2013 NFL Season

Yeah, Seattle is the only team that can truly cover, and not just one defender like a team usually gets, they have a bunch! Truly impressive, it will be a great game that one.

The Bronco - Eagle game went about like I expected...though 52 points was a big surprise.  I had serious doubts our defense could stop Vick effectively...and he absolutely shredded us in the 1st half.  Really felt the absence of Von Miller's speed in the rush as Vick made us look really bad.  I was kinda shocked Vick still ran so well and he did a fine job passing too...he seems to have a lot left in the tank.  I had a feeling though that the Eagles D would fall apart in the 2nd half.  I've been a Bronco fan since '84 and I've seen it dozens of times...big nasty defenses sucking on those oxygen machines just can't play all 4 quarters.  Next up, Cowboys in Dallas.

JJLehto wrote: Well whadya know? After "this wont be a blowout!" and leave the fantasy away... It's a blowout!! Because cmon....in the end it's Ryan Tannehill vs Drew Brees. Kudos to the Phins and Tannehill is playing surprisingly well but...it's the Saints. You can't stop Brees, he can only falter.    337 yds, 4 TDs before the 4th even begins. Machine

rushfan4 wrote: In regards to the Lions being 3 and 1, the locals are already carving the team name on the Super Bowl trophy.  I am glad to see that they are 3 and 1, but will wait until the halfway point of the season before deciding whether to hop on the bandwagon or not.  The Lions visit Lambeau next week; a place where they haven't won since 1991.  The Packers are down so far this year, but if the Lions can actually pull off a win next week I think that will definitely be a sign of the upcoming apocalypse.

And because the Packers are only 1-2 and they're playing in Lambeau next week, I'm counting that as an automatic loss for us.  I just don't see them dropping to 1-3.  As the Lions demonstrated yesterday, they have a tough time holding on to a lead, no matter how big.  Don't get me wrong, I was ecstatic to beat the Bears yesterday because, frankly, I didn't expect it.  But the Packers are a much more disciplined team than the Lions and I don't think this game will end any differently than the previous twenty or so trips to Lambeau.  That's our wedge to winning the division:  the damned Packers.


Edited by MillsLayne - September 30 2013 at 18:13

Yeah lets keep the fantasies on the nfl fantasy thread.

The Dolphins were my favorite AFC team back in my childhood days.  I can't say that I really pay all that much attention to them anymore but I am glad to see that they are 3 and 0, even though I know nothing about the team or anyone on it.    Mostly just residual feelings in that regard. 

In regards to the Lions being 3 and 1, the locals are already carving the team name on the Super Bowl trophy.  I am glad to see that they are 3 and 1, but will wait until the halfway point of the season before deciding whether to hop on the bandwagon or not.  The Lions visit Lambeau next week; a place where they haven't won since 1991.  The Packers are down so far this year, but if the Lions can actually pull off a win next week I think that will definitely be a sign of the upcoming apocalypse.


Edited by rushfan4 - September 30 2013 at 11:06

I'm skeptical of the Dolphins. But I'm more skeptical of Rob Ryan actually being competent. 

RIP to former Steelers DE L.C. Greenwood

AEProgman wrote: Man With Hat wrote: Giants...At least they are only two games out of the division lead.   Same for the Stillers.....  All the AFC north is 2-2 except us.  No take aways in 4 games, unreal.  I saw 2 missed interceptions right in Ike's hands and a fumble that just squirted away from 3 Steelers and gave the Vikings a first down.

Haha. Damn...I didn't realize the AFC North was having similar problems. At least it makes the division races exciting.

Man!! I missed the last half of Hawks game....had to leave. I honestly did not think they had a chance playing like they were.