Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Music and Musicians Exchange
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Canterbury Scene and fuzz pedals
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Canterbury Scene and fuzz pedals

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Jacob Schoolcraft View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 22 2021
Location: NJ
Status: Offline
Points: 1066
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jacob Schoolcraft Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Canterbury Scene and fuzz pedals
    Posted: May 20 2024 at 20:40
Phil Miller sounds like he's using the "Big Muff" but you never know. Distortion or a fuzz tone which was built into guitar amps back then was rather impressive sounding. I believe guitarist Jeff Beck was using Orange Amps at the time. A good example is on Rough And Ready where his guitar is singing...rather crying..A good example of that particular guitar sound would be present on Camel recordings.

Camel sometimes had similarities to what one would hear from Canterbury bands. "Supertwister" from Mirage, Several tracks from Moonmadness and Rain Dances and of course CAMEL A LIVE RECORD. With Richard Sinclair on vocals and Mel Collins on sax it has definite similarities to what exists in the Canterbury style. Andrew Latimer's guitar sound is more like Jeff Beck and far from sounding like Phil Miller.

Phil Miller ...in some cases captured the fuzz tone that Bob Fripp used on Larks Tongues In Aspic Part 1. The same fuzz tone is heard on Matching Mole recordings. On National Health albums the fuzz is less and the sustain is more.

In some cases Phil Lee from Gilgamesh captured that fuzzy tone during improvisation on electric guitar. He was a brilliant Classical guitarist as well.

Steve Hillage didn't have a fuzzy tone. He produced a full sounding tone where the treble of his high pitched notes and the bass of his lower sounding notes were pronounced with clarity. Even though he used Distortion it sounded off quite differently and sophisticated not unlike Frank Marino or Ronnie Montrose playing Jazz Rock.Gong were thought to be Canterbury and Hillage contributed immensely on their important albums.

Mike Oldfield was briefly affiliated with Canterbury musicians and he sounded like he was using a Big Muff on Tubular Bells. The distorted sound that Hillage used in Gong was eventually reproduced with an MXR pedal. For a while though it seemed as if you could only produce that sound through a Marshall Amp that had built in Distortion...or an Orange Amp. I might be wrong..but I believe the only way to get that sound was by turning up the amps along with using the Distortion dial.

In some cases guitarists with Steely Dan often produced that driving energetic affect on "Reelin' In The Years" or "Bodhisattva ". I remember in 68' there wasn't a pedal for it. ..but there was "The Big Muff"

Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17484
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote moshkito Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 15 2024 at 05:52
Hi,

I was kinda thinking ... that above all ... you really had to have a FUZZY mind first ... to end up doing all kinds of funny/funky/farout stuff. 

Nice break down of things derickgtwk. Enjoyed reading that, however, I have to admit that for me, many times the sound was more indicative of a specific feeling/idea to move the piece along differently than the commons ways and styles. Always thought this was one of the special things about the Canterbury folks ... and sometimes it was for fun. I have a hard time thinking that people did it simply for the sake of using something different ... and new ... however, the non-stop proliferation of ideas on how to use anything is neat, and far out to read. An organ through a wah pedal ... hmmmm ... but it reminds me of Edgar Froese i his book describing their experiments with echo chambers, before they became electronic, and it is crazy and then some, but they made it work and you can hear the sound in the early LP's, if you can identify them, which TD was really clean on that part more often than not .. and then ... the incredible use and constant development of sequencers, which Christopher Franke had to do manually for a long time!!!!



Edited by moshkito - May 15 2024 at 05:58
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
derickgtwk View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: April 09 2024
Location: perdυes mg
Status: Offline
Points: 1
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote derickgtwk Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 09 2024 at 13:16
reading this topic, I wanted to make my contribution.

i've been researching the equipment used by the bands in the canterbury scene, not just the pedals, but also the amps and cabinets.

about the fuzz pedal used by MGP's bass player: based on the photos I've seen of the band's gigs, I believe it to be the "elka dizzy tone".

in the case of EGG, KHAN, Hatfield and the North, National Health: all the organ sounds consist of the harmmond l100 through a superfuzz/duo-fuzz and a wah pedal called "schaller bow-wow yoy-yoy."

both Dave Stewart and Mont Campbell used the same model of amplifier and cabinet, each had a pair of 100w hiwatts with wem starfinder cabinets, which from the sound of it, I'm sure they didn't have Fane Crescendo, I believe the starfinders they used had rare goodmans power audiom 50w speakers.

In the case of some other bands like Supersister, Quiet Sun, Cos, STUBBS: they all used electric organs with fuzz.

Quiet Sun and STUBBS used vox organs.

Supersister's keyboard player: Robert Jan Stips used a farfisa compact series at first and then switched to a farfisa vip series organ, and I can see from the band's pictures that they used london city amps.

Cos keyboard player Marc Hollander used a Farfisa Professional Duo.
Back to Top
hugo1995 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 20 2019
Location: New Zealand
Status: Offline
Points: 164
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote hugo1995 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 15 2020 at 16:11
Surprisingly this is yet to be mentioned in the thread.

Mike Ratledge and Dave Stewart 100% used the Shaftesbury Fuzz pedal. There is a photo archive with Dave using it, and he had it to the left of him on a stand instead of using it with his foot.



Edited by hugo1995 - January 15 2020 at 16:13
interests: Moon Safari, Gilgamesh, Egg, ELP, Soft Machine, Gong, Opeth (Everything pre watershed), Brighteye Brison, The Flower Kings
Back to Top
Magmatt View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: July 10 2019
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 58
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Magmatt Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 19 2019 at 09:04
It is well documented that Chris Squire from Yes used a Maestro Brassmaster fuzz device. No longer made.
There is actually a modern version of this made by Mallekko Heavy Industries and it's called  The (B)Assmaster.
it's not cheap as far as effect pedals go and it is well built. I obtained one when I played with a Deep Purple tribute. Our keyboard player tried it on his Hammond with success also. I love that it comes with a set of rubber teeth inside and the control pot read " More Ass ".  Best fuzzy organ sound has to be Wakeman on Strawbs "The Hangman and the Papist ' . 
Back to Top
handwrist View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 19 2019
Location: Lisbon
Status: Offline
Points: 135
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote handwrist Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 21 2019 at 04:55
I don't have specifics, but the key to the Canterbury organ sound from my experience, comes not so much from a specific pedal or amp, but from cheapness. If you have a cheap keyboard and a cheap amp with incorporated distortion, or a cheap fuzz pedal, you will get pretty close. The cheaper the better actually.

With VSTs you can explore more, but in the end, remember that the sound grew from the bands having no money to buy proper equipment. Necessity is the mother of invention as they say, or something to that effect.
Back to Top
Polymorphia View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 06 2012
Location: here
Status: Offline
Points: 8856
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Polymorphia Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 18 2019 at 09:34
I was looking at the two Wattson clones earlier. Apparently, they're the most accurate. (They've even been sued by Univox - good sign).
Back to Top
Davesax1965 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 23 2013
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 2839
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Davesax1965 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 18 2019 at 05:24
Here's a clone in action..... 



Back to Top
Davesax1965 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 23 2013
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 2839
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Davesax1965 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 18 2019 at 04:49
And Polymorphia may be happy to know that clones are indeed available. ;-)

https://www.thegearpage.net/board/index.php?threads/what-are-my-options-for-a-univox-super-fuzz.1796015/

Back to Top
Davesax1965 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 23 2013
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 2839
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Davesax1965 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 18 2019 at 04:46
DA-90 germanium diodes, just use 1N4148's instead. Nothing else in there is unusual, all off the shelf bits. Modern resistors and capacitors are built to better tolerances than the 60's stuff as well. 

The schematic above would cost about £20-30 to build using a Chinese made PCB, including the price of a Hammond enclosure, foot switch, jacks, pots, knobs and a power inlet (I'd ditch the battery.) Nothing to it, this is "pre integrated circuit" days, of course. 

Quick PS, it'll be well out of copyright. ;-)

Edited by Davesax1965 - January 18 2019 at 05:32

Back to Top
Davesax1965 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 23 2013
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 2839
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Davesax1965 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 18 2019 at 04:43
That's interesting ! Could be. 

I was looking up the price of Fuzz Faces yesterday - ha haaaa, thousands for a pedal because it has the original germanium transistors in it. World's gone mad, a bipolar transistor junction transistor is basically a voltage controlled high speed switch. It's like saying a vintage car handles differently due to the wind resistance of the original paint. 

Just found this, a schematic for a Univox Superfuzz. The original transistors are 2SC828's - you can get new old stock ones for 99p each. There are six of them, standard NPN ones. You could actually use BC547's and save a few quid, there wouldn't be much of a difference. Pretty simple to build this on stripboard or design a simple PCB for it. Not that I'm volunteering, too much work to do on the modular synth !!! 


Back to Top
Polymorphia View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 06 2012
Location: here
Status: Offline
Points: 8856
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Polymorphia Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 17 2019 at 16:57
In most cases, it doesn't quite sound like a big muff to me. It sounds a little more "congested." I've been watching some Univox Superfuzz demos and I thinks that's definitely what the MGP bass player is using. 
Back to Top
Davesax1965 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 23 2013
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 2839
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Davesax1965 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 17 2019 at 09:59
Well, perhaps the thread is actually about "do you know what equipment was used" rather than "let's all go off on a tangent and no we don't", Mosh........ ;-)

Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17484
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote moshkito Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 17 2019 at 07:16
Originally posted by Davesax1965 Davesax1965 wrote:

I thought I'd include a picture of a tangent at this point. ;-) (Sorry. Mosh. ;-) )



Sorry Dave ... the picture is not funny ... where are the laughs? (spoken through a space whisper thing that Gilly used!)
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
Davesax1965 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 23 2013
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 2839
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Davesax1965 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 17 2019 at 02:26
This may help. Searchable pedals and effects made from 1960 - 69. Just alter the link to get it to, say, 1972. 

https://reverb.com/marketplace/effects-and-pedals?year_max=1969&year_min=1960

Back to Top
Davesax1965 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 23 2013
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 2839
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Davesax1965 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 17 2019 at 02:23
Oh yes, another point. Polymorphia was talking about what might have been used for the organ and guitar as well. The answer is "probably the same pedal that the bassist was using". Equipment was pretty scarce in the early 70's. 

Even bands like Hawkwind would only have, say, a couple of Binson echo units, a couple of Dunlop wah pedals and a couple of generic "fuzz" pedals. That would be the lot, apart from some WEM / Marshall / Sound City / Vox amps. Amps in the UK were generally British made, getting something heavy shipped from the US was a bit of an expensive proposition, then. Matter of fact, even American guitars and basses were by no means universal, either. 

Edited by Davesax1965 - January 17 2019 at 02:24

Back to Top
Davesax1965 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 23 2013
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 2839
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Davesax1965 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 17 2019 at 02:18
They're the most likely. However, remember that this is an era where decent pedals and amps are scarce in the UK. You can get bassists using guitar pedals, there are obscure manufacturers coming up with a few designs which are only manufactured by the handful - you also get bassists using guitar amps, so unless you get an equipment list or a photo, you can never be completely sure. 

My money would really be on a Fuzz Face or Big Muff Pi. That covers most of the possibilities. However, of course, without knowing what the amp was, you're never going to absolutely replicate the sound. And even if you found an old bass valve amp, which it just might be, modern valves will sound different. And a modern one is probably biased correctly as well. Then there's the bass and string choice. ;-)

You may get close, but you probably won't get *exact*. Although that may not matter. 

Back to Top
Gerinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 10 2010
Location: Barcelona Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 5154
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Gerinski Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2019 at 12:08
I would also put my bet on the Big Muff and the Fuzz Face.
Back to Top
Davesax1965 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 23 2013
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 2839
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Davesax1965 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2019 at 08:17
I thought I'd include a picture of a tangent at this point. ;-) (Sorry. Mosh. ;-) )



Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17484
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote moshkito Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 16 2019 at 06:20
Originally posted by Polymorphia Polymorphia wrote:

Originally posted by moshkito moshkito wrote:

Originally posted by Polymorphia Polymorphia wrote:

I'm looking for the specific fuzz box. Is it a fuzzface? Is it the superfuzz?


I would probably check the websites for some of these bands, since at times they list the equipment for various members ... hopefully you will find it, but I caution you about one thing ... don't try to emulate ... create your own sound, even if you have to use a kitchen pot! For the most part it is some of the crazy stuff that many of them did to help create an identity.
Thanks for the tip, but if you listen to my music you'll hear there's little danger of it sounding like Caravan.
 

CARAVAN, is probably the most "classical" sounding band of them all, and also the one that stood out … however, the really far out stuff is buried and out there … and I would probably spend more time listening to National Health, Matching Mole, Richard Sinclair (try Caravan of Dreams! (much later!)), and so many others around that time … they are really different and fun to enjoy. And the creative efforts are … totally out there somewhere in the galaxy, sometimes, but always fun! I did not keep up with Soft Machine after the 5th or 6th album to tell you more.

(BTW, I'm probably the only Caravan person you know that has at least 15 of their albums) … (I forgot how to count in my old age to tell you more about the Canterbury folks!)

(BTW2 … I find sounds in the strangest of places! So I went to the food bank and someone dropped … whatever it was … let me tell you that sound was … too late for a recorder, and I did not have my smartphone!) … I like walking down the street and record the sounds haphazard for 5 minutes … (and NOT LISTEN to it for several days) … then get in the car, go somewhere else … do it again … by the time you turn that stuff over, and goof around with it forwards, backwards, and different speeds, you have created a new sound effect, that you can use … for a lot of … who knows … ohh, by the way, try bathroom sounds backwards … they sound great!


Edited by moshkito - January 16 2019 at 06:31
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.148 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.