Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Mike Oldfield vs. Mikael Åkerfeldt
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedMike Oldfield vs. Mikael Åkerfeldt

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>
Poll Question: Which Michael?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
58 [51.79%]
49 [43.75%]
5 [4.46%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
bsms810 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 03 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 363
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 08 2009 at 02:44
poor MJ
'when was the last time you had a girlfriend?'
'I dont look at it as when, I look at it as who...and why' - David Brent
Back to Top
J-Man View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: August 07 2008
Location: Philadelphia,PA
Status: Offline
Points: 7826
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 07 2009 at 21:33
Originally posted by WalterDigsTunes WalterDigsTunes wrote:

Originally posted by J-Man J-Man wrote:

Originally posted by WalterDigsTunes WalterDigsTunes wrote:

Let's see: Classic 70s artist vs. some modern nobody... umm, the choice is obvious.


Let's see: Classic Modern asrtist vs. some 70's nobody... umm, the choice is obviousWink


Asrtist indeed.

No such thing as a modern classic.


So what? The question was not which musician has been around longer; the question was which one do you preferWink

Check out my YouTube channel! http://www.youtube.com/user/demiseoftime
Back to Top
WalterDigsTunes View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: September 11 2007
Location: SanDiegoTijuana
Status: Offline
Points: 4373
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 07 2009 at 19:45
Originally posted by J-Man J-Man wrote:

Originally posted by WalterDigsTunes WalterDigsTunes wrote:

Let's see: Classic 70s artist vs. some modern nobody... umm, the choice is obvious.


Let's see: Classic Modern asrtist vs. some 70's nobody... umm, the choice is obviousWink


Asrtist indeed.

No such thing as a modern classic.
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19552
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 07 2009 at 19:16
Originally posted by snobb snobb wrote:

Just want to reply to last two reviews:
 
I don't think, that most important question is are you "classic" ( who told, that Oldfield is classic?), or modern. Most important question is what is your music for a moment. I voted for Opeth, because they are one of rare really important MODERN band in prog-rock. I like some Oldfield works as well, but his time is gone long ago, and even few hist best works are questionable classics.But for sure, who knows, what all we will think about today's Opeth music. Time will show. 
 
Lets see, Mike Olfield was 19 when he went to Richard Branson and tod him "I want to record an album in which I play all the instruments".
 
Richard Branson was creating a label (Virgin Records) and he requuired a great artist...He took the risk and wasn't disappointed, the kid made an outstanding album that made of Virgin Records an important label.
 
Willian Friedkin was making a movie (The Exorcist) and wanted the perfect theme, he had listened many themes, but he only required a listen of Tubular Bells and went for it.
 
I believe Mike Oldfield was one of the first Progressive Artists to receive recognition by the critic and public in USA for Tubular Bells.
 
When he reached N° 1 uuin UK, he took tthe place from Hergest Ridge by........Mike Oldfield, who along with The Beatles and Bob Dylan is the only artist who displaced himself from N° 1.
 
Aren't this enough reasons to consider him a classic?
 
Iván  
            
Back to Top
snobb View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: August 20 2009
Location: Vilnius,LT,EU
Status: Offline
Points: 3584
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 07 2009 at 18:01
Just want to reply to last two reviews:
 
I don't think, that most important question is are you "classic" ( who told, that Oldfield is classic?), or modern. Most important question is what is your music for a moment. I voted for Opeth, because they are one of rare really important MODERN band in prog-rock. I like some Oldfield works as well, but his time is gone long ago, and even few hist best works are questionable classics.But for sure, who knows, what all we will think about today's Opeth music. Time will show. 
Back to Top
J-Man View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: August 07 2008
Location: Philadelphia,PA
Status: Offline
Points: 7826
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 07 2009 at 14:51
Originally posted by WalterDigsTunes WalterDigsTunes wrote:

Let's see: Classic 70s artist vs. some modern nobody... umm, the choice is obvious.


Let's see: Classic Modern asrtist vs. some 70's nobody... umm, the choice is obviousWink

Check out my YouTube channel! http://www.youtube.com/user/demiseoftime
Back to Top
WalterDigsTunes View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: September 11 2007
Location: SanDiegoTijuana
Status: Offline
Points: 4373
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 07 2009 at 12:55
Let's see: Classic 70s artist vs. some modern nobody... umm, the choice is obvious.
Back to Top
snobb View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: August 20 2009
Location: Vilnius,LT,EU
Status: Offline
Points: 3584
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 07 2009 at 12:40
so, 29/29 for a moment! Once again, I believe that Oldfield and Opeth are too different, but great in their own fields. And I agree, that it's naive to think, that heavy metal heads will vote against Oldfield till victory. Just dont's think that people older than 15 could be metal heads at all ( I am not speaking about serious heavy music lovers, as myself Wink). So, it's not sport. If you love music, you usually love any good music.
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19552
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 07 2009 at 10:13
Originally posted by paganinio paganinio wrote:

new age vs. metal? Are you kidding? Shouldn't Mikael win this by 300 votes already? I guess there are plenty of metal haters on the forum as well. We'll see.

I believe your expectations were exagerated, the fight is close.
 
BTW: The people who like Oldfield more is not vnecesarilly Metal haters, and BTW: Oldfiekld is not a New Age artist, Tubular bells is a classic album as well as Amarok and Omadawn....Saying Oldfield is a New Age artist is klike saying Wakeman is also.
 
Plus Oldfield is a complete muti-instrumentaluist, to a level few artists can't even dream.
 
Iván
 
            
Back to Top
zachfive View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 13 2005
Location: Kitsap WA
Status: Offline
Points: 770
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 06 2009 at 22:19
I was listening to Amarok on my way home from work today so voting was pretty easy.
Oldfield, hands down.
Back to Top
bsms810 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 03 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 363
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 06 2009 at 22:01
i hated the growls at first.... but for some reason i cant explain i now like them...as long as they are used appropriately. take the beginning of 'the baying of the hounds'....that would not work as anything other than growls for me these days. I mean he isnt writing in growls for the sake of it, the songs are designed and written like that for a reason, so you have to take them for how they are imo
'when was the last time you had a girlfriend?'
'I dont look at it as when, I look at it as who...and why' - David Brent
Back to Top
mrcozdude View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 25 2007
Location: Devon,UK.
Status: Offline
Points: 2078
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 06 2009 at 20:30
Michael Jackson
Back to Top
Wanorak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 09 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 4574
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 06 2009 at 20:25
Paganinio I'm not a metal hater I just hate the cookie monster growls on Opeth albums:) I would listen to Opeth if not for the vocals which destroy it for me. Besides there are few people in music period who are as talented as Mike Oldfield!
A GREAT YEAR FOR PROG!!!
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19552
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 06 2009 at 19:33
Oldfield doesn't growl.
 
Now seriously, Mike Oldfield is a classic with at least 4 fantastic albums.
 
Iván
 
Edit; Isn't qualifying Mike Oldfield as New Age an attempt of manipulation? Wink


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - November 06 2009 at 19:36
            
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 06 2009 at 19:11
Akerfeldt by a large margin. I'll never understand MJs treatment as a great pop musician. He has some great pop songs, but his career as a whole is nothing special in my opinion. Oldfield is pretty bland.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
Anthony View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 08 2006
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 774
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 06 2009 at 19:11
Anyone who calls Mike Oldfield's music "new age", while he only made one album in that 'style' (namely "The songs of distant earth") can't be taken seriously.
Future prosperity lies in the way you heal the world with love
(Introitus - The hand that feeds you)
Back to Top
progmatic View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 22 2009
Location: Ohio
Status: Offline
Points: 1785
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 06 2009 at 19:09
I think Michael Jackson looks exactly like one of those Roswell aliens.
PROGMATIC
Back to Top
Icarium View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: March 21 2008
Location: Tigerstaden
Status: Offline
Points: 34055
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 06 2009 at 17:45
Michaelangelo Tongue
 
no joking, i like Opeth very much and Mikael Åkerfelt is very goof (är jättebra) on svedish
verry good singer, composer, guitaris and GROWLER ROAR (i dont think his microphone kabel is plugged in to the mixing table but to Hells Abyss

i only have Tubular Belles so cant vote


Edited by aginor - November 06 2009 at 17:46
Back to Top
Alberto Muñoz View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 26 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 3577
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 06 2009 at 17:23
Vote for the Ommadawn man




Back to Top
JLocke View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 06 2009 at 15:58
Oldfield is good at what he does; but what he does is stock material. Perhaps not where rock was concerned, though. Surely, Tubular Bells was quite popular at the time due to The Exorcist film featuring it, but had it not been for that, would that song have launched Oldfield into real stardum? Honestly, I can't think of one Oldfield tune that stands out as truly brilliant, where as plenty of Opeth songs get that score from me.

Of course, this is all about taste, but I like Akerfeldt is a better songwriter, anyway. That's what matters most to me.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.107 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.