Worst USA President

 

Meh, Clinton wasn't bad. Can't remember his opponents. Seems the only peopel who don't think so are ruffled up because he either got a blow job (probably not the best moral choice to make, but W ain't the most moral of us all anyway) or he didn't follow the coservative agenda, which is logical because the guy wasn't conservative. He was a likeable person (something Bush will never be able to regain) and if anything, he made the US more favorable in the world's eye, a lot more than we can say for....well you know by now.

 

 

Take this as a lesson. Why do people feel the need to bash US presidents? Maybe...CAUSE WE ELECT TERRIBLE ONES.

 

But this wouldn't be such a one-sided thing for no reason. The reason the US is being brought down is because these countries want it to be brought down. face up to it (not saying anyone was denying it) but the US is clearly in the spotlight globally and has been for many years. If I was in another country, I would get sick of seeing crap about the US all the time, regardless of whether it is good or bad. Perhaps they think that if enough bad crap happens to the US, it will just exit stage left and let somebody else take center stage. Do the people in these countries really hate the USA? You'd have to ask them, but I'd wager they don't.

 

Except for some people with an own agenda, most of us give our opinion because like it or not, USA rules the destiny of all our countries, if you have read my previous posts you will notice that I prefer USA than any Nationalist, Socialist or Communist Government but this doesn't make me blind.

 

I don't think Bush is the worst President ever, it's too soon to say that but his acts cause repercusions in all our countries, when he started the war, Bush came to visit Perú (We didn't had terrorism for almost a decade) but the night before he came, somebody placed a bomb at 50 mts of the USA Embassy, no USA citizen or functionary died because the Embassy is a bunker with no windows and 100 Mts away from the external walls,  but 9 innocent Peruvians who were near died.

 

If USA Presidents want to be the world Sheriff and decide the destiny of our countries directly or indirectly, well, they must accept the ctitics, and I'm one of the person who always makes comments in favour of USA system because I feel more comfortable with a nation in which democracy (Despite the problems) has an impeccable record, a country where you can write in a  newspaper that you disagree with the President without the fear of vanishing in the air, but this respect and this lead role has a price to pay and it's the critics, something very cheap in comparison with all the power a USA President has in and outside their country.

 

Iván

   .

 

clinton turned the white house into an 8 year toga party, killed americans for owning guns, had one of the most corrupt administrations in all of the history of the usa (monica was the least of it all), gave north korea nuclear reactors and china our seaports and military secrets and contributed heavily to the "paper tiger" image of the usa, but "it was all about the sex". americans just feel a warm fuzzy about him and he is such a hero, having spirited away to the uk and russia during the vietnam war. apparently, though, what folks were doing during vietnam only applies to bush and his lot and not to clinton and his buddies. nevermind that clinton had raw data fbi files on his political opponents and critics and ordered irs audits on them as part of his political strategy for dealing with republicans, it's that evil george bush who seeks to hunt terrorists by checking phone records of people making calls to places such as israel, iran and syria. granted, bush is no prize in my book and i never voted for the guy, but the bush bashing is at a point that it has ceased to be annoying, but is destructive.