Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
The T
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
|
Posted: July 31 2007 at 16:54 |
StyLaZyn wrote:
The T wrote:
[But you act like the Moral Righteousness Authority that has come here to show us that that is wrong because...you say so???![Confused](https://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley5.gif)
|
DUDE!!! You're confusing him with me.
|
I'm getting confused here ![Confused](https://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley5.gif) ![LOL](https://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley36.gif) ....
You're an already known "Authority" StyLaZyn... But we can only allow ONE! ![Wink](https://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley2.gif) ![LOL](https://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley36.gif)
By the way, to our new Famous Expert Mgallard:
1 - right - which means you're famous... OH!
2 - right - which means you're completely infatuated with yourself! OH!
Are you Paris Hilton??
Maybe... from the lack of coherence between some of your own posts... maybe that's the case...
Edited by The T - July 31 2007 at 17:03
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
StyLaZyn
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 22 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4079
|
Posted: July 31 2007 at 16:26 |
The T wrote:
[But you act like the Moral Righteousness Authority that has come here to show us that that is wrong because...you say so???![Confused](https://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley5.gif)
|
DUDE!!! You're confusing him with me.
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
mgallard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 27 2005
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 155
|
Posted: July 31 2007 at 16:21 |
1- Right and 2- Right 3- Right too.
M.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
The T
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
|
Posted: July 31 2007 at 16:16 |
mgallard wrote:
I forgive you all. One day you will see the light. I'll pray for that day. You all don't get it do ya. All good prog groups become pop in the end cause $ in the real God.
Oh I see... you're a priest.... or some higher power, as you can forgive all of us for our sins and you KNOW the light!
Anyway, now seriously, don't turn this into something personal, I am more open-minded, you aren't or are, whatever. The only proof that we have that you're open minded is, well, YOUR testimony and your constant "I'm open minded" rants.... But from what we can READ, you just can't stand opposite arguments or different opinions... It's a relatively easy tactic for narrow-minded people to call everybody else narrow-minded... It's called projection and it's a rather common defense mechanism...
What I find pathetic is that people let their rationality become controlled by that irrational fear of something "popular". It's normally expressed as "Oh, X group is now famous, or they had a hit single, or they made a poppy song, ie.: they sold out", but anyway, some people like to be pathetic too... so good for them! Yes! Good for them! They make millions! Or they don't! Why should we care! We care for THE MUSIC... If they make millions and we (I mean, each particular individual) likes it, OK... If it doesn't sell and we like it, OK! If it sells and we don't like it, OK! If it doesn't sell and we don't like it, OK! Don't you get that, what many people here have been trying to say (among other things) is that PARTICULAR TASTES ARE WHAT MAKES A PERSON LIKE OR NOT A BAND, NOT HOW POP OR COMMERCIAL IT IS....It so happens that, from the nature of this site, most of us don't like things like 90125 or Invisible Touch... But you act like the Moral Righteousness Authority that has come here to show us that that is wrong because...you say so???![Confused](https://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley5.gif)
M.
PD: BTW, I am famous enough already, so I don't need to even have a name on ProgArchives if it was me you were referring to, or was it Ibán? or, Mr. T, are you just trying to be funny? | Oh, when I try to be funny Mr Famous, I usually succeed. And of course I'm not talking about Ivan, who has a name here for all the right reasons. You say you're already famous, so, either:
1. you're a famous person that comes to a prog-website trying to show how wise you are, but you don't reveal your name, so that nobody can actually laugh at your true self...
2. Your selfi nfatuation is such that you think you're famous....
You may even be The Queen of England my friend.... we don't care. We're here to discuss about music, other stuvff (and a LOT of useless stuff)... not to allow such a famous person to "undumb us"....
Edited by The T - July 31 2007 at 16:17
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
1800iareyay
Prog Reviewer
Joined: November 18 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2492
|
Posted: July 31 2007 at 16:13 |
God, how do I keep getting drawn into this? It's like a scab I keep picking. No one said that when a band achieves financial success that they sold out. They did, however, sell out when they abandoned their sound and purposefully sacrificed their integrity to make hit music. It is not a sin to receive lots of money (this is not the indie rock archives), but I reserve the right to listen to what I want. I enjoy good pop. For example, I believe Michael Jackson and Prince have made some of the best music of all time, regardless of genre. Both are androgynous, somewhat racially ambigous, and both have made money that is measured in the s**tloads. Genesis cannot compare to those two artists when it comes to pop material (doesn't make Genesis bad, but it's true). From Fleetwood Mac to Arcade Fire, I'll listen to a band provided they are good. I don't consider your attacks personal, mainly because you make up comments to critique. I'd take it personally if you actually addressed what we say instead of either making something up, or actually quoting us, then ignoring the quote to say teh smae thing over and over again.
P.S. His name is Ivan, not Iban. Misspelling his name isn't a clever dig, it's childish
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
StyLaZyn
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 22 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4079
|
Posted: July 31 2007 at 16:06 |
mgallard wrote:
I forgive you all. One day you will see the light. I'll pray for that day. You all don't get it do ya. All good prog groups become pop in the end cause $ in the real God. ![LOL](smileys/smiley36.gif)
Anyway, now seriously, don't turn this into something personal, I am more open-minded, you aren't or are, whatever.
What I find pathetic is that people let their rationality become controlled by that irrational fear of something "popular". It's normally expressed as "Oh, X group is now famous, or they had a hit single, or they made a poppy song, ie.: they sold out", but anyway, some people like to be pathetic too... so good for them!
M.
PD: BTW, I am famous enough already, so I don't need to even have a name on ProgArchives if it was me you were referring to, or was it Ibán? or, Mr. T, are you just trying to be funny? |
From my perspective, any ProgSnobbery I may refer to comes from those who don't allow themselves the ability to see value in music that is not Prog. I don't care for Madonna's music but the mass appeal reflects a formula that works for her goal. My tastes do lie elsewhere but I have found guilty pleasures in bands that are no where close to technical. Prime example: The Beatles have some excellent music in their early years before moving into more adventurous territory.
Edited by StyLaZyn - July 31 2007 at 16:07
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Vibrationbaby
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
|
Posted: July 31 2007 at 16:05 |
Oh no! The F word has been suggested ![Shocked](smileys/smiley3.gif) . I can`t believe I`ve read all four pages. All I care about is that quite a few bands that I really dig, new , old , jazz, rock whatever, are represented here. If Alvin And The Chipmunks were here They`d definitely be getting a review from me. Seriously I`d be the first one to submit a review. And talk about being in it for the money my heroes from my tender years are making a movie and they`ve gone Hip Hop.
Edited by Vibrationbaby - July 31 2007 at 16:12
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
progismylife
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 19 2006
Location: ibreathehelium
Status: Offline
Points: 15535
|
Posted: July 31 2007 at 16:00 |
Some of these posts are so hilarious.....
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
mgallard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 27 2005
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 155
|
Posted: July 31 2007 at 15:59 |
I forgive you all. One day you will see the light. I'll pray for that day. You all don't get it do ya. All good prog groups become pop in the end cause $ in the real God. ![LOL](smileys/smiley36.gif) Anyway, now seriously, don't turn this into something personal, I am more open-minded, you aren't or are, whatever. What I find pathetic is that people let their rationality become controlled by that irrational fear of something "popular". It's normally expressed as "Oh, X group is now famous, or they had a hit single, or they made a poppy song, ie.: they sold out", but anyway, some people like to be pathetic too... so good for them! M. PD: BTW, I am famous enough already, so I don't need to even have a name on ProgArchives if it was me you were referring to, or was it Ibán? or, Mr. T, are you just trying to be funny?
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
The T
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
|
Posted: July 31 2007 at 15:46 |
Poeple trying to make a name in here by showing how "open-minded" they are is not a rare thing.... It's funny how there are people who think that, to be "famous" (what else are they aiming for but attention?) in a prog website, they have to show us that prog isn't so good after all!! It's like a soccer fan going to a soccer site saying "hey, you idiots! There are other sports around! I'm open minded, you're not!". ![Confused](https://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley5.gif) As Ivan said, this is a PROG site... it's just normal and coherent that MOST people will prefer the PROGGIER version of bands rather than the POPPIER version of bands... I would say that, if it was the other way around, we should be analyzed for being incoherent as a group....
The initial post in this thread, though a little arrogant, was interesting and I guess full of good intentions... Somebody hijacked this trying to "impress" all of us... And that he achieved! He "impressed" us so much that I'm not sure how seriously comments coming from this person will be taken in the future....
Oh... we're so close-minded, narrow-headed....
If so, SO ![Censored](https://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley35.gif) WHAT.
Edited by The T - July 31 2007 at 15:56
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
|
Posted: July 31 2007 at 15:15 |
darqdean wrote:
I've just re-read all four pages of this thread and can find nothing that screems Progsnobishness to me - have people been editing their posts to remove such inflamatory comments, or are my perceptions of this phenomina different to everyone else?
Amen, people is only expressiing their opinions.
Anyway, that aside...
The review ratings in the PA are with respect to an albums Progishness® - therefore Holidays In Eden for example, (which I think is a damn fine album btw just not a particularily prog-oriented), deserves its three stars (remember 3-stars = Good, but non-essential) - three stars does not (necessarily) equal a bad album - just one you wouldn't recommend to another Progger. For me, the simple fact that Marillion's follow-up album, Brave, courts 4 and 5 star reviews placing it higher than the Pre-Hogarth era, Fugazi, highlights the complete lack of regressive thinking within the archive.
Why Darqdean?
Some bands reach their peak early in their careers and then go downhill, others keep improving, people like Brave more than Fugazzi, it's simple taste.
Progressive Rock doesn't have to progress, it's only the name of a genre with certain characteristics, not an adjective that qualifies the approach of the band towards music.
Yes was Prog in the 70's and Magenta who play more or less the music of the 70's are also Progressive Rock band because they are part of this genre.
Anglagard in the 90's played the music of the 70's refusing to use any instrument not availlable in the 70's and they were a fabulous Progressive rock band.
I always use this example: Modern Classical Music was Modern in 1900, in 1950, today and will still be Modern (with capital M) in the XXX Century, because it's a name of an era.
You can say as an adjective, hey that band has a modern approach to rhythm, but then you're not talking about Modern Classical Music.
The same is with Progressive Rock, I can say REM was a progressive (with low case) band in 1990 because they were ahead of most mainstream, but they were not part of a genre called Progressive Rock and I'm just qualifying their approach towards music.
If a band makes a song with similar structure to lets say The Musical Box, with a lot of similaritries to it, it will be a Progressive Rock song, maybe not a masterpiece (maybe even bad) of course not original, but will still be part of the genre.
I'm not a particular fan of Marillion, but I like "Script for a Jester's Tear" much more than any later album, and this doesn't make me regressive, it only means I have a different taste.
Cheers
Iván
|
PS:
1800iareyay wrote:
And now the thread gets locked...
Don't worry my friend, I said what i had to say and his last post is not worth a reply.
As Don Quixote said:
They bark Sancho....It's a sign we're advancing |
Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - July 31 2007 at 15:19
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
1800iareyay
Prog Reviewer
Joined: November 18 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2492
|
Posted: July 31 2007 at 15:14 |
And now the thread gets locked...
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
|
Posted: July 31 2007 at 14:52 |
Until now I can’t understand if mgallard came here to give us a lecture about how open minded you are if you like CAS, We Can’t Dance and No Jacket Required or as an emissary of Hit & Run records to boost the sales of 5.1 Genesis late albums, or is simply a stubborn guy that doesn’t like to accept he screwed it and tries to cover this facts changing names, calling everybody who doesn’t agree with him Progsnob and forgiving us for our sins against the holy trinity (Banks, Rutherford and Collins with the Earth Wind & Fire Phoenix Horns as cherubs blowing trumpets).
At the end….Who cares?
Nobody will teach us here what freedom is, we are used to say loud and clear what we like and what we don’t like, this won’t change.
Few sites allow every visitor to review and rate an album without any censorship (unless there’s abuse of course), when in the Genesis Forum some members started to write they were not happy with a reunion without Gabriel and Hackett, there was a letter by Phil Collins telling us we were jeopardizing the chances of a reunion. But here we receive reviews saying for example that ELP are overblown and self indulgent arrogant or that Wakeman is a pompous egomaniac and nobody says a thing, and it’s ok for us, that’s what we pretend, absolute freedom of opinion.
Nobody can ask us to be more open minded and allow more freedom.
This is a serious DISCUSSION FORUM, not a fan club, we are not forced to like everything listed, some will like Symphonic, others Prog Metal, some will like both.
I’m really tired of people rubbing in our faces that they are so open minded because they like Rap or Hip Hop or Invisible Touch and we are close minded Progsnobs because for we don’t.
Lets remember that Prog Archives is a progressive Rock website and it’s absolutely normal that the vast majority comes here because we like Progressive Rock, so why in hell can’t we say loud and clear that Prog is our music?
There are millions of mainstream sites where, people go to say EMINEM is the best thing since chocolate cake and ice-cream were invented, but I haven’t read anybody calling them EMINEMSNOBS or POPSNOBS or RAPSNOBS.
Why should we be ashamed to like a genre more than others? And the worst thing is that they come here, to our house to tell us how arrogant we are because we know what we like and what we don’t like.
Lets go on with the discussions, that’s why we are here.
Iván
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
kenethlevine
Special Collaborator
Prog-Folk Team
Joined: December 06 2006
Location: New England
Status: Offline
Points: 9070
|
Posted: July 31 2007 at 14:49 |
Of course music of my youth has sentimental value, and that happens to be the 70s. But I have shelved some of the stuff I liked back then, and also recognize that some of the stuff I still like might not resonate with me if I heard it for teh first time now. Still, prog was almost mainstream in the 70s, and since then it has been much more underground, although in the last 10 years this has been nicely offset by the internet. All this exposure has helped me to realize that, even in the so-called dark days of the 80s, there was always good prog being released. There has never been a year without good prog releases, and I don't judge them by when they were issued. If I like them, I like them.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
StyLaZyn
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 22 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4079
|
Posted: July 31 2007 at 13:57 |
darqdean wrote:
I've just re-read all four pages of this thread and can find nothing that screems Progsnobishness to me - have people been editing their posts to remove such inflamatory comments, or are my perceptions of this phenomina different to everyone else?
Anyway, that aside...
The review ratings in the PA are with respect to an albums Progishness® - therefore Holidays In Eden for example, (which I think is a damn fine album btw just not a particularily prog-oriented), deserves its three stars (remember 3-stars = Good, but non-essential) - three stars does not (necessarily) equal a bad album - just one you wouldn't recommend to another Progger. For me, the simple fact that Marillion's follow-up album, Brave, courts 4 and 5 star reviews placing it higher than the Pre-Hogarth era, Fugazi, highlights the complete lack of regressive thinking within the archive. |
You raise an issue here that has come up before. I believe ratings exhibit favoritism. I have many times have felt very strongly about an album when rating it, regardless of Progishness® and for that reason given it a higher rating. On the other hand there are a couple that may be quite exemplary of Progishness® however the music was lacking or just not very listener friendly thus get low ratings.
I don't believe I am alone in this. Hope not anyway.
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Dirk
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 1043
|
Posted: July 31 2007 at 13:56 |
^mgallard, good post. Liking music is extremely subjective and it's important never to forget that. I listen to a lot of italian and russian sympho , there are 3 threads about these genres here (symphonic, all from italy and russian symphonic). But also here where we're discussing only the symphonic genre opinions about what's great, good and not so good vary immensely. I like early Genesis more than their later work myself btw. Edit: i don't relate to the rest of your post so much and certainly not to your following up posts here, just to be sure that there aren no misunderstandings........ ^Stylazyn (and off topic sorry), that's the first song of King Crimson's Discipline, got that album recently and i love it, always believed it more or less stopped ( or at least got wildy unaccessible) for KC after Red, i know better now ![Thumbs%20Up](smileys/smiley20.gif) .
Edited by Dirk - July 31 2007 at 16:46
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: July 31 2007 at 13:41 |
I've just re-read all four pages of this thread and can find nothing that screems Progsnobishness to me - have people been editing their posts to remove such inflamatory comments, or are my perceptions of this phenomina different to everyone else?
Anyway, that aside...
The review ratings in the PA are with respect to an albums Progishness® - therefore Holidays In Eden for example, (which I think is a damn fine album btw just not a particularily prog-oriented), deserves its three stars (remember 3-stars = Good, but non-essential) - three stars does not (necessarily) equal a bad album - just one you wouldn't recommend to another Progger. For me, the simple fact that Marillion's follow-up album, Brave, courts 4 and 5 star reviews placing it higher than the Pre-Hogarth era, Fugazi, highlights the complete lack of regressive thinking within the archive.
|
What?
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
StyLaZyn
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 22 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4079
|
Posted: July 31 2007 at 12:42 |
Easy Livin wrote:
Let's keep the banter to the velvet room.![Wink](https://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley2.gif) |
Certainly you refer to Elephant Talk!
"Talk, its only talk Babble, burble, banter, bicker bicker bicker Brouhaha, boulderdash, ballyhoo Its only talk"
OK...sorry for the detour. Back to topic.
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
mgallard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 27 2005
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 155
|
Posted: July 31 2007 at 12:39 |
1800iareyay wrote:
It's equally close-minded to say all of Geneis is great because it hints at fanboyism. I'll listen to what I like, Ivan will listen to what he likes, and you can rock out to We Can't Dance until your Genesis thirst is quenched. More power to you. |
Never said I liked all of Genesis in the same measure. I said I listened certain records as much or more than another. Didn't mention that I "loved" We Can't Dance, that you imply, I can listen to it, but I prefer the albums I mention in my replies. M.
Edited by mgallard - July 31 2007 at 12:41
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
mgallard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 27 2005
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 155
|
Posted: July 31 2007 at 12:32 |
Anyway, will not get into details with Ibán, he can live his life as he wants it, he can insult (now I bark and can't read... he knows me so well...) and attack, but for the most it is all uncalled for and certainly he's good at overreacting (won't fall down to your level). Anyway, maybe you, Ibán, are not a progsnob, just maybe a bit shortsighted and I forgive you, ![LOL](smileys/smiley36.gif) . I prefer to live in a world with a very open mind, my general rule is, if I can listen to it 5 times without getting bored, then it's good enough to give a try, that's how I found Nusrat, Blof, You Am I, Pain Of Salvation and so on, but even with an open mind I don't get Hip hop and things related, though I like Beastie Boys. I am a Genesis fan, yes, but I know what I like most and I know the records I don't choose when given a choice. The best of Genesis was until Abacab and then I jump to Calling All Stations, which as we know is not liked by most, I think many only have an opinion based on the one song they heard on the radio (which I jump when listening to the album), plus I think others listen to an album expecting to hear something very similar to what they heard last time, if so Hackett or Zappa or Prince are not enjoyed by them. Anyway, there are a lot of progsnobs (not you Stylazyn, nor you Ibán ;-)) out there and you know who you are. If anyone dares to make a more melodic song and even worse a hit single, and dare to include it among some real "prog" songs, they are selling out, the song is crap, they stop listening to the albums, and so on. So this thread has basis in the real world, the overreacting members that appear on the thread are also proof of that. I think many judge the great bands of Rock and Prog, based on their own shortsighted view of the world and music, and think they have a right to call X music they made "crap" or awful or whatever, when it's all just a personal opinion. Music isn't just music, it's a series of more basic reactions, certain music for me (as with most people that listen to music, not "think" or "analyse" music: listen) can elicit a series of images, feelings, smells and so on, based on where and when I heard the music most, can that be understood or grasped by someone else, a rotund no! So music is for the most a personal experience and what is obviously "crap" to everyone else, isn't so for another. So anyway, Duke, And then there were three, Abacab, which for many aren't good, for me are very worthy and enjoyable additions to the Genesis catalog and I enjoy them as much as I do the previous albums. Ah! Just a recommendation, do take the time to listen to the 5.1 versions of these albums, they are mind blowing (not for the snogs* though)! Greetings M. *prog snobs
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |