Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Polls
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - 1973
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic Closed1973

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 6>
Poll Question: Fav album of ’73
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
5 [2.07%]
74 [30.71%]
72 [29.88%]
19 [7.88%]
6 [2.49%]
17 [7.05%]
2 [0.83%]
46 [19.09%]
This topic is closed, no new votes accepted

Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
Swinton MCR View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 19 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 848
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 02 2005 at 14:21
Looks like I'm going to have to listen to Octopus then doesn't it - Must be a good album if it pushed SEBTP ???
Back to Top
Jimbo View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 28 2005
Location: Helsinki
Status: Offline
Points: 2818
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 02 2005 at 14:16
I voted for "Dark side of the moon" but now I'm having second thoughts.. "Selling england by the pound" is also one of my favourite albums.. This is too hard.

Back to Top
Possessed View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: July 10 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 430
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 02 2005 at 14:06
Originally posted by Joren Joren wrote:

I've voted for Octopus...

me too.

Selling England by the Pound is awesome also.

Back to Top
Joren View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 07 2004
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 6667
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 15 2005 at 21:29

I've voted for Octopus...

But WHERE'S MAGMA'S M.D.K.??

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Forum Guest Group
Forum Guest Group
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 15 2005 at 20:49
Reed Lover

I'm still cringing after you praised Emerson's bulge.Dead

 

Yeh ok man from utopia.Shiek ya buti if thats what your into

ELP IS LIFE

 

Back to Top
Reed Lover View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 15 2005 at 20:37
Originally posted by Karnevil9 Karnevil9 wrote:

Reed Lover wrote:

It's called personal opinion Mini-Me!Confused

 

Yeh i know what it is reed lover!

Whats your view then?

ELP is life

I'm still cringing after you praised Emerson's bulge.Dead

Evil Smile




Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Forum Guest Group
Forum Guest Group
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 15 2005 at 20:26

Reed Lover wrote:

It's called personal opinion Mini-Me!Confused

 

Yeh i know what it is reed lover!

Whats your view then?

ELP is life



Edited by Karnevil9
Back to Top
Reed Lover View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 16 2004
Location: Sao Tome and Pr
Status: Offline
Points: 5187
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 15 2005 at 20:22
Originally posted by Karnevil9 Karnevil9 wrote:

Swinton MCR wrote:

As for ELP V Genesis - I've just re-listened to Tarkus and Trilogy...

Tarkus track is good in parts and AquaTarkus is V. Good - Side TWO IS COMPLETE PANTS !

Trilogy has two good tracks in Trilogy and The Endless Enigma and a so-so track in Abaddons Bolero,,,The rest is WARCH!

Compare with Nursery Cryme and Foxtrot (Same two years) - fookin hell - No comparisson - Every track (except "For absent friends") is better than the best offering on the two ELP albums, The ELP offerings are VERY VERY weak by comparisson !!!

I totally disagree with the above statement.

So your saying the ''Musical box'' & ''harold the barrel'' from NC is a better track than say ''Infinite space'' from 'Tarkus'??? i think not.

And how the hell can you not like ''Hoedown'' & '' Living sin'' from Trilogy & love the very poor(filler track) ''More fool me'' from the later 'SEBTP'..???

'Foxtrot' is consistant being very good.

ELP is life

 

It's called personal opinion Mini-Me!Confused




Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Forum Guest Group
Forum Guest Group
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 15 2005 at 20:17

 

 



Edited by Karnevil9
Back to Top
Swinton MCR View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 19 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 848
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 12 2005 at 08:33

I'd forgotten Tales.... That album gives SEBTP a run for it's money but SEBTP just about scrapes it......................

As for ELP V Genesis - I've just re-listened to Tarkus and Trilogy...

Tarkus track is good in parts and AquaTarkus is V. Good - Side TWO IS COMPLETE PANTS !

Trilogy has two good tracks in Trilogy and The Endless Enigma and a so-so track in Abaddons Bolero,,,The rest is WARCH!

Compare with Nursery Cryme and Foxtrot (Same two years) - fookin hell - No comparisson - Every track (except "For absent friends") is better than the best offering on the two ELP albums, The ELP offerings are VERY VERY weak by comparisson !!!

Back to Top
Garion81 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4338
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 11 2005 at 18:11
Originally posted by JrKASperov JrKASperov wrote:

Sorry mate, I am occupied with University and having a hangover on that day

Actually, I do think of Jazz as one of the best forms of music. But ofcourse, there is more to jazz than playing faster. If yu say Art Tatum can't create atmosphere because he can't hold notes and chords, then to me, he is a worse musician. I did not know that.

Let me take as example mister Bruford, again. He plays fast, alternating beats, like on South Side of the Sky's bridge part with piano, he is BETTER than Phil Collins. He does that throughout his career, with crimson, Earthworks, Yes and whatnot. That is my point.

 

Cool, but if you ever get a chance to see that group go do it. You will see and hear better than I can ever write about Mike Rutherford.  The only point I am trying to make about Mike Rutherford is many parts of his did not call for him to be using a bass. Twelve string and bass pedals. 

 Jazz is great and my son who is learning the bass I gave Jaco Pastorious for the Jazz.  But I also gave him Jack Cassidy because you can be good according to the style you play.  Jack Cassidy is a blues bassed bass player and one of the best that ever lived in that style. 

Art Tatum played a stride piano type in the day that you would take a standard and sit down and improvise.  Quite good for that and like I said fastest left hand I have ever heard. But I don't always just want riffs and his tempos are always upbeat. I can only take that so long.  I like big melodies that are created by multiple insturments and moods created by various tempos.  Not all orchestral music is fast riff orientated stuff.   I like stuff by Keith on piano like Closer to Home off the Black Mood CD.  He uses the fast scales and runs around a nice soft theme. It really is quite effective.  That can also be applied to band music too with great effect.

 

AS for Bill Bruford he is excelent and got to see both Phil and Bill play with Genesis on A Trick of the Tale tour in 1976.    I also saw him in UK.

 

 

 



Edited by Garion81


"What are you going to do when that damn thing rusts?"
Back to Top
JrKASperov View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 07 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 904
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 11 2005 at 17:41

Sorry mate, I am occupied with University and having a hangover on that day

Actually, I do think of Jazz as one of the best forms of music. But ofcourse, there is more to jazz than playing faster. If yu say Art Tatum can't create atmosphere because he can't hold notes and chords, then to me, he is a worse musician. I did not know that.

Let me take as example mister Bruford, again. He plays fast, alternating beats, like on South Side of the Sky's bridge part with piano, he is BETTER than Phil Collins. He does that throughout his career, with crimson, Earthworks, Yes and whatnot. That is my point.

Epic.
Back to Top
Garion81 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4338
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 11 2005 at 16:55

 

JrKASperov,

 

You have a chance to see this still.  I don't how far away you are From  Enschede but if it is close enoough on Sunday the 13th a Genesis tribute band is playing. Here is there web site.  They are fantastic.  They are not a cover or copy band.  They recreate the concert as it was in 1975 this time it is The Lamb Lies Down on Broadway. I saw this show in Decemeber and it is stunning.  There is much said about them in the concert reivew thread here.  Anyway if you are curious go see it.

 

http://www.themusicalbox.net/

 

http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=1615&a mp;PN=1



Edited by Garion81


"What are you going to do when that damn thing rusts?"
Back to Top
Garion81 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4338
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 11 2005 at 16:40
Originally posted by JrKASperov JrKASperov wrote:

Ahh, but here you are discussing how well he can play. Something that I am not discussing. Sure he can do a lot, and I'm sure he's good at it, just like Phil is.

Why don't they use it in their songs then? THAT is my concern. They can play, but the basslines on Genesis' work are still empty and sleepinducing, even when I play it. i will listen to RtS when I get that Lamb cd back onder my fingers. I hope it will be as you say.

I'm not arguing about what is better and what people like. I'm arguing about how it should be judged. You say Art Tatum is superior. Then he is better, and should be rated as BEST pianist.

Ahh, I see what I have done. I have mistakenly took this poll for a BEST poll. My excuses  

 

 

 

I still wonder why people like less superior music better anyway. Isn't it better and thus more to listen to and thus more enjoyment? That's how I experience it. I know this not to be the case with everyone, but I wonder

You are the one who seems to be implying that about what is best.  You keep saying superior.  What does that mean?  Do they play more notes?  32nd instead of 16th.  If that is the criteria then we would all be listening to Jazz. 

 

One more time:

If you have that naive opinion of Mike Rutherford’s ability then maybe you should try playing a 12 string guitar while doing the bass lines on moog pedals like Michael Rutherford did on many,many  songs.

He wasn't always playing bass.  Most of the twelve string parts are his.  He played the bass on pedals.  Try playing the double necked bass and twelve string guitar. Then tell me how bad it is.  They (Genesis) felt the twelve string parts added more than the bass did in parts.  Since he could not play both bass lines and twelve string live he did not overdub a bass line in the studio. If you don't like that that is fine but to say it is nothing is not right either.

 

Art Taum has a superior technique especially with his left hand.  He is the absolute fastest I have ever heard but he is not my favoirte.  Why? Because he doesn't use the subilties of Emerson or even Banks of holding a note or a chord and creating an atmosphere.  THere is more to music than speed.

 

 

 



Edited by Garion81


"What are you going to do when that damn thing rusts?"
Back to Top
JrKASperov View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 07 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 904
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 11 2005 at 16:29

Ahh, but here you are discussing how well he can play. Something that I am not discussing. Sure he can do a lot, and I'm sure he's good at it, just like Phil is.

Why don't they use it in their songs then? THAT is my concern. They can play, but the basslines on Genesis' work are still empty and sleepinducing, even when I play it. i will listen to RtS when I get that Lamb cd back onder my fingers. I hope it will be as you say.

I'm not arguing about what is better and what people like. I'm arguing about how it should be judged. You say Art Tatum is superior. Then he is better, and should be rated as BEST pianist.

Ahh, I see what I have done. I have mistakenly took this poll for a BEST poll. My excuses  

 

 

 

I still wonder why people like less superior music better anyway. Isn't it better and thus more to listen to and thus more enjoyment? That's how I experience it. I know this not to be the case with everyone, but I wonder

Epic.
Back to Top
Certif1ed View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 08 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 7559
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 11 2005 at 16:27
Originally posted by JrKASperov JrKASperov wrote:

-Chris Squire does make it intricate (like on Heart of the Sunrise), and it immediately sounds 10 times as good.

Please; you mean it sounds 10 times better to you. I like Squire's style too - but it wouldn't work with Genesis music - it would be entirely inappropriate!

-No, Phil does NOT drum intricately here, I've not only have me decide that, but laid that problem before a few people, all far from unknown in music. Listen to his work on Brand X to know the difference.

*Sigh* Yes it IS intricate. This could get cyclic, since you don't qualify your opinion. 

The work on Brand X suits what he is doing there. The work on SEBTP is sublime, focussed and understated - on purpose and out of necessity for the music. The intricacies are all there.

-Yes, the keyboards and guitars are nice, but that just doesn't cut it. They still make the song feel empty by not having a solid backing, which was my original point.

The backing is more than solid enough - it contains space - something which both Yes and ELP could have learned lessons in. It is a hard technique to hold back - it is all too easy to just continually let rip. It certainly "cuts it" for me.

Again, in general, I feel your need to put me down as an unknowing person, as you immediately take it I search for  'blunt in-your-facedness'. I wonder why this must be so? I have not even addressed Peter's voice...Maybe you do have a feel of a higher position because you are learned? (this is not an attack but I simply WONDER why you do make it seem so)

You have stated many times - here included, when you talk about the intricacies of Squire - that you have a preference for complex music, and you frequently put down music that seems simple to you - I was certainly not trying to put you down, or suggest that you might be an unknowing person, but I do feel you lack a degree of understanding because of what you typically say about "simple" music.

I try very hard not to patronise anyone by deliberately using complex and confusing musical terminology to win debating points - but everyone I know says I'm patronising when it comes to music. I don't see it myself, of course - but if that's one of my current character traits, then I really don't mind too much; it could be worse!

I hope you find this reasonable, even if, as I suspect, I misunderstand somehow.

It sounds like improvising music indeed, your analysis of that is true, what I argue, however, is that it sounds empty, and unfinished, as if P&M had not the technical capabilities to improvise adequately here. vdGG do make their music deceptively easy sounding, and I wrote that in my review of Godbluff, so I DO listen closely.

I've only heard Godbluff a couple of times - and haven't read your review (yet!), so can't make the comparison. VDGG are a band I'm still catching up with, but the improvisational feel is there, as you say. However, Genesis' music is a different ball game - a slower less intense one. Once you get hooked on the spaces in between, there's no going back, but until then, I kind of understand what you mean even if I don't agree.

Furthermore, I'd like to add to this that my point is that Genesis is nice and all, but it is far from THE BEST. Bands that DO add intricate bass, drums and keyboards like YES, KING CRIMSON and VDGG do such a good job at this that it fits in! Especially Bruford, I have applauded his works many times. Theya re simply better because of this, and that is why i don't accept Genesis having such a lead here.

But what you do can be as important as what you miss out. I am not keen on Yes, and the reasons will become apparent when I review them - I would never drop into a discussion on them and say, for example, that it is over elaborate and intense and seems to miss the point of creating music, since that would upset people!

To say that one band is better than another requires qualification, especially if you're going to state it as fact. If you make it clear that this is your opinion, then that's fair enough - although it's still polite to qualify that - as you have done. It makes discussion more interesting when you understand both sides, I think.

However, the choices given here are impossibly hard - I hated choosing one over another. "Angel's Egg" is one of my all-time favourite albums, but I had to select one, and SEBTP just took it.

Genesis have the lead because more members of this forum voted for them



Edited by Certif1ed
Back to Top
Garion81 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4338
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 11 2005 at 16:20
Originally posted by JrKASperov JrKASperov wrote:

It has less to do with opinion than with more accomplishment within the music. Genesis simply stops somewhere with making it more intricate and complex, still fitting into the music. Like Yes did on Fragile, like VDGG did on Pawn Hearts, like King Crimson did on almost all of their albums, etc.

We cannot go around saying:'oh you don't like that but that's merely an opinion' I give arguments discussing the music itself, and why, musically, other bands are simply better. Now, to MY OPINION, music SHOULD be rated according to how GOOD they are musically, since we get horse loads of crap on tv, on radio, and lately increasingly, on this forum.

Instead of arguing about 'how you don't understand it'  or how 'I don't understand it',honestly things we cannot say ANYTHING about, since we don't know what is EXACTLY going on in other people's heads, I give arguments why it musically is not good. I do not bother to tell you you don't understand, maybe, and probably, you do, else you wouldn't be here in the first place. (excepting that you could be some sort of freakish fan, liking the bands for something outside the music)

I am a bassist, I have played for merely 5 years, and now, I think Genesis bass parts are NOTHING. Doesn't that say anything? Doesn't it say anything I get bored playing their parts because actually, I'm not DOING enough? I have studied the drumworks on many bands as well, and can dabble around a bit on drums, and honestly, I CAN compare a few drummers. Collins on Genesis fades to nothing when compared to his Brand X work.

 

If you have that naive opinion of Mike Rutherford’s ability then maybe you should try playing a 12 string guitar while doing the bass lines on moog pedals like Michael Rutherford did on many,many  songs.  Did you ever see Mike Rutherford play in the 70's? I did several times. He does a lot more than you know. Listen to the Rriding the Scree from The Lamb.  That is just Mike, Tony and Phil. Pretty damn full sound to me. Chris Squire is very good I saw him twice also but he does not do more than MR.  I am not trying to compare each of thier abilities.

 I have played piano for 28 years so I know a thing or two about what is good and what is not.  Don’t be fooled, most of the people who post here play something and have a good understanding of music. I do not feel your opinion is more qualified to mine in any way shape or form.

Keith Emerson is my favorite pianist to listen to.  But Art Tatum is superior technically. Does that make my enjoyment of Emerson less?  Is that what your argument is or is because YOU say he is better that makes it better?

 



"What are you going to do when that damn thing rusts?"
Back to Top
JrKASperov View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 07 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 904
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 11 2005 at 16:02

It has less to do with opinion than with more accomplishment within the music. Genesis simply stops somewhere with making it more intricate and complex, still fitting into the music. Like Yes did on Fragile, like VDGG did on Pawn Hearts, like King Crimson did on almost all of their albums, etc.

We cannot go around saying:'oh you don't like that but that's merely an opinion' I give arguments discussing the music itself, and why, musically, other bands are simply better. Now, to MY OPINION, music SHOULD be rated according to how GOOD they are musically, since we get horse loads of crap on tv, on radio, and lately increasingly, on this forum.

Instead of arguing about 'how you don't understand it'  or how 'I don't understand it',honestly things we cannot say ANYTHING about, since we don't know what is EXACTLY going on in other people's heads, I give arguments why it musically is not good. I do not bother to tell you you don't understand, maybe, and probably, you do, else you wouldn't be here in the first place. (excepting that you could be some sort of freakish fan, liking the bands for something outside the music)

I am a bassist, I have played for merely 5 years, and now, I think Genesis bass parts are NOTHING. Doesn't that say anything? Doesn't it say anything I get bored playing their parts because actually, I'm not DOING enough? I have studied the drumworks on many bands as well, and can dabble around a bit on drums, and honestly, I CAN compare a few drummers. Collins on Genesis fades to nothing when compared to his Brand X work.

Epic.
Back to Top
Garion81 View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: May 22 2004
Location: So Cal, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 4338
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 11 2005 at 15:41
Originally posted by JrKASperov JrKASperov wrote:

[QUOTE=Certif1ed]Yes, it is so

Furthermore, I'd like to add to this that my point is that Genesis is nice and all, but it is far from THE BEST. Bands that DO add intricate bass, drums and keyboards like YES, KING CRIMSON and VDGG do such a good job at this that it fits in! Especially Bruford, I have applauded his works many times. Theya re simply better because of this, and that is why i don't accept Genesis having such a lead here.

 

 

That is YOUR opinion.  Obviously there are a lot of people who disagree. I am one of them. I like Genesis better because of the understated nature of their music. It grows on you and you start to get it.  THen you start to hear how difficult those passages really are.

If YOU don't get it you don't but to say you don't accept them having a lead here or anywhere else I presume is not allowing for the fact that others disagree.  I cannot really listen to Yes anymore. I think they have aged badly and I just really don't get it.  I mean they are all fine musicians and they all have talent but outside of a few things I just don't get it and never really did. Now that is my opinion. I don't expect yours or anyone else to be the same.

 

 



"What are you going to do when that damn thing rusts?"
Back to Top
threefates View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 30 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4215
Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 11 2005 at 14:26
I so agree with you, and I've been listening to SEBTP a lot lately just to see if it would sink in, but instead.. I like it less now than I did before.  I find them bland. And this has nothing to do with my love for ELP.. I'd prefer to listen to Yes and Pink Floyd over Genesis. Heck, I'd prefer to listen to Gentle Giant over Genesis....
THIS IS ELP
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 6>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.141 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.