Please Self-Release Me, Let Me Go |
Post Reply | Page <1 678910 14> |
Author | ||||
stefolof
Forum Groupie Joined: November 30 2009 Location: Kl Status: Offline Points: 59 |
Posted: February 12 2010 at 03:30 | |||
>
Edited by stefolof - August 26 2015 at 04:59 |
||||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65243 |
Posted: February 12 2010 at 03:21 | |||
There is indeed much to be said for charging a price - at some point in the exchange - for what you're offering. I believe it was the Joker who said "Never do anything you do well for free." He was right, and there's something fundamental about how people judge things upfront that is reflected in its cost. A free sample is one thing but to habitually give away your work suggests, rightly or wrongly, a lack of confidence and exclusivity. People expect to pay for something good, and they will.
|
||||
jplanet
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: August 30 2006 Location: NJ Status: Offline Points: 799 |
Posted: February 12 2010 at 02:40 | |||
I believe that ultimately all of the data and media we consume will be "in the cloud". On-demand streaming in various forms is the future - why should music be any different than television, other than being more portable?
In this way, digital formats will become transparent to end-users - they will simply turn on a device and click on a song...Media providers will then be the gatekeepers as people become more separated from manipulating and storing files themselves... |
||||
harmonium.ro
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: August 18 2008 Location: Anna Calvi Status: Offline Points: 22989 |
Posted: February 11 2010 at 20:37 | |||
It's good to discuss things in theory but if we do have a real case let's not waste it even if it's not perfectly adequate to the theory. Of course it's not a perfect flip-chart example but flip charts do not always match reality either. I've seen promotion for Part The Second over the internet and it was all word of mouth. I got the news from PA and tried the album because I usually try free downloads promoted on PA. Then I recommended the album to my friend Maria, who already knew the band due to word of mouth as can be seen here: http://caffeineandmusic.wordpress.com/2009/02/21/maudlin-of-the-well/ She blogged about Part The Second too. http://caffeineandmusic.wordpress.com/2009/05/14/part-the-second/ Of course Maudlin Of The Well and Kayo Dot are not completely unknown bands but as Kayo Dot drawn less than 100 people to their concert in London I can say they should be considered in our discussion even if not complying 100% to the pure self-release scenario.
I know nothing else than that if I have to upgrade something in order to keep my data then I will. Why keep me out of this equation? |
||||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: February 11 2010 at 19:55 | |||
Was maudlin of the Well an unknown before then? Was Part The Second their first release? Didn Kayo Dot keep them "in the public eye" between their 3rd album and this one? Sorry, this was not a word-of-mouth success.
I've owned computers since 1978 and disaster recovery is in my job-description. 2003 is recent history - your PC is probably running Windows XP - that's still current (just) - what about PCs running 311, OS2 or CP/M-86? Can you still access those? What happens to your data when Microsoft depricates FAT32 hard-drives or IDE? If your PC dies in the next five years you'll be hard pushed to find anything that will take a PATA drive - and I'm talking about recovering data in 30 to 40 years time. Technology is moving quicker than data.
|
||||
What?
|
||||
harmonium.ro
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: August 18 2008 Location: Anna Calvi Status: Offline Points: 22989 |
Posted: February 11 2010 at 19:37 | |||
Part The Second. Ha!
I still have my stuff from 2003-2004, my first year of computer usage Actually that computer still exists and still works |
||||
Easy Money
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: August 11 2007 Location: Memphis Status: Offline Points: 10616 |
Posted: February 11 2010 at 18:41 | |||
Yeah, a good example is how quickly the big newspapers and news stations are becoming 'internet' sources of news. Newspapers may be dieing, but the people behind them are not.
|
||||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: February 11 2010 at 18:32 | |||
Part 2 - There Goes My Everything
With everybody and their auntie releasing music without the restrictions imposed by financial limitations what becomes popular and what receives widest recognition is purely at the whim of the buyer. Of course those buyer can still be manipulated, the question now is by whom and for what ends.
Already we are seeing the rise of corporate download sites like iTunes and Amazon, when the "market" is awash with millions of self-release albums those businesses are going to start wielding their power more and will dictate who sells and who doesn't, and from that, who they list and who they don't. Because while it may appear that selling a million downloads is the same whether for a thousand artists or a million, it is not. There is less overhead costs involved in paying a thousand artists than a million (it's a thousand times cheaper to be exact), so it is still in their best financial interests to have a few really big selling downloads than lots of poor selling ones - there is simply more profit in it that way.
Free-issue is not the solution here, nor is it a bypass of the problem. Unlike free audio-streams which removes the cost and replaces it with the true value of what is on offer, (assuming that a proportion of steam listeners are converted into download buyers), free-releases removes any viable consumer feedback (an essential part of "public performance") so the count of the number of downloads is not a measure of the worth. Similarly since the artist has no direct way of knowing whether the download was enjoyed or discarded it is also valueless. (and no - cost, worth and value are not the same thing). If all an artist is interested in is the respect, consideration and approval of their "public" then there has to be a way of gauging that or the exercise is pointless.
The other issue with free-releases is the use of one-click hosting sites like Rapidshare and YouSendIt that provide the infrastructure to support self-release downloads. All these sites are commercial, either funded by membership revenue or by advertising sales and you don't get anything for nothing, even in the internet. As much as the artist tries to run away from big business, while there is money to be made the artist is a prime target for exploitation and they will get exploited. And let's face it, by giving the files to download for nothing the artist is already allowing themselves to be exploited. At the moment the adverts are essentially passive - the "buyer" can block or ignore them, but if the advertisers are not getting a return for their money then they will go elsewhere and the one-clicks will change their business model to recover their costs and losses - one possible solution is that the adverts will cease to be passive.
While there appears to be no room for the major labels in this vision of tomorrow, don't write off the big boys just yet. They will change, and they will enter the "self-release" market, just as they entered the Indie market (how many Indie labels are truly independent?), and when they do they will sweep away all the cottage-industry small fry [in truth the big-boys invented self-release 40 years ago - Apple Corps, Swan Song, Purple, Manticore, Threshold - while being "vanity" labels for major artists on major labels, they were also essentially corporately funded self-release labels]. There is simply too much money at stake for them to roll-over and play dead, once the learn they cannot beat the new system, they will adapt to it and regardless of the noble ideals of a few artists, there will be plenty more who will happily take the corporate dollar.
No great albums will ever be discovered by word-of-mouth promotion since will only carry the message so far, like ripples on a pond the message will dissipate and weaken the further it travels from the source. Social networking is transitory and fleeting, it simply does not have the persistence or long-term stability to grow anything more than a one-hit wonder with a half-life recorded in weeks not years. In fact nothing on the internet has any longevity - nothing stored on your hard-drive on your PC has any longevity, nothing you can transfer to CDR will survive more than a few years - the electronic world is a dynamic medium that needs to be constantly refreshed or it vanishes. Vinyl has a longer shelf-life than any electronic recording and look how rare and obscure some of that material has become in 30 years - for the internet that figure could be as low as 3 years and for some self-released albums, 3 days...
If a song, piece of music or album has any measure of greatness then it deserves to be remembered long into the future and as the future stands at the moment I can't see how that works.
Edited by Dean - February 11 2010 at 18:36 |
||||
What?
|
||||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: February 11 2010 at 16:58 | |||
Then that's even more reason for self released artists to release the best they can possibly and practically do.
If the labels crumble (or have begun to crumble) then the power will be in the hands of the consumer, not the self-release artist, so rather than freeing the artist they are going to be even more constrained and restricted, not now by what sells best, but by what buys best.
|
||||
What?
|
||||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: February 11 2010 at 16:51 | |||
|
||||
What?
|
||||
Epignosis
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: December 30 2007 Location: Raeford, NC Status: Offline Points: 32524 |
Posted: February 11 2010 at 16:19 | |||
You know what I want?
A good old fashioned patron. Oh wait... |
||||
jplanet
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: August 30 2006 Location: NJ Status: Offline Points: 799 |
Posted: February 11 2010 at 15:24 | |||
The house of cards is already lying at our feet!
What has really changed is that music is now a commodity of the people - just as it always was before big corporations became the gatekeepers. For a short time, labels were able to create mega-superstars, by having control over radio, production, and distribution. None of us heard any music unless the big labels decided we heard it. Remember, it was only a short time ago that albums cost tens of thousands of dollars just to record. Now, you and I can make recordings at home for beans, distribute them worldwide instantly, and get interest from niche dj's without depending on payola. |
||||
JLocke
Prog Reviewer Joined: November 18 2007 Status: Offline Points: 4900 |
Posted: February 11 2010 at 14:29 | |||
Indeed. it seems to me that the greedier the big businesses become, the more free we artists will ultimately be. Sooner or later it's all going to come falling down like a house of cards unless these labels learn to accept that their days of running the show are quickly coming to an end. . . . or perhaps I'm just fooling myself and being a bit too optimistic about the biz.
|
||||
jplanet
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: August 30 2006 Location: NJ Status: Offline Points: 799 |
Posted: February 11 2010 at 14:15 | |||
I do think it makes sense in some cases for a first release to be on an indie, just to learn the ropes and see who all the distributors, dj's and reviewers are - but being a member of a site like this, you're already tapping into a huge resource.... |
||||
jplanet
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: August 30 2006 Location: NJ Status: Offline Points: 799 |
Posted: February 11 2010 at 14:10 | |||
I would have no objections to that at all! But, meanwhile, we'll happily play for the opening of an envelope! |
||||
JLocke
Prog Reviewer Joined: November 18 2007 Status: Offline Points: 4900 |
Posted: February 11 2010 at 14:10 | |||
Record labels are a dying breed, as far as I am concerned. If I would ever find myself in such a fortunate position as being asked to sign (which by the way, I won't), I wouldn't be completely opposed to joining an indie label one day if they would play fair, but it seems more and more even the tiny guys are getting forced into the pompous attitude by their higher-ups. Shame.
Edited by JLocke - February 11 2010 at 14:11 |
||||
Windhawk
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: December 28 2006 Location: Norway Status: Offline Points: 11401 |
Posted: February 11 2010 at 14:08 | |||
Now, if we could only get you guys to play for Jay Leno or Oprah Winfrey... ;-)
|
||||
Websites I work with:
http://www.progressor.net http://www.houseofprog.com My profile on Mixcloud: https://www.mixcloud.com/haukevind/ |
||||
jplanet
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: August 30 2006 Location: NJ Status: Offline Points: 799 |
Posted: February 11 2010 at 13:41 | |||
Also, Warner has just released a statement that it will not ever support free streaming of any of its music. Had Shadow Circus signed to even a very small indie, ultimately all paths go through Warner at some point for distribution, and it wouldn't be possible for us to stream the CD for free on our website, which has been one of the best promotional tools we have ever had.
|
||||
clarke2001
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: June 14 2006 Location: Croatia Status: Offline Points: 4160 |
Posted: February 11 2010 at 13:08 | |||
Fresh news: just posted in 'free downloads' thread: The Enid is offering their almost-entire discography as a free download. At first sight, it seems fishy why a major prog act active for 30+ years is doing such thing. Things get clearer when you visit their website (it's www.theenid.co.uk , not .com ) - The Enid are 'at war' with their label. It seems label violated some contractual obligations, or got a bit of a too hefty appetite, anyway, legal proceedings are at large. A new policy, a strategical shift, just a revenge? In light of our moder Internet era, is that (assuming background is real) just a label's greed, or a desperate struggle to survive at end of the Label's Era? Such things are just speeding up the avalanche. A food for thoughts... Of course, there were legal battles between artists and labels many times before, but it was not possible for artists to magically snap their fingers (read: mouse-click) and make their entire discographies available along with new issues of newspapers in an instant, all around the globe, figuratively speaking. |
||||
Nakatira
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 31 2005 Location: Norway Status: Offline Points: 178 |
Posted: February 09 2010 at 16:49 | |||
Cool stuff, Yeah mixed the two tunes on reverb nation. |
||||
http://daccord-music.com/home.cfm
|
||||
Post Reply | Page <1 678910 14> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |