To include ELO in Progarchives

OK then! Lets keep it a british idea of what should
and shouldnt be progressive, after all its safer that
way keeps em inline. BLAH!!!
Give up the control, New Gibraltar dont have any
problem with the inclusion of Traffic, ELO, Todd
Rundgren, Cluster, Klaus Schulze, Guru Guru, etc.
And calls RUSH not to prog themselves! But for my
Canadian friends and British folk lets keep it safe,
kinda give you a sense of well being, BLAH!!!
And for my American friends quit letting them lead
you around by the nose!

Again, The Move(pre ELO), Traffic and the Moody
Blues were considered progressive rock when Pink
Floyd was still considered psychedelic experimental
rock and the rest were still nursing on the Beatles
and their output.


------------------------------
There's a new kid in town
Ooh, hoo
Everybody's talking 'bout the new kid in town
Ooh, hoo
Everybody's walking' like the new kid in town
There's a new kid in town
There's a new kid in town
I don't want to hear it
There's a new kid in town
I don't want to hear it


Edited by DallasBryan

I just wnt to say that I voted NO WAY. I like a  Roll Over Beethoven but that`s about as far as I go with ELO.

DallasBryan wrote: here we go again with the brits defining the catagory. they have decided for us, its been debated at Oxford and the Queen has made a ruling. think for once everyone else should decide this one!

Off you go then... 

Guillermo wrote: I think that the Electric Light Orchestra should be included in this website. In my opinion, this band mixed Rock music with very good orchestral arrangements. I consider, at least, that their first 4 albums are more Progressive ("The Electric Light Orchestra" (71), "ELO2" (73), "On the Third Day" (73) and "Eldorado" (74)). Maybe they became more Pop rockers later, but other Prog bands like YES, GENESIS, PFM, TRIUMVIRAT, THE MOODY BLUES and others did it too. What do you think?

Sorry Guillermo, we have this question asked every two or three months and it always gets voted down. I love ELO, 'Out Of The Blue' was the first album I ever owned and I can still find new things in it even today but for me, the argument is a tad futile as everybody remembers them for the pop stuff not the tricky stuff that they did in the early days. IMO they just don't 'feel' very proggy.

What would Roy Wood think of us?  

No,again.
First 4 albums had 'elements' of prog but on the whole
they are Beatles Revolver-Abbey Road homages

NO DOUBT, in their heyday, they were included with
the Moodies, Pink Floyd, Yes, ELP. Jethro Tull, Mike
Oldfield, Genesis, King Crimson and Gentle Giant
as the main progressive rock bands coming from
England. Even though they moved into more
commercial ground after there first 4 albums I cant
blame them. Almost everything put out by these
bands after that was watered down crap and
controlled by the record companies. The fact Jeff
Lynne was smart enough to steer another course in
hind sight wasnt a bad idea. They made more
money being commercial than most of these guys
did.
The Move(pre ELO), Traffic and the Moody Blues
were considered progressive rock when Pink Floyd
was still considered psychedelic experimental rock
and the rest were still nursing on the Beatles and
their output.

Edited by DallasBryan