Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > Proto-Prog and Prog-Related Lounge
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Black Sabbath inclusion
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedBlack Sabbath inclusion

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 10>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 13 2007 at 09:28
I just found out Rick Wakeman played with the band.  Weird.  I did not know that.  Hope someone posts something from that to the streaming.  I guess I'll have to check out the samples at my favorite internet CD shop.

Just checked out the site and he's not in the credit but the review mentions synthesizers and none of the other band members are credited with synthesizer. LOL


Edited by Slartibartfast - October 13 2007 at 09:32
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10617
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 13 2007 at 09:20
I know I'm not reviewing any more albums till the BS reviews die down. My Eno review was on the front page for a second and then it was trampled by a horde of metal thunder, and poor Eno is so delicate. Ouch!!!
Back to Top
Raff View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 29 2005
Location: None
Status: Offline
Points: 24429
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 13 2007 at 09:06
Originally posted by fuxi fuxi wrote:

I'm sure you can rationalise BS's inclusion as much as you like. I just find it thoroughly depressing.


I can understand your point of view... However, I don-t understand why  you and all the other people who find PR additions depressing don-t address the issue directly with the owners. If they think they are important to draw more people in, perhaps they should realise that instead they are having the opposite effect, especially on longtime members. Personally, though I am in favour of PR and none of the additions has ever bothered me in the least, I think it-s not a good thing if they are forced down people-s throats.
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10617
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 13 2007 at 09:05
Originally posted by Hercules Hercules wrote:

Much though I like Sabbath, their connection with prog is too tenuous to include them and nothing in Sean's biopic convinces me otherwise.Add to that Iron Maiden, The Beatles, Radiohead, Messhugah, Led Zeppelin and The Who and this site is stretching the boundaries of what is prog, or even prog related much too far.Yet some bands with really progressive tendencies (Toto is an obvious candidate) are not here.


Sorry Toto, but we're not in Kansas anymore.
Back to Top
fuxi View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: March 08 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 2459
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 13 2007 at 08:55
I'm sure you can rationalise BS's inclusion as much as you like. I just find it thoroughly depressing.
Back to Top
andu View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 27 2006
Location: Romania
Status: Offline
Points: 3089
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 13 2007 at 08:23
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

that's a great Zep 4 write-up, micky


Great one, indeed Clap

Except for the fact that Battle of Evermore is the only Zepp songs where Jones doesn't do the mandolin, but Page... and Jones did the guitar, and the backing vocals when Sandy wasn't around LOL

And a great Tales review too, btw Thumbs%20Up

Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20239
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 13 2007 at 08:06
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:


I really can't believe you all.... albums don't 'deserve' any particular rating.  IF so ..what is the point of reviewing...  just award the damn album 5 stars.. because it is inluential or popular. 

sorry to see my example has been ignored.  You can review a non prog album accurately and fairly based on it's prog quotient.  That is fair to all... unless the only thing that matters.. is what the damn ranking is...


 
Exactly my point.
 
If I did pull out those rankings, it is to see that on the average these albums on top are the better ones from a given group.
 
 
 
But as I said in the other thread (rating changes) I couldn't care less of those rankings as seen from a general spectrum. Those TOP 100 list are not that trustworthy (they might give an idea, but theway some focus on it, I suspect major skewing) and less on this site than at Progressive Ears  or at Gnosis2000.
 
 
 
So in its finality, I don't care for intergroup comparisons, because PA is not trustworthy 
 
read you tomorrow
 
Wink
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 13 2007 at 07:56
Hopefully it'll settle down over time - those rankings are ridiculous and make a mockery of the site.
 
4 stars = "Excellent addition to any prog music collection".
 
Come on.
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Back to Top
Hercules View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 14 2007
Location: Near York UK
Status: Offline
Points: 7024
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 13 2007 at 07:54
Much though I like Sabbath, their connection with prog is too tenuous to include them and nothing in Sean's biopic convinces me otherwise.

Add to that Iron Maiden, The Beatles, Radiohead, Messhugah, Led Zeppelin and The Who and this site is stretching the boundaries of what is prog, or even prog related much too far.

Yet some bands with really progressive tendencies (Toto is an obvious candidate) are not here.
A TVR is not a car. It's a way of life.
Back to Top
micky View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 13 2007 at 07:32
Originally posted by Sean Trane Sean Trane wrote:

Originally posted by Abstrakt Abstrakt wrote:

Black Sabbath >> Far too low, this one is a masterpiece 1970 3.83
Excellent%20addition%20to%20any%20prog%20music%20collection
(13 ratings)
Studio Album
Paranoid > This one's a masterpiece aswell, but better rating 1970 4.23
Excellent%20addition%20to%20any%20prog%20music%20collection
(10 ratings)
Studio Album
Master Of Reality >> No masterpiece, but still deserves a 3.5, at least 1971 3.09
Good,%20but%20non-essential
(7 ratings)
Studio Album
Volume Four >> Excellent Rating, i agree all the way! 1972 4.06
Excellent%20addition%20to%20any%20prog%20music%20collection
(9 ratings)
Studio Album
Sabbath Bloody Sabbath > Could've been a bit higher, still good 1973 4.14
Excellent%20addition%20to%20any%20prog%20music%20collection
(10 ratings)
Studio Album
Sabotage >> A good album, but not as good as the rating says 1975 4.54
Essential:%20a%20masterpiece%20of%20progressive%20music
(6 ratings)
Studio Album
We Sold Our Soul for Rock and Roll 1975 4.00
Excellent%20addition%20to%20any%20prog%20music%20collection
(2 ratings)
Boxset / Compilation
Technical Ecstasy >> Come on, this one deserves 3 stars! 1976 2.33
Collectors/fans%20only
(3 ratings)
Studio Album
Never Say Die >> Far too low, this one's excellent! 1978 2.00
Collectors/fans%20only
(3 ratings)
Studio Album
Heaven and Hell >> Good rating, could've been a four instead. 1980 3.38
Good,%20but%20non-essential
(5 ratings)
Studio Album
 
Wink
 
 
COPYCAT!!!!  Tongue
 
 
LOL
 
 
 
 


I really can't believe you all.... albums don't 'deserve' any particular rating.  IF so ..what is the point of reviewing...  just award the damn album 5 stars.. because it is inluential or popular. 

sorry to see my example has been ignored.  You can review a non prog album accurately and fairly based on it's prog quotient.  That is fair to all... unless the only thing that matters.. is what the damn ranking is...


The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
Back to Top
Raff View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 29 2005
Location: None
Status: Offline
Points: 24429
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 13 2007 at 07:26
Steve, it is not... I think I made it clear enough in the other thread. It doesn-t make any sense to give great albums lower ratings just because they-re not prog. It would make much more sense to scrap the category altogether.
Back to Top
Abstrakt View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 18 2005
Location: Soundgarden
Status: Offline
Points: 18292
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 13 2007 at 07:23
As the Sabbath Fanboy that i am, i added:
Live at Last 1980 4.00
Excellent%20addition%20to%20any%20prog%20music%20collection
(1 ratings)
Live
 
Big%20smile
Back to Top
mystic fred View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 13 2006
Location: Londinium
Status: Offline
Points: 4252
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 13 2007 at 07:19
Originally posted by Ghost Rider Ghost Rider wrote:

I don-t see why we should rejoice or anything at an album having a low rating just because it-s not prog... I am afraid that, in my very odd opinion, it sounds a little bit like a form of fanaticism. Mind you, Hugues or anyone else, this remark is NOT directed at you... However, nothing and no one will stop me from giving 5 stars to Heaven and Hell, if I ever get to reviewing it. The fact of giving those albums a lower rating because they-re not prog is absurd to me, as I made it abundantly clear in that other thread in Help Improve the site.
 
agreed "Heaven and Hell" is a masterpiece, but is it  an "essential masterpiece of progressive music" ...? Smile
 
 
 
Prog Archives Tour Van
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20239
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 13 2007 at 07:15
Originally posted by Abstrakt Abstrakt wrote:

Black Sabbath >> Far too low, this one is a masterpiece 1970 3.83
Excellent%20addition%20to%20any%20prog%20music%20collection
(13 ratings)
Studio Album
Paranoid > This one's a masterpiece aswell, but better rating 1970 4.23
Excellent%20addition%20to%20any%20prog%20music%20collection
(10 ratings)
Studio Album
Master Of Reality >> No masterpiece, but still deserves a 3.5, at least 1971 3.09
Good,%20but%20non-essential
(7 ratings)
Studio Album
Volume Four >> Excellent Rating, i agree all the way! 1972 4.06
Excellent%20addition%20to%20any%20prog%20music%20collection
(9 ratings)
Studio Album
Sabbath Bloody Sabbath > Could've been a bit higher, still good 1973 4.14
Excellent%20addition%20to%20any%20prog%20music%20collection
(10 ratings)
Studio Album
Sabotage >> A good album, but not as good as the rating says 1975 4.54
Essential:%20a%20masterpiece%20of%20progressive%20music
(6 ratings)
Studio Album
We Sold Our Soul for Rock and Roll 1975 4.00
Excellent%20addition%20to%20any%20prog%20music%20collection
(2 ratings)
Boxset / Compilation
Technical Ecstasy >> Come on, this one deserves 3 stars! 1976 2.33
Collectors/fans%20only
(3 ratings)
Studio Album
Never Say Die >> Far too low, this one's excellent! 1978 2.00
Collectors/fans%20only
(3 ratings)
Studio Album
Heaven and Hell >> Good rating, could've been a four instead. 1980 3.38
Good,%20but%20non-essential
(5 ratings)
Studio Album
 
Wink
 
 
COPYCAT!!!!  Tongue
 
 
LOL
 
 
 
 
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
Abstrakt View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 18 2005
Location: Soundgarden
Status: Offline
Points: 18292
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 13 2007 at 07:09
Black Sabbath >> Far too low, this one is a masterpiece 1970 3.83
Excellent%20addition%20to%20any%20prog%20music%20collection
(13 ratings)
Studio Album
Paranoid > This one's a masterpiece aswell, but better rating 1970 4.23
Excellent%20addition%20to%20any%20prog%20music%20collection
(10 ratings)
Studio Album
Master Of Reality >> No masterpiece, but still deserves a 3.5, at least 1971 3.09
Good,%20but%20non-essential
(7 ratings)
Studio Album
Volume Four >> Excellent Rating, i agree all the way! 1972 4.06
Excellent%20addition%20to%20any%20prog%20music%20collection
(9 ratings)
Studio Album
Sabbath Bloody Sabbath > Could've been a bit higher, still good 1973 4.14
Excellent%20addition%20to%20any%20prog%20music%20collection
(10 ratings)
Studio Album
Sabotage >> A good album, but not as good as the rating says 1975 4.54
Essential:%20a%20masterpiece%20of%20progressive%20music
(6 ratings)
Studio Album
We Sold Our Soul for Rock and Roll 1975 4.00
Excellent%20addition%20to%20any%20prog%20music%20collection
(2 ratings)
Boxset / Compilation
Technical Ecstasy >> Come on, this one deserves 3 stars! 1976 2.33
Collectors/fans%20only
(3 ratings)
Studio Album
Never Say Die >> Far too low, this one's excellent! 1978 2.00
Collectors/fans%20only
(3 ratings)
Studio Album
Heaven and Hell >> Good rating, could've been a four instead. 1980 3.38
Good,%20but%20non-essential
(5 ratings)
Studio Album
 
Wink
Back to Top
Raff View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 29 2005
Location: None
Status: Offline
Points: 24429
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 13 2007 at 07:06
I don-t see why we should rejoice or anything at an album having a low rating just because it-s not prog... I am afraid that, in my very odd opinion, it sounds a little bit like a form of fanaticism. Mind you, Hugues or anyone else, this remark is NOT directed at you... However, nothing and no one will stop me from giving 5 stars to Heaven and Hell, if I ever get to reviewing it. The fact of giving those albums a lower rating because they-re not prog is absurd to me, as I made it abundantly clear in that other thread in Help Improve the site.
Back to Top
Trickster F. View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 10 2006
Location: Belize
Status: Offline
Points: 5308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 13 2007 at 07:00
Originally posted by mystic fred mystic fred wrote:

^ i always liked "Technical Ecstasy" and  "Never Say Die" - not normal Sabs material admittedly but not poor. Ermm
 
I agree, there are at least 4 songs on each of those I am really fond of.
sig
Back to Top
mystic fred View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 13 2006
Location: Londinium
Status: Offline
Points: 4252
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 13 2007 at 06:58
^ i always liked "Technical Ecstasy" and  "Never Say Die" - not normal Sabs material admittedly but not poor. Ermm
Prog Archives Tour Van
Back to Top
Sean Trane View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Prog Folk

Joined: April 29 2004
Location: Heart of Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 20239
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 13 2007 at 06:49
So far this is hardly disgraceful:
 
Black Sabbath >> A little low 1970 3.83
Excellent%20addition%20to%20any%20prog%20music%20collection
(13 ratings)
Studio Album
Paranoid 1970 4.23
Excellent%20addition%20to%20any%20prog%20music%20collection
(10 ratings)
Studio Album
Master Of Reality >> Actually I am surprised at this low rating 1971 3.09
Good,%20but%20non-essential
(7 ratings)
Studio Album
Volume Four >> I don't get this should beunder 4Star 1972 4.06
Excellent%20addition%20to%20any%20prog%20music%20collection
(9 ratings)
Studio Album
Sabbath Bloody Sabbath 1973 4.14
Excellent%20addition%20to%20any%20prog%20music%20collection
(10 ratings)
Studio Album
Sabotage >> This one is a bit too high but WTF 1975 4.54
Essential:%20a%20masterpiece%20of%20progressive%20music
(6 ratings)
Studio Album
We Sold Our Soul for Rock and Roll 1975 4.00
Excellent%20addition%20to%20any%20prog%20music%20collection
(2 ratings)
Boxset / Compilation
Technical Ecstasy >> Poor album, poor rating 1976 2.33
Collectors/fans%20only
(3 ratings)
Studio Album
Never Say Die >> Poor album, poor rating 1978 2.00
Collectors/fans%20only
(3 ratings)
Studio Album
Heaven and Hell >> I expected this closer to 4Star 1980 3.38
Good,%20but%20non-essential
(5 ratings)
Studio Album
 
 
No abuse really!! And in one week time, it'll have blown over!!!
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword
Back to Top
Easy Money View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10617
Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 13 2007 at 04:01
I guess since I'm reading this I should throw in an opinion too, I think the idea of different ratings words for bands like Zep or Sabbath is a good one.

Edited by Easy Money - October 13 2007 at 04:03
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 10>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.141 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.