Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Rob The Plant
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 15 2004
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 819
|
Posted: March 28 2005 at 13:49 |
Sgt Pepper came out in '67, Love put out an album in '66, The Floyd
also put out their first album in '67. As said previously- Zappa was
doing stuff well before the Beatles, as was Beefheart of course, and it
is said that Beefheart is Prog. The Beatles were certainly not anything
near prog until Sgt Pepper, so they are obviously not the founding
fathers of prog. Thank god they moved away from what they did in their
first 2 albums though.
|
Collaborators will take your soul.
|
|
frenchie
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 30 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 2234
|
Posted: March 28 2005 at 13:34 |
i like the beatles a lot but all of my friends (and probably most of my teenage generation) do not see them as a phoenomenom or as good songwriters. The whole 62-66 period is all happy and poppy and sounds samey. it only got slightly more interesting in the latter years with more realistic and depressing stuff.
I have a few of their albums and they are great, and me and my friends appreciate that at the time they were the best songwriters and had such a major influence (and still do). same with elvis, but they really cant compare to the modern stuff we listen to!
overall brilliant band... but us new kids cant see why they are given so much praise. maybe they just didnt age well or something! but their influence will never die or be forgotten!
the only thing is, if i or anyone else says a view like this we get sl*gged off, when it is very valid!
Edited by frenchie
|
The Worthless Recluse
|
|
terramystic
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 02 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 776
|
Posted: March 28 2005 at 13:11 |
FuzzyDude wrote:
Hendrix, Zappa, and Barrett were doing their
thing long before the Beatles. The thing is, at the time, the Beatles
were considered the greatest band in the world, and when you already
have an 'in' band being experimental, why bother giving credit to
obscure (at the time) bands who are tons more creative? I would even go
so far as to credit the Beach Boys as coming up with the idea of
blending classical instrumentation and pop song structures before the
Beatles... except I dislike the Beach Boys with a passion. I'm a
huge Beatles fan, I even own the obscure stuff from the early
sixties... I just don't think they were as creative as many people make
them out to be, especially when people credit them as inventing
progressive rock. As I said, there were far more inventive bands
at the time. |
YES, The Beatles were (only) one year behind Frank Zappa and The Beach
Boys BUT Sgt. Pepper was the most influental and thus considered the
prototype of prog. I guess all three were the inventors of prog. Next
inventors were The Who (consistent concept album), The Moody Blues
(symphonic sound), Procul Harum (classical elements), The Nice
(classical forms). King Crimson marked the classic prog era with the
first real prog rock album - ItCoCK.
Barret-era Floyd sound more pure psych to me. Pink Floyd weren't the
inventors of classic (symphonic) prog. Their first and only attempt at
symphonic prog is AHM (not before 1970). However,they were the first
and most influential space rock (boundary prog subgenre) band and one
of the first to attempt avant rock (Ummagumma).. ostamble();
|
|
Joren
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 07 2004
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 6667
|
Posted: March 28 2005 at 13:03 |
|
|
Guests
Forum Guest Group
|
Posted: March 28 2005 at 11:41 |
Hendrix, Zappa, and Barrett were doing their thing long before the Beatles. The thing is, at the time, the Beatles were considered the greatest band in the world, and when you already have an 'in' band being experimental, why bother giving credit to obscure (at the time) bands who are tons more creative? I would even go so far as to credit the Beach Boys as coming up with the idea of blending classical instrumentation and pop song structures before the Beatles... except I dislike the Beach Boys with a passion. I'm a huge Beatles fan, I even own the obscure stuff from the early sixties... I just don't think they were as creative as many people make them out to be, especially when people credit them as inventing progressive rock. As I said, there were far more inventive bands at the time.
|
|
Dick Heath
Special Collaborator
Jazz-Rock Specialist
Joined: April 19 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 12813
|
Posted: March 28 2005 at 10:47 |
The Beatles through the long apprenticeship of playing the clubs for
many a hard day's night in Hamburg, had to have a big bag of tunes.
Their early stuff was derived from Tamla Motown and other black soul
music, plus the rockabilly and straight rock and roll. Plus some of
their own music, based on the same. Their second album, With The Beatles
when it was first released, was always played at parties because it had
some great tunes to dance to and each only lasted 3 minutes at the
most. Lennon and McCartney as one of the major song writers of the 20th
century, had a great ability to write very catchy (and often timeless)
pop tunes, which are now part of the popular music catalogue - fit for
plunder by budding jazz divas who need a standard. The Dylan
influence comes around the period of Rubber Soul, when their
compositions became more complex. However, it was often said in the mid
60's that the Beatles were great absorbers of what was going on around
them musically, and had this all knowing ability to process those new
sounds into something distinctly Beatlely. They visited the West Coast,
came back doing Byrd-like or Beach Boy-like tunes. Then with the summer
of love, absorption of the Haight Astbury psychedelic sound
re-evolving into the Englishness of Sgt Pepper. After the White Album
and Magic Mystery Tour, with the Beatles slowly disintergrating,
leading to McCartney doing the pushing (often pushing his songs
into the frame for the next album), some great riffs but the move back
to mainstream simplicity of pop and rock'n'roll.
Indeed the Beatles shifted music forward, building their house often
from borrowed bricks and mortar, constructed in a unique manner. Hence
they progressed - but so did many other bands (Kinks for instance - and
I often see Ray Davies being written up as a superior composer than
Lennon and McCartney nowadays). Beatles 'inventing' progressive rock:
no chance. Not one group or musican invented progressive rock, it
evolved. The Beatles helped show was that there was more than just the
2 minute 30 second single to be composed, played and recorded for the
young record buying market - what George Martin showed the Beatles and
therefore other musicians, was how music could be arranged and be
instrumented in unexpected ways. However, Beatles and Martin didn't
corner the market in such innovation.
|
|
Yams
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 16 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 198
|
Posted: March 28 2005 at 09:41 |
I give them credit for influencing music on a grand scale (something
that will be remembered forever), but I've never heard anything close
to 21st Century Schizoid Man from The Beatles. Two years after the
release of Sgt. Pepper's, ITCOTKC blew that album out of the water in
terms of progression (no pun intended) towards a new musical style.
|
|
Certif1ed
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
|
Posted: March 28 2005 at 09:38 |
The Beatles led the evolution of rock music for 5 years, and to say they were crap musicians is to miss several points, as they (apart from Ringo) certainly weren't crap rock musicians by any stretch of th imagination.
Not one item on that top 10 list is actually true - for a start, musique concrete was "invented" many decades previously, and many composers and jazz bands have used "exotic" instrumentation, and the Moog was invented long before the Beatles got their hands on it. However, reword it to "The Beatles were the first rock band to..." and it becomes a bit more accurate.
Progressive rock was the culmination of many, many styles - the Beatles certainly played their part in its evolution, but so did the Byrds, the Nice, Pink Floyd and arguably John Mayall, Miles Davis and Rakhmaninov, among others.
To adequately discuss this subject would require far more time - but I think those are the bare bones.
|
|
frenchie
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 30 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 2234
|
Posted: March 28 2005 at 09:31 |
i recon if the beatles did play a part in the creation of prog it was probably by accident. ive never heard any proggy stuff by them, most of it is straight forward. i guess sgt peppers is a concept album but i wudnt call it prog.
|
The Worthless Recluse
|
|
akin
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 06 2004
Location: Brazil
Status: Offline
Points: 976
|
Posted: March 28 2005 at 09:13 |
Nobody invented the progressive rock, but the Beatles deserves credit.
They were the most famous "beat" band (and rock ´n roll band)at that time, but they weren´t satisfied with the music they were doing, so they experimented lots of things, trying to make their music richer. And they achieved their goal. They simply could keep doing I Wanna Hold Your Hand, She Loves You, Help, and etc, but they changed their style and they, without a doubt, made psychedelic and progressive rock reach to the great audience. Without Beatles, the psychedelic and progressive rock would need a lot of more time to reach the mass audience and probably wouldn´t achieve so much success as they did.
|
|
Valarius
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 08 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 1480
|
Posted: March 28 2005 at 07:49 |
*Snarls at*
|
|
Zero the hero
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 18 2005
Location: Bosnia Hercegovina
Status: Offline
Points: 153
|
Posted: March 28 2005 at 06:54 |
Moribund wrote:
OK King Crimson may have been the first to recognise, refine and launch, but here's a quick list to agree/disagee/disprove/snarl at/laugh at:-
The Beatles were the first to:-
-
Use the studio as a writing tool
-
Use the LP as an artform
-
Use multitrack recording creatively
-
DI the bass
-
Use exotic & orchestral instruments creatively
-
Produce the first concept album
-
Use a moog synthesiser
-
Use feedback creatively
-
Use many FX and unusual recording techniques (vari-speed, voices thru Leslie Cab, flanging)
-
Use musique concrete techniques
All yours Ladies & Gentlemen..............................
|
Just one thing,even though Lennon & McCartney were probably the greatest song writers ever,they,together with George & ringo were crap musicians...Everything is owed to George Martin,without him they would have not been the great sussess they ended up as.
George Martin was the man behind every technique,he judged the way the album was to be produced,the way the effects were to be used,even the one who encouraged them to use Moog & Hammond.
For the time he pushed the studio as a recreational area as far forward as possible...
All yours
|
|
goose
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 20 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 4097
|
Posted: March 28 2005 at 05:55 |
I think it's undoubtable that they laid the foundations not only for prog rock but also for a vast array of popular music since them (If I remember, Tony Iommi was a fan, although it might not be easy to hear ). How much they shaped it is impossible to say, I suppose, but I'd like to think it was considerably.
|
|
JrKASperov
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 07 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 904
|
Posted: March 28 2005 at 05:39 |
Yet the beatles never came up with a composition that was evolving,
complex, intricating in the way musical layers interact and even
VIRTUOUS.
|
Epic.
|
|
Moribund
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 21 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 210
|
Posted: March 28 2005 at 05:35 |
OK King Crimson may have been the first to recognise, refine and launch, but here's a quick list to agree/disagee/disprove/snarl at/laugh at:-
The Beatles were the first to:-
-
Use the studio as a writing tool
-
Use the LP as an artform
-
Use multitrack recording creatively
-
DI the bass
-
Use exotic & orchestral instruments creatively
-
Produce the first concept album
-
Use a moog synthesiser
-
Use feedback creatively
-
Use many FX and unusual recording techniques (vari-speed, voices thru Leslie Cab, flanging)
-
Use musique concrete techniques
All yours Ladies & Gentlemen..............................
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.