Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Proto-Prog and Prog-Related Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Led Zeppelin?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedLed Zeppelin?
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 5678>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Jimbo View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 28 2005
Location: Helsinki
Status: Offline
Points: 2818 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 22 2006 at 16:25
It's going to be great seeing hundreds of Led Zeppelin reviews in the next few weeks - after all, they're such an obscure act that it's not like the average progarchives member is already more than familiar with their output... SleepyWink
Back to Top
tardis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: Victoria, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 14378 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 22 2006 at 16:24
Originally posted by TheProgtologist TheProgtologist wrote:

And so it begins....

LZ was added because it is the wishes of the owners of this site that they be added.

Pay attention to their classification please.They are here as Prog Related,which does NOT mean they are prog,but that they had a hand in influencing the development of progressive rock.


Is that clear?
Back to Top
Asyte2c00 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 15 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2099 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 22 2006 at 16:22
Originally posted by tardis tardis wrote:

Originally posted by Asyte2c00 Asyte2c00 wrote:

 
 
PROG IS PROG.
 
NON PROG IS NON PROG. 
 


And Prog Related is Prog Related. Approve
 
 
 
Using the Transitive Property
 
 
A=B
 
B=C
 
THEN
 
A=C
 
___________________________________
 
Prog-Related=Rock (Classic Rock )
 
AND
 
Rock (Classic Rock)= Non-Prog
 
THEN
 
 
Prog Related=Non Prog
 
 
PWNED.
 
 
Back to Top
Frasse View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 22 2004
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 758 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 22 2006 at 16:17
Whatever.
 
Golden earring could be added too.
 
I want Fläsket Brinner added.
Back to Top
tardis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: Victoria, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 14378 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 22 2006 at 16:15
Originally posted by Asyte2c00 Asyte2c00 wrote:

 
 
PROG IS PROG.
 
NON PROG IS NON PROG. 
 


And Prog Related is Prog Related. Approve


Edited by tardis - November 22 2006 at 16:16
Back to Top
enteredwinter View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 05 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 501 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 22 2006 at 16:15
I don't have a problem with Zeppelin being here, although we may be headed on a nasty slippery slope where some really questionable bands get added. Hopefully that's not the case.

With bands like Zeppelin and Iron Maiden being added though, Black Sabbath seems to stand out like a sore thumb (in my mind) as in example of "why not them too?"

Sabbath was clearly very important in the evolutionary cascade of early 70's metal -> new-wave-of-british-heavy-metal -> 80's thrash -> prog-metal. And remember, as is always important in these discussions, I'm arguing that they are prog-related and therefore not a prog band.
Back to Top
OpethGuitarist View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: June 25 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1655 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 22 2006 at 16:10
I think what I find most interesting is the timing of all of this, right before Thanksgiving so fewer people see it.

Strange how everything is run.
back from the dead, i will begin posting reviews again and musing through the forums
Back to Top
Barla View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 13 2006
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 4309 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 22 2006 at 16:07
YEEEAH !!
THE MIGHTY ZEP IS HERE !! Big smile

THANK YOU VERY MUCH !!! (I'll start reviewing right now!)

THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU !!

Clap
Back to Top
memowakeman View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 19 2005
Location: Mexico City
Status: Offline
Points: 13032 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 22 2006 at 16:05
Originally posted by OpethGuitarist OpethGuitarist wrote:

Originally posted by chamberry chamberry wrote:

Originally posted by OpethGuitarist OpethGuitarist wrote:

And so it begins...


Put on the helmets.


Remember people prog related is not prog.




Yes but you also don't see U2 or Green Day being added.

If that's the case, it should just be called Rock

would make that classification correct


And so it begins...
LOL

Follow me on twitter @memowakeman
Back to Top
Asyte2c00 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 15 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2099 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 22 2006 at 16:04

What The Fvck!!

 
 
Jaco Pastorius
 
Japan
 
Grateful Dead
 
Lothar and the Hand People
 
Aphex Twin
 
Cocteau Twins
 
 
 
^Pute these bands/artsist in first.  I sent the material for Japan's inclusion
 
to PA using the band submission procedure posted in another thread.   
 
Zeppelin.  Good band. have everything by them.  Not for PA though. 
 
 
 
BUT THIS is PROGARCHIVES.COM
 
 
NOT LETS ADD MORE NON-PROG BANDS TO THE SITE SO IT WILL
 
BOLSTER WEB HITS AND APPEAL TO A LARGER AUDIANCE. 
 
 
PROG IS PROG. 
 
NON PROG IS NON PROG. 
 
 
 
 
 
WHAT  IS GOING ON?
 
 
Prioritize!!!
 
Back to Top
OpethGuitarist View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: June 25 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1655 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 22 2006 at 15:59
Originally posted by chamberry chamberry wrote:

Originally posted by OpethGuitarist OpethGuitarist wrote:

And so it begins...


Put on the helmets.


Remember people prog related is not prog.




Yes but you also don't see U2 or Green Day being added.

If that's the case, it should just be called Rock

would make that classification correct


And so it begins...
back from the dead, i will begin posting reviews again and musing through the forums
Back to Top
ClemofNazareth View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Prog Folk Researcher

Joined: August 17 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4659 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 22 2006 at 15:58
Originally posted by Trickster F. Trickster F. wrote:

Originally posted by ClemofNazareth ClemofNazareth wrote:

Originally posted by TheProgtologist TheProgtologist wrote:

They are here as Prog Related,which does NOT mean they are prog,but that they had a hand in influencing the development of progressive rock.
Oh, what the heck. Just for the sake of argument (er., 'conversation'), wouldn't that by definition make them Proto-prog? "Rock Bands in existence prior to 1969 that influenced the development of progressive rock."     

 

You've just answered your own question.


I know. They were formed and recorded their first album in 1968, and it was released in January 1969.
"Peace is the only battle worth waging."

Albert Camus
Back to Top
chamberry View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 24 2005
Location: Puerto Rico
Status: Offline
Points: 9008 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 22 2006 at 15:56
Originally posted by OpethGuitarist OpethGuitarist wrote:

And so it begins...


Put on the helmets.


Remember people prog related is not prog.

Back to Top
Trickster F. View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 10 2006
Location: Belize
Status: Offline
Points: 5308 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 22 2006 at 15:52
Originally posted by ClemofNazareth ClemofNazareth wrote:

Originally posted by TheProgtologist TheProgtologist wrote:

They are here as Prog Related,which does NOT mean they are prog,but that they had a hand in influencing the development of progressive rock.


Oh, what the heck. Just for the sake of argument (er., 'conversation'), wouldn't that by definition make them Proto-prog?

"Rock Bands in existence prior to 1969 that influenced the development of progressive rock."
    
 
You've just answered your own question. Wink
sig
Back to Top
OpethGuitarist View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: June 25 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1655 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 22 2006 at 15:50
And so it begins...
back from the dead, i will begin posting reviews again and musing through the forums
Back to Top
thecool View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: November 27 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 21 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 22 2006 at 15:50
no way not golden earring! they suck!
Back to Top
ClemofNazareth View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Prog Folk Researcher

Joined: August 17 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4659 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 22 2006 at 15:50
Originally posted by TheProgtologist TheProgtologist wrote:

They are here as Prog Related,which does NOT mean they are prog,but that they had a hand in influencing the development of progressive rock.


Oh, what the heck. Just for the sake of argument (er., 'conversation'), wouldn't that by definition make them Proto-prog?

"Rock Bands in existence prior to 1969 that influenced the development of progressive rock."
    
"Peace is the only battle worth waging."

Albert Camus
Back to Top
Evans View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 15 2006
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 3004 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 22 2006 at 15:50
No. i know, i think that they might actually deserve a place in "related", i was just so surprised to see them. And even more surprised that i couldn't find a topic on it already, haha..
Back to Top
The Rock View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 30 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 746 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 22 2006 at 15:49
Now let's hope they'll add GOLDEN EARRING
What's gonna come out of my mouth is gonna come out of my soul."Skip Prokop"
Back to Top
TheProgtologist View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 22 2006 at 15:45
And so it begins....

LZ was added because it is the wishes of the owners of this site that they be added.

Pay attention to their classification please.They are here as Prog Related,which does NOT mean they are prog,but that they had a hand in influencing the development of progressive rock.


Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 5678>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 1.265 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.