Larger avatars? |
Post Reply | Page <1 345 |
Author | |||
NotAProghead
Special Collaborator Errors & Omissions Team Joined: October 22 2005 Location: Russia Status: Offline Points: 7871 |
Posted: December 30 2008 at 16:42 | ||
Not long ago we got rid of of annoying big signatures . I think the current size of avatars is enough. There are still lots of places "to enjoy albums' artwork".
|
|||
Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
|
|||
The Quiet One
Prog Reviewer Joined: January 16 2008 Location: Argentina Status: Offline Points: 15745 |
Posted: December 30 2008 at 16:34 | ||
I hope it's Alan from Relayer, and not from Tales!! ....At least I'll gain some popularity with the title |
|||
Epignosis
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: December 30 2007 Location: Raeford, NC Status: Offline Points: 32530 |
Posted: December 30 2008 at 16:16 | ||
My album's artwork is a large photo of Alan White. The title of the album is "Cacho Sucks!"
|
|||
The Miracle
Prog Reviewer Joined: May 29 2005 Location: hell Status: Offline Points: 28427 |
Posted: December 30 2008 at 16:03 | ||
yay from me.... cant imagine how limiting 64x64, especially making animated avatars is like jewelry work
|
|||
Abstrakt
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 18 2005 Location: Soundgarden Status: Offline Points: 18292 |
Posted: December 30 2008 at 15:30 | ||
They could be bigger, but 100x100 would be better.
|
|||
harmonium.ro
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: August 18 2008 Location: Anna Calvi Status: Offline Points: 22989 |
Posted: December 30 2008 at 14:40 | ||
How large is 120x120 px? Or how annoying? An avatar this size can even fit the "Author" column as it is right now without stretching it at all. Edited by Swan Song - December 30 2008 at 14:40 |
|||
Padraic
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 16 2006 Location: Pennsylvania Status: Offline Points: 31169 |
Posted: December 30 2008 at 13:09 | ||
I'm fine either way, the proposed size wouldn't bother me, but I'm also cool with the status quo.
|
|||
TGM: Orb
Prog Reviewer Joined: October 21 2007 Location: n/a Status: Offline Points: 8052 |
Posted: December 30 2008 at 13:05 | ||
Large pictures. Very annoying. Sigs are bad enough already. Personally, I think that, in the department of avatars, less is more.
|
|||
The Quiet One
Prog Reviewer Joined: January 16 2008 Location: Argentina Status: Offline Points: 15745 |
Posted: December 30 2008 at 12:18 | ||
Nobody wants to see your album's artwork, don't worry ...Seriously, you didn't tell me! |
|||
The Quiet One
Prog Reviewer Joined: January 16 2008 Location: Argentina Status: Offline Points: 15745 |
Posted: December 30 2008 at 12:16 | ||
^I was just supposing, since there are reasons signatures can't be more than 200 words, or threads more of 200 pages, and considering all these preventions, still PA isn't working 100% perfect, so I wouldn't consider it a good call. But this is coming from a guy that doesn't know about internet pages, memory, etc, just using the facts.
...No problem! |
|||
Epignosis
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: December 30 2007 Location: Raeford, NC Status: Offline Points: 32530 |
Posted: December 30 2008 at 12:16 | ||
I could really dig some larger avatars. Since MovingPictures07 and I both have new albums this month, we talked about making our avatars our albums' artwork. I did a trial run of my album's artwork and it just didn't look very good so small.
|
|||
harmonium.ro
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: August 18 2008 Location: Anna Calvi Status: Offline Points: 22989 |
Posted: December 30 2008 at 12:10 | ||
How much slower? A page displayed on the PA forums has 20 posts (like this page for example: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=53654&PN=113). That means a maximum 20 different posters with different avatars; considering 4 KB for each different avatar, their total weigh is now 80 KB. If avatars would be 120x120 pixels (9 KB each), the total weigh could be around 180 KB. What kind of Internet Connection would make PA run slower because of 100 KB more for a page. (This is only an example, on the page I linked there are only 13 different avatars unlike 20 in my hypothetical example). Thanks for the support btw Edited by Swan Song - December 30 2008 at 14:36 |
|||
The Quiet One
Prog Reviewer Joined: January 16 2008 Location: Argentina Status: Offline Points: 15745 |
Posted: December 30 2008 at 11:55 | ||
It also gets my vote, but I'm sure it will make PA run slower.
|
|||
crimhead
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: October 10 2006 Location: Missouri Status: Offline Points: 19236 |
Posted: December 30 2008 at 11:50 | ||
This gets my vote for my tired eyes.
I'd like to see them just to be able to enjoy some of the album artwork that some members use. |
|||
harmonium.ro
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: August 18 2008 Location: Anna Calvi Status: Offline Points: 22989 |
Posted: December 30 2008 at 08:40 | ||
Could we have larger avatars on the forum?
The current limitation is 64x64 pixels for any avatar. Increasing the limitation to 120x120 pixels the total size of the hosted avatars would increase in a negligible proportion. At least according to the calculations I was doing here: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=50480&PID=3090562#3090562 This is a visual representation of what I mean: 64x64 pixels: 120x120 pixels: |
|||
Post Reply | Page <1 345 |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |