Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Proto-Prog and Prog-Related Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Beatles in two periods
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Beatles in two periods
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
AFlowerKingCrimson View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 02 2016
Location: Philly burbs
Status: Offline
Points: 18269 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AFlowerKingCrimson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Beatles in two periods
    Posted: July 04 2019 at 17:56
Originally posted by judahbenkenobi judahbenkenobi wrote:

Whoever decided to release The Beatles 1962-1965 and The Beatles 1966-1970 answered this question decades ago

Oh yes, the red and blue albums respectively. We had those when I was a kid. Two of the best compilation albums ever and you are right they pretty much settle this argument. Wink
Back to Top
AFlowerKingCrimson View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 02 2016
Location: Philly burbs
Status: Offline
Points: 18269 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AFlowerKingCrimson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 04 2019 at 17:55
Maybe their meeting with Bob Dylan? Not sure. I would say rubber soul was more or less the dividing line. Not sure whether to include it with later or earlier Beatles since it has elements of both. I'll say rubber soul anyway as the turning point for the band.
Back to Top
Rogertheshrubber View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2009
Location: Keller, TX
Status: Offline
Points: 12 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rogertheshrubber Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 04 2019 at 17:26
Originally posted by Fischman Fischman wrote:

Originally posted by chopper chopper wrote:

Originally posted by Fischman Fischman wrote:

The Beatles can actually be divided into four periods.  

The first dividing line seems to be pretty well agreed upon.  Help -> Rubber Soul.  Where they went from catchy but still simple and unremarkable little ditties/boy band pop songs and emerged into a massive explosion of what could be done in pop music. 

That middle period, comprised of Rubber Soul and Revolver, and to some degree, Sgt. Pepper, was the peak of Beatle awesomenedd before the third and final period, when all that creativity and experimentation went awry, descending into a mix of drug-addled gibberish, silly indulgence, and mindless hippie escapism.  
That's only 3 and I really don't think you can call Abbey Road "drug-addled gibberish, silly indulgence, and mindless hippie escapism"

Sorry, not sure why I typed four.  I have fixed my original post. 

Come Together = Drug Addled Gibberish
Maxwell's Silver Hammer = Even many Beatlemaniacs don't like this one
Octopus's Garden = Silly indulgence, and juvenile at that.  
I Want You (She's So Heavy) = Mind numbingly repetitious, so yes, indulgent.  And what does I Want You have to do with someone being So Heavy?  And who the hell is "she" anyway.  The song is musically interesting enough to hold for about three minutes (like most Beatle songs) but wears out its welcome long before it hits its 7+ total.  As for the lyrics, they're done even sooner.  

Other silliness follows in some of the subsequent songs.  

Thanks for your input Sgt. FridayTongue
I have nothing to say occifer!
Back to Top
Rogertheshrubber View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2009
Location: Keller, TX
Status: Offline
Points: 12 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rogertheshrubber Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 04 2019 at 17:14
Or call anything they did "gibberish". It was the end of the 60s. No baroque dreams for flutes floating around.
I have nothing to say occifer!
Back to Top
omphaloskepsis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2011
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 6341 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote omphaloskepsis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 27 2019 at 01:12
Originally posted by patrickq patrickq wrote:

...but for me, it’s Rubber Soul. Period 1: great pop/rock band. Period 2: greatest pop/rock band.
 

This^
Back to Top
chopper View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20030 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote chopper Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 26 2019 at 04:34
Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

Originally posted by CosmicVibration CosmicVibration wrote:

pre- Rubber Soul
post - Rubber Soul
 

at the risk of being pedantic that would make 3 periods
 
LOL
Back to Top
richardh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 28029 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote richardh Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 25 2019 at 22:28
Originally posted by CosmicVibration CosmicVibration wrote:

pre- Rubber Soul
post - Rubber Soul
 

at the risk of being pedantic that would make 3 periods

I think it's well established that Beatles changed from mop top pop group to a serious and often experimental band from Rubber Soul onwards. That's when a lot of bands were becoming inspired and 'rebelling' against record companies to a degree who just wanted a puppet. The Who and The Kinks and even The Rolling Stones (bless) were part of the revolution. The Beatles though were the more pretentious end of this and that can be more easily traced through to their influence on the likes of Robert Fripp and progressive rock.
Back to Top
CosmicVibration View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 26 2014
Location: Milky Way
Status: Offline
Points: 1396 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote CosmicVibration Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 25 2019 at 10:15
pre- Rubber Soul
post - Rubber Soul
Back to Top
patrickq View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 18 2015
Location: the New England
Status: Offline
Points: 508 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote patrickq Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 25 2019 at 00:35
^
So Paul is dead! I always suspected that.
Back to Top
someone_else View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: May 02 2008
Location: Going Bananas
Status: Offline
Points: 24295 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote someone_else Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 25 2019 at 00:13
Originally posted by siLLy puPPy siLLy puPPy wrote:

Ah, i thought this was gonna be before the real Paul died and the fake Paul took over LOL
 

Ah, the one and only Billy Shears turns up LOL … finally. So Sgt. Pepper was the turning point (Paul allegedly blew his mind out in a car on 9 November 1966).


Edited by someone_else - June 25 2019 at 00:15
Back to Top
siLLy puPPy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
PSIKE, JRF/Canterbury, P Metal, Eclectic

Joined: October 05 2013
Location: SFcaUsA
Status: Offline
Points: 15243 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote siLLy puPPy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 24 2019 at 22:27
Ah, i thought this was gonna be before the real Paul died and the fake Paul took over LOL

https://rateyourmusic.com/~siLLy_puPPy
Back to Top
Fischman View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 21 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1612 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Fischman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 24 2019 at 22:06
Originally posted by jamesbaldwin jamesbaldwin wrote:

Originally posted by chopper chopper wrote:

Originally posted by Fischman Fischman wrote:

Originally posted by chopper chopper wrote:

Originally posted by Fischman Fischman wrote:

The Beatles can actually be divided into four periods.  

The first dividing line seems to be pretty well agreed upon.  Help -> Rubber Soul.  Where they went from catchy but still simple and unremarkable little ditties/boy band pop songs and emerged into a massive explosion of what could be done in pop music. 

That middle period, comprised of Rubber Soul and Revolver, and to some degree, Sgt. Pepper, was the peak of Beatle awesomenedd before the third and final period, when all that creativity and experimentation went awry, descending into a mix of drug-addled gibberish, silly indulgence, and mindless hippie escapism.  

That's only 3 and I really don't think you can call Abbey Road "drug-addled gibberish, silly indulgence, and mindless hippie escapism"



Sorry, not sure why I typed four.  I have fixed my original post. 

Come Together = Drug Addled Gibberish
Maxwell's Silver Hammer = Even many Beatlemaniacs don't like this one
Octopus's Garden = Silly indulgence, and juvenile at that.  
I Want You (She's So Heavy) = Mind numbingly repetitious, so yes, indulgent.  And what does I Want You have to do with someone being So Heavy?  And who the hell is "she" anyway.  The song is musically interesting enough to hold for about three minutes (like most Beatle songs) but wears out its welcome long before it hits its 7+ total.  As for the lyrics, they're done even sooner.  

Other silliness follows in some of the subsequent songs.  

I'll give you Octopus' Garden but we'll have to agree to differ on the others. Read up a bit on Come Together and I Want You ("she" is Yoko and there is a reason behind the lyrics).



Octopus' Garden is a very good funny country pop song.
Maxwell is a weak song but it's not bad
Is "I want you" self indulgent? Yes, luckily!!! Like most of Dylan's masterpieces and prog's masterpieces.

I want you is one of the greatest masterpieces by the Beatles.


Dylan actually exceeds the fabs in the overrated department.
Back to Top
jamesbaldwin View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 25 2015
Location: Milano
Status: Offline
Points: 5986 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jamesbaldwin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 24 2019 at 16:17
Originally posted by chopper chopper wrote:

Originally posted by Fischman Fischman wrote:

Originally posted by chopper chopper wrote:

Originally posted by Fischman Fischman wrote:

The Beatles can actually be divided into four periods.  

The first dividing line seems to be pretty well agreed upon.  Help -> Rubber Soul.  Where they went from catchy but still simple and unremarkable little ditties/boy band pop songs and emerged into a massive explosion of what could be done in pop music. 

That middle period, comprised of Rubber Soul and Revolver, and to some degree, Sgt. Pepper, was the peak of Beatle awesomenedd before the third and final period, when all that creativity and experimentation went awry, descending into a mix of drug-addled gibberish, silly indulgence, and mindless hippie escapism.  
That's only 3 and I really don't think you can call Abbey Road "drug-addled gibberish, silly indulgence, and mindless hippie escapism"

Sorry, not sure why I typed four.  I have fixed my original post. 

Come Together = Drug Addled Gibberish
Maxwell's Silver Hammer = Even many Beatlemaniacs don't like this one
Octopus's Garden = Silly indulgence, and juvenile at that.  
I Want You (She's So Heavy) = Mind numbingly repetitious, so yes, indulgent.  And what does I Want You have to do with someone being So Heavy?  And who the hell is "she" anyway.  The song is musically interesting enough to hold for about three minutes (like most Beatle songs) but wears out its welcome long before it hits its 7+ total.  As for the lyrics, they're done even sooner.  

Other silliness follows in some of the subsequent songs.  
I'll give you Octopus' Garden but we'll have to agree to differ on the others. Read up a bit on Come Together and I Want You ("she" is Yoko and there is a reason behind the lyrics).

Octopus' Garden is a very good funny country pop song.
Maxwell is a weak song but it's not bad
Is "I want you" self indulgent? Yes, luckily!!! Like most of Dylan's masterpieces and prog's masterpieces.

I want you is one of the greatest masterpieces by the Beatles.
Amos Goldberg (professor of Genocide Studies at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem): Yes, it's genocide. It's so difficult and painful to admit it, but we can no longer avoid this conclusion.
Back to Top
Rednight View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 18 2014
Location: Mar Vista, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 4807 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rednight Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 24 2019 at 11:13
Candlestick Park: 1. the end of grueling, thankless tours 2. the beginning of full-time attention to their future recording endeavors
"It just has none of the qualities of your work that I find interesting. Abandon [?] it." - Eno
Back to Top
jamesbaldwin View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: September 25 2015
Location: Milano
Status: Offline
Points: 5986 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jamesbaldwin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 22 2019 at 18:31
Originally posted by BaldJean BaldJean wrote:

Beatles before "Rubber Soul" and Beatles from "Rubber Soul" on

oh yeah
Amos Goldberg (professor of Genocide Studies at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem): Yes, it's genocide. It's so difficult and painful to admit it, but we can no longer avoid this conclusion.
Back to Top
patrickq View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 18 2015
Location: the New England
Status: Offline
Points: 508 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote patrickq Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 21 2019 at 13:03
Thank you everyone to responding to my query!
Back to Top
The Anders View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 02 2019
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 3529 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote The Anders Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 20 2019 at 18:05
I really like the White Album, but it is not very cohesive. There are some of their best songs ("Blackbird", "Happiness Is A Warm Gun", "Dear Prudence", "I'm So Tired", "Long Long Long" and "Revolution 9" [sic] are probably my favourites), but there are also a lot of mediocre fillers. Plus I still find it very hard to cope with "Obla di Obla da".

On the other hand, it has all kinds of everything on it, and it is almost like a collage. That's probably the most fascinating thing about it. It displays a band breaking up, consisting mainly on what is essentially solo material, so it is, if you like, a great album by accident.
Back to Top
Prog Loving Deadhead View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: June 16 2019
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Points: 28 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Prog Loving Deadhead Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 20 2019 at 13:49
That's an easy one!

Before lsd.  After lsd.
Back to Top
patrickq View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 18 2015
Location: the New England
Status: Offline
Points: 508 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote patrickq Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 20 2019 at 09:46
Originally posted by judahbenkenobi judahbenkenobi wrote:

Whoever decided to release The Beatles 1962-1965 and The Beatles 1966-1970 answered this question decades ago
hmmmm.....
Back to Top
chopper View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20030 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote chopper Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 20 2019 at 05:35
Originally posted by Fischman Fischman wrote:

Originally posted by chopper chopper wrote:

Originally posted by Fischman Fischman wrote:

The Beatles can actually be divided into four periods.  

The first dividing line seems to be pretty well agreed upon.  Help -> Rubber Soul.  Where they went from catchy but still simple and unremarkable little ditties/boy band pop songs and emerged into a massive explosion of what could be done in pop music. 

That middle period, comprised of Rubber Soul and Revolver, and to some degree, Sgt. Pepper, was the peak of Beatle awesomenedd before the third and final period, when all that creativity and experimentation went awry, descending into a mix of drug-addled gibberish, silly indulgence, and mindless hippie escapism.  
That's only 3 and I really don't think you can call Abbey Road "drug-addled gibberish, silly indulgence, and mindless hippie escapism"

Sorry, not sure why I typed four.  I have fixed my original post. 

Come Together = Drug Addled Gibberish
Maxwell's Silver Hammer = Even many Beatlemaniacs don't like this one
Octopus's Garden = Silly indulgence, and juvenile at that.  
I Want You (She's So Heavy) = Mind numbingly repetitious, so yes, indulgent.  And what does I Want You have to do with someone being So Heavy?  And who the hell is "she" anyway.  The song is musically interesting enough to hold for about three minutes (like most Beatle songs) but wears out its welcome long before it hits its 7+ total.  As for the lyrics, they're done even sooner.  

Other silliness follows in some of the subsequent songs.  
I'll give you Octopus' Garden but we'll have to agree to differ on the others. Read up a bit on Come Together and I Want You ("she" is Yoko and there is a reason behind the lyrics).


Edited by chopper - June 20 2019 at 05:36
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.191 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.