Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
VanderGraafKommandöh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
|
Posted: May 13 2009 at 16:08 |
|
|
|
horsewithteeth11
Prog Reviewer
Joined: January 09 2008
Location: Kentucky
Status: Offline
Points: 24598
|
Posted: May 13 2009 at 16:08 |
|
|
|
Padraic
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
|
Posted: May 13 2009 at 16:07 |
|
|
VanderGraafKommandöh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
|
Posted: May 13 2009 at 16:07 |
MovingPictures07 wrote:
James wrote:
Oh I'm quite aware they're opinions.
I just say it deliberately. I knew you'd pick up on the objectivism thing like a nun to a habit. It worked. You were drawn in.
|
So you purposefully say your opinions like they're facts just to get people pissed at you or to get attention?
|
Nope. You can chose to ignore it. I'm not asking for you to get pissed off.
|
|
|
horsewithteeth11
Prog Reviewer
Joined: January 09 2008
Location: Kentucky
Status: Offline
Points: 24598
|
Posted: May 13 2009 at 16:07 |
James wrote:
Oh I'm quite aware they're opinions.
I just say it deliberately. I knew you'd pick up on the objectivism thing like a nun to a habit. It worked. You were drawn in.
|
What in the world does objectivism have to do with this? We're talking about subjective vs. objective opinions.
|
|
|
VanderGraafKommandöh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
|
Posted: May 13 2009 at 16:07 |
MovingPictures07 wrote:
Padraic wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
Objective elitism ftl
I'm sorry, but these are facts:
1. Porcupine Tree is prog.
|
Lol, you rail against objective elitism and present "PT=prog" as a fact?
|
Do you think anyone would question the progressiveness of Yes?
Porcupine Tree fit the progressive rock label, and that's why they're here. Want me to prove it to you?
|
You cannot prove it. Like I cannot prove Yes are prog or Henry Cow are avant-prog. Yes can often be jazz rock/fusion. Relayer is a very jazzy albums at times.
|
|
|
MovingPictures07
Prog Reviewer
Joined: January 09 2008
Location: Beasty Heart
Status: Offline
Points: 32181
|
Posted: May 13 2009 at 16:06 |
James wrote:
Oh I'm quite aware they're opinions.
I just say it deliberately. I knew you'd pick up on the objectivism thing like a nun to a habit. It worked. You were drawn in.
|
So you purposefully say your opinions like they're facts just to get people pissed at you or to get attention?
|
|
|
horsewithteeth11
Prog Reviewer
Joined: January 09 2008
Location: Kentucky
Status: Offline
Points: 24598
|
Posted: May 13 2009 at 16:06 |
Padraic wrote:
James wrote:
It isn't bad at all. I don't hate it.
It's just not prog.
|
I think most of the Shred denizens would agree.
They're a great alt-rock band, but sometimes you feel they get crowned the king of the new prog scene sometimes, at least around here anyway.
|
Again, simply subjective opinions.
|
|
|
VanderGraafKommandöh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
|
Posted: May 13 2009 at 16:04 |
Oh I'm quite aware they're opinions.
I just say it deliberately. I knew you'd pick up on the objectivism thing like a nun to a habit. It worked. You were drawn in.
|
|
|
MovingPictures07
Prog Reviewer
Joined: January 09 2008
Location: Beasty Heart
Status: Offline
Points: 32181
|
Posted: May 13 2009 at 16:04 |
Padraic wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote:
Objective elitism ftl
I'm sorry, but these are facts:
1. Porcupine Tree is prog.
|
Lol, you rail against objective elitism and present "PT=prog" as a fact?
|
Do you think anyone would question the progressiveness of Yes? Porcupine Tree fit the progressive rock label, and that's why they're here. Want me to prove it to you?
|
|
|
Padraic
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
|
Posted: May 13 2009 at 16:04 |
it is for the loss
|
|
TGM: Orb
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 21 2007
Location: n/a
Status: Offline
Points: 8052
|
Posted: May 13 2009 at 16:03 |
what's ftl?
(I could potentially see for the loss, but that wouldn't go with my ftw)
|
|
MovingPictures07
Prog Reviewer
Joined: January 09 2008
Location: Beasty Heart
Status: Offline
Points: 32181
|
Posted: May 13 2009 at 16:03 |
James wrote:
PT have been prog in the past. They're barely prog now. That's what I mean. They still have proggy moments, don't get me wrong. They're quite accessible though. There are proggier albums out there.
Objectively better ones too.
I'm allowed to say whether something is better, whether it's an objective viewpoint or not.
|
I didn't say you weren't allowed to say whether something is better or not; you're just wrong if you say music is objectively better than other music. Music, by nature, is subjective. Especially when you compare two art albums to each other, there is no objective way of saying "Henry Cow is better than Porcupine Tree" or "Porcupine Tree is better than Henry Cow". They're all opinions, and you never seem to understand the fact that your opinions are simply that: opinions.
Edited by MovingPictures07 - May 13 2009 at 16:03
|
|
|
VanderGraafKommandöh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
|
Posted: May 13 2009 at 16:02 |
|
|
|
Padraic
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
|
Posted: May 13 2009 at 16:00 |
MovingPictures07 wrote:
Objective elitism ftl
I'm sorry, but these are facts:
1. Porcupine Tree is prog.
|
Lol, you rail against objective elitism and present "PT=prog" as a fact?
|
|
VanderGraafKommandöh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
|
Posted: May 13 2009 at 16:00 |
PT have been prog in the past. They're barely prog now. That's what I mean. They still have proggy moments, don't get me wrong. They're quite accessible though. There are proggier albums out there.
Objectively better ones too.
I'm allowed to say whether something is better, whether it's an objective viewpoint or not.
|
|
|
Ricochet
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 27 2005
Location: Nauru
Status: Offline
Points: 46301
|
Posted: May 13 2009 at 15:59 |
|
|
|
Padraic
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
|
Posted: May 13 2009 at 15:59 |
James wrote:
It isn't bad at all. I don't hate it.
It's just not prog.
|
I think most of the Shred denizens would agree. They're a great alt-rock band, but sometimes you feel they get crowned the king of the new prog scene sometimes, at least around here anyway.
|
|
horsewithteeth11
Prog Reviewer
Joined: January 09 2008
Location: Kentucky
Status: Offline
Points: 24598
|
Posted: May 13 2009 at 15:58 |
|
|
|
MovingPictures07
Prog Reviewer
Joined: January 09 2008
Location: Beasty Heart
Status: Offline
Points: 32181
|
Posted: May 13 2009 at 15:57 |
James wrote:
Ricochet wrote:
James wrote:
And how a non-prog album can be best prog album of 2008 on P.A. makes me moist.
|
We don't wanna know about that process.
|
It's quite simple.
A bunch of relatively clueless n00bs vote for something that's popular and not-prog because they cannot listen to anything that actually is prog and better.
|
Objective elitism ftl I'm sorry, but these are facts: 1. Porcupine Tree is prog. It isn't the most prog thing you'll find, but it's just as prog as other artists which are clearly progressive. 2. Nothing you like is objectively better than what anyone else likes. You come across like that alot, and that's where people misunderstand you.
|
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.