, we're looking at about $40 USD for THE SAME album from either a local retailer or the band's official online store, with less versatility in digital playback options.
I don't think ANYTHING sounds better on vinyl, anyway (aside from the fact that vinyl is much harder to take care of and STILL gets damages over time, is less versatile and cannot be used in a vehicle, is heavy and hard to transport, cannot directly be uploaded to a computer or phone, etc.). It has a lower potential dynamic range than CD and digital (although the human ear can barely, if even at all, pick up the difference when we reach the maximum DR on any format), and the sound of vinyl depends heavily on your setup and each person will have different preferences. If you're like me and can't afford an expensive setup, vinyl sounds - and I'm going to ruffle a lot of feathers here. I don't care - like utter sh*t. At triple the price I would pay for a format that doesn't sound like sh*t and which won't even allow me to listen on my phone or in the car. Depending on your set up and the amount of wear on the hypothetical CD, either digital download or CD is the way to go. Any bitrate above 320 is unnecessary (although I concede that WAV is the best sounding format, albeit not enough to warrant them larger size - FLAC is a straight up scam). Sure, if you're paying very close attention 24-bit may sound nicer than 16-bit, but it's not noticeable enough to warrant the higher price. Basically, if you want the objectively best sounding format, WAV, 24-bit digital download is the best. But I'll stick with regular CDs and 320 mbps MP3s, thank you. There is one exception to my dislike of vinyl - poorly mastered digital albums. When a digital album out CD has been brickwalled or just poorly mastered, then vinyl is better because it likely is not AS poorly mastered. It still won't sound good, but it'll be better than the digital version. Regardless I hate this trend of producing digital albums as if their vinyl. It's better than brickwalling it, but you know there's a way to make a god sounding digital album without either brickwalling it nor treating it as if it were vinyl, right. So my answer? Pretty much most albums released after 1986 sound better NOT on vinyl. And even a lot of stuff before then, too! In theory, that is. Let's be real - 8/10 remasters sound like piss-stained sh*t. Since most well-selling music before 2005 has gotten a sh*tty remaster (except for some very new remasters of initially poorly mastered albums, such as the 2022 Nightwish remastered which actually FIXED the brickwall), I actually prefer the vinyl for a good plurality of anything released before 1986 (and a good minority of albums released after 1997) for which the price of these vinyl will not usually exceed $5-10 USD, if I shop at the right store (which is cheaper than the digital/CD reissues). So the takeaway here? Poorly mastered albums on digital formats are better on vinyl, as are the original vinyl releases for albums that had only s sh*tty remaster on digital. Otherwise, vinyl sucks. Sorry. Of course there's more nuance here than I'm making this out to be with.
Edited by bardberic - August 04 2023 at 19:15 |
|||
JD
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 07 2009 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 18446 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
|
|||
Thank you for supporting independently produced music
|
|||
JD
Forum Senior Member Joined: February 07 2009 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 18446 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
I was just thinking of Geoff Downes & New Dance Orchestra - The Light Program. From the booklet notes: "The Light Program is a collection of musical pieces which have been discreetly assembled. It is possible to make up your own alternative program, using the track/index facility, which is included on most moden compact disc player" Can't really do that on vinyl. Edited by JD - August 04 2023 at 16:33 |
|||
Thank you for supporting independently produced music
|
|||
The Anders
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 02 2019 Location: Denmark Status: Offline Points: 3529 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||
If there are too many scratches on the LP, of if it runs in the same groove, I would prefer another media for sure. Apart from that, I would probably choose other medias in case of music with very silent moments - so that the LP noise doesn't get in the way. Here I am thinking f.e. of some classical music or several types of electronica. Otherwise my main concern would be sound quality and the effect it has on the musical experience. If the sound is good, I don't really care if I am listening to a vinyl, a CD, or to online streaming. When I do buy the vinyl, it is either 1) for sentimental reasons (I do have something of a collector's gene in me), 2) if the album has been remixed and the LP is the only way to get the original mix, 3) for aesthetic reasons (cover art), 4) it allows me to read the lyrics or 5) if I want to support the artist financially.
Edited by The Anders - August 04 2023 at 14:26 |
|||
Post Reply | Page 12> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |