Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Gerinski
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 10 2010
Location: Barcelona Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 5154
|
Posted: March 20 2010 at 10:09 |
rogerthat wrote:
My goalposts aren't shifting, I have said this before when the same topic came up. Yes, indeed, I would rate an album with one or more masterpiece tracks as masterpiece because that's my way of saying people should listen to the album for the masterpieces. What would I do with an album full of decent songs but all lacking in lustre?
|
I quite agree, I'd rate higher an album with several true masterpieces but some flaw, than a consistently good album but with no real highlight in it. Of course we need some sense of measure, a masterpice of 10 min in an otherwise full of sh*t album of 50 min is not enough to rate the album 5 stars, this is common sense. I love the song Lifeline in Neal Morse's same titled album but I rated it 2 stars because most of the rest sucks. And yet I rate any of the first albums of ELP until Welcome Back (included) with 5 stars without hesitation.
|
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: March 20 2010 at 09:45 |
ExittheLemming wrote:
So your goalposts appear to be not just shifting but actually on wheels then ? i.e. if 50% of an album is brilliant and the rest is mediocre you would presumably rate this 5 stars. Are you therefore basing your review score on the longest track ? What about prog bands who have albums with 10 tracks roughly the same length and 5 of them suck - does this get 5 stars also ? Wake up to yourself son.
|
My goalposts aren't shifting, I have said this before when the same topic came up. Yes, indeed, I would rate an album with one or more masterpiece tracks as masterpiece because that's my way of saying people should listen to the album for the masterpieces. What would I do with an album full of decent songs but all lacking in lustre? The so called flawless album doesn't exist, even Red has Providence which many people, myself included, don't like. If we don't even rate THAT as a masterpiece, then the "prog masterpiece" simply doesn't exist. Why focus on the five that suck, to take your hypothetical example? If the other five are of unsurpassed genius, is it still not a masterpiece?
|
|
ExittheLemming
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Penal Colony
Status: Offline
Points: 11415
|
Posted: March 20 2010 at 09:18 |
rogerthat wrote:
ExittheLemming wrote:
Although I do broadly agree with this (after all I'm an ELP fanboy crusty) your post does highlight one of the anomalies re interpretation of the ratings system for album reviews. Of the entire ELP discography, I have rated only Brain Salad Surgery as 5 stars because every single track on that critter IMO is quite brilliant. Trilogy, Pictures, Tarkus and to a lesser extent, the debut are but a small kick in the backside off 5 stars but do contain flaws that force me to mark lower. How many times have you read a fawning review of say Crimson, Yes, Tull or Genesis where the reviewer states something along the lines of:
This track is a bit poppy/boring/silly/simple for me but you cant deny it, the remainder is a masterpiece of progressive rock music ***** ?
There was even one deluded piece of hirsute plankton who rated 2112 by Rush as 5 stars and admitted he thought all of side two of the album sucked ?! (Has he considered suing his parents for malpractice?)
So, are we forced to conclude that all ELP fans try to be honest and as objective as possible with regards their fave band or that the remainder are a disingenuous rabble of barely literate apologists for patchy masterpieces ?
|
I agree with the poster above you that if a sidelong epic is a masterpiece, it should seal the five star rating for the album. Based on this, I would give Tarkus five stars but not so to say BSS, because I don't think KE9 is a masterpiece though it is a great track, yes. The way I see it, you listen to say Foxtrot because it has Supper's Ready and whether you like Timetable or not should be inconsequential to the rating. Yes, there is a problem if people apply this thinking to say Genesis albums but not to ELP albums (though why people should do so beats me ).
|
So your goalposts appear to be not just shifting but actually on wheels then ? i.e. if 50% of an album is brilliant and the rest is mediocre you would presumably rate this 5 stars. Are you therefore basing your review score on the longest track ? What about prog bands who have albums with 10 tracks roughly the same length and 5 of them suck - does this get 5 stars also ? Wake up to yourself son.
|
|
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: March 20 2010 at 09:07 |
ExittheLemming wrote:
Although I do broadly agree with this (after all I'm an ELP fanboy crusty) your post does highlight one of the anomalies re interpretation of the ratings system for album reviews. Of the entire ELP discography, I have rated only Brain Salad Surgery as 5 stars because every single track on that critter IMO is quite brilliant. Trilogy, Pictures, Tarkus and to a lesser extent, the debut are but a small kick in the backside off 5 stars but do contain flaws that force me to mark lower. How many times have you read a fawning review of say Crimson, Yes, Tull or Genesis where the reviewer states something along the lines of:
This track is a bit poppy/boring/silly/simple for me but you cant deny it, the remainder is a masterpiece of progressive rock music ***** ?
There was even one deluded piece of hirsute plankton who rated 2112 by Rush as 5 stars and admitted he thought all of side two of the album sucked ?! (Has he considered suing his parents for malpractice?)
So, are we forced to conclude that all ELP fans try to be honest and as objective as possible with regards their fave band or that the remainder are a disingenuous rabble of barely literate apologists for patchy masterpieces ?
|
I agree with the poster above you that if a sidelong epic is a masterpiece, it should seal the five star rating for the album. Based on this, I would give Tarkus five stars but not so to say BSS, because I don't think KE9 is a masterpiece though it is a great track, yes. The way I see it, you listen to say Foxtrot because it has Supper's Ready and whether you like Timetable or not should be inconsequential to the rating. Yes, there is a problem if people apply this thinking to say Genesis albums but not to ELP albums (though why people should do so beats me ).
|
|
ExittheLemming
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 19 2007
Location: Penal Colony
Status: Offline
Points: 11415
|
Posted: March 20 2010 at 08:55 |
Gerinski wrote:
O666 wrote:
Keith is wild player and he plays like god. Carl is powerful and he has pretty good technic and Greg balanced keith wild and his voice had commercial potential ( like collins). This combination can make magneficence masterpiece but it never happened. Every prog legends have 1 or more masterpiece but ELP dont have ONE 5 STAR ALBUM. One of friends told " they have many 5 star songs". I agree with that but they dont have 5 star album. |
Sorry but I totally disagree. The masterpieces of ELP did happen. Actually quite a few of them, and I don't mean just masterpiece songs but masterpiece albums. A soccer team with 1 or 2 weaker players out of the 11 can still be a superteam if the other 9 or 10 are among the best in the world. Many masterpiece albums by other bands have also their weaker moments and yet they still deserve being called masterpieces.
I repeat, to me ELP debut, Pictures, Tarkus, Trilogy, BSS and Welcome Back all qualify as 5-star masterpieces.
Obviously it's a matter of taste, but I feel like many people have a strange negative bias against ELP compared to other great prog bands. |
Although I do broadly agree with this (after all I'm an ELP fan boy crusty) your post does highlight one of the anomalies re interpretation of the ratings system for album reviews. Of the entire ELP discography, I have rated only Brain Salad Surgery as 5 stars because every single track on that critter IMO is quite brilliant. Trilogy, Pictures, Tarkus and to a lesser extent, the debut are but a small kick in the backside off 5 stars but do contain flaws that force me to mark lower. How many times have you read a fawning review of say Crimson, Yes, Tull or Genesis where the reviewer states something along the lines of: This track is a bit poppy/boring/silly/simple for me but you cant deny it, the remainder is a masterpiece of progressive rock music ***** ? There was even one deluded piece of hirsute plankton who rated 2112 by Rush as 5 stars and admitted he thought all of side two of the album sucked ?! (Has he considered suing his parents for malpractice?) So, are we forced to conclude that all ELP fans try to be honest and as objective as possible with regards their fave band or that the remainder are a disingenuous rabble of barely literate apologists for patchy masterpieces ?
Edited by ExittheLemming - March 20 2010 at 08:57
|
|
micky
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 02 2005
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 46833
|
Posted: March 20 2010 at 08:30 |
sigod wrote:
I'm trying to imagine what Threefates would be saying if she saw all of this. |
hahah... probably rolling her eyes... it isn't like fans of the group aren't aware that ELP isn't exactly the flavor of the month in prog circles..
|
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
|
Gerinski
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 10 2010
Location: Barcelona Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 5154
|
Posted: March 20 2010 at 08:26 |
O666 wrote:
Keith is wild player and he plays like god. Carl is powerful and he has pretty good technic and Greg balanced keith wild and his voice had commercial potential ( like collins). This combination can make magneficence masterpiece but it never happened. Every prog legends have 1 or more masterpiece but ELP dont have ONE 5 STAR ALBUM. One of friends told " they have many 5 star songs". I agree with that but they dont have 5 star album. |
Sorry but I totally disagree. The masterpieces of ELP did happen. Actually quite a few of them, and I don't mean just masterpiece songs but masterpiece albums. A soccer team with 1 or 2 weaker players out of the 11 can still be a superteam if the other 9 or 10 are among the best in the world. Many masterpiece albums by other bands have also their weaker moments and yet they still deserve being called masterpieces.
I repeat, to me ELP debut, Pictures, Tarkus, Trilogy, BSS and Welcome Back all qualify as 5-star masterpieces.
Obviously it's a matter of taste, but I feel like many people have a strange negative bias against ELP compared to other great prog bands.
|
|
sigod
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 17 2004
Location: London
Status: Offline
Points: 2779
|
Posted: March 19 2010 at 11:54 |
I'm trying to imagine what Threefates would be saying if she saw all of this.
Edited by sigod - March 19 2010 at 11:54
|
I must remind the right honourable gentleman that a monologue is not a decision.
- Clement Atlee, on Winston Churchill
|
|
esky
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 12 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 643
|
Posted: March 19 2010 at 11:42 |
You figured that out only now. Very good! On the Victory B.S.S reissure of the 1990s, there are pictures of ELP looking over H.R. Geiger's artwork for the album.
|
|
presdoug
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 24 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 8615
|
Posted: March 19 2010 at 08:31 |
Textbook wrote:
ELP are generally considered the epitome of w**kery- I'm not saying it's true or false, but the perception is out there. I know that out of the giants of prog (Rush, VDGG, Genesis, Yes, Pink Floyd. King Crimson etc) they are the only one I heard for the first time and went "that's a bit naff".
I think ELP are a great ideas band but sometimes the execution isn't there. Like if they had written for Yes or King Crimson rather than performed it themselves things might've gone a lot better. I'm not saying they can't play, they certainly can, but something just feels wooden and phoney about a lot of their recordings.
Also, they made Love Beach. |
If there ever was a group whose legitmate ideas and execution were there, and justifiably paid off, it was ELP. As for recording Love Beach, nobody is perfect, and there were a real lot of progressive groups that ended up recording a "Love Beach" of their own .Things did go well for them, because they did perform their own musical ideas, and then some!
|
|
O666
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 20 2009
Location: TEHRAN-IRAN
Status: Offline
Points: 2619
|
Posted: March 19 2010 at 05:51 |
ELP is one of prog-gods for all time. Keith is unique and his touch is specific. TARKUS is my first meet with ELP and after that i try hard to find another albums. BSS is next album and i search harder. after this 2 album i found ELP ( first album) and TRILOGY togather. In this period i think ELP is the best band i ever know. BUT from next album i found ( Love beach) everything changed. they go bad step by step and i disappointed day after day. WHY? Keith is wild player and he plays like god. Carl is powerful and he has pretty good technic and Greg balanced keith wild and his voice had commercial potential ( like collins). This combination can make magneficence masterpiece but it never happened. Every prog legends have 1 or more masterpiece but ELP dont have ONE 5 STAR ALBUM. One of friends told " they have many 5 star songs". I agree with that but they dont have 5 star album.
|
|
Textbook
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 08 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 3281
|
Posted: March 19 2010 at 04:23 |
ELP are generally considered the epitome of w**kery- I'm not saying it's true or false, but the perception is out there. I know that out of the giants of prog (Rush, VDGG, Genesis, Yes, Pink Floyd. King Crimson etc) they are the only one I heard for the first time and went "that's a bit naff".
I think ELP are a great ideas band but sometimes the execution isn't there. Like if they had written for Yes or King Crimson rather than performed it themselves things might've gone a lot better. I'm not saying they can't play, they certainly can, but something just feels wooden and phoney about a lot of their recordings.
Also, they made Love Beach.
|
|
halabalushindigus
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 05 2009
Location: San Diego
Status: Offline
Points: 1438
|
Posted: March 19 2010 at 03:07 |
Ok. the BSS album cover does look like H.R. And have seen the "Fresh Fruit" Poster when it came out
that stuff seems silly to me now
|
assume the power 1586/14.3
|
|
halabalushindigus
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 05 2009
Location: San Diego
Status: Offline
Points: 1438
|
Posted: March 19 2010 at 03:02 |
"still.....you turn me on"
|
assume the power 1586/14.3
|
|
richardh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 28029
|
Posted: March 19 2010 at 02:15 |
Dellinger wrote:
Oh, and what's all that hatred towards "Are you ready, Eddie", I mean, it's certainly not a stellar track from this band, but as a matter of fact I even like it. Benny the Bouncer and other such tracks I cerainly don't like, but this one is rather fun. Come on, who would think about a "Rock 'n Roll" song done without an electric Guitar at all. |
Recorded as a tribute to their engineer Eddy Offord after a drunken night out.It is unique that it is the only ELP track with Emerson and Palmer doing backing vocals. Can't imagine why there were'nt more
|
|
Dellinger
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: June 18 2009
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 12732
|
Posted: March 18 2010 at 23:12 |
Oh, and what's all that hatred towards "Are you ready, Eddie", I mean, it's certainly not a stellar track from this band, but as a matter of fact I even like it. Benny the Bouncer and other such tracks I cerainly don't like, but this one is rather fun. Come on, who would think about a "Rock 'n Roll" song done without an electric Guitar at all.
|
|
Dellinger
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: June 18 2009
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 12732
|
Posted: March 18 2010 at 23:05 |
halabalushindigus wrote:
In concert, it was like a one-man show. Like now that Wakeman's gone, I'm the bad ass prog player of keyboard-dome. Then he would let Carl do his thing. But Lake to me was the awesome player. His bass pedals.
Emerson kinda played like wanted to just be overboard. He didn't wear the cape(like Wake) He didn't really dress up(like little rich)but when he played two keyboards at once, with, of course, the second keyboard 180 degrees to the side, I'm thinking wow but WHY? So after a few minutes, It would be the same thing then Emerson would strech his analog sucker with some kind of envelope and trip out. He was fantastic , raw.
It seemed to me that after the years gone by.....Keith does't appear to have, let say. become more incredible.
But that two-handed thing,,,,you got to give it to him. His performance perks are in order |
Well, Wakeman does that thing about playing two keyboards at the same time (I don't think the did the 180 degrees thing, though), and actually is known for having as many keyboards at his reach as he could think of during the concerts. The cape thing began because (before Wakeman started using them, during a Yes show) someone remarked to him that he looked really weird stretching and contorting to reach the different keyboards he intended to use during the different parts of the show; so he decided to use the cape as a distraction (and according to him it worked).
|
|
Dellinger
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: June 18 2009
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 12732
|
Posted: March 18 2010 at 22:11 |
^ As a matter of fact, originally the name of the album was suposed to be "Whip Some Skull on Ya", which was an euphemism for oral sex. They dropped the name when they explained the name to the executives of the Record Company; the booklet of the album sais that one look at the horrified expressions on the assembled executives faces was sufficient to convince the band that they needed to rethink. So they came up with the name "Brain Salad Surgery", and the executives were a lot happier with this name; only this time they didn't tell them what it meant: according to the lyirics of one Dr. John's album "Right Place Wrong Time" it was also a metaphor for Oral Sex. As a matter of fact, even though the cover is somewhat creepy, I thik it's rather cool and original, I guess that it had much more impact on the LP.
|
|
uduwudu
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 17 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 2601
|
Posted: March 18 2010 at 20:24 |
halabalushindigus wrote:
what thehell is up with that cover picture on "Brain Salad Surgery"?. That alone makes me want to stay away as faaaaarrrrrrr away as possible from whatever It is.
never got a full listening of this 'plate' of 'salad'. And I've heard 'round these parts that is ,perhaps, their best. But that album cover |
The cover is a picture of H R Giger's then girlfriend. . There is supposed to be (and there is on some covers) a white light phallic depiction. ELP were disposed to 'stand up for the penis' (against the censorship) feeling a certain masculine obligation toward defending this aspect of symbolism. The title Brain Salad Surgery is a an. um, oral metaphor for female to male oral sexual gratification. Perhaps oddly I've never heard anyone use for the term this particular activity but then I might move in the socially incorrect circles. Of course being a prog rock fan I don't have social circles but there we go... The girlfriend committed suicide a few years after. Giger's work is not exactly William Morris (wallpaper) and if you want something is truly foul and might make you more kindly disposed to BSS art then check out the poster for the Dead Kennedy's Fresh Fruit and Rotting Vegetables album. I seriously doubt in this ultra PC age of mind control (Karn Evil 9 come true) that this art will be available. But bear it in mind. Incidentally H R Giger was the guy that did the Aliens in the Aliens movies. BSS is still a great album.
|
|
jacob s cracker
Forum Newbie
Joined: March 06 2008
Location: Norwich, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20
|
Posted: March 18 2010 at 17:15 |
Well I've been a prog fan since the early 70's and I always favoured bands with guitars in them, or at least non-keyboard focussed bands.
Which means that ELP were always in my 'top of division 2' bands. I love a lot of their stuff but it's mostly the non Emerson-focussed stuff such as Take A Pebble and From The Beginning. ELP did also include utter sh*te like Benny The Bouncer and Are You Ready Eddie as well, (on a low par with Cream's Baby's Lament if you ask me - I mean what was the flippin' point?).
For some that I feel too, but don't really understand, Yes meant a lot more to their fans than ELP. I personally think yes were the most innovative band of that time - melodic, skilled and powerful yet still verey, very subtle, Maybe that helps explain, or maybe just adds fuel to the fire...
Sorry to bang on about Yes when this is an ELP thread but I think they were the top 2 in terms of popularity (Also Pink Floyd, but then they were yet another sub-culture altogether), and Yes won, simple as that after all the debate.
<sits and thinks and waits for backlash>
|
I wasn't there when I did it
|
|