Vinyl vs CD

Certif1ed wrote: 2) "Vinyl are cheaper" - In the same manner as stamps, since vinyl is very delicate and wears quickly, good condition copies are hard to find - especially of popular records, as people tended to play them (how could they ). A First Pressing of "In The Court Of The Crimson King" fetches up to £500. "Please Please Me" by the Beatles is worth £2,500 in it's original STEREO release. And the White Album - well, if you've got one of the first 50, you're looking at the best part of £1,000,000.

Yeah I hear you! But in that lifestyle order I was talking about, it certainly depends where u from... for instance, here in Mexico we have this very popular music flea market called "El Chopo" were every Saturday people get together (it's mostly similar to a Swap Meet... ) and exchange, sell, buy music (it goes from the oldest and rarest albums to find till brand new cd's and artists...) so it's easier for me to get a vinyl album of Yes, Zappa, VDGG or Pink Floyd for less that $1.00 usd a piece... it also depends on the public preferences, for instante, where you live, UK; people are more appealed to prog rock than we do here... it's all about cultures and sub-cultures... (although during the past 15 years, Mexico's become a very visited forum for prog bands...  )

Edited by landberkdoten

I am soooooo tempted to get rid of the 3/400 vinyl albums I have (a lot of them are embarrasing crap from the '80s anyway), but I just cannot bring myself to do it - even though I have a top line record deck, I can't remember the last time it was used.

I'm not going to get into the argument re sound quality, as there are sound (sorry) arguments on both sides, but one thing vinyl DOES have over CDs.......

Ever tried rolling up a 'special' cigarette on a CD cover? Album covers are the perfect size to sit on the lap...... or so I have been told....

I've been collecting vinyl for about 2 years now, so I'm relatively new to the "vinyl jungle" I agree that vinyl offers a far better listening experience than CDs. It certainly depends on the equipment, but anyone who is still under the impression that CDs sound better than vinyl, should try getting some decent equipment (doesn't need to cost a fortune) and get hold of your favorite record in a high quality pressing, then you should be in for a listening experience beyond the usual.             

Edited by ummagumma08

SALUDOS Y FUERTES ABRAZOS A NUESTROS PAÍSES HERMANOS LATINOAMERICANOS, REPÚBLICA DOMINICANA Y HAITÍ; ESPERANDO HALLEN PRONTA RESIGNACIÓN Y ESPERANZA EN SUS CORAZONES DADAS LAS CIRCUNSTANCIAS ACAECIDAS EN LOS ÚLTIMOS DÍAS. LO MEJOR HOY Y SIEMPRE DESDE MÉXICO   

Sheesh, I (accidently) nicked my "Road Games" album (Allan Holdsworth) when opening the sleeve with a kitchen knife (dumb sh*t, eh?) and every time I listen to that I get pissed 'cause I did it. I still own that album (my only vinyl album left) and I know that scratch reduces it from pristine to crap. I have it on CD now, so the pains not so deep, but ....... memories.... Laying on my bed... Queen "A Night at the Opera" full blast through a pair of Marantz Emperial 9's (RobJ's) and still enjoying the last moments of a good buzz..... Yeah, Vinyl rules. It's just not permanent.

Maybe it's just me being silly, but, I can't stand the "snap crackle pop" if I'm not eating cereal. I spent gazillions on cleaners, vinyl protectors and other such products and every album, after numerous and I mean NUMEROUS plays, sounded like an AARP dental convention(old people making smackin' sounds with their false teeth, oy!!).

I traded in over 700 (that's seven hundred) vinyl albums (including some first press, and many prog) for $300.00 and 30 (thirty) CD's in 1987. Except for the first press issues, I haven't looked back.  

I understand the (slight) loss of highs and lows, but for me... CD all the way.

One almost killed argument!! Spot on, Joren!!!

However, it's not just "ambience" that makes vinyl win over CD aesthetically - the covers are "warm" and wonderful things to own. It's a bit like collecting stamps or art, except that vinyl has a practical purpose beyond either in that you can not only gaze at the magnificent artwork and go "Aaaaah" to your heart's content, but you can listen to it as well!! Many albums had/have magnificent gatefold sleeves, or sleeves that folded out into massive posters, and nice little bits and pieces tucked away inside. You just don't get that with CD.

I'm hoping that someone with a scientific bent can explain the theory that "proves" that the sound of CD is better than vinyl.

There are problems with vinyl, of course; once you've played it, it will never sound the same, as you are dragging a diamond (hardest substance known to man) across soft plastic. Not only that, but it moves from side to side and up and down. With CD, a cool laser shines through holes in a plastic-coated aluminium disc. There is next to no wear throughout the disc's lifetime.

HOWEVER.

Vinyl sounds better - particularly a first pressing - because it is ANALOGUE, like sound itself. There is NOTHING digital about sound - it is constant and never stops. Anything in a digital format either exists or it does not exist. On or off. No room for compromise...

Except for Digital-Analogue Converters (DACs), which I do not understand fully. These have filters to "muddy" the sound and restore some of the analogue feel. But I cannnot see how they can escape from the nature of digital.

16-bit CDs particularly are a con - and mp3 is MUCH worse. NEVER pay the same, or anywhere near as much for an mp3 as you would for a CD. mp3 audio is COMPRESSED and, no matter what the bitrate, will NEVER sound as good as 16-bit CD.

24-bit CD does not leave out data that 16-bit might simply ignore (especially in dense sections and moments when there is, for example, a subtle reverb at a very low level). This is why vinyl tends to have more presence than the current crop of 16-bit CDs - you may not necessarily hear what is different, but, because sound has a physical effect, you will FEEL it.

24-bit (AKA SACD or DVD Audio) leaves out practically (virtally!) nothing. It has a wider dynamic range and far greater dynamic presence. It is superior to vinyl in this respect - but, like all digital music, retains some of the "clinical" sound.

In the end, it's like comparing digital photographs to "proper" photographs. Somehow, digital images look "too real". As any photographer will tell you, you cannot replace natural chemical grains with digital pixels. Or can you...?

For me, listening to Pink Floyd's "Dark Side Of the Moon" on First Pressing vinyl is the ultimate way of hearing that album - apart from the original master tapes (which I have heard.../smug).

So vinyl for me, please!!!

Vinyl or CD ??

Let's fight

(cool topic idea by Certif1ed)