Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Music Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Prog's not prog.
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedProg's not prog.

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 34567 10>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 37153
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 01 2009 at 12:28
I like different types of music, but nomenclature is very useful for me -- categorisation helps me to find music that I will like, and labelling generally is important if one wants organisation. Music may be the spice of life, and I like the spices in my spice cabinet to be labelled.  Nomenclature is really essential for archival purposes, so I would expect the majority of those who use archives to be interested in labels.
Back to Top
LanCaiHe View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: April 20 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 78
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 01 2009 at 12:04
Of course I disagree with you.   First, if we dispense with labels then there is absolutely no use for a website such as this.  Also, I also disagree with you that the songs Matte Kudasai and Heartbeat are not prog songs.  They certainly are, the former being an interesting distortion of an old rock/country/blues lick, especially the way in which it's combined rhythmically with the other parts of the song.    Shocked
 
Originally posted by Nuke Nuke wrote:

I suspect labels are only important to people who believe in genre superiority. Personally, I look for good music, and the more genres I look in the more I find. Boo hoo to those who complain about pop songs being on their prog albums. Matte Kudasaiand Heartbeat are 2 of my all time favorite king crimson songs despite them being far from prog. 

Dean, although I agree that traditional gothic metal isn't prog, however some newer gothic metal does seem to be prog while remaining gothic on the same album. The example I'm thinking of is Decipher by After Forever. I guess the 2 newest epica albums would qualify as well. 

Jim
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 01 2009 at 11:43
Originally posted by Nuke Nuke wrote:

Dean, although I agree that traditional gothic metal isn't prog, however some newer gothic metal does seem to be prog while remaining gothic on the same album. The example I'm thinking of is Decipher by After Forever. I guess the 2 newest epica albums would qualify as well. 

Fair point, though I wonder how far both AF and Epica were more Symphonic Metal than Gothic Metal when compared to the plethora of european Female Fronted Gothic Metal bands such as Theatre of Tragedy, Alas, Sirenia, Tristania etc. (or even Within Temptation or Lacuna Coil come to that). I guess I never really thought of either Dutch band as being particularly Gothic Metal.
What?
Back to Top
Nuke View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 25 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 271
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 01 2009 at 11:24

I suspect labels are only important to people who believe in genre superiority. Personally, I look for good music, and the more genres I look in the more I find. Boo hoo to those who complain about pop songs being on their prog albums. Matte Kudasaiand Heartbeat are 2 of my all time favorite king crimson songs despite them being far from prog. 

Dean, although I agree that traditional gothic metal isn't prog, however some newer gothic metal does seem to be prog while remaining gothic on the same album. The example I'm thinking of is Decipher by After Forever. I guess the 2 newest epica albums would qualify as well. 

Back to Top
suremang View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: July 30 2009
Location: Ventura, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 8
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 01 2009 at 11:07
Forget about labels. I don't think of "progressive" or "prog" as a label that defines a band or a CD. That's much too broad. To me, progressive is a mindset - a way of looking at the creative process that guides the artist. Many bands can produce works that are progressive, and turn around and do something in the mainstream the very next song. Look at Yes' "Fragile" LP: you have a top 40 song in "Roundabout", alongside Chris Squire's "Fish", which is a totally progressive breakthrough song for bass players. Their cover of "America" is a progressive music classic in that they take a mainstream folk song and cover it in a progressive way.

The best thing about these bands is the audience they bring to progressive music...hundreds of thousands of listeners that would not normally be exposed to "prog" music any other way. Any time a prog band, or even a mildly prog band scores a commercial hit, or does a tour that sells in the tens of thousands of tickets per venue, I cheer.

Greg Sherman
Greg Sherman
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 31 2009 at 05:48
 in
Originally posted by LanCaiHe LanCaiHe wrote:

Sorry to differ with you, but at least in my hometown in the 70's we did refer to ELP, Genesis, Yes, Gentle Giant, etc. as "Progressive Rock."  It might be different where you are from.  I've only in the last 5 years or so heard it referred to as Prog.  But I do agree with you!  Clap

Though you have said much that I disagree with in this thread, this single point I do agree with (in part). I have stated many times that the term Progressive Rock came about in the early 70s and was in common usage in England at that time. However, we did shorten it to Prog Rock and just Prog then as well. It was not a synonimous term with Art Rock, which was a broader category and included many "non-Prog" bands such as Roxy Music and Queen. A number of other terms (inc some that have long been forgotten) were used around that time in the Music Press (Melody Maker, NME & Sounds), such as Techno-Flash and Pomp Rock to describe bands like Yes and ELP.
 
Personnally I have no discontinuity in listenning to Progressive music from the late 60s through to the present day so I am happy to accept that Prog of today is a natural linear development that is traceable back to the founding fathers of the movement, even when that involves pulling modern influences into the genre and thus broadening the horizon to encompass a wider spectrum of music.
 
Originally posted by LanCaiHe LanCaiHe wrote:

My God, I've listened to more Opeth than I ever care to again.  I just listened to two more tunes.  If anything at all they are Goth Metal.  If I had the distasteful task of categorizing their music, that's what heading I would put them under.  

You would be in a class of one if you did that, while some GothI(ic) Metal bands did venture into Progressive Metal territory, the albums that earned them that tag were not Gothic Metal albums ... those bands had moved on from the traditional Gothic Metal sound (The Gathering, Moonspell, Dreams of Sanity etc). Opeth have never been a Gothic Metal band.
 
Originally posted by LanCaiHe LanCaiHe wrote:

I see what you mean!  It's almost like you are running around with meat cleavers.  LOL ! LOL 
That's the risk you run when criticising any artist, Wink it is a thin line between criticising a band and criticising fans of that band - and when you make that criticism generic you stand a greater chance of offending a lot more people; make a single observation of a band and then extrapolate that to contain all bands in that genre and you'll invite a negative response from more people.
What?
Back to Top
Sliver Lord View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: February 06 2009
Location: Lumiar, Lisboa
Status: Offline
Points: 11
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 31 2009 at 04:35
Ok, not all songs you like by a prog band (even in the prog albums) are prog songs, but take the example of Aristillus, from Moonmadness. It has 1 and half minute and it isn't prog, but is it pop? No, it never could be pop.


So, I think those songs you say that are "non-prog" prog songs are at least art rock or prog related.
Back to Top
LanCaiHe View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: April 20 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 78
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2009 at 11:45
I see what you mean!  It's almost like you are running around with meat cleavers.  LOL ! LOL 
Jim
Back to Top
friso View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 24 2007
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 2506
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2009 at 10:45
One thing is for shure, If you want a discussion of more then four pages, you only have to state that a highrated PA band 'might not be progressive'. Usually a lot of people get hurt.
Back to Top
LanCaiHe View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: April 20 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 78
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 30 2009 at 06:15

Haha!  I totally agree!  Clap

 

 

Originally posted by SMSM SMSM wrote:

The Gentle Giant recordings: The Missing Piece and Giant for a Day are some of the greatest pop recordings around.

 
Kansas recordings with Steve Morse are terrific, but need redoing to get rid of that 80's synth drum sound and other new wave effects 
 
The Rennaisance recordings starting with Camera Camera, When Geneis became Phil Collins back up band in the 80's and Asia recordings of that same time period are not prog.
 
Personally, I consider Pink Floyd's Money and Jethro Tull's Aqualung to be rock songs, not prog songs
Jim
Back to Top
Nuke View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 25 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 271
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2009 at 18:00
Originally posted by LanCaiHe LanCaiHe wrote:

Hi, I listened to Porcelain Heart, Windowpane, Burden, Bleak, and the Grand Conjuration.  I think I started to listen to a few others but couldn't get past the intros.  I was most impressed that they had a keyboard player, but most of the time I couldn't hear any keyboards on the live stuff.   I think I've been misinterpreting this website.  Seems that everything is progressive and they just keep splitting bands down into smaller and smaller categories.  I thought it was funny that they give Italy it's own category.   I guess progressive classical would be Claude Debussy, or Stravinsky, or Jehan Alain.  Sleepy

Originally posted by Nuke Nuke wrote:

Heh, not goth metal at all, but judging by your posts you probably don't care to learn all about the different genres of metal.Wink Opeth are basically a death metal band at their core, but they take lots of influences from progressive rock and other genres outside metal, so that makes them "progressive metal" in a sense. Maybe they are a bit goth in that they are slow and melodic, but that could also make them doom, drone, ect. Kudos for giving them so many chances, what songs did you listen to?

The epitome of progressive classical = beethoven. I kind of like this genre Big smile

Anyways, I've only listened to 3 of those, and I thought bleak was by far the best. I seem to remember the 1st 2 songs on the album "Ghost reveries" being a bit more progressive in the sense that it is normally referred to than the ones you listened to. I doubt I could get you to like them, because quite honestly I'm not the biggest fan myself, but I'd say that if you are really determined to give them a fair shake relisten to bleak or else listen to the ghost of perdition. I find they have lots of progressive moments in their music, but you might not see it unless you listen to it from a death metal perspective, where the prog touches seem more unusual wheras to the prog fan they might seem so natural they go unnoticed. It's no big loss if you don't like them, but you probably should give them enough time so that you understand what everyone else is talking about...

Back to Top
SMSM View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 15 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 212
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2009 at 17:38
The Gentle Giant recordings: The Missing Piece and Giant for a Day are some of the greatest pop recordings around.
 
Kansas recordings with Steve Morse are terrific, but need redoing to get rid of that 80's synth drum sound and other new wave effects 
 
The Rennaisance recordings starting with Camera Camera, When Geneis became Phil Collins back up band in the 80's and Asia recordings of that same time period are not prog.
 
Personally, I consider Pink Floyd's Money and Jethro Tull's Aqualung to be rock songs, not prog songs
Back to Top
topofsm View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 17 2008
Location: Arizona, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1698
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2009 at 16:04
I wonder what that was that Akerfeldt said once about him ripping off Camel in a lot of his songs....

Back to Top
Padraic View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2009 at 14:12
Originally posted by LanCaiHe LanCaiHe wrote:

  I think I've been misinterpreting this website.  Seems that everything is progressive and they just keep splitting bands down into smaller and smaller categories.  I thought it was funny that they give Italy it's own category.   I guess progressive classical would be Claude Debussy, or Stravinsky, or Jehan Alain.  Sleepy


Yep.  We're pretty much all idiots here.  At least this is a niche site that no one visits or takes seriously.

Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 37153
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2009 at 13:56
Originally posted by LanCaiHe LanCaiHe wrote:

No problem, thanks for the interesting read, I will definitely check it out.  I've never thought of Henry Cow as avant pop, maybe avant broadway sometimes such as Desperate Straights, but usually I've seen them as progressive rock.   I think I might agree with you on Bjork, that sort of fits the description you gave.  Threre are also a number of young classical composers that are apparently writing for rock groups now because they cannot get their symphonic works played by orchestras.  Interesting!

 

Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

Originally posted by LanCaiHe LanCaiHe wrote:

Avant Pop??????  That sounds like an obvious contradiction to me.   Sort of like saying an intelligent idiot?Confused



Sorry for the belated response, but I was away and just noticed this now.

Avant-Pop (and experimental pop) commonly refers to music that employs conventional pop idioms/ form such as a verse/ bridge/ chorus structure and common pop harmonic melodies and puts experimental, avant-garde spins on the music.

Bowie and Bjork, for example, have music that is considered Avant-Pop.  I don't think it's unintelligent to play around with Pop conventions and incorporate avant-garde elements.... Rock is generally a simple form of music (and often considered a subset of Pop), and I don't blame bands for using standard rock conventions as a base for more progressive music (e.g. Progressive Rock).  Tell me it's a pop rock album, and I probably won't be that interested, however.

Here's a fun little read:

http://www.altx.com/manifestos/avant.pop.manifesto.html


Just to clarify, though, I mentioned Henry Cow in relation to Slapp Happy, though (collaborations such as Desperate Straits and In Praise of Learning), and it's Slapp Happy to which I was assigning an Avant Pop status.
Back to Top
LanCaiHe View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: April 20 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 78
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2009 at 13:44

No problem, thanks for the interesting read, I will definitely check it out.  I've never thought of Henry Cow as avant pop, maybe avant broadway sometimes such as Desperate Straights, but usually I've seen them as progressive rock.   I think I might agree with you on Bjork, that sort of fits the description you gave.  Threre are also a number of young classical composers that are apparently writing for rock groups now because they cannot get their symphonic works played by orchestras.  Interesting!

 

Originally posted by Logan Logan wrote:

Originally posted by LanCaiHe LanCaiHe wrote:

Avant Pop??????  That sounds like an obvious contradiction to me.   Sort of like saying an intelligent idiot?Confused



Sorry for the belated response, but I was away and just noticed this now.

Avant-Pop (and experimental pop) commonly refers to music that employs conventional pop idioms/ form such as a verse/ bridge/ chorus structure and common pop harmonic melodies and puts experimental, avant-garde spins on the music.

Bowie and Bjork, for example, have music that is considered Avant-Pop.  I don't think it's unintelligent to play around with Pop conventions and incorporate avant-garde elements.... Rock is generally a simple form of music (and often considered a subset of Pop), and I don't blame bands for using standard rock conventions as a base for more progressive music (e.g. Progressive Rock).  Tell me it's a pop rock album, and I probably won't be that interested, however.

Here's a fun little read:

http://www.altx.com/manifestos/avant.pop.manifesto.html
Jim
Back to Top
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 37153
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2009 at 13:37
Originally posted by LanCaiHe LanCaiHe wrote:

Avant Pop??????  That sounds like an obvious contradiction to me.   Sort of like saying an intelligent idiot?Confused



Sorry for the belated response, but I was away and just noticed this now.

Avant-Pop (and experimental pop) commonly refers to music that employs conventional pop idioms/ form such as a verse/ bridge/ chorus structure and common pop harmonic melodies and puts experimental, avant-garde spins on the music.

Bowie and Bjork, for example, have music that is considered Avant-Pop.  I don't think it's unintelligent to play around with Pop conventions and incorporate avant-garde elements.... Rock is generally a simple form of music (and often considered a subset of Pop), and I don't blame bands for using standard rock conventions as a base for more progressive music (e.g. Progressive Rock).  Tell me it's a pop rock album, and I probably won't be that interested, however.

Here's a fun little read:

http://www.altx.com/manifestos/avant.pop.manifesto.html
Back to Top
LanCaiHe View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: April 20 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 78
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2009 at 13:13

Hi, I listened to Porcelain Heart, Windowpane, Burden, Bleak, and the Grand Conjuration.  I think I started to listen to a few others but couldn't get past the intros.  I was most impressed that they had a keyboard player, but most of the time I couldn't hear any keyboards on the live stuff.   I think I've been misinterpreting this website.  Seems that everything is progressive and they just keep splitting bands down into smaller and smaller categories.  I thought it was funny that they give Italy it's own category.   I guess progressive classical would be Claude Debussy, or Stravinsky, or Jehan Alain.  Sleepy

Originally posted by Nuke Nuke wrote:

Originally posted by LanCaiHe LanCaiHe wrote:

My God, I've listened to more Opeth than I ever care to again.  I just listened to two more tunes.  If anything at all they are Goth Metal.  If I had the distasteful task of categorizing their music, that's what heading I would put them under.   We had an add compaign here where I live years ago for a sticker to put on household cleaning products to protect young children from poisoning themselves. It was a green sad face sticker.  It was called "Mr. Yuck."   The theme music for the slogan was this simple tune built on a diminished chord and a tritone that said "Mr. Yuck is green, Mr. Yuck is Mean!"   It sounded exactly like the two Opeth songs I just listened to. Dead

 

Originally posted by LanCaiHe LanCaiHe wrote:

Yes, well, I went back to that band Opeth, and they are definitely not prog.  There is just nothing special about it.  I can't even stand waiting for them to start talking.  Remind me of that movie by the Kids in the Hall "Brain Candy".....that metal band called "Grievo". LOL  So boring. :-(

Heh, not goth metal at all, but judging by your posts you probably don't care to learn all about the different genres of metal.Wink Opeth are basically a death metal band at their core, but they take lots of influences from progressive rock and other genres outside metal, so that makes them "progressive metal" in a sense. Maybe they are a bit goth in that they are slow and melodic, but that could also make them doom, drone, ect. Kudos for giving them so many chances, what songs did you listen to?

Jim
Back to Top
Nuke View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 25 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 271
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2009 at 12:45
Originally posted by LanCaiHe LanCaiHe wrote:

My God, I've listened to more Opeth than I ever care to again.  I just listened to two more tunes.  If anything at all they are Goth Metal.  If I had the distasteful task of categorizing their music, that's what heading I would put them under.   We had an add compaign here where I live years ago for a sticker to put on household cleaning products to protect young children from poisoning themselves. It was a green sad face sticker.  It was called "Mr. Yuck."   The theme music for the slogan was this simple tune built on a diminished chord and a tritone that said "Mr. Yuck is green, Mr. Yuck is Mean!"   It sounded exactly like the two Opeth songs I just listened to. Dead

 

Originally posted by LanCaiHe LanCaiHe wrote:

Yes, well, I went back to that band Opeth, and they are definitely not prog.  There is just nothing special about it.  I can't even stand waiting for them to start talking.  Remind me of that movie by the Kids in the Hall "Brain Candy".....that metal band called "Grievo". LOL  So boring. :-(

Heh, not goth metal at all, but judging by your posts you probably don't care to learn all about the different genres of metal.Wink Opeth are basically a death metal band at their core, but they take lots of influences from progressive rock and other genres outside metal, so that makes them "progressive metal" in a sense. Maybe they are a bit goth in that they are slow and melodic, but that could also make them doom, drone, ect. Kudos for giving them so many chances, what songs did you listen to?

Back to Top
LanCaiHe View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: April 20 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 78
Direct Link To This Post Posted: July 29 2009 at 10:31

I will try to change my attitude in future posts as to not voice my opinion so strongly so as not to offend.

It is interesting that I also listened to a lot of Porcupine Tree recently as a result of these posts.  In my opinion of course,  they fit more into my "opinion" of what Prog is than do Opeth, even though I do not prefer to listen to them either.   In my opinion they are a much more creative band in terms of the structure of their songs, the chords, etc. 
 
 
Originally posted by harmonium.ro harmonium.ro wrote:

As I already said, it's about attitude, not opinion.
Jim
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 34567 10>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.285 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.