| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
M27Barney 
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 09 2006
Location: Swinton M27
Status: Offline
Points: 3136
|
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote  Reply
 Posted: January 08 2020 at 10:44 |
|
Strange. But every band/artist I don't like produces the same tedious music, release after release...is that JUST me?
|
 |
Grumpyprogfan
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 09 2019
Location: Kansas City
Status: Offline
Points: 12451
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 08 2020 at 10:22 |
|
^Ha ha. FYI, I'm a brain surgeon.
|
|
SteveG
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20617
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 08 2020 at 10:15 |
 Grumpyprogfan wrote:
SteveG wrote:
octopus-4 wrote:
Did anybody mention Dire Straits? |
As much as I love them, you're right. And that goes for Midnight Oil and Judas Priest and Iron Maiden...
Good god, the list is endless.  |
Why do you keep engaging in this thread that you find "negative"? Help me understand. |
Simple. A member PM-ed me and asked me to lighten up. I agreed. I know that you're not a rocket scientist, but I think that you can understand that.
|
|
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
|
Prog Sothoth
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 03 2011
Location: MA
Status: Offline
Points: 1940
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 08 2020 at 10:11 |
dougmcauliffe wrote:
Cant believe genesis, Gentle Giant, King Crimson and Tull have been mentioned, are we hearing the same music? |
Might as well throw ELP in there, 'cause it all sounds like the same old prog...
Like where's the vaporwave breakdownz? Where's the "Featuring Kanye" vocoder guest-rapping? How about the tropical house chiptune choruses? Where's the bubblegum-bass drops?
|
|
timothy leary
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 29 2005
Location: Lilliwaup, Wa.
Status: Offline
Points: 5319
|
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 08 2020 at 10:11 |
|
In the thread title I never said sounding the same across multiple albums is a bad thing. I leave that determination to the posters. Responding to a thread only to call it negative seems negative. Positive or negative feel free to comment.
|
|
Grumpyprogfan
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 09 2019
Location: Kansas City
Status: Offline
Points: 12451
|
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 08 2020 at 10:08 |
SteveG wrote:
octopus-4 wrote:
Did anybody mention Dire Straits? |
As much as I love them, you're right. And that goes for Midnight Oil and Judas Priest and Iron Maiden...
Good god, the list is endless. |
Why do you keep engaging in this thread that you find "negative"? Help me understand.
|
|
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 02 2016
Location: Philly burbs
Status: Offline
Points: 18992
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 08 2020 at 09:32 |
miamiscot wrote:
The correct answers are: AC/DC, Ramones and IQ.
Now to the ridiculous notion that all Gentle Giant albums sound the same - listen to the debut, then Free Hand and then Civilian and they sound like three different bands to me!!!
|
Well even the Ramones adopted a new wave sound at some point and incorporated keyboards. I'm not sure how much of their material was like this but I know that at least some was different than their initial punk sound.
Also, no one has mentioned any of the heartland rockers such as Bob Segar, JCM, Tom Petty etc. Tom Petty in particular had a very uniform sound throughout for the most part imo(with the exception of "don't come around here no more").
Edited by AFlowerKingCrimson - January 08 2020 at 09:33
|
|
dougmcauliffe
Forum Senior Member
Joined: February 23 2019
Location: US
Status: Offline
Points: 3895
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 08 2020 at 09:27 |
|
Cant believe genesis, Gentle Giant, King Crimson and Tull have been mentioned, are we hearing the same music?
|
|
The sun has left the sky...
...Now you can close your eyes
|
|
SteveG
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20617
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 08 2020 at 09:16 |
octopus-4 wrote:
Did anybody mention Dire Straits? |
As much as I love them, you're right. And that goes for Midnight Oil and Judas Priest and Iron Maiden...
Good god, the list is endless.
|
|
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
|
octopus-4
Special Collaborator
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl,Neo & Post/Math Teams
Joined: October 31 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 14573
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 08 2020 at 09:13 |
Did anybody mention Dire Straits?
|
|
I stand with Roger Waters, I stand with Joan Baez, I stand with Victor Jara, I stand with Woody Guthrie. Music is revolution
|
|
SteveG
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20617
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 08 2020 at 09:11 |
Jeffro wrote:
SteveG wrote:
What's next? List all the ways that Phil Collins ruined prog? |
On it |
Poor Phil, hasn't he suffered enough?
Edited by SteveG - January 08 2020 at 09:13
|
|
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
|
miamiscot
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 23 2014
Location: Ohio
Status: Offline
Points: 3628
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 08 2020 at 08:29 |
The correct answers are: AC/DC, Ramones and IQ.
Now to the ridiculous notion that all Gentle Giant albums sound the same - listen to the debut, then Free Hand and then Civilian and they sound like three different bands to me!!!
Edited by miamiscot - January 08 2020 at 08:34
|
|
Lewian
Prog Reviewer
Joined: August 09 2015
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 15175
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 08 2020 at 08:23 |
progaardvark wrote:
And then when a band suddenly changes their sound, you'll all be poo-pooing about how inconsistent they are.... |
I don't think I have seen much of this on this forum. Solid thread topic as far as I'm concerned, with some interesting (if crazy) contributions. (Jethro Tull!  King Crimson! The Beatles! )
Edited by Lewian - January 08 2020 at 08:25
|
|
Jeffro
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 29 2014
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 2201
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 08 2020 at 07:51 |
SteveG wrote:
What's next? List all the ways that Phil Collins ruined prog? |
On it!
|
|
We all dwell in an amber subdomain, amber subdomain, amber subdomain.
My face IS a maserati
|
|
SteveG
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20617
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 08 2020 at 07:35 |
Grumpyprogfan wrote:
SteveG wrote:
Another negative thread. Yippie! |
I don't see this thread as negative. Much more interesting than your duo polls of ancient bands that has been repeated for years. |
When the duo polls only get 5 or 6 voters participating instead of 50 to 60, then I'll take your opinion to heart. So far, we've had "what's so good about The Flower Kings and King Crimson?" along with "albums that all sound the same." What's next? List all the ways that Phil Collins ruined prog? Band's whose members look old and can barely carry their instruments? I can't wait.
|
|
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
|
Jeffro
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 29 2014
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 2201
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 08 2020 at 06:38 |
Mortte wrote:
Blacksword wrote:
Mortte wrote:
Blacksword wrote:
Mortte wrote:
Blacksword wrote:
Mortte wrote:
^So Rush Hemispheres & Hold Your Fire sounds the same?
Anyway I think most of todayīs bands albums sounds the same album by album. Thatīs because todayīs bands canīt take the risk they fans get mad, if they change their music or sounds. Really any band of today doesnīt come my mind that has changed it music radically after earlier album, Knifeworld latest has more organic sounds than two earlier and thatīs just a good thing, also music gone more to the seventies style from more heavy stuff. |
I think they said, Rush AFTER Roll the Bones, and I'm inclined to agree to an extent.
Historically, Rush were one of those bands that were certainly NOT 'samey' from one album to the next. Even the brother and sister albums of AFTK & Hemispheres sound quite different to me, then the change from Hemispheres to PW is quite dramatic.
|
Yes, I noticed FlowerKing said after Roll the Bones, but because Stack didnīt quote him, I thought he meant all the Rush albums. I am not very familiar after Presto albums, but I think production is quite organic and great in Snakes & Arrows and differs Roll the Bones. Three albums that I think sound quite the same both musically & production are Grace Under Pressure, Power Windows & Hold Your Fire and I think Hold Your Fire is the most boring one of those. In Presto they went a little bit more organic sounds. |
Yeah, I would probably agree regarding Power Windows and Hold your Fire. Similar production jobs, and approach to songwriting. The better songs are on PW IMO. I prefer Presto to RTB.
I think with the later Rush albums, the problem wasn't so much production for me, it was the songs. There was less diversity of sound and ideas on the albums. Especially Test for Echo and Vapour Trails, where they just seemed to meld into each other as hard rock mush. When you consider the striking contrasts between songs on earlier albums (YYZ vs Vital Signs, Spirit of Radio vs Natural Science etc etc) The later albums lacked the dynamics, memorable melodies and interesting song structures of the earlier releases. |
I agree with you about later Rush. I lost my interest totally when seeing and hearing Roll the Bones-video. Then one of my friend borrowed me Snakes And Arrows, it has good production, but also I think the music is a little bit mediocre. From Rush book I got the picture, Vapour Trails should be something at least little interesting, but the picture I got from you there is not much interesting. |
I'd say Snakes and Arrows is better than Vapour Trails, but only just. VT is heavy, monotonous and IMO badly produced. |
Okey, thanx, I wonīt waste my time to that, not sounding at all the album I want to listen. |
There is the Vapor Trails remixed version though, which was done to "fix" the production issues.
|
|
We all dwell in an amber subdomain, amber subdomain, amber subdomain.
My face IS a maserati
|
|
Kempokid
Collaborator
Prog Metal Team
Joined: November 01 2018
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 331
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 08 2020 at 06:33 |
Symphony X sticks very closely to a proggy, neoclassical power metal sort of sound, even if their more recent couple are more heavy. Cool band, but one that have a specific sound that they don't deviate too much from.
Thank You Scientist have more or less made the same album 3 times, just refining their core sound with each one. Another case of the band being quite good regardless
|
|
Mortte
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 11 2016
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 5538
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 08 2020 at 06:26 |
Blacksword wrote:
Mortte wrote:
Blacksword wrote:
Mortte wrote:
Blacksword wrote:
Mortte wrote:
^So Rush Hemispheres & Hold Your Fire sounds the same?
Anyway I think most of todayīs bands albums sounds the same album by album. Thatīs because todayīs bands canīt take the risk they fans get mad, if they change their music or sounds. Really any band of today doesnīt come my mind that has changed it music radically after earlier album, Knifeworld latest has more organic sounds than two earlier and thatīs just a good thing, also music gone more to the seventies style from more heavy stuff. |
I think they said, Rush AFTER Roll the Bones, and I'm inclined to agree to an extent.
Historically, Rush were one of those bands that were certainly NOT 'samey' from one album to the next. Even the brother and sister albums of AFTK & Hemispheres sound quite different to me, then the change from Hemispheres to PW is quite dramatic.
|
Yes, I noticed FlowerKing said after Roll the Bones, but because Stack didnīt quote him, I thought he meant all the Rush albums. I am not very familiar after Presto albums, but I think production is quite organic and great in Snakes & Arrows and differs Roll the Bones. Three albums that I think sound quite the same both musically & production are Grace Under Pressure, Power Windows & Hold Your Fire and I think Hold Your Fire is the most boring one of those. In Presto they went a little bit more organic sounds. |
Yeah, I would probably agree regarding Power Windows and Hold your Fire. Similar production jobs, and approach to songwriting. The better songs are on PW IMO. I prefer Presto to RTB.
I think with the later Rush albums, the problem wasn't so much production for me, it was the songs. There was less diversity of sound and ideas on the albums. Especially Test for Echo and Vapour Trails, where they just seemed to meld into each other as hard rock mush. When you consider the striking contrasts between songs on earlier albums (YYZ vs Vital Signs, Spirit of Radio vs Natural Science etc etc) The later albums lacked the dynamics, memorable melodies and interesting song structures of the earlier releases. |
I agree with you about later Rush. I lost my interest totally when seeing and hearing Roll the Bones-video. Then one of my friend borrowed me Snakes And Arrows, it has good production, but also I think the music is a little bit mediocre. From Rush book I got the picture, Vapour Trails should be something at least little interesting, but the picture I got from you there is not much interesting. |
I'd say Snakes and Arrows is better than Vapour Trails, but only just. VT is heavy, monotonous and IMO badly produced. |
Okey, thanx, I wonīt waste my time to that, not sounding at all the album I want to listen.
|
|
Blacksword
Prog Reviewer
Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 08 2020 at 06:21 |
Mortte wrote:
Blacksword wrote:
Mortte wrote:
Blacksword wrote:
Mortte wrote:
^So Rush Hemispheres & Hold Your Fire sounds the same?
Anyway I think most of todayīs bands albums sounds the same album by album. Thatīs because todayīs bands canīt take the risk they fans get mad, if they change their music or sounds. Really any band of today doesnīt come my mind that has changed it music radically after earlier album, Knifeworld latest has more organic sounds than two earlier and thatīs just a good thing, also music gone more to the seventies style from more heavy stuff. |
I think they said, Rush AFTER Roll the Bones, and I'm inclined to agree to an extent.
Historically, Rush were one of those bands that were certainly NOT 'samey' from one album to the next. Even the brother and sister albums of AFTK & Hemispheres sound quite different to me, then the change from Hemispheres to PW is quite dramatic.
|
Yes, I noticed FlowerKing said after Roll the Bones, but because Stack didnīt quote him, I thought he meant all the Rush albums. I am not very familiar after Presto albums, but I think production is quite organic and great in Snakes & Arrows and differs Roll the Bones. Three albums that I think sound quite the same both musically & production are Grace Under Pressure, Power Windows & Hold Your Fire and I think Hold Your Fire is the most boring one of those. In Presto they went a little bit more organic sounds. |
Yeah, I would probably agree regarding Power Windows and Hold your Fire. Similar production jobs, and approach to songwriting. The better songs are on PW IMO. I prefer Presto to RTB.
I think with the later Rush albums, the problem wasn't so much production for me, it was the songs. There was less diversity of sound and ideas on the albums. Especially Test for Echo and Vapour Trails, where they just seemed to meld into each other as hard rock mush. When you consider the striking contrasts between songs on earlier albums (YYZ vs Vital Signs, Spirit of Radio vs Natural Science etc etc) The later albums lacked the dynamics, memorable melodies and interesting song structures of the earlier releases. |
I agree with you about later Rush. I lost my interest totally when seeing and hearing Roll the Bones-video. Then one of my friend borrowed me Snakes And Arrows, it has good production, but also I think the music is a little bit mediocre. From Rush book I got the picture, Vapour Trails should be something at least little interesting, but the picture I got from you there is not much interesting. |
I'd say Snakes and Arrows is better than Vapour Trails, but only just. VT is heavy, monotonous and IMO badly produced.
|
|
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
|
|
Mortte
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 11 2016
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 5538
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: January 08 2020 at 06:18 |
Blacksword wrote:
Mortte wrote:
Blacksword wrote:
Mortte wrote:
^So Rush Hemispheres & Hold Your Fire sounds the same?
Anyway I think most of todayīs bands albums sounds the same album by album. Thatīs because todayīs bands canīt take the risk they fans get mad, if they change their music or sounds. Really any band of today doesnīt come my mind that has changed it music radically after earlier album, Knifeworld latest has more organic sounds than two earlier and thatīs just a good thing, also music gone more to the seventies style from more heavy stuff. |
I think they said, Rush AFTER Roll the Bones, and I'm inclined to agree to an extent.
Historically, Rush were one of those bands that were certainly NOT 'samey' from one album to the next. Even the brother and sister albums of AFTK & Hemispheres sound quite different to me, then the change from Hemispheres to PW is quite dramatic.
|
Yes, I noticed FlowerKing said after Roll the Bones, but because Stack didnīt quote him, I thought he meant all the Rush albums. I am not very familiar after Presto albums, but I think production is quite organic and great in Snakes & Arrows and differs Roll the Bones. Three albums that I think sound quite the same both musically & production are Grace Under Pressure, Power Windows & Hold Your Fire and I think Hold Your Fire is the most boring one of those. In Presto they went a little bit more organic sounds. |
Yeah, I would probably agree regarding Power Windows and Hold your Fire. Similar production jobs, and approach to songwriting. The better songs are on PW IMO. I prefer Presto to RTB.
I think with the later Rush albums, the problem wasn't so much production for me, it was the songs. There was less diversity of sound and ideas on the albums. Especially Test for Echo and Vapour Trails, where they just seemed to meld into each other as hard rock mush. When you consider the striking contrasts between songs on earlier albums (YYZ vs Vital Signs, Spirit of Radio vs Natural Science etc etc) The later albums lacked the dynamics, memorable melodies and interesting song structures of the earlier releases. |
I agree with you about later Rush. I lost my interest totally when seeing and hearing Roll the Bones-video. Then one of my friend borrowed me Snakes And Arrows, it has good production, but also I think the music is a little bit mediocre. From Rush book I got the picture, Vapour Trails should be something at least little interesting, but the picture I got from you there is not much interesting.
|
|
/PAlogo_v2.gif "Progarchives.com Homepage")
