Mike Oldfield vs. Mikael Åkerfeldt |
Post Reply | Page <1234> |
Author | |||
bsms810
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 03 2009 Status: Offline Points: 363 |
Posted: November 08 2009 at 02:44 | ||
poor MJ
|
|||
'when was the last time you had a girlfriend?'
'I dont look at it as when, I look at it as who...and why' - David Brent |
|||
J-Man
Prog Reviewer Joined: August 07 2008 Location: Philadelphia,PA Status: Offline Points: 7826 |
Posted: November 07 2009 at 21:33 | ||
So what? The question was not which musician has been around longer; the question was which one do you prefer |
|||
Check out my YouTube channel! http://www.youtube.com/user/demiseoftime |
|||
WalterDigsTunes
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 11 2007 Location: SanDiegoTijuana Status: Offline Points: 4373 |
Posted: November 07 2009 at 19:45 | ||
Asrtist indeed. No such thing as a modern classic. |
|||
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19552 |
Posted: November 07 2009 at 19:16 | ||
Lets see, Mike Olfield was 19 when he went to Richard Branson and tod him "I want to record an album in which I play all the instruments".
Richard Branson was creating a label (Virgin Records) and he requuired a great artist...He took the risk and wasn't disappointed, the kid made an outstanding album that made of Virgin Records an important label.
Willian Friedkin was making a movie (The Exorcist) and wanted the perfect theme, he had listened many themes, but he only required a listen of Tubular Bells and went for it.
I believe Mike Oldfield was one of the first Progressive Artists to receive recognition by the critic and public in USA for Tubular Bells.
When he reached N° 1 uuin UK, he took tthe place from Hergest Ridge by........Mike Oldfield, who along with The Beatles and Bob Dylan is the only artist who displaced himself from N° 1.
Aren't this enough reasons to consider him a classic?
Iván
|
|||
|
|||
snobb
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: August 20 2009 Location: Vilnius,LT,EU Status: Offline Points: 3584 |
Posted: November 07 2009 at 18:01 | ||
Just want to reply to last two reviews:
I don't think, that most important question is are you "classic" ( who told, that Oldfield is classic?), or modern. Most important question is what is your music for a moment. I voted for Opeth, because they are one of rare really important MODERN band in prog-rock. I like some Oldfield works as well, but his time is gone long ago, and even few hist best works are questionable classics.But for sure, who knows, what all we will think about today's Opeth music. Time will show.
|
|||
J-Man
Prog Reviewer Joined: August 07 2008 Location: Philadelphia,PA Status: Offline Points: 7826 |
Posted: November 07 2009 at 14:51 | ||
Let's see: Classic Modern asrtist vs. some 70's nobody... umm, the choice is obvious |
|||
Check out my YouTube channel! http://www.youtube.com/user/demiseoftime |
|||
WalterDigsTunes
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 11 2007 Location: SanDiegoTijuana Status: Offline Points: 4373 |
Posted: November 07 2009 at 12:55 | ||
Let's see: Classic 70s artist vs. some modern nobody... umm, the choice is obvious.
|
|||
snobb
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: August 20 2009 Location: Vilnius,LT,EU Status: Offline Points: 3584 |
Posted: November 07 2009 at 12:40 | ||
so, 29/29 for a moment! Once again, I believe that Oldfield and Opeth are too different, but great in their own fields. And I agree, that it's naive to think, that heavy metal heads will vote against Oldfield till victory. Just dont's think that people older than 15 could be metal heads at all ( I am not speaking about serious heavy music lovers, as myself ). So, it's not sport. If you love music, you usually love any good music.
|
|||
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19552 |
Posted: November 07 2009 at 10:13 | ||
I believe your expectations were exagerated, the fight is close.
BTW: The people who like Oldfield more is not vnecesarilly Metal haters, and BTW: Oldfiekld is not a New Age artist, Tubular bells is a classic album as well as Amarok and Omadawn....Saying Oldfield is a New Age artist is klike saying Wakeman is also.
Plus Oldfield is a complete muti-instrumentaluist, to a level few artists can't even dream.
Iván
|
|||
|
|||
zachfive
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 13 2005 Location: Kitsap WA Status: Offline Points: 770 |
Posted: November 06 2009 at 22:19 | ||
I was listening to Amarok on my way home from work today so voting was pretty easy.
Oldfield, hands down. |
|||
bsms810
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 03 2009 Status: Offline Points: 363 |
Posted: November 06 2009 at 22:01 | ||
i hated the growls at first.... but for some reason i cant explain i now like them...as long as they are used appropriately. take the beginning of 'the baying of the hounds'....that would not work as anything other than growls for me these days. I mean he isnt writing in growls for the sake of it, the songs are designed and written like that for a reason, so you have to take them for how they are imo
|
|||
'when was the last time you had a girlfriend?'
'I dont look at it as when, I look at it as who...and why' - David Brent |
|||
mrcozdude
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 25 2007 Location: Devon,UK. Status: Offline Points: 2078 |
Posted: November 06 2009 at 20:30 | ||
Michael Jackson
|
|||
Wanorak
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 09 2006 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 4574 |
Posted: November 06 2009 at 20:25 | ||
Paganinio I'm not a metal hater I just hate the cookie monster growls on Opeth albums:) I would listen to Opeth if not for the vocals which destroy it for me. Besides there are few people in music period who are as talented as Mike Oldfield!
|
|||
A GREAT YEAR FOR PROG!!!
|
|||
Ivan_Melgar_M
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 27 2004 Location: Peru Status: Offline Points: 19552 |
Posted: November 06 2009 at 19:33 | ||
Oldfield doesn't growl.
Now seriously, Mike Oldfield is a classic with at least 4 fantastic albums.
Iván
Edit; Isn't qualifying Mike Oldfield as New Age an attempt of manipulation? Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - November 06 2009 at 19:36 |
|||
|
|||
Equality 7-2521
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 11 2005 Location: Philly Status: Offline Points: 15784 |
Posted: November 06 2009 at 19:11 | ||
Akerfeldt by a large margin. I'll never understand MJs treatment as a great pop musician. He has some great pop songs, but his career as a whole is nothing special in my opinion. Oldfield is pretty bland.
|
|||
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
|||
Anthony
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 08 2006 Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 774 |
Posted: November 06 2009 at 19:11 | ||
Anyone who calls Mike Oldfield's music "new age", while he only made one album in that 'style' (namely "The songs of distant earth") can't be taken seriously.
|
|||
Future prosperity lies in the way you heal the world with love
(Introitus - The hand that feeds you) |
|||
progmatic
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 22 2009 Location: Ohio Status: Offline Points: 1785 |
Posted: November 06 2009 at 19:09 | ||
I think Michael Jackson looks exactly like one of those Roswell aliens.
|
|||
PROGMATIC
|
|||
Icarium
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: March 21 2008 Location: Tigerstaden Status: Offline Points: 34055 |
Posted: November 06 2009 at 17:45 | ||
Michaelangelo
no joking, i like Opeth very much and Mikael Åkerfelt is very goof (är jättebra) on svedish verry good singer, composer, guitaris and GROWLER ROAR (i dont think his microphone kabel is plugged in to the mixing table but to Hells Abyss i only have Tubular Belles so cant vote Edited by aginor - November 06 2009 at 17:46 |
|||
Alberto Muñoz
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 26 2006 Location: Mexico Status: Offline Points: 3577 |
Posted: November 06 2009 at 17:23 | ||
Vote for the Ommadawn man
|
|||
|
|||
JLocke
Prog Reviewer Joined: November 18 2007 Status: Offline Points: 4900 |
Posted: November 06 2009 at 15:58 | ||
Oldfield is good at what he does; but what he does is stock material. Perhaps not where rock was concerned, though. Surely, Tubular Bells was quite popular at the time due to The Exorcist film featuring it, but had it not been for that, would that song have launched Oldfield into real stardum? Honestly, I can't think of one Oldfield tune that stands out as truly brilliant, where as plenty of Opeth songs get that score from me.
Of course, this is all about taste, but I like Akerfeldt is a better songwriter, anyway. That's what matters most to me. |
|||
Post Reply | Page <1234> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |