Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > General Music Discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Punk: A Logical Extension of Prog?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedPunk: A Logical Extension of Prog?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 34567 11>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2015 at 19:17
Okay... I think a treatise on the banality and abuse of language is a serious subject matter, you don't. We'll leave it there then.

Edited by Dean - March 10 2015 at 19:18
What?
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20617
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2015 at 19:04
^I edited my original post for clarity. It is a record, after all.
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2015 at 18:57
Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:


^Not on this planet.

is that No you're not saying that or No it isn't serious subject matter?
What?
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20617
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2015 at 18:52
^It's not a serious subject on this planet.

Edited by SteveG - March 10 2015 at 19:00
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2015 at 18:30
Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Since you are a songwriter who teaches others I would have thought that Sting's 'articulate song about being inarticulate' would have been regarded as serious enough subject matter.

My post was not a knock against Sting's lyrical abilities. It was only an example of the New Wave subject matter, which was generally not of a serious nature. 
 
Nice dodge. Glad to see you back in old form. Wink



So are you saying that de do do do de da da da is not serious subject matter?
What?
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2015 at 18:20
Copywrong.
What?
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20617
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2015 at 17:53
The Stranglers. Punk? Post Punks? Something else? Or all three?
Decide for yourself:
 
Biography excerpt from Allmusic,
"The Stranglers
formed as the Guildford Stranglers in the southern England village of Chiddingfold (near Guildford) in 1974, plowing a heavily Doors-influenced furrow through the local pub rock scene -- such as it was. Of the four founding members, only Hugh Cornwell had any kind of recognizable historical pedigree, having played alongside Richard Thompson in the schoolboy band Emil & the Detectives. According to Thompson, their repertoire stretched from "Smokestack Lightning" and the blues, through to "old Kiki Dee B-sides," while their gigging was largely confined to the Hornsey School of Art, where Thompson's sister was Social Secretary.

The Guildford Stranglers were confined to a similar circuit. It was 1975 before they ventured into even the London suburbs, although once there -- and having shortened their name to the less parochial Stranglers -- things began moving quickly. The established pub rock scene was dying and promoters were willing to give any unknown band a break, simply to try and establish a new hierarchy. Thus it was that as the first stirrings of punk began to make their own presence felt on the same circuit, The Stranglers were on board the bandwagon from the beginning.

 

Their early songs, too, radiated the same ugly alienation that was the proto-punk movement's strongest calling card. Material like "Peasant in the Big sh*tty," "I Feel Like a Wog," "Down in the Sewer," and "Ugly" itself were harsh, uncompromising, and grotesque, a muddy blurge of sound cut through with Dave Greenfield's hypnotically Doors-like keyboards that was possessed of as much attitude as it was detectable musical competence. One uses the word guardedly, but "highlights" of this period were included on the 1994 archive release Live, Rare & Unreleased 1974-1976.

By mid-1976 The Stranglers already had enough force behind them to be booked as opening act at the Ramones' first London show, and Mark P., editor of the newly launched punk fanzine Sniffin' Glue, conferred further punk approval on the band when he wrote, "their sound is 1976...The Stranglers are a pleasure to boogie to -- sometimes they sound like the Doors, other times like Television, but they've got an ID of their own." Further prestige accompanied the band's opening slot for Patti Smith in October -- and that despite most of the audience walking out long before the band left the stage; by the time the band set out on their own first U.K. tour, they had signed with UA (A&M in America) and were preparing to record their debut album with producer Martin Rushent.

 
"(Get A) Grip (On Yourself)," The Stranglers' debut single, made the lower reaches of the Top 50; Rattus Norvegicus, their first album, confirmed the group as one of the fastest developing bands on the entire scene -- even as the scene itself still puzzled over whether The Stranglers even belonged on board. "Old hairy misogynists" was a common accusation to fling in their direction, and it was one which The Stranglers themselves delighted in encouraging. In a more PC climate, their first U.K. Top Ten hit, summer 1977's "Peaches," would never even have been written, let alone recorded, while the bandmembers' reputation as sexual bad boys was only exacerbated by other songs in their repertoire: "London Lady," "Bring on the Nubiles," "Choosy Susie."

The fact that much of their lyrical prowess was built around the darkest hued of black humors never entered many people's minds at the time, but listen again to their finest moments -- "Hangin' Around," "Down in the Sewer," the mindless boogie of "Go Buddy Go," and the sheer vile joys of "Ugly" -- and try to keep an even halfway straight face.

Unfortunately, though The Stranglers themselves reveled in an almost Monty Python-esque grasp of absurdity (and, in particular, the absurdities of modern "men's talk"), there was an undercurrent of violence that not only permeated their music, it also, inevitably, spilled into their live shows. Their fall 1977 British tour was marred by some very ugly scenes, while a trip to Sweden brought them into violent confrontation with the Raggere, that country's equivalent of Britain's punk-hating Teddy Boys. Hugh Cornwell's choice of T-shirts (a Ford logo reworked to read  "F*ck") brought the band into conflict with London's local council, while the group's decision to line their stage with topless dancing girls when they played a concert in that city's Battersea Park brought women's groups screaming down on them, too.               

Yet despite so much controversy, The Stranglers' grip on the British chart seemed unbreakable. "Peaches" was followed by "Something Better Change" and might easily have been joined by a passionate cover of "Mony Mony" had the band not opted to hide behind the pseudonym of the Mutations, accompanying singer Celia Gollin on the number. (A second Celia & the Mutations single, "You Better Believe Me," followed late in 1977.) "No More Heroes," the driving title track to The Stranglers' second album, was another huge hit, although the album itself was a disappointment -- recorded in a hurry, with little time to write new material, it was largely comprised of older songs that had been passed over for Rattus. Within months, a new Stranglers album was on the streets, and this time they got everything right. Black and White was previewed by the hits "Five Minutes" and "Nice'n'Sleazy" (self-mythology in a nutshell), and was swiftly followed by one of the band's finest moments, a murderously slowed-down version of Bacharach/David's "Walk on By."               

 

More importantly, Black and White was the last Stranglers album to even flirt with the socio-sexual shock troop imagery that fired their first records; with the live X Cert album (their first for IRS in America) rounding off 1978 with a final flurry of gruffness, the band was now free to experiment beyond even the most indulgent fan's wildest imaginings.

 

1979's The Raven saw them moving toward both psychedelia and radio-friendly pop -- "The Duchess," Top 20 that summer, was a classic tune by anybody's standards and, while a flurry of solo activity from Jean Jacques Burnel (The Euroman Cometh) and Hugh Cornwell (Nosferatu) raised rumors that the band was reaching the end of its lifespan, in fact it was their non-musical activities that came closest to bursting the bubble, after Cornwell was sentenced to three months imprisonment for drug possession in January 1980.               

 

The band regrouped following his release and banged out two albums in a year, the concept Meninblack and the extraordinarily ambitious La Folie -- home of their biggest hit single yet, "Golden Brown." It reached number two in Britain, although two other singles from the same album, "Let Me Introduce You to the Family" and "La Folie" itself, contrarily proved among their least successful so far.              

 

"Strange Little Girl," specially recorded for the hits compilation The Collection 1977-1982, returned the band to the Top Ten the following summer and, having moved from UA to Epic, The Stranglers rounded out 1982 with the "European Female" single and Feline album, defiantly pop-heavy albums flavored by the group's own special take on the then-prevalent synthesizer sounds. This phase of the band's development reached a nadir of sorts with 1984's Aural Sculpture, the least engaging of their albums to date, and the least successful -- it faltered at number 14, with the exquisite "Skin Deep" single drawn up one place lower.               

 

Two years of near silence followed, punctuated only by a succession of under-performing British 45s -- American releases were even rarer. "Nice in Nice," a commentary on a six-year-old misadventure in the French city of that name, "Always the Sun," "Big in America," and "Shakin' Like a Leaf," drawn from the 1986 album Dreamtime, ensured the band remained very much a sideshow into the late '80s, but 1988 finally brought a massive turnaround in their fortunes. That January, a wildly churning cover of the Kinks' "All Day and All of the Night" powered The Stranglers back into the Top Ten, to be followed by a new live album of the same name.             

 

Another long silence followed but, sticking with covers, The Stranglers were back to their best with ? & the Mysterians' "96 Tears" in early 1990, a taster for the album 10. A second hits collection, Greatest Hits 1977-1990, stuffed stockings across Europe that Christmas, but any serious attempt at a lasting revival was stymied by the departure of Cornwell for a solo career. He was replaced by John Ellis, a former member of fellow pub-to-punk graduates the Vibrators, and Sniff 'n' the Tears frontman Paul Roberts, and the new-look Stranglers re-emerged on the China indie in early 1992.             

 

A new album, Stranglers in the Night, appeared that fall, together with the minor hit "Heaven or Hell"; by year's end, however, drummer Jet Black, too, had departed. He was replaced by Tikake Tobe and, in this form, the group recorded yet another live album, Saturday Night Sunday Morning, before Black returned for 1995's About Time. The group's studio set Coup de Grace was issued in 1998, after which Ellis left the band, to be replaced by Baz Warne. Their next album, Norfolk Coast, was a surprise success in 2004, spawning a Top 40 hit in "Big Thing Coming." After this record, Roberts departed and the group released Suite XVI in 2006. Six years later, they put out their 17th album, Giants.

 

Each of their UA/Epic albums was reissued with generous helpings of bonus tracks, while 1992 saw the release of a classic 1977 live show, Live at the Hope & Anchor, together with a collection of the band's (surprisingly inventive) 12" singles and a fabulous box set drawn from the 1976-1982 period, The Old Testament. Further live albums have since appeared, as has a remarkable document of the band's three BBC sessions, from 1977 and 1982.

That it is those earliest years that remain The Stranglers' most popular is not surprising -- from bad-mannered yobs to purveyors of supreme pop delicacies, the group was responsible for music that may have been ugly and might have been crude -- but it was never, ever boring. That people are still offended by it only adds to its delight -- if rock & roll (especially punk rock & roll) was meant to be pleasant, it would never have changed the world, after all. The fact that much of The Stranglers' message was actually hysterically funny -- as they themselves intended it to be -- only adds to their modern appeal. And the fact that their fans are still called upon to defend them only proves them right. 



Edited by SteveG - March 10 2015 at 18:00
Back to Top
richardh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 29332
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2015 at 16:46
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

The thing most frequently said about the Stranglers was "well, they were never really a Punk band"... Jet Black has even said they were never a Punk band. In the main they were treated with suspicion within the punk scene fro being too old, too intellectual and too musical. Burnell was trained as a classical guitarist, Greenfield's keyboards would sit comfortably alongside Mazarek's and Jet Black was in his 40's in 1977.

" Up until that point it’s almost politically incorrect to admit your influences. But you can tell by just listening to the music. On our first album, the nearest thing we had to a prog rock song was this four-part piece called Down In The Sewer. That was about 11 minutes long and it was a suite. Prog rock, essentially, even if it was prog ŕ la Beefheart and The Doors. " .... JJ Burnell, Classic Rock Magazine.

 
Yep I well remember Fluff playing them on the prog show and they were the 'punk band' adopted by most prog fans
Back to Top
Svetonio View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 20 2010
Location: Serbia
Status: Offline
Points: 10213
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2015 at 12:55
Originally posted by Komandant Shamal Komandant Shamal wrote:

Originally posted by Svetonio Svetonio wrote:

Just to illustrate how the punk movement was big in my country and how much Punk was popular in former Yugoslavia, here's a feature film Dečko koji Obećava ("The Promising Boy") about the punk movement in former Yugoslavia that was a big hit in cinemas across the country in 1981: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZddmkTQsZaE (English subtitles, drama genre). The members of Belgrade's post-punk band Šarlo Akrobata - already in Prog Archives as an "avant-prog" act what always make me laugh - are also starring in this film. Released in 1981, it was one of the first feature films with the theme of Punk ever filmed. Not that much feature 'punk-movies' was filmed before Yugoslav "The Promising Boy", as e.g. British film Jubilee with Adam Ant from 1977, Rock'n'Roll Highschool, an American comedy with The Ramones from 1979, Dutch movie Cha Cha with Lene Lovich and Nina Hagen from 1979 and the British film Breaking Glass  with Hazel O'Connor from 1980.
In February 1981, one of the major record companies in former Yugoslavia, Jugoton, released a punk / post-punk compilation album titled Paket Aranžman ("Package Deal") with the songs of the most popular Yugoslav punk / post-punk bands; that album sold tremendously well to this day, as it reached a cult status.
 
Both mentioned film and the compilation were a final "victory" of Punk aesthetics here. As a music genre, Punk in my country represented a complete break with the Progressive rock because young bands were completely turned into punk and (or) post-punk. Progressive rock in my country has not yet recovered from Punk hysteria then gripped the former Yugoslavia in late 70s / early 80s. 
 
A few days ago, a former Yugoslav punk rocker (who also starring with his band in "The Promising Boy" the movie), Vlada Divljan from "Idoli" ("Idols") died by cancer at 57. As a young man he was one of the pioneers of the punk movement here, and the government is seriously considering to declare a day of mourning in the capital of Serbia. That's how big youth movement it was here.
Great post, comrade Svetonio! hey what about some LIVE FOOTAGE of 80s Yugoslavia post-punk grooves? it would be nice:
 
Nice video of EKV... However, as you know, it is a sad story with that band. It is worth to say that it was the Punk that bring heroin to Yugoslavia. All of them in that video, except the drummer, were destroyed themselfs with heroin and died one by one. Of course it was some heroin in Yugoslavia before the Punk hysteria, but these were isolated cases because the youngsters enjoyed hashish in 70s. With Punk, Yugoslavia was coming to an epidemic of young people death caused by intravenous use of heroin (overdose and AIDS).
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20617
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2015 at 09:56
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Since you are a songwriter who teaches others I would have thought that Sting's 'articulate song about being inarticulate' would have been regarded as serious enough subject matter.
My post was not a knock against Sting's lyrical abilities. It was only an example of the New Wave subject matter, which was generally not of a serious nature. 
 
Nice dodge. Glad to see you back in old form. Wink


Edited by SteveG - March 10 2015 at 14:37
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2015 at 04:07
The thing most frequently said about the Stranglers was "well, they were never really a Punk band"... Jet Black has even said they were never a Punk band. In the main they were treated with suspicion within the punk scene fro being too old, too intellectual and too musical. Burnell was trained as a classical guitarist, Greenfield's keyboards would sit comfortably alongside Mazarek's and Jet Black was in his 40's in 1977.

" Up until that point it’s almost politically incorrect to admit your influences. But you can tell by just listening to the music. On our first album, the nearest thing we had to a prog rock song was this four-part piece called Down In The Sewer. That was about 11 minutes long and it was a suite. Prog rock, essentially, even if it was prog ŕ la Beefheart and The Doors. " .... JJ Burnell, Classic Rock Magazine.

What?
Back to Top
richardh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 29332
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2015 at 02:56
Originally posted by ExittheLemming ExittheLemming wrote:

Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

For something that's deemed to be so small, Punk's lasting impact on music cannot be underestimated. There would be no New Wave movement without it and no Grudge movement as a response to New Wave. And let's not forget the entire arty Post Punk movement. Prog simply has not have had that impact on Pop music, regardless of how big it was, unless we look in terms of Punk being a reaction to Prog, which would place Prog right back into the negative light that it was cast into in the middle to later seventies.


Have to agree with most of this but as for the reasons, things get a tad blurry hereabouts. As Dean has correctly pointed out already, Punk's musical legacy was rudimentary and meager at best, until such time as we reached circa '79 and the so-called Post Punk artists emerged. I guess that what Punk bequeathed to music were the sorts of values I personally still hold dear e.g. discipline, brevity, economy, focus, structure etc in stark contrast to the spacey improvs and lengthy noodly meanderings that afflict some of the worst Prog. It also probably goes without saying that Punk was accessible so that anyone with a very basic set of chops and a cheap guitar could join a band with like minded souls without being subjected to ridicule or having to attend a conservatoire beforehand. Similarly, the subject matter was considerably more pragmatic, prosaic and political (at least in the UK) than the sort of conceptual tangents so beloved of Sinfield, Anderson, Gabriel, Lake et al. Prog was effectively overripe and rotting by circa 1974/75 and had lost much of its customer base. I'm still unsure what deserting Prog fans started to listen to instead between then and the end of the decade?
 
Some of the new stuff was worth listening to. The Stranglers were a weird mix of styles and I just happened to listen to Grip this morning which has prog keyboards/bass but very punkish singing and lyrics. This played well across all audiences. I was also very found of Siouxsie and The Banshees who were not your average band. Then you had the emergence of Kate Bush from nowhere it seemed which caught everyone by surprise. From across the pond there was also The Tubes who managed to confuse the hell out of everyone!! I would also add Be Bop Deluxe who were kinda of punkish in some respects and then Bill Nelson adopted the new wave approach with Red Noise. Of course we can also talk about Peter Gabriel and the rise of metal (Iron Maiden . Motorhead) that was massive at the time and did appeal to rock fans generally because they were bloody good!
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 10 2015 at 02:14
Since you are a songwriter who teaches others I would have thought that Sting's 'articulate song about being inarticulate' would have been regarded as serious enough subject matter.
What?
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20617
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 09 2015 at 09:58
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

I suspect the difficulty lies in the perception that music development within all genres of music is linear because in some of the more simplistic subgenres it is. Prog and Post Punk are not singular styles of music, they are parallel developments of differing styles. For example we regard Krautrock as being under the umbrella terminology of Progressive Rock, yet it bears no direct relationship with Prog Rock that came out of the UK, USA, Italy or Holland, it follows a parallel path and encompasses a sympathetic aesthetic. we can make the same observations about The Canterbury Scene and Zeuhl. New Wave suffers a similar parallelism - Neo Prog was Prog with a New Wave influence (a more accurate terminology would perhaps have been New Wave of British Progressive Rock, but the Neo Prog tag was thrown at it in the late 80s and the name stuck), to date this is the only nod to New Wave that has been acknowledged as being part of Progressive Rock umbrella.

Whether revisionism or new-found clarity, we have accepted Post Rock and Post Metal into the Prog cannon yet (aside from Japan, Talking Heads and Talk Talk) have dodged all attempts to add Post Punk. Television, Sonic Youth, The Stranglers, XTC and Magazine have all been suggested in the past (and rejected), which suggest that for some at least that connection between Progressive Rock and Post Punk has already been made.
I can definitely respect the views of parallel genre development as I deal with it with the sixties American and British Psych Rock developments which, when first initiated, were quite separate with the creating artists having quite different aims for their music. Sonic experimentation (British) versus substance evangelization (American). But it seems to me that New Wave did also hold on to the Punk aesthetic (if not the ethos) as that music was, for the greater part, simpler with no serious subject matter. Songs such as Our HouseMelt With You and De do do do de da da da would seem to confirm my feelings.

Edited by SteveG - March 09 2015 at 13:44
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20617
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 09 2015 at 08:49
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

^I agree with you except on this one critical point. No Post Punk artist would have been caught dead if they even hinted that their music was Prog or Prog inspired. There seems to be some other factor involved then just avoiding sounding like an old music trend. Being labeled Post Punk, however, was quite alright. Even for the more arty and experimental artists who requested not to be labeled at all, the Post Punk moniker seemed to cause them little discomfort.
Oh - I agree, (John Lydon's later praise of Peter Hammill and VdGG not withstanding), and that fear of "not being caught dead" was wholly attributable to how they would be perceived in the music press rather than any audience counter-reaction to such a claim. Being tagged Prog was (and to some extent still is) an anathema to many and an albatross to be hung around the neck of any musician who dares to mention its name. 


I'm not an expert on this area, as I've stated numerous times, but I would like to bring up one of my favorite Post Punk bands, The Stranglers, who were certainly on their own Psych-Post Punk (pop?) train but maintained the Punk ethos of being brawlers, having an adoring fan base that were their shock troops, and the fact that the band even partook of heroin to gain insights into that lifestyle and used those insights to create songs. (Shades of the Velvet Underground?)
 
 
Was this all done merely for how they appeared in the press? I don't necessary think so. I believe that the Punk ethos and aesthetic was deep seeded in this group, as it was with many others, their actions were not always commercially based.  Of course, some were only in it for the money, as Mr. Zappa once stated.
This is why I feel that Punk split the later rock music era (the Beatles split it first in the early sixties) into two distinct sections, before Punk and after (Post) Punk. Seeing this movement as solely media hype, or  as artist's pandering solely to the media, strikes me as being extremely restrictive. I feel that the aversion to the Prog tag By Post Punk artists was, at times, an aversion to one old music genre, among many, that was "defeated" by the "Punk revolution".  Regardless if that "revolution" was real, contrived or both. I feel that, as with most recorded events in history, both is the correct answer.

Edited by SteveG - March 09 2015 at 14:42
Back to Top
ExittheLemming View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Penal Colony
Status: Offline
Points: 11420
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 09 2015 at 08:25
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by ExittheLemming ExittheLemming wrote:

(I still don't understand what punctuated equilibrium is thoughConfused)
Punctuated Equilibrium is the idea that things remain in a relatively constant state with very little evolutionary change until an event occurs that creates a significant evolutionary shift resulting in branching into two or more species and/or the rise of an otherwise less dominant species. The equilibrium state is where the fauna reach a stable state that is supported by the ecological flora. In the case of the Cretaceous dinosaurs they had exhibited a prolonged period of relative stability in the 66 million years following the Jurassic period, though there is evidence that they were in a gradual decline. This would have continued at its own evolutionary pace until something happened (KT-boundary event) that hastened their demise, which in turn saw the rapid evolution of mammals (dominant species) and birds (an evolutionary branch of dinosaurs) to fill the ecological gap left by the dinosaurs, this was followed by another prolonged period of stasis (the Tertiary period).  

My premise is that Punk was the 'KT-boundary' catastrophic event that hastened Prog's decline but contributed little or nothing to the music gene-pool. Punk in itself was unable to fill the hole in the musical ecology left by demise of Prog Rock, thus leaving room for Post Rock to evolve into that space.


OK I think I understand that a little better now (and I love the irony of a dinosaur analogy vis a vis Prog's demise) but yes, I think it's a very astute premise but there's still a nagging 'gap' between '75 and '80 i.e. Prog was a bloated corpse by 74/75 tops and it's fan-base had abandoned the ship long before the advent of Punk circa 76/77. I do appreciate your careful choice of 'hastened' to describe Punk's role in Prog's decline but for me, emergent Post Punk (XTC, Cure, Banshees, PIL, Fall, Joy Division, Bunnymen, Monochrome Set, Talking Heads, Magazine et al) was very sudden and wasn't populated by musicians who had previously been fashionably slumming it pretending they had no technique, articulacy, ambition etc. (OK I get the lineage of Siouxsie, Devoto and Lydon) I just can't see any gradual evolution from: last rites are read to Prog Rock, the shackles are off for Post Punk musicians to get adventurous and innovative. I've never been able to understand what at the time (I was 18) might have precipitated this unforcasted tsunami of wondrous creativity. It was the only time in my adult life I bought albums 'the day they were released'
Back to Top
tamijo View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 06 2009
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 4287
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 09 2015 at 07:37
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by ExittheLemming ExittheLemming wrote:

I'm still unsure what deserting Prog fans started to listen to instead between then and the end of the decade?
Bob Marley, AC/DC, Thin Lizzy and Aerosmith probably. Exodus was as ubiquitous as Dark Side Of The Moon in student digs during the later quarter of the 1970s

I would gauge what was popular among that particular demographic by the various festival line-ups as that tends to be a pretty accurate barometer. Before The Reading Festival became a corporate shindig, it was a fairly good grass-rooted affair initially set up by the people who ran the Marquee and later The Mean Fiddler

1976: Gong, Rory Gallagher, Osibisa ... Pub-rock arrives in the lone form of Eddie & the Hot Rods, Friday night is roots dub reggae night.
1977: Golden Earring, Thin Lizzy, Alex Harvey ... Punk represented solely Gloria Mundi and art-punk by Ultravox!, the rest of the line up is Prog and Southern Rawk, Reggae is conspicuous by its absence.
1978: The Jam, Status Quo, Patti Smith ... Friday night is mainstream punky Power Pop night.
1979: The Police, The Scorpions, Peter Gabriel ... All hail the New Wave.

 
I dont remember it as beeing a bad time for music, even if I was not into much Punk at the time.
 
People i knew (all prog lover) was listening to new albums by :
 
Return to Forever - (76) 
Genesis (76)
Shakti (76-77)
Kate Bush (78)
Weather Report (76-77-78) 
Supertramp (77)
Alan Parsons (76-77-78)
Jethro Tull (76-77-78)
Pink Floyd (77)
Joni Mitchell (and Jaco) (77)
Yes (77)
 
There was a sh*tzload of great albums made in the period, I think most prog lover, didnt think much about the so called decline that the press was "creating". And if they did, it is more like that they started thinking about it in 81-82 at a time when Punk was no longer very "hot".
 
So i belive it would be more fair to say New Wave was the "Logical Extension of Prog" in the circles i'we been in.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Prog is whatevey you want it to be. So dont diss other peoples prog, and they wont diss yours
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 09 2015 at 06:06
Originally posted by ExittheLemming ExittheLemming wrote:

(I still don't understand what punctuated equilibrium is thoughConfused)
Punctuated Equilibrium is the idea that things remain in a relatively constant state with very little evolutionary change until an event occurs that creates a significant evolutionary shift resulting in branching into two or more species and/or the rise of an otherwise less dominant species. The equilibrium state is where the fauna reach a stable state that is supported by the ecological flora. In the case of the Cretaceous dinosaurs they had exhibited a prolonged period of relative stability in the 66 million years following the Jurassic period, though there is evidence that they were in a gradual decline. This would have continued at its own evolutionary pace until something happened (KT-boundary event) that hastened their demise, which in turn saw the rapid evolution of mammals (dominant species) and birds (an evolutionary branch of dinosaurs) to fill the ecological gap left by the dinosaurs, this was followed by another prolonged period of stasis (the Tertiary period).  

My premise is that Punk was the 'KT-boundary' catastrophic event that hastened Prog's decline but contributed little or nothing to the music gene-pool. Punk in itself was unable to fill the hole in the musical ecology left by demise of Prog Rock, thus leaving room for Post Rock to evolve into that space.
What?
Back to Top
ExittheLemming View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Penal Colony
Status: Offline
Points: 11420
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 09 2015 at 05:36
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

So for me, punctuated equilibrium (no it wasn't a pun, but now I see it, it is quite amusing) is a more logical explanation: 1976 did not suddenly produce a wealth musicians whose ability, skill-level and technical competency was at the barest minimum required to thrash out 3-chord 12-bar for two-and-a-half minutes while some nasally snot-nosed yob whined on about how tough life was living on the dole. Nor did it suddenly render unemployable and redundant any musician who could actually play their instrument. Sure, there were a few who achieved a little fame and notoriety for being unable to play their instruments, but their moment in the spotlight was short-lived. In the main, Punk was made by musicians who understood music and knew how to play, and those musicians grew up listening to and playing music that was far more complex and involved than Punk Rock. We can only speculate as to what kind of music those musicians would have created had Punk Rock never existed, but it is evident that once the Punk bubble had burst they quickly gravitated to a new level of complexity and musicianship that wasn't present in Punk Rock. That post-punk wave of music may superficially bear little resemblance to the progressive music scene that preceded it, until that is you scratch beneath the surface and start to think about where that music came from, Post-punk is Prog Rock (or some other pre-Punk Rock music) seen through Punk-tinted spectacles if you like. 



Very perceptive post certainly, with this bit especially so re the inconspicuous and rarely acknowledged kinship between Prog and Post Punk. (I still don't understand what punctuated equilibrium is thoughConfused)
Back to Top
Evolver View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Crossover & JR/F/Canterbury Teams

Joined: October 22 2005
Location: The Idiocracy
Status: Offline
Points: 5482
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 08 2015 at 15:22
Oddly enough, by the early 80's some of the more popular (relatively) pink acts in the U.S., while not explicitly embracing progressive rock, used some aspects of prog in their music.  The Dead Kennedys and Fear, to name two that I saw perform, often used odd time signatures and more difficult chord progressions in their music, and Flipper would embark on long psychedelic excursions.  Other groups at the time tried to follow them, but most were not successful, and by that time, the genre was already falling out of fashion (with fashion itself becoming more important to the market anyway).
Trust me. I know what I'm doing.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 34567 11>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.230 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.