Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Why many people dislike The Flower Kings
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedWhy many people dislike The Flower Kings

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 678910 11>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
The Wizard View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 18 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7341
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 24 2006 at 17:49

How is my rating 'objectively wrong'?

Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21206
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 24 2006 at 17:48
I really don't like ratings like that one ... they are objectively wrong. Unfortunately there's nothing we can do about them ... so I think it's best to ignore them.

On my website I developed a smart way to handle them ... their impact on the average is dampened as long as they're only a very small minority.Smile
Back to Top
The Wizard View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 18 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7341
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 24 2006 at 17:48
Originally posted by Man Overboard Man Overboard wrote:

Originally posted by The Wizard The Wizard wrote:

Read my review of Paradox Hotel and tell me what you all think.

    
That was completely uncalled for. The only one-star review you've ever written, and you've not written any two-stars, either. Your review is trolling, and you should be suitably reprimanded.
How is it trolling? I wrote 5 paragraphs to back up my rating.
Back to Top
Man Overboard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 07 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Status: Offline
Points: 3830
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 24 2006 at 17:38
Originally posted by The Wizard The Wizard wrote:

Read my review of Paradox Hotel and tell me what you all think.

    
That was completely uncalled for. The only one-star review you've ever written, and you've not written any two-stars, either. Your review is trolling, and you should be suitably reprimanded.
Back to Top
The Miracle View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: May 29 2005
Location: hell
Status: Offline
Points: 28427
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 24 2006 at 17:37
Or kitty cats.
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 24 2006 at 17:36
Lack of marillion.
Back to Top
The Miracle View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: May 29 2005
Location: hell
Status: Offline
Points: 28427
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 24 2006 at 17:31
Whatever, to me it sounds great.
Back to Top
The Wizard View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 18 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7341
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 24 2006 at 17:26
No, I wouldn't be. I specifically said the problem is not that it sounds like 70's prog. It's the very music itself that is poor.
Back to Top
The Miracle View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: May 29 2005
Location: hell
Status: Offline
Points: 28427
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 24 2006 at 17:23
That wasn't fair IMO, it's an excellent 4 star album of very intelligently composed music. It might not be that original, but it's very enjoyable quality symphonic prog. If it was made in 73, you'd all be raving about how amazing it is.
Back to Top
The Wizard View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 18 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7341
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 24 2006 at 17:20
Read my review of Paradox Hotel and tell me what you all think.
Back to Top
progadder View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: November 05 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 36
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 27 2006 at 16:49
Deadi don't know why I don't like them but having given them a chance, I just don't!
 
Ironically, I think that the F.K. members in The Tangent make a very positive contribution.
 
Perhaps it's Roine Stolt I don't like because The Tangent definitely sound infinitely better now he's gone.
 
However, Flower Kings is still better than most of the drivel on TV and mainstream radio.Angry
There's an angel standing in the sun ...
Back to Top
E-Dub View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 24 2006
Location: Elkhorn, WI
Status: Offline
Points: 7910
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 27 2006 at 05:11
I recall being unable to get into The Flower Kings because of Stolt's voice. I found it to be nasally and derivative of David Bowie. Due to the prodding of a friend of mine, I invested in my first Flower Kings disc (The Rainmaker). I liked it, and slowly started to buy discs that I would find at my local store or Half.com. Well, what do ya know? About 3 years later I ended up buying all of their stuff, I've actually come to appreciate Stolt's voice, and TFK's have become one of my favorite bands.

For me, they took a bit, but they caught on. That's happened with bands like Riverside and King Crimson (although, I find their appeal to be waivering just a bit).

E
    

Edited by E-Dub - October 27 2006 at 05:11
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65268
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 27 2006 at 04:07
Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

..but you might get the RSPCA onto you
 

 

btw originality and musical brilliance are not mutually exclusive.

Lets say you have one peice of music that is brilliantly played but derivative of Yes and another which is original and also briliantly played.What would you choose? I've already got all the classic Yes releases.I now want something different thanks.Originality does count IMO.


I agree. In fact, originality is underated these days. Sometimes it's all we have.
    
Back to Top
richardh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 28107
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 27 2006 at 02:32
..but you might get the RSPCA onto you
 
 
btw originality and musical brilliance are not mutually exclusive.
Lets say you have one peice of music that is brilliantly played but derivative of Yes and another which is original and also briliantly played.What would you choose? I've already got all the classic Yes releases.I now want something different thanks.Originality does count IMO.


Edited by richardh - October 27 2006 at 02:33
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 26 2006 at 22:24
LOLThumbs Up
Back to Top
BePinkTheater View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 01 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1381
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 26 2006 at 22:20
Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

Once again....

 
 
I can strangle a canary in a tin can and it would be really original, but that wouldn't save it from sounding like utter sh*t.
 
 
 
Don't bring originality into any discussion ever. It doesn't mean anything at all.
I'm pretty sure I just fell in love with you.
I'm going to use that quote as my signiture, if that's alright with you. (the first time I've changed my signiture ever here)


Edited by BePinkTheater - October 26 2006 at 22:22
I can strangle a canary in a tin can and it would be really original, but that wouldn't save it from sounding like utter sh*t.
-Stone Beard
Back to Top
Cygnus X-2 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 24 2004
Location: Bucketheadland
Status: Offline
Points: 21342
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 26 2006 at 21:04
Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

Originally posted by Cygnus X-2 Cygnus X-2 wrote:

Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

Originally posted by Cygnus X-2 Cygnus X-2 wrote:

Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

Once again....

 
 
I can strangle a canary in a tin can and it would be really original, but that wouldn't save it from sounding like utter sh*t.
 
 
 
Don't bring originality into any discussion ever. It doesn't mean anything at all.

The ever popular Mike Patton defense?Wink
I find it works well in an increasing number of situations. Big smile

So it seems to be nowadays. Could it have proved OJ's innocence? Well, that's another story.Geek
No, but the Chewbacca defense could have. Wink

The Chewbacca defense could get anyone out of anything.Wink

But enough of this, we're getting way off topic here.Geek
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 26 2006 at 21:02
Originally posted by Cygnus X-2 Cygnus X-2 wrote:

Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

Originally posted by Cygnus X-2 Cygnus X-2 wrote:

Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

Once again....

 
 
I can strangle a canary in a tin can and it would be really original, but that wouldn't save it from sounding like utter sh*t.
 
 
 
Don't bring originality into any discussion ever. It doesn't mean anything at all.

The ever popular Mike Patton defense?Wink
I find it works well in an increasing number of situations. Big smile

So it seems to be nowadays. Could it have proved OJ's innocence? Well, that's another story.Geek
No, but the Chewbacca defense could have. Wink
Back to Top
Cygnus X-2 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 24 2004
Location: Bucketheadland
Status: Offline
Points: 21342
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 26 2006 at 20:57
Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

Originally posted by Cygnus X-2 Cygnus X-2 wrote:

Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

Once again....

 
 
I can strangle a canary in a tin can and it would be really original, but that wouldn't save it from sounding like utter sh*t.
 
 
 
Don't bring originality into any discussion ever. It doesn't mean anything at all.

The ever popular Mike Patton defense?Wink
I find it works well in an increasing number of situations. Big smile

So it seems to be nowadays. Could it have proved OJ's innocence? Well, that's another story.Geek
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 26 2006 at 20:56
Originally posted by Cygnus X-2 Cygnus X-2 wrote:

Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

Once again....

 
 
I can strangle a canary in a tin can and it would be really original, but that wouldn't save it from sounding like utter sh*t.
 
 
 
Don't bring originality into any discussion ever. It doesn't mean anything at all.

The ever popular Mike Patton defense?Wink
I find it works well in an increasing number of situations. Big smile
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 678910 11>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.168 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.