Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Genesis were bad to its fans.
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedGenesis were bad to its fans.

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Stooge View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 09 2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1003
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2009 at 15:29
I don't necessarily think Genesis were bad to their fans by changing their sound.  They are also obviosly quite proud of their past as evident from their 1970-1975 boxset interviews and the fact that they played material spanning their entire career on their reunion tour.

I was also thinking about what the original poster said about them telling fans wanting to hear their old stuff in the 80s that "we don't play that crap anymore", such a comment may have been as a response to hecklers (Why you'd pay to go to a concert just to heckle a band, I don't know).  These comments from the band may have been made because they wished for the audience to give their new material a chance.  I don't know how things were back then, but if I saw Genesis on the Abacab tour, i'd expect the bulk of their set to be from that album, and had I heard Abacab I'd expect that the days of The Musical Box were long gone.

While I'd be upset if I was a Genesis fan when they made the pop transition in the late 70s (or if I was ALIVE in the 70s for that matter), I enjoy Duke quite a bit, and some of And Then There Were 3.  At the end of the day, the band has the artistic control for what music they present the fans, and not the other way around.
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2009 at 11:07
I still have to ask the question, are the three capable of another album of new material as Genesis?

Edited by Slartibartfast - May 08 2009 at 15:56
Back to Top
Raff View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 29 2005
Location: None
Status: Offline
Points: 24429
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2009 at 10:55
Originally posted by lazland lazland wrote:



Fans who expect bands to continually rehash the original glories upon which they set their love of the band should contain themselves to watching the ridiculous number of tribute bands that are touring. The bands themselves move on, and we either live with it, enjoy, or simply choose not to buy. As I said in my series of Genesis LP reviews, most of the commercial music Genesis wrote as a threesome was damn good commercial music, and I will, for the rest of my life, be grateful to a band, in all its forms, that has given me so much pleasure over the years.


ClapClapClap

I think this quote should be framed and hung up on PA's virtual wallWink. Personally, I am not a fan of Genesis' pop years - however, this is not because they betrayed prog, but just because their music leaves me cold, and I don't like Collins' voice that much. On the other hand, I love Yes' 90125, which is equally loathed by prog purists. 'Poppy' and 'commercial' don't automatically mean 'bad' - Peter Gabriel released a number of hit singles, which are damn good commercial music as well (to use Lazland's own wordsWink). I'd rather listen to "Sledgehammer", "Big Time" or "Owner of a Lonely Heart" than to the endless, rambling doodlings of many a 'retro-prog' band.




Edited by Raff - April 25 2009 at 10:55
Back to Top
lazland View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 28 2008
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 13634
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2009 at 05:09
I remember seeing Genesis on the Abacab tour in Birmingham, and an audience member, right from the off, continually shouted "The Knife, The Knife, play The Knife!". Collins eventually brought out a toy rifle and pretended to shoot him. However, much to our surprise and delight, they did actually play it as an "extra" encore piece.

There are some people who will never forgive Collins for the direction the band took after ATTWT, but they always miss the point. The other two were still principal songwriters and agreed almost wholly with the move to writing shorter, catchier tracks, except maybe Banks who loathed the second side of the Genesis LP, a mistake that was never to be repeated.

I also enjoyed Calling All Stations, especially its darker moments, but by then the game commercially was really well and truly up.

Fans who expect bands to continually rehash the original glories upon which they set their love of the band should contain themselves to watching the ridiculous number of tribute bands that are touring. The bands themselves move on, and we either live with it, enjoy, or simply choose not to buy. As I said in my series of Genesis LP reviews, most of the commercial music Genesis wrote as a threesome was damn good commercial music, and I will, for the rest of my life, be grateful to a band, in all its forms, that has given me so much pleasure over the years.
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org

Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
Back to Top
Chris S View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 09 2004
Location: Front Range
Status: Offline
Points: 7028
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2009 at 04:27
Well both great artists.........Prince video more entertaining perhaps!
<font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian

...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]
Back to Top
Orbit View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: April 23 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 6
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 25 2009 at 04:20
Someone offered to give me a free Phil Collins VHS the other day.
I took the Prince one instead.
Back to Top
MovingPictures07 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 09 2008
Location: Beasty Heart
Status: Offline
Points: 32181
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2009 at 22:16
Originally posted by cacho cacho wrote:

Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Zappa plays whatever he wants.

Nobody can fault him!


Wink


Megawin.
Back to Top
The Quiet One View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: January 16 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 15745
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2009 at 22:07
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Zappa plays whatever he wants.

Nobody can fault him!


Wink
Back to Top
Queen By-Tor View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 13 2006
Location: Xanadu
Status: Offline
Points: 16111
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2009 at 22:02
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Fripp plays whatever he wants.

Can't fault him there.


now replace Fripp with "everyone" TongueLOL
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2009 at 20:57
Fripp plays whatever he wants.

Can't fault him there.
Back to Top
debrewguy View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 30 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3596
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2009 at 19:45
You know, Geddy Lee had stated at one point in the 80s (during their synth period) that they couldn't stand some of their early material , that it was painful to their ears. He said it was like looking at the drawings you made in kindergarden.
Then the 90s come around, and finally in the new millenium,  doggonit , they turn around and get back to playing the ear ache music of yore.
Looking back, I wonder if the frustration was more that Rush's fans couldn't see that the band was in a different space at the time (late 80s).
The same as Roger Waters having to deal with shouted requests for Syd's songs, and replying that it wasn't '67 anymore .
And so it comes down to a double edge sword - a die hard is so attached to his favourite band that he'll support it for ever. But a die hard will also feel betrayed if his favourite band no longer plays the music the fan demands.
Neil Young has gotten away with it. But then, more than a few of his albums are not in his fan's collections.
"Here I am talking to some of the smartest people in the world and I didn't even notice,” Lieutenant Columbo, episode The Bye-Bye Sky-High I.Q. Murder Case.
Back to Top
Pekka View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 03 2006
Location: Espoo, Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 6442
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2009 at 16:05
Does anybody have a problem with the 80s King Crimson being King Crimson and not Discipline?

I thought so.

Then why the Cinema/Yes problem? Crimso changed just as much if not more, and a larger percentage of members were new to the band.
Back to Top
jimidom View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 02 2007
Location: Houston, TX USA
Status: Offline
Points: 570
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2009 at 14:29

Great posts.... What a lot fans need to realize is that, for better or for worse, 1). they are never a consideration when an artist is in the midst of the creative process,  2). great artists evolve. I'm sure Kandinsky alienated many fans of The Blue Rider when his works became more geometric and abstract during the 1920's and 1930's. Furthermore, many artists wish to leave their past in the past, or some of it. If Phil thinks "The Musical Box" is crap, imagine what he must think of "Return of the Giant Hogweed".

"The music business is a cruel and shallow money trench, a long plastic hallway where thieves and pimps run free, and good men die like dogs. There's also a negative side." - HST

Back to Top
Negoba View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 24 2008
Location: Big Muddy
Status: Offline
Points: 5208
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2009 at 14:05
The second album I bought was the shapes album when I was 11 or 12 years old. I listened to that thing hundreds of times and really enjoyed it. Along with Peter Gabriel's pop output, this is what led me to the classic era. I actually enjoyed Abacab too. My younger brother listened to Invisible Touch a zillion times (when he was about 8).....that music connected with people at that time in that place. It doesn't hold up artistically in the same way years later, but I still have some fond memories.
 
And in terms of what is owed the fans...if you separate the pop Genesis fans and the prog Genesis fans, there were more of them than us.
 
You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.
Back to Top
SgtPepper67 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 17 2007
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 530
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2009 at 13:29
Originally posted by Cheesecakemouse Cheesecakemouse wrote:


What am I saying here? I believe that a band can grow and experiment but remain true to their sound, while a solo artist has no such obligation they can be diverse as they want; that is the nature of solo work its about the artist exploring sounds outside of the requirements of the band.


Some times I think the same way, but I'm not sure about that. Do you think The Beatles remained "true to their sound" in all their albums, I don't think so, they completely changed their sound and style and no one seem to complain about that. I think artists should make the music they feel like, some people may like it and some may not, they shouldn't worry too much about pleasing their fans. They should be true to themselves and what they really want to do more than true to their sound.
I don't like many of the songs on Invisible touch and We can't dance, but ok, they made a couple of weak albums and went poppier, like a lot of other bands did, it's not such a big deal. Anyway, in my opinion there's some quality music in all their albums, even the weaker ones, and I completely disagree with people who thinks the bands changed completely from one day to the next one after Peter left, or after Hackett left, like they sold out or something, it was transitional from album to album.

In the end the love you take is equal to the love you made...
Back to Top
St.Cleve Chronicle View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 02 2008
Location: Finland
Status: Offline
Points: 1131
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2009 at 07:32
If Genesis ingnored their fans, then what explains the appearance of Apocalypse/Eggs is eggs and Los endos in the Invisible touch tour setlist?

Yes, their musical tasted changed and they did (very good) pop albums in the 80's, but they always played some of their old epics live. And their later albums do include more unusual stuff, like Domino and Home by the sea.

You can be as cynical as you like, but I really believe that they changed their style because they just wanted to play more straightforward material, and the wanted to survive.

And what comes to PC calling The musical box "old crap", I'm sure that's just a rumour.
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2009 at 07:18
I'm listening to my son's favorite song.  "Can-Utility and the Coastliners."  Approve
Back to Top
The Doctor View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 23 2005
Location: The Tardis
Status: Offline
Points: 8543
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2009 at 07:16

I had a long response planned out, but I'm too lazy to actually type it all, so I'll make my response a bit shorter.  If it weren't for albums like Abacab, Genesis and 90125, I might not have discovered prog, at least not as early as I did.  How many others in their mid- to late-30's/early 40's did Genesis and Yes bring into the realm of prog by exploring more radio-friendly territory?  Also, neither band completely abandoned their prog roots.  Genesis continued to do some long-form songs and usually had one nice long instrumental jam on each album.  And some of their pop stuff (though not all) was quite enjoyable.  Yes, although shortening the song length generally during Rabin's tenure, still performed complex music, with some great vocal harmonies, and even threw in a really cool 15+ minute song in the form of Endless Dream. 

 Those fans disappointed by the direction Genesis took in the 80's had one very good option available to them.  They didn't have to buy their albums or attend their concerts.  Do I wish they had done more songs like Domino, Home by the Sea, Fading Lights and Mama and less songs like Invisible Touch, Throwing It All Away and Illegal Alien?  Yes.  But it's not my band.  On the other hand, I also probably would have been bored with them if they'd produced Foxtrot II, Foxtrot III and Foxtrot IV and chances are so would they.  I can't see demonizing one person or a band for deciding they wanted to do something a bit different from what they had done before.
 
Ok. Longer than I thought. Embarrassed
I can understand your anger at me, but what did the horse I rode in on ever do to you?
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2009 at 07:00
I think in the end they made all the great prog albums they had in them and their pop was good pop.  Just wish they hadn't expressed such contempt for the fans of the old stuff.

Edited by Slartibartfast - April 24 2009 at 07:01
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
Chris S View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: June 09 2004
Location: Front Range
Status: Offline
Points: 7028
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 24 2009 at 05:40
Originally posted by Cheesecakemouse Cheesecakemouse wrote:


Perhaps I should have made this a blog.
But basically my point is, it's not unreasonable for a progger to feel some sort of annoyance at collins and co.
I am surprised by many of your responses many of the review written about 80s Genesis belie 'matter of fact' responses this thread has generated. 
My point here is to put things in perspective. I believe fans are important to a band, Iron Maiden has shown this by them coming to NZ recently, if they didn't feel anything to their fans then they wouldn't have come. The fact is folks these bands are in entertainment its all about their audiences, if not it annoys us after all some posts have expressed frustration about Fripp's treatment of fans, the fact that he has got his lawyers
to take off his music of the archives gave many annoyance. Also those posts about hoping bands will come to your home country and play. This website is all about fans, you members are fans of different bands, so what on earth are you all talking about fans being silly? We are the fans, and about bands owing you nothing, don't we all attend or try to attend concerts, so spare me please this all these posts about bands owing nothing, I'm just being honest about my fandom, in NZ we get zilch prog, so count yourselves lucky that your bands do consider you and tour in your countries.WinkSmile
 
 
 
 
 
 
Confused
 
Not sure I am getting the basis of your post. Are you saying NZ is deprived of prog bands touring? Do you think Iron Maiden toured NZ because they wanted to thank their fans or make money or...both? Jeff Beck just toured NZ as did Roger Waters, less recently.
Collins also played more obscure prog than Banks and Rutherford put together with Brand X....I think Banks and Rutherford had a large role to play too on the direction of the band




Edited by Chris S - April 24 2009 at 05:42
<font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian

...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.185 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.