Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Tibet, China and the Olympics
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedTibet, China and the Olympics

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123
Poll Question: Should there be a boycott on the Olmpic Games in China?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
4 [14.81%]
4 [14.81%]
4 [14.81%]
6 [22.22%]
9 [33.33%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
bhikkhu View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 06 2006
Location: AČ Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 5109
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 19 2008 at 14:02
Every other country competing in the games should have a "Free Tibet" patch sewn to their uniforms.
Back to Top
Raff View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 29 2005
Location: None
Status: Offline
Points: 24429
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 19 2008 at 13:20
My first reaction would be to choose the first option, but I am afraid this is a clear-cut case of locking the stable after the horse has bolted. Everyone in the West knows what China is like as regards human rights (including workers' rights) - nevertheless, they were given the Games, for obvious reasons of financial gain. Boycotting now would be, in my humble opinion, an act of hypocrisy, and not solve anything at all. We have all let China become more and more powerful, closing our eyes to everything that happened here... Unfortunately, I think there is very little to be done now, when they have us by the attributes in so many respects.
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 19 2008 at 11:24
China is destroying a culture of peace in the name of modernization. Forceful modernization. China is power-hungry, and seeks domination in the shrewdest and least sympathetic way. The only reason we let China get away with this sh!t is that our economy would get a righteous f**king-over. But what does it say for us when the wealth of our economy depends on another country?

I think China should be boycotted in every possible way.

At least our figurehead of a leader should not dole out wimpy, half-assed comments about dissatisfaction or whatever about China. Have some balls for once in your life you yellow b*****d, Bush and condemn China for its awful actions. But then again, with you f**king over your own country and the world so much, that would reek of hypocrisy, wouldn't it?


Edited by stonebeard - March 19 2008 at 11:27
Back to Top
Norbert View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 20 2005
Location: Hungary
Status: Offline
Points: 2506
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 19 2008 at 10:47
The Olympic Games should not have been given to a bloody dictatorship.
The people of Tibet(and other minorites) and all opposition movements are brutally surpressed.
Mao 's regime is responsible for the death of at least 35-40 million people and the portray of Mao can be still seen on the central square of Beijing.
I don't want to say that the western democracies are close to perfection, they  are actually very corrupted  and materialistic but the maoist regime is one of the worst on Earth.


Edited by Norbert - March 28 2008 at 11:22
Back to Top
Petrovsk Mizinski View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 19 2008 at 07:56
I can't even to vote on this. Every option is equally important to my mind.
We boycott, and the west stands to potentially lose economic ground with China. As an Australian at least, I can see the economic importance of China to Australia, and I would imagine it's not much different for the US and Canada.
We don't boycott, our weakness for standing against the Fulong Gong killings and the world in general will possibly view each other as less humanitarian.
The games are about sport and coming together as a world to celebrate sports, so it's of social and cultural significance too.
But as for not helping the people in Tibet, I disagree. How can a whole world of competing nations boycotting the games not have any impact on this?
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 19 2008 at 07:53
With all the air pollution in Beijing, some athletes might want to consider a boycott simply for health reasons.
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...

Back to Top
Guzzman View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 21 2004
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 3563
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 19 2008 at 07:06
For a couple of days now we hear about the uprisings/demonstrations in Tibet and how China is responding. Due to the violent strikes Chinese "security units" blow, a discussion has got on the way whether or not the Olympic Summer Games in Bejing should be boycotted. Please vote and tell us about your decision. Thanks.


In my opinion participants should show their solidarity and sympathy for the people of Tibet while taking part in the Games. There even might be a chance to bring the issue to the knowledge of some of the Chinese. Yes, I know that I'm a dreamer.
"We've got to get in to get out"
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.133 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.