Your Prog Rock Hot Takes

Olias of Sunhillow is a 5-star album

richardh wrote: ^ Talking of Hammill, drummer Andy Edwards has drawn attention to the album Nadirs Big Chance as being an influence on Johnny Lydon . Excellent video this, best Andy has done imo.

Faul_McCartney wrote: Fish is a better singer than Hogarth

SEBTP is probably the worst Gabriel/Hackett album. Which means it's still amazing, just not as amazing as the rest! 

Edited by Faul_McCartney - March 06 2024 at 11:44

^^ I watched that, interesting point of view there. 

^ Talking of Hammill, drummer Andy Edwards has drawn attention to the album Nadirs Big Chance as being an influence on Johnny Lydon . Excellent video this, best Andy has done imo.

Hot take: England by Amazing Blondel should be removed from PA because it is not """"""Prog"""""" Folk. Just generic, run-off-the-mill folk. If we are accepting selected regular folk bands without a prog or even rock element to the prog folk category, why shouldn't we accept all of them? Because they're not favorites of the members of the so called evaluation "team"? That's unfair and BS.

richardh wrote: presdoug wrote: richardh wrote: GodzillaStan wrote: Yes only made 3 amazing records (TYA, Fragile & CTTE), although the others have their moments. Prog doesn't need to have complex time signatures, or virtuosic members. Genesis was still making great progressive music well into the late 80's. Derek Sherinian was just as good as Kevin Moore and Jordan Rudess. The only good part of Tubular Bells is the beginning. Return to Forever > Mahavishnu Orchestra   The only truly amazing ELP record is the first one. Not sure about the word 'amazing'. Are we talking 'original', 'ground breaking' 'unique' or something like that? Often 'consistency' is considered important by many but that doesn't mean 'amazing'. In terms of great playing then all Yes albums from TYA to 90125 have that. ELP likewise goes as far as Works. Prog doesn't need complex time signatures. True. Dave Stewart (the prog one) was a already parodying this idea with his band Egg back in 1970 with 'Seven Is A Jolly Good Time'. Check it out. Genesis made some good tracks in the 80's such as Dodo, Domino and Home By The Sea. 'Great progressive music' is a stretch. More throwing a bone to their few remaining prog fans! The Dream Theater one is hardly a revelation.  Tubular Bells is mostly recognised for the opening section but it is mostly very inventive and highly original music that drew on some wider influences. Maybe his later albums are 'better' but are they just better organised? I so don't care about Jazz fusion where its 'how many angels dance on the head of a pin' type arguments. Both bands had incredible players disappearing up their own backsides a lot of the time. Personally I reckon the British band Colosseum made the only jazz rock stuff that is worth listening to. I disagree with your "take" on jazz fusion. Colosseum are one of the best, but not the best, for that you need to look at Continental Europe with Italy's "Dedalus"  and "il Baricentro" and from Germany "Passport" and "Giger Lenz Marron" (the latter not accepted by PA, but , oh, well) I've not looked that much to be honest. It is a very personal 'take' and I'm sure not helpful in general but is jazz fusion just really a continuation of jazz music but using modern rock instruments? (at that time). How much of it was it's own thing? I'm not sure at all. At school there were certainly some fans of Billy Cobham knocking around. He could do ridiculous things on a kit but I still struggle to understand the point.

It is a challenge, for me, to define jazz rock, and I am a very seasoned listener of it.....I guess it is a true "fusion" of some traditionally jazz instruments like sax, trumpet, bass and drums and piano, and those of the rock music (at that time) like synthesisers, electric 6 string guitar and electric bass, for example....I feel it is great because I feel when listening to it, if it is done the way I like, I am getting "the best of both worlds at once" though my taste in jazz rock does tend to be for things "off the beaten track" like the groups I mentioned and I realise that to call a group like Dedalus or Giger Lenz Marron as "definitive" is pretty way out in left field, but so be it. I hope what I am elaborating on is not what some may find a struggle to understand-it is a bit of a struggle even for me to explain lol, but I am grateful for European jazz rock fusion in the end....

richardh wrote: Hrychu wrote: Hot take: RPI is not a subgenre in the slightest. The reason for this label to exist and especially still include contemporary brand new spanking bands is just silly, purely judgmental, and has a tinge of xenophilia based on cultural fetishism and prejudice. I'm no expert admittedly but Italy is a special place for music and culture. I hear a lot of modern(ish) RPI bands still obviously proud of their heritage and putting it in their music. Their is purity that is less obvious elsewhere, at least to my ears. We could also remove Krautrock on your reasoning. In fact Crossover and Neo are also silly sub genres. It's all music after all regardless of any label. They only exist for convenience sake. It's like going into a library and finding no separate book sections for fiction/ non-fiction etc . Why would anyone want that? Perhaps though the most arbitrary label is 'eclectic'. Basically everyone wants to be in that one. It's the least obvious in terms of what it is and most made up one of the lot!

Hrychu wrote: Pointing out other similar problems is not a way to solve a problem. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ That's a logical fallacy. But anyway, going by your "library analogy". Let's say: I'm looking for a sci fi book and can't find it under sci fi. Oh! It's in the 'Italian Speculative Fiction' section that used to be called 'Italian retro sci fi'!