Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Faith Based Prog
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedFaith Based Prog

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 8>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2012 at 16:16
^ ThanksApprove
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32553
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2012 at 16:14
Slightly off topic: Nice recent play Ian!  Cool
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2012 at 15:44
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Roman Gods are Jupiter and Mars and Venus etc...

Too literal Ian - many of the festivals of the Roman gods were adopted into the christian calendar, for example Saturnalia, the festival of Saturn became the Christmas even though there was no evidence that Jesus was born in December - Morse's lyric is (poetically) accurate... they took the gods' (festivals) and changed the names. You could produce similar arguments for the saints too - such as Baccus and St. Vincent both being the "patrons" of wine and winemakers.

Literal maybe, but true nevertheless. To be honest I'm not sure what point your making. Christianity has only one god so "Roman Gods" equals Mars and his cohorts to most of us.
Back to Top
Gerinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 10 2010
Location: Barcelona Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 5154
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2012 at 15:40
I see very few posts by europeans in this thread Wink
 
I did not want to get involved in this one, but I will just say:
 
1. @ Ivan: you do not want your daughter to get indoctrinized by rock albums she may listen to, but, how did you become a Catholic? surely by some kind of indoctrination. Before rock existed, society had other means of transmitting culture, values, information and so on. Allow me to guess that you got your faith through teachings from your family, habits soaked from your local environment and culture etc etc. Rock albums are a more modern media but there is no good reason why they should be considered too different from previous media. Saying that music must be only "art" and not "culture" is too tricky, the line between both is too thin.
 
2. As often, wise words by Dean. The issue of where to lay rules is one of the most fundamental and frequently dismissed aspects of a human society.
Yeah most people think that nazism must be banned, a few less think that antisemitism must be banned, fewer think that anti-homosexuality must be banned, fewer think that if your neighbour plays music too loud he must be silenced, some think that motorbikes should be forbidden, some think that pigs should not be farmed in such terrible conditons as they are, some think people should not be allowed to smoke even in open spaces...
 
In between there are a lot of grey areas and even more when you realise that everything is tinted by the historical moment, place, culture or beliefs of the people around.
 
Some people like to think that we in the western world live now in a free society. Hahaha, never have things been more regulated and prohibited than now. We can not do this, we can not do that, everything is either forbidden or regulated, if you do not follow the standard you are an outlaw or at the very least a weirdo.
In the end this society force us all to be and live the same way (the way which is "desired for our society") and anything deviatig from this will be banned.
I shiver at the thought but it's the way it looks.
 
Back to Top
progresssaurus View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 08 2012
Location: Czech Republic
Status: Offline
Points: 1884
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2012 at 15:38
Uhmmm ... my dear friends ... I'm happy after reading this topic, that I'm stupid atheist only. Maybe I will be damned for ever if I'm wrong, but I can listen music peacefully taking religious lyrics somewhat seculary, simply like one from wide scale of prog-rock attractive themes.
 
Back to Top
AlexDOM View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 02 2011
Location: Indianapolis
Status: Offline
Points: 775
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2012 at 15:21
Why all the argument, let's just enjoy some prog:)
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2012 at 14:53
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Because that (the question) is a double-standard - censuring those who would censure - where is the logic in that?

There's a universal principle of law:

"To equal act, equal law"

This is a law, like it or not we must accept it...So if a law applies to one sector of the population, the same law should apply to another.

Some of this fundamentalist Christians intentionally attack others, so if the law applies to hose that offend them, the same law should apply to those who intentionally attacks other religion.

I'm sure that if a  band would praise antisemitism or holocaust, everybody would agree with censorship, if a band attacked homosexual rights, people here will make a scandal...Well this is an insult to a religion (no matter which), the law should apply to them.

Or they retire all the stickers or they apply them to everybody who explicitly denigrates others

Iván
Well, first off - it's not a law - it is discretionary.
 
Secondly - no argument from me - retire the stickers because it is not possible, practical or fair to apply it to all - by that reasoning all folk protest songs would be stickered, including those by Joan Baez and Bob Dylan.
What?
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2012 at 14:47
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

I do not agree with anything Ivan has stated above. I do not believe Neal is "evangelical, propoganda or indoctrinating." I am a practicing Catholic and I find zero offense to anything Neal has recorded, 


Have you read the lyrics?

Quote The pearl is trodden underfoot into the muck and mireWe'll take the Roman Gods except the names will all be changed

This is a direct attack to the institution of the Saints 
Possibly a reference to them, but not necessarily an attack. That the christian church adopts and adapts some aspects of local beliefs to make the christian message more accessible to locals is well documented.
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:



Quote The woman's fed by ravens and her feet are in the fire
Cold and bare she's holding there 1260 day

Isn't his an attack to the virgin?
The jury is still out on this one. Many believe the woman of Rev 12 to be Mary, others believe it refers to Israel or Jerusalem. Either way Revelations is eschatology and a very ambiguous one at that. Whether Morse is attacking here is debatable.
 
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:


Quote f you think the whore is only history
Are there those who teach her lies?

This is one of many DIRECT attacks to the Catholic Church
Another eschatological reference - who the whore of babylon is is again open to debate - sure some say it is the Catholic Church, but that is anachronistic, more likely it is The Roman Empire or the mother of the antichrist (the antivirgin mother).
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:


Seems that you like people who like the music don't notice the lyrics.

Iván
No, we just interpret them slightly differently. Smile

Please Dean, you know that this are arguments used in every fundamentalist page to attack Catholicism, so there's no doubt what the intention is.

Go to http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/False%20Religions/false_religions.htm#rc and you will find each and every word Morse said used to attack the Catholic Church.

You know it Dean, it's obvious.

Iván

            
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2012 at 14:40
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Because that (the question) is a double-standard - censuring those who would censure - where is the logic in that?

There's a universal principle of law:

"To equal act, equal law"

This is a law, like it or not we must accept it...So if a law applies to one sector of the population, the same law should apply to another.

Some of this fundamentalist Christians intentionally attack others, so if the law applies to hose that offend them, the same law should apply to those who intentionally attacks other religion.

I'm sure that if a  band would praise antisemitism or holocaust, everybody would agree with censorship, if a band attacked homosexual rights, people here will make a scandal...Well this is an insult to a religion (no matter which), the law should apply to them.

Or they retire all the stickers or they apply them to everybody who explicitly denigrates others

Iván
            
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2012 at 14:36
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

I do not agree with anything Ivan has stated above. I do not believe Neal is "evangelical, propoganda or indoctrinating." I am a practicing Catholic and I find zero offense to anything Neal has recorded, 


Have you read the lyrics?

Quote The pearl is trodden underfoot into the muck and mireWe'll take the Roman Gods except the names will all be changed

This is a direct attack to the institution of the Saints 
Possibly a reference to them, but not necessarily an attack. That the christian church adopts and adapts some aspects of local beliefs to make the christian message more accessible to locals is well documented.
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:



Quote The woman's fed by ravens and her feet are in the fire
Cold and bare she's holding there 1260 day

Isn't his an attack to the virgin?
The jury is still out on this one. Many believe the woman of Rev 12 to be Mary, others believe it refers to Israel or Jerusalem. Either way Revelations is eschatology and a very ambiguous one at that. Whether Morse is attacking here is debatable.
 
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:


Quote f you think the whore is only history
Are there those who teach her lies?

This is one of many DIRECT attacks to the Catholic Church
Another eschatological reference - who the whore of babylon is is again open to debate - sure some say it is the Catholic Church, but that is anachronistic, more likely it is The Roman Empire or the mother of the antichrist (the antivirgin mother).
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:


Seems that you like people who like the music don't notice the lyrics.

Iván
No, we just interpret them slightly differently. Smile


Edited by Dean - March 11 2012 at 14:38
What?
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2012 at 14:07
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

I do not agree with most things Iván has stated above, , but not for any of the reasons anyone has said so far. Whether Morse is proselytising or not is not really much of an issue, same is true for any perceived attacks on organised religion - both are by and large, irrelevant - that there is disagreement on this is indication enough that interpretation plays a part in whether this is something you agree with or are offended by. The idea that music must either be free of any message or carry a warning sticker is simply unacceptable...
 

... and begs the question of not where do you start, but where do you stop, and who is being protected here... the children or their parents or is the aim to protect everyone from content that may offend some?


I absolutely understand you. (Amazing)

In a perfect world, no sticker should exist...BUT IT EXISTS

this sticker was created by lobby and pressure of Protestant Christian groups to censor whatever offends them, mostly lyrics made for commercial reasons with no real meaning, I don't believe most Metal musicians really praise Satan.

But when Protestant Christian artists make lyrics expressly created to insult and denigrate other religions that they want, we must all accept it.

Again, the sticker probably shouldn't exist, but if tit exists by pressure of Christian groups, the same rule should apply to them when they attack who they want.
The idea of one rule for all sounds perfectly reasonable as long as the rule is sound in the first place. To promote the idea that the rule should be applied to all is to accept that applying the rule in the first place was correct and valid. As you say yourself - Metal music does not really praise satan, nor does it preach satanism and the occult, and similarly sexually explicit lyrics do not praise sex nor do they preach it - the knee-jerk reaction against explicit lyrics was a puritanical reaction to foul language and the Washington Wives imposing their erroneously presumed right not to be offended.
 
As I asked before - where do you stop? Where do you draw the line? Which institutions is it okay to criticise and censure? Is it bad to criticise a religion but not a government? Or a big business? Or a secret sect? Or an oppressive regime? One rule for all says you are not permitted to criticise any of those regardless of whether you personally believe one of them to be above reproach.
 
Sure, like ATF, I think "one rule for you and one rule for me" is hypocrisy, but that does not mean I should accept the bad and unjust rule should be applied to both of us.
 
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:


Why should they have "Letters of Marque" to attack who they want and to censure who they want?

Iván

Because that (the question) is a double-standard - censuring those who would censure - where is the logic in that?


Edited by Dean - March 11 2012 at 14:44
What?
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2012 at 13:35
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

I do not agree with most things Iván has stated above, , but not for any of the reasons anyone has said so far. Whether Morse is proselytising or not is not really much of an issue, same is true for any perceived attacks on organised religion - both are by and large, irrelevant - that there is disagreement on this is indication enough that interpretation plays a part in whether this is something you agree with or are offended by. The idea that music must either be free of any message or carry a warning sticker is simply unacceptable...
 

... and begs the question of not where do you start, but where do you stop, and who is being protected here... the children or their parents or is the aim to protect everyone from content that may offend some?


I absolutely understand you. (Amazing)

In a perfect world, no sticker should exist...BUT IT EXISTS

this sticker was created by lobby and pressure of Protestant Christian groups to censor whatever offends them, mostly lyrics made for commercial reasons with no real meaning, I don't believe most Metal musicians really praise Satan.

But when Protestant Christian artists make lyrics expressly created to insult and denigrate other religions that they want, we must all accept it.

Again, the sticker probably shouldn't exist, but if tit exists by pressure of Christian groups, the same rule should apply to them when they attack who they want.

Why should they have "Letters of Marque" to attack who they want and to censure who they want?

Iván

            
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2012 at 12:41
...anyway,
 
Back to topic
 
Back when I was a christian one band stood out for me as being "right-on" as both a christian band and a damn fine progressive rock band and that was After The Fire. Sadly, like so many, they changed their ways in the 80s and became a new wave pop band with less emphasis on the christian message, though their first hit single in this new format was "One Rule For Me" - protesting at the mainstream music business's attitude to christian rock, somewhat aptly, the lyric serves well here:
 
They say believe in what you like as long as you can keep it to yourself
I say if what I know is right, it's wrong if I don't tell somebody else
What kind of line is that you're giving me
One Rule for you, one rule for me
 
 
What?
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2012 at 12:14
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Roman Gods are Jupiter and Mars and Venus etc...

Too literal Ian - many of the festivals of the Roman gods were adopted into the christian calendar, for example Saturnalia, the festival of Saturn became the Christmas even though there was no evidence that Jesus was born in December - Morse's lyric is (poetically) accurate... they took the gods' (festivals) and changed the names. You could produce similar arguments for the saints too - such as Baccus and St. Vincent both being the "patrons" of wine and winemakers.

Edited by Dean - March 11 2012 at 12:25
What?
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2012 at 12:10
^As always, wise words Dean.

Edited by Snow Dog - March 11 2012 at 12:10
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2012 at 12:06
Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

I do not agree with anything Ivan has stated above. I do not believe Neal is "evangelical, propoganda or indoctrinating." I am a practicing Catholic and I find zero offense to anything Neal has recorded, to me and most he is simply describing his personal journey with religion. In the same way someone might describe their journey to find love......with passion.

I do not agree with most things Iván has stated above, but not for any of the reasons anyone has said so far. Whether Morse is proselytising or not is not really much of an issue, same is true for any perceived attacks on organised religion - both are by and large, irrelevant - that there is disagreement on this is indication enough that interpretation plays a part in whether this is something you agree with or are offended by. The idea that music must either be free of any message or carry a warning sticker is simply unacceptable...
 

... and begs the question of not where do you start, but where do you stop, and who is being protected here... the children or their parents or is the aim to protect everyone from content that may offend some?
 
There is a distinction being made here between religious music and music with a religious message, and I wonder how fair and reasonable that is, and how fairly and honestly that would be applied to all forms of music, and how and where that distinction will be made. To say it is okay to praise or eulogise but not to preach or criticise is more than just censorship, it is in itself just another form of evangelising, (and that's worse), just as the PMRC in holding up their idealism as blueprint for all to adopt and live by, were preaching their message by the adoption of the sticker system, stickering all albums that somebody has arbitrarily decided are preaching a message is a back-door means of sending your message on someone else's art. And that's wrong.


Edited by Dean - March 11 2012 at 12:17
What?
Back to Top
timothy leary View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 29 2005
Location: Lilliwaup, Wa.
Status: Offline
Points: 5319
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2012 at 11:55
yes we need some more repression from the Catholic Church.....the world is flat
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2012 at 11:40
Roman Gods are Jupiter and Mars and Venus etc...

Besides, the catholic church needs deserves all the attacking it gets, but in this case i don't believe it.


Edited by Snow Dog - March 11 2012 at 11:42
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2012 at 11:34
Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

I do not agree with anything Ivan has stated above. I do not believe Neal is "evangelical, propoganda or indoctrinating." I am a practicing Catholic and I find zero offense to anything Neal has recorded, 


Have you read the lyrics?

Quote The pearl is trodden underfoot into the muck and mireWe'll take the Roman Gods except the names will all be changed

This is a direct attack to the institution of the Saints 

Quote The woman's fed by ravens and her feet are in the fire
Cold and bare she's holding there 1260 day

Isn't his an attack to the virgin?

Quote f you think the whore is only history
Are there those who teach her lies?

This is one of many DIRECT attacks to the Catholic Church

Seems that you like people who like the music don't notice the lyrics.

Iván
            
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 11 2012 at 11:28
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

I agree with Iain in this debate.  I can totally listen to Morse's music and lyrics without changing my opinion or being indoctrinated. He can write what he wants to his music as far as I'm concerned.

Almost nobody will change their mind, that's not the point, but he is evangelizing that's a fact and I believe is wrong to use music to evangelize.

Sola Scriptura is insulting for Catholics (Would feel the same in the inverse case), but I'm sure that if my sister read reviews saying it's a positive album (as many say), she would buy it to he ids...But she is also a Catholic, and without knowledge would be giving an album that has offensive lyrics to her beliefs...So the least that should happen is that those albums should carry a warning.

USA Christians pressure has been so strong, that the albums that have lyrics they consider violent or offensive have to carry a warning label....Well, the albums that have messages used by them to insult others, should also carry a warning.

Iván

I do not accept it as a fact. And even if he was, I don't believe it would be wrong to use music to evangelise..or to speak out about oppression...or anything political. Music has traditionally been used this way.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 8>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.555 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.